This Account Doesn’t Exist: Tweet Decay and the Politics of Deletion in the Brexit Debate

Literature on influence operations has identified metrics that are indicative of social media manipulation, but few studies have explored the lifecycle of low-quality information. We contribute to this literature by reconstructing nearly 3 million messages posted by 1 million users in the last days...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills) 2021-05, Vol.65 (5), p.757-773
1. Verfasser: Bastos, Marco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 773
container_issue 5
container_start_page 757
container_title The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills)
container_volume 65
creator Bastos, Marco
description Literature on influence operations has identified metrics that are indicative of social media manipulation, but few studies have explored the lifecycle of low-quality information. We contribute to this literature by reconstructing nearly 3 million messages posted by 1 million users in the last days of the Brexit referendum campaign. While previous studies have found that on average only 4% of tweets disappear, we found that 33% of the tweets leading up to the referendum vote are no longer available. Only about half of the most active accounts that tweeted the referendum continue to operate publicly, and 20% of all accounts are no longer active. We tested whether partisan content was more likely to disappear and found more messages from the Leave campaign that disappeared than the entire universe of tweets affiliated with the Remain campaign. We compare these results with an assorted set of 45 hashtags posted in the same period and find that political campaigns present much higher ratios of user and tweet decay. These results are validated by inspecting 2 million Brexit-related tweets posted over a period of nearly 4 years. The article concludes with an overview of these findings and recommendations for future research.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0002764221989772
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2511847176</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0002764221989772</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2511847176</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-87c5b8eb4ed6ed96321cb35a3269cd4fc097b1ae7b37301bbbdb2a0df99fd1063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKt3jwHPq5lkd7PxVrX-gYIe6snDkmRnbUrd1E2K7c2v4dfzk7hrBUHwNMz83nsDj5BjYKcAUp4xxrjMU85BFUpKvkMGkGU8EaKAXTLocdLzfXIQwrxbmcz4gDxNZy7QkbV-1UR65TE0n-8fkY7XLsRzOn1D7M5o9YbqpqJxhvTBL1x0NlBfd2SB0fmGuuabXbS4dr3B6IiHZK_Wi4BHP3NIHq_H08vbZHJ_c3c5miRWZBCTQtrMFGhSrHKsVC44WCMyLXiubJXWlilpQKM0QgoGxpjKcM2qWqm6ApaLITnZ5i5b_7rCEMu5X7VN97LkGUCRSpC9im1VtvUhtFiXy9a96HZTAiv7Csu_FXaWZGsJ-hl_Q__VfwEYZ3Ck</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2511847176</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>This Account Doesn’t Exist: Tweet Decay and the Politics of Deletion in the Brexit Debate</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bastos, Marco</creator><creatorcontrib>Bastos, Marco</creatorcontrib><description>Literature on influence operations has identified metrics that are indicative of social media manipulation, but few studies have explored the lifecycle of low-quality information. We contribute to this literature by reconstructing nearly 3 million messages posted by 1 million users in the last days of the Brexit referendum campaign. While previous studies have found that on average only 4% of tweets disappear, we found that 33% of the tweets leading up to the referendum vote are no longer available. Only about half of the most active accounts that tweeted the referendum continue to operate publicly, and 20% of all accounts are no longer active. We tested whether partisan content was more likely to disappear and found more messages from the Leave campaign that disappeared than the entire universe of tweets affiliated with the Remain campaign. We compare these results with an assorted set of 45 hashtags posted in the same period and find that political campaigns present much higher ratios of user and tweet decay. These results are validated by inspecting 2 million Brexit-related tweets posted over a period of nearly 4 years. The article concludes with an overview of these findings and recommendations for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7642</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3381</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0002764221989772</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Accounts ; EU membership ; Literature ; Manipulation ; Partisanship ; Political campaigns ; Politics ; Referendums ; Social media ; Social networks ; Voting</subject><ispartof>The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills), 2021-05, Vol.65 (5), p.757-773</ispartof><rights>2021 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-87c5b8eb4ed6ed96321cb35a3269cd4fc097b1ae7b37301bbbdb2a0df99fd1063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-87c5b8eb4ed6ed96321cb35a3269cd4fc097b1ae7b37301bbbdb2a0df99fd1063</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0480-1078</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0002764221989772$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002764221989772$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,33753,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bastos, Marco</creatorcontrib><title>This Account Doesn’t Exist: Tweet Decay and the Politics of Deletion in the Brexit Debate</title><title>The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills)</title><description>Literature on influence operations has identified metrics that are indicative of social media manipulation, but few studies have explored the lifecycle of low-quality information. We contribute to this literature by reconstructing nearly 3 million messages posted by 1 million users in the last days of the Brexit referendum campaign. While previous studies have found that on average only 4% of tweets disappear, we found that 33% of the tweets leading up to the referendum vote are no longer available. Only about half of the most active accounts that tweeted the referendum continue to operate publicly, and 20% of all accounts are no longer active. We tested whether partisan content was more likely to disappear and found more messages from the Leave campaign that disappeared than the entire universe of tweets affiliated with the Remain campaign. We compare these results with an assorted set of 45 hashtags posted in the same period and find that political campaigns present much higher ratios of user and tweet decay. These results are validated by inspecting 2 million Brexit-related tweets posted over a period of nearly 4 years. The article concludes with an overview of these findings and recommendations for future research.</description><subject>Accounts</subject><subject>EU membership</subject><subject>Literature</subject><subject>Manipulation</subject><subject>Partisanship</subject><subject>Political campaigns</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Referendums</subject><subject>Social media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>0002-7642</issn><issn>1552-3381</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKt3jwHPq5lkd7PxVrX-gYIe6snDkmRnbUrd1E2K7c2v4dfzk7hrBUHwNMz83nsDj5BjYKcAUp4xxrjMU85BFUpKvkMGkGU8EaKAXTLocdLzfXIQwrxbmcz4gDxNZy7QkbV-1UR65TE0n-8fkY7XLsRzOn1D7M5o9YbqpqJxhvTBL1x0NlBfd2SB0fmGuuabXbS4dr3B6IiHZK_Wi4BHP3NIHq_H08vbZHJ_c3c5miRWZBCTQtrMFGhSrHKsVC44WCMyLXiubJXWlilpQKM0QgoGxpjKcM2qWqm6ApaLITnZ5i5b_7rCEMu5X7VN97LkGUCRSpC9im1VtvUhtFiXy9a96HZTAiv7Csu_FXaWZGsJ-hl_Q__VfwEYZ3Ck</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Bastos, Marco</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0480-1078</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>This Account Doesn’t Exist: Tweet Decay and the Politics of Deletion in the Brexit Debate</title><author>Bastos, Marco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-87c5b8eb4ed6ed96321cb35a3269cd4fc097b1ae7b37301bbbdb2a0df99fd1063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accounts</topic><topic>EU membership</topic><topic>Literature</topic><topic>Manipulation</topic><topic>Partisanship</topic><topic>Political campaigns</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Referendums</topic><topic>Social media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bastos, Marco</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bastos, Marco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>This Account Doesn’t Exist: Tweet Decay and the Politics of Deletion in the Brexit Debate</atitle><jtitle>The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills)</jtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>757</spage><epage>773</epage><pages>757-773</pages><issn>0002-7642</issn><eissn>1552-3381</eissn><abstract>Literature on influence operations has identified metrics that are indicative of social media manipulation, but few studies have explored the lifecycle of low-quality information. We contribute to this literature by reconstructing nearly 3 million messages posted by 1 million users in the last days of the Brexit referendum campaign. While previous studies have found that on average only 4% of tweets disappear, we found that 33% of the tweets leading up to the referendum vote are no longer available. Only about half of the most active accounts that tweeted the referendum continue to operate publicly, and 20% of all accounts are no longer active. We tested whether partisan content was more likely to disappear and found more messages from the Leave campaign that disappeared than the entire universe of tweets affiliated with the Remain campaign. We compare these results with an assorted set of 45 hashtags posted in the same period and find that political campaigns present much higher ratios of user and tweet decay. These results are validated by inspecting 2 million Brexit-related tweets posted over a period of nearly 4 years. The article concludes with an overview of these findings and recommendations for future research.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0002764221989772</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0480-1078</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-7642
ispartof The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills), 2021-05, Vol.65 (5), p.757-773
issn 0002-7642
1552-3381
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2511847176
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Accounts
EU membership
Literature
Manipulation
Partisanship
Political campaigns
Politics
Referendums
Social media
Social networks
Voting
title This Account Doesn’t Exist: Tweet Decay and the Politics of Deletion in the Brexit Debate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T23%3A19%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=This%20Account%20Doesn%E2%80%99t%20Exist:%20Tweet%20Decay%20and%20the%20Politics%20of%20Deletion%20in%20the%20Brexit%20Debate&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20behavioral%20scientist%20(Beverly%20Hills)&rft.au=Bastos,%20Marco&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=757&rft.epage=773&rft.pages=757-773&rft.issn=0002-7642&rft.eissn=1552-3381&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0002764221989772&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2511847176%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2511847176&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0002764221989772&rfr_iscdi=true