Too Burdensome to Bid: Transaction Costs and Pay-for-Performance Conservation
In a world free of transaction costs, reverse auctions have the potential to cost-effectively allocate payment for environmental service contracts by targeting projects that provide the most benefit per dollar spent. However, auctions only succeed if enough farmers choose to bid so that the auctione...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of agricultural economics 2016-10, Vol.98 (5), p.1314-1333 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1333 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1314 |
container_title | American journal of agricultural economics |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | Palm-Forster, Leah H. Swinton, Scott M. Lupi, Frank Shupp, Robert S. |
description | In a world free of transaction costs, reverse auctions have the potential to cost-effectively allocate payment for environmental service contracts by targeting projects that provide the most benefit per dollar spent. However, auctions only succeed if enough farmers choose to bid so that the auctioneer can evaluate numerous projects for targeted funding. A 2014 conservation auction to allocate payments for practices that reduce phosphorus runoff in Northwest Ohio experienced very thin bidding. According to a follow-up survey, auction participation was deterred by the perceived complexity of the bidding process and the need to negotiate with renters. Due to low participation, the actual conservation auction made payments for phosphorus reduction that were surprisingly costly at the margin. Applying a farmer behavioral model to the Western Lake Erie Basin, we simulate participation choice and cost-effectiveness of environmental outcomes in reverse auctions and uniform payment conservation programs. Results reveal that when perceived transaction costs of bid preparation are high, reverse auctions can be less cost-effective than spatially targeted, uniform payment programs that attract higher participation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ajae/aaw071 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2511822220</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44132444</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44132444</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4321-ac01b44379e3b070f49e6f9fc5e543d5b66e030ea009836c436aae6b042f49f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZPnoWAR4md_cgm6y2W-kXFHioel00ygYQ2W3dTS_-9WyMeHRiGYZ53hnkJuaRwS0HxiWkNTozZQUqPyIgKmcYZS-UxGQEAixUodkrOvG9DC1RlI_K6tDa637oKO2_XGPWha6q7aOlM503ZN7aLptb3PjJdFS3MPq6tixfoQlmbrsQw7Ty6L3NAz8lJbVYeL37rmLw_zJbTp3j-9vg8zedxKTijsSmBFkLwVCEvIIVaKJS1qssEE8GrpJASgQMaAJVxGUTSGJQFCBbQmvIxuR72bpz93KLvdWu3rgsnNUsozVgICNTNQJXOeu-w1hvXrI3bawr64Jc--KUHvwKdDvSuWeH-P1TnL_nsJ_OPQXk1KFvfW_enFIJyJsKb37oLeSk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2511822220</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Too Burdensome to Bid: Transaction Costs and Pay-for-Performance Conservation</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Palm-Forster, Leah H. ; Swinton, Scott M. ; Lupi, Frank ; Shupp, Robert S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Palm-Forster, Leah H. ; Swinton, Scott M. ; Lupi, Frank ; Shupp, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><description>In a world free of transaction costs, reverse auctions have the potential to cost-effectively allocate payment for environmental service contracts by targeting projects that provide the most benefit per dollar spent. However, auctions only succeed if enough farmers choose to bid so that the auctioneer can evaluate numerous projects for targeted funding. A 2014 conservation auction to allocate payments for practices that reduce phosphorus runoff in Northwest Ohio experienced very thin bidding. According to a follow-up survey, auction participation was deterred by the perceived complexity of the bidding process and the need to negotiate with renters. Due to low participation, the actual conservation auction made payments for phosphorus reduction that were surprisingly costly at the margin. Applying a farmer behavioral model to the Western Lake Erie Basin, we simulate participation choice and cost-effectiveness of environmental outcomes in reverse auctions and uniform payment conservation programs. Results reveal that when perceived transaction costs of bid preparation are high, reverse auctions can be less cost-effective than spatially targeted, uniform payment programs that attract higher participation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8276</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ajae/aaw071</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Agri‐environmental policy ; ASSA Meeting Invited Papers ; Auctioning ; Auctions ; Bidding ; Bids ; Conservation ; conservation programs ; Cost analysis ; Costs ; cost‐effective ; endogenous participation ; Farmers ; Lake basins ; Participation ; Payments ; Phosphorus ; reverse auctions ; Runoff ; Transaction costs</subject><ispartof>American journal of agricultural economics, 2016-10, Vol.98 (5), p.1314-1333</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 Agricultural and Applied Economics Association</rights><rights>2016 Agricultural and Applied Economics Association</rights><rights>Agricultural and Applied Economics Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4321-ac01b44379e3b070f49e6f9fc5e543d5b66e030ea009836c436aae6b042f49f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4321-ac01b44379e3b070f49e6f9fc5e543d5b66e030ea009836c436aae6b042f49f13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44132444$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44132444$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,805,1419,27931,27932,45581,45582,58024,58257</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Palm-Forster, Leah H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swinton, Scott M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lupi, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shupp, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><title>Too Burdensome to Bid: Transaction Costs and Pay-for-Performance Conservation</title><title>American journal of agricultural economics</title><description>In a world free of transaction costs, reverse auctions have the potential to cost-effectively allocate payment for environmental service contracts by targeting projects that provide the most benefit per dollar spent. However, auctions only succeed if enough farmers choose to bid so that the auctioneer can evaluate numerous projects for targeted funding. A 2014 conservation auction to allocate payments for practices that reduce phosphorus runoff in Northwest Ohio experienced very thin bidding. According to a follow-up survey, auction participation was deterred by the perceived complexity of the bidding process and the need to negotiate with renters. Due to low participation, the actual conservation auction made payments for phosphorus reduction that were surprisingly costly at the margin. Applying a farmer behavioral model to the Western Lake Erie Basin, we simulate participation choice and cost-effectiveness of environmental outcomes in reverse auctions and uniform payment conservation programs. Results reveal that when perceived transaction costs of bid preparation are high, reverse auctions can be less cost-effective than spatially targeted, uniform payment programs that attract higher participation.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agri‐environmental policy</subject><subject>ASSA Meeting Invited Papers</subject><subject>Auctioning</subject><subject>Auctions</subject><subject>Bidding</subject><subject>Bids</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>conservation programs</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>cost‐effective</subject><subject>endogenous participation</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Lake basins</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>reverse auctions</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Transaction costs</subject><issn>0002-9092</issn><issn>1467-8276</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZPnoWAR4md_cgm6y2W-kXFHioel00ygYQ2W3dTS_-9WyMeHRiGYZ53hnkJuaRwS0HxiWkNTozZQUqPyIgKmcYZS-UxGQEAixUodkrOvG9DC1RlI_K6tDa637oKO2_XGPWha6q7aOlM503ZN7aLptb3PjJdFS3MPq6tixfoQlmbrsQw7Ty6L3NAz8lJbVYeL37rmLw_zJbTp3j-9vg8zedxKTijsSmBFkLwVCEvIIVaKJS1qssEE8GrpJASgQMaAJVxGUTSGJQFCBbQmvIxuR72bpz93KLvdWu3rgsnNUsozVgICNTNQJXOeu-w1hvXrI3bawr64Jc--KUHvwKdDvSuWeH-P1TnL_nsJ_OPQXk1KFvfW_enFIJyJsKb37oLeSk</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Palm-Forster, Leah H.</creator><creator>Swinton, Scott M.</creator><creator>Lupi, Frank</creator><creator>Shupp, Robert S.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Too Burdensome to Bid: Transaction Costs and Pay-for-Performance Conservation</title><author>Palm-Forster, Leah H. ; Swinton, Scott M. ; Lupi, Frank ; Shupp, Robert S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4321-ac01b44379e3b070f49e6f9fc5e543d5b66e030ea009836c436aae6b042f49f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agri‐environmental policy</topic><topic>ASSA Meeting Invited Papers</topic><topic>Auctioning</topic><topic>Auctions</topic><topic>Bidding</topic><topic>Bids</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>conservation programs</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>cost‐effective</topic><topic>endogenous participation</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Lake basins</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>reverse auctions</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Transaction costs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Palm-Forster, Leah H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swinton, Scott M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lupi, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shupp, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>American journal of agricultural economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Palm-Forster, Leah H.</au><au>Swinton, Scott M.</au><au>Lupi, Frank</au><au>Shupp, Robert S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Too Burdensome to Bid: Transaction Costs and Pay-for-Performance Conservation</atitle><jtitle>American journal of agricultural economics</jtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1314</spage><epage>1333</epage><pages>1314-1333</pages><issn>0002-9092</issn><eissn>1467-8276</eissn><abstract>In a world free of transaction costs, reverse auctions have the potential to cost-effectively allocate payment for environmental service contracts by targeting projects that provide the most benefit per dollar spent. However, auctions only succeed if enough farmers choose to bid so that the auctioneer can evaluate numerous projects for targeted funding. A 2014 conservation auction to allocate payments for practices that reduce phosphorus runoff in Northwest Ohio experienced very thin bidding. According to a follow-up survey, auction participation was deterred by the perceived complexity of the bidding process and the need to negotiate with renters. Due to low participation, the actual conservation auction made payments for phosphorus reduction that were surprisingly costly at the margin. Applying a farmer behavioral model to the Western Lake Erie Basin, we simulate participation choice and cost-effectiveness of environmental outcomes in reverse auctions and uniform payment conservation programs. Results reveal that when perceived transaction costs of bid preparation are high, reverse auctions can be less cost-effective than spatially targeted, uniform payment programs that attract higher participation.</abstract><cop>Malden</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ajae/aaw071</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9092 |
ispartof | American journal of agricultural economics, 2016-10, Vol.98 (5), p.1314-1333 |
issn | 0002-9092 1467-8276 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2511822220 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Agricultural economics Agri‐environmental policy ASSA Meeting Invited Papers Auctioning Auctions Bidding Bids Conservation conservation programs Cost analysis Costs cost‐effective endogenous participation Farmers Lake basins Participation Payments Phosphorus reverse auctions Runoff Transaction costs |
title | Too Burdensome to Bid: Transaction Costs and Pay-for-Performance Conservation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T18%3A05%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Too%20Burdensome%20to%20Bid:%20Transaction%20Costs%20and%20Pay-for-Performance%20Conservation&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20economics&rft.au=Palm-Forster,%20Leah%20H.&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1314&rft.epage=1333&rft.pages=1314-1333&rft.issn=0002-9092&rft.eissn=1467-8276&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ajae/aaw071&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44132444%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2511822220&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44132444&rfr_iscdi=true |