Backward‐oriented economics

Nowadays, academic journals of high standing rarely accept a conceptual idea in a paper not instantly accompanied by econometric estimates. The idea would almost certainly get rejected. Empirical validation based on past statistical data has produced an unfortunate backward orientation in economics....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Kyklos (Basel) 2021-05, Vol.74 (2), p.187-195
1. Verfasser: Frey, Bruno S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 195
container_issue 2
container_start_page 187
container_title Kyklos (Basel)
container_volume 74
creator Frey, Bruno S.
description Nowadays, academic journals of high standing rarely accept a conceptual idea in a paper not instantly accompanied by econometric estimates. The idea would almost certainly get rejected. Empirical validation based on past statistical data has produced an unfortunate backward orientation in economics. While one can learn from the past, this approach fails when the underlying conditions strongly change. The paper suggests various possibilities to overcome the intense publication pressure in so‐called top journals and the overemphasis on instant empirical evidence. Academia is, however, unlikely to adapt. As economics is too backward oriented, other disciplines or cranks may well dominate future economic policy.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/kykl.12263
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2511713089</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A658264710</galeid><sourcerecordid>A658264710</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-9ae98e28ebe593158f7e3cb53f733edf618f00d44f179110d76461192abaa7253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90L1OwzAQB3ALgUQoLOxISEgMSCk-O7bjsVTlQ63EAgOT5SbnKk2aFDtV6cYj8Iw8CSlh5pZbfvehPyHnQIfQ1W25K6shMCb5AYkgkSqWCReHJKKU8VhoyY7JSQhLSilIpSJycWezcmt9_v351fgC6xbzS8yaulkVWTglR85WAc_--oC83k9exo_x7PnhaTyaxRkHyWNtUafIUpyj0BxE6hTybC64U5xj7iSkjtI8SRwoDUBzJRMJoJmdW6uY4ANy1e9d--Z9g6E1y2bj6-6kYQJAAaep7tR1rxa2QlPU3ZctfrQLuwnBmJEUKZOJAtrBmx5mvgnBozNrX6ys3xmgZp-T2edkfnPqMPR4W1S4-0ea6dt01s_8AP3caJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2511713089</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Backward‐oriented economics</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Frey, Bruno S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Frey, Bruno S.</creatorcontrib><description>Nowadays, academic journals of high standing rarely accept a conceptual idea in a paper not instantly accompanied by econometric estimates. The idea would almost certainly get rejected. Empirical validation based on past statistical data has produced an unfortunate backward orientation in economics. While one can learn from the past, this approach fails when the underlying conditions strongly change. The paper suggests various possibilities to overcome the intense publication pressure in so‐called top journals and the overemphasis on instant empirical evidence. Academia is, however, unlikely to adapt. As economics is too backward oriented, other disciplines or cranks may well dominate future economic policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-5962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-6435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/kykl.12263</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bern: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Economic aspects ; Economic policy ; Economics ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Kyklos (Basel), 2021-05, Vol.74 (2), p.187-195</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Blackwell Publishers Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-9ae98e28ebe593158f7e3cb53f733edf618f00d44f179110d76461192abaa7253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-9ae98e28ebe593158f7e3cb53f733edf618f00d44f179110d76461192abaa7253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fkykl.12263$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fkykl.12263$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27847,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frey, Bruno S.</creatorcontrib><title>Backward‐oriented economics</title><title>Kyklos (Basel)</title><description>Nowadays, academic journals of high standing rarely accept a conceptual idea in a paper not instantly accompanied by econometric estimates. The idea would almost certainly get rejected. Empirical validation based on past statistical data has produced an unfortunate backward orientation in economics. While one can learn from the past, this approach fails when the underlying conditions strongly change. The paper suggests various possibilities to overcome the intense publication pressure in so‐called top journals and the overemphasis on instant empirical evidence. Academia is, however, unlikely to adapt. As economics is too backward oriented, other disciplines or cranks may well dominate future economic policy.</description><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Economic policy</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0023-5962</issn><issn>1467-6435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90L1OwzAQB3ALgUQoLOxISEgMSCk-O7bjsVTlQ63EAgOT5SbnKk2aFDtV6cYj8Iw8CSlh5pZbfvehPyHnQIfQ1W25K6shMCb5AYkgkSqWCReHJKKU8VhoyY7JSQhLSilIpSJycWezcmt9_v351fgC6xbzS8yaulkVWTglR85WAc_--oC83k9exo_x7PnhaTyaxRkHyWNtUafIUpyj0BxE6hTybC64U5xj7iSkjtI8SRwoDUBzJRMJoJmdW6uY4ANy1e9d--Z9g6E1y2bj6-6kYQJAAaep7tR1rxa2QlPU3ZctfrQLuwnBmJEUKZOJAtrBmx5mvgnBozNrX6ys3xmgZp-T2edkfnPqMPR4W1S4-0ea6dt01s_8AP3caJw</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Frey, Bruno S.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Backward‐oriented economics</title><author>Frey, Bruno S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3163-9ae98e28ebe593158f7e3cb53f733edf618f00d44f179110d76461192abaa7253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Economic policy</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frey, Bruno S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Kyklos (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frey, Bruno S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Backward‐oriented economics</atitle><jtitle>Kyklos (Basel)</jtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>187</spage><epage>195</epage><pages>187-195</pages><issn>0023-5962</issn><eissn>1467-6435</eissn><abstract>Nowadays, academic journals of high standing rarely accept a conceptual idea in a paper not instantly accompanied by econometric estimates. The idea would almost certainly get rejected. Empirical validation based on past statistical data has produced an unfortunate backward orientation in economics. While one can learn from the past, this approach fails when the underlying conditions strongly change. The paper suggests various possibilities to overcome the intense publication pressure in so‐called top journals and the overemphasis on instant empirical evidence. Academia is, however, unlikely to adapt. As economics is too backward oriented, other disciplines or cranks may well dominate future economic policy.</abstract><cop>Bern</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/kykl.12263</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-5962
ispartof Kyklos (Basel), 2021-05, Vol.74 (2), p.187-195
issn 0023-5962
1467-6435
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2511713089
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Business Source Complete
subjects Economic aspects
Economic policy
Economics
Validity
title Backward‐oriented economics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T20%3A27%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Backward%E2%80%90oriented%20economics&rft.jtitle=Kyklos%20(Basel)&rft.au=Frey,%20Bruno%20S.&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=187&rft.epage=195&rft.pages=187-195&rft.issn=0023-5962&rft.eissn=1467-6435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/kykl.12263&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA658264710%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2511713089&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A658264710&rfr_iscdi=true