Prediction Skill of the 2012 U.S. Great Plains Flash Drought in Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) Models

Rapid-onset droughts, known as flash droughts, can have devastating impacts on agriculture, water resources, and ecosystems. The ability to predict flash droughts in advance would greatly enhance our preparation for them and potentially mitigate their impacts. Here, we investigate the prediction ski...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of climate 2020-07, Vol.33 (14), p.6229-6253
Hauptverfasser: DeAngelis, Anthony M., Wang, Hailan, Koster, Randal D., Schubert, Siegfried D., Chang, Yehui, Marshak, Jelena
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6253
container_issue 14
container_start_page 6229
container_title Journal of climate
container_volume 33
creator DeAngelis, Anthony M.
Wang, Hailan
Koster, Randal D.
Schubert, Siegfried D.
Chang, Yehui
Marshak, Jelena
description Rapid-onset droughts, known as flash droughts, can have devastating impacts on agriculture, water resources, and ecosystems. The ability to predict flash droughts in advance would greatly enhance our preparation for them and potentially mitigate their impacts. Here, we investigate the prediction skill of the extreme 2012 flash drought over the U.S. Great Plains at subseasonal lead times (3 weeks or more in advance) in global forecast systems participating in the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX). An additional comprehensive set of subseasonal hindcasts with NASA’s GEOS model, a SubX model with relatively high prediction skill, was performed to investigate the separate contributions of atmospheric and land initial conditions to flash drought prediction skill. The results show that the prediction skill of the SubX models is quite variable. While skillful predictions are restricted to within the first two forecast weeks in most models, skill is considerably better (3–4 weeks or more) for certain models and initialization dates. The enhanced prediction skill is found to originate from two robust sources: 1) accurate soil moisture initialization once dry soil conditions are established, and 2) the satisfactory representation of quasi-stationary cross-Pacific Rossby wave trains that lead to the rapid intensification of flash droughts. Evidence is provided that the importance of soil moisture initialization applies more generally to central U.S. summer flash droughts. Our results corroborate earlier findings that accurate soil moisture initialization is important for skillful subseasonal forecasts and highlight the need for additional research on the sources and predictability of drought-inducing quasi-stationary atmospheric circulation anomalies.
doi_str_mv 10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0863.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2511385219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26937957</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26937957</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-501164389c6e3cb8026fa7c710e41d890d5e8648b5a7245c3cbd183623687ae23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLAzEUhYMoWB97FwoBN7qYem8yecxSWp9UFFRwF9KZ1E4dJzVJQf-9KRVXF-75zuFwCDlCGCIqcXE_mtwV4wKrArTkQ9wiAxQMCihLtk0GoKuy0EqIXbIX4wIAmQQYkOYpuKatU-t7-vzRdh31M5rmjrJM0Nfh85DeBGcTfeps20d63dk4p-PgV-_zRNtsWk2js9H3tqNX30sX2k_XJ3qW_2_n9ME3rosHZGdmu-gO_-4-eb2-ehndFpPHm7vR5aSouZCpEIAoS66rWjpeTzUwObOqVgiuxEZX0AinZamnwipWijozDWouGZdaWcf4Pjnd5C6D_1q5mMzCr0JuFg0TiFwLhlWmYEPVwccY3Mwsc2kbfgyCWW9p1luascHKrLc0mC3HG0tvozV9CjkQGAgAJpjK8slGXsTkw38ckxVXlVD8F36Cdjs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2511385219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prediction Skill of the 2012 U.S. Great Plains Flash Drought in Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) Models</title><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>NASA Technical Reports Server</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>DeAngelis, Anthony M. ; Wang, Hailan ; Koster, Randal D. ; Schubert, Siegfried D. ; Chang, Yehui ; Marshak, Jelena</creator><creatorcontrib>DeAngelis, Anthony M. ; Wang, Hailan ; Koster, Randal D. ; Schubert, Siegfried D. ; Chang, Yehui ; Marshak, Jelena</creatorcontrib><description>Rapid-onset droughts, known as flash droughts, can have devastating impacts on agriculture, water resources, and ecosystems. The ability to predict flash droughts in advance would greatly enhance our preparation for them and potentially mitigate their impacts. Here, we investigate the prediction skill of the extreme 2012 flash drought over the U.S. Great Plains at subseasonal lead times (3 weeks or more in advance) in global forecast systems participating in the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX). An additional comprehensive set of subseasonal hindcasts with NASA’s GEOS model, a SubX model with relatively high prediction skill, was performed to investigate the separate contributions of atmospheric and land initial conditions to flash drought prediction skill. The results show that the prediction skill of the SubX models is quite variable. While skillful predictions are restricted to within the first two forecast weeks in most models, skill is considerably better (3–4 weeks or more) for certain models and initialization dates. The enhanced prediction skill is found to originate from two robust sources: 1) accurate soil moisture initialization once dry soil conditions are established, and 2) the satisfactory representation of quasi-stationary cross-Pacific Rossby wave trains that lead to the rapid intensification of flash droughts. Evidence is provided that the importance of soil moisture initialization applies more generally to central U.S. summer flash droughts. Our results corroborate earlier findings that accurate soil moisture initialization is important for skillful subseasonal forecasts and highlight the need for additional research on the sources and predictability of drought-inducing quasi-stationary atmospheric circulation anomalies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-8755</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0442</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0863.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Goddard Space Flight Center: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Agricultural ecosystems ; Agriculture ; Anomalies ; Atmospheric circulation ; Atmospheric circulation anomalies ; Atmospheric models ; Drought ; Extreme weather ; Initial conditions ; Mathematical models ; Meteorology And Climatology ; Planetary waves ; Predictions ; Rossby waves ; Soil ; Soil conditions ; Soil moisture ; Water resources ; Wave trains</subject><ispartof>Journal of climate, 2020-07, Vol.33 (14), p.6229-6253</ispartof><rights>2020 American Meteorological Society</rights><rights>Copyright Determination: GOV_PERMITTED</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Jul 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-501164389c6e3cb8026fa7c710e41d890d5e8648b5a7245c3cbd183623687ae23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-501164389c6e3cb8026fa7c710e41d890d5e8648b5a7245c3cbd183623687ae23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26937957$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26937957$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,800,803,3681,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>DeAngelis, Anthony M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hailan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koster, Randal D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schubert, Siegfried D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Yehui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshak, Jelena</creatorcontrib><title>Prediction Skill of the 2012 U.S. Great Plains Flash Drought in Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) Models</title><title>Journal of climate</title><description>Rapid-onset droughts, known as flash droughts, can have devastating impacts on agriculture, water resources, and ecosystems. The ability to predict flash droughts in advance would greatly enhance our preparation for them and potentially mitigate their impacts. Here, we investigate the prediction skill of the extreme 2012 flash drought over the U.S. Great Plains at subseasonal lead times (3 weeks or more in advance) in global forecast systems participating in the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX). An additional comprehensive set of subseasonal hindcasts with NASA’s GEOS model, a SubX model with relatively high prediction skill, was performed to investigate the separate contributions of atmospheric and land initial conditions to flash drought prediction skill. The results show that the prediction skill of the SubX models is quite variable. While skillful predictions are restricted to within the first two forecast weeks in most models, skill is considerably better (3–4 weeks or more) for certain models and initialization dates. The enhanced prediction skill is found to originate from two robust sources: 1) accurate soil moisture initialization once dry soil conditions are established, and 2) the satisfactory representation of quasi-stationary cross-Pacific Rossby wave trains that lead to the rapid intensification of flash droughts. Evidence is provided that the importance of soil moisture initialization applies more generally to central U.S. summer flash droughts. Our results corroborate earlier findings that accurate soil moisture initialization is important for skillful subseasonal forecasts and highlight the need for additional research on the sources and predictability of drought-inducing quasi-stationary atmospheric circulation anomalies.</description><subject>Agricultural ecosystems</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Anomalies</subject><subject>Atmospheric circulation</subject><subject>Atmospheric circulation anomalies</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Extreme weather</subject><subject>Initial conditions</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Meteorology And Climatology</subject><subject>Planetary waves</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Rossby waves</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil conditions</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Wave trains</subject><issn>0894-8755</issn><issn>1520-0442</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>CYI</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtLAzEUhYMoWB97FwoBN7qYem8yecxSWp9UFFRwF9KZ1E4dJzVJQf-9KRVXF-75zuFwCDlCGCIqcXE_mtwV4wKrArTkQ9wiAxQMCihLtk0GoKuy0EqIXbIX4wIAmQQYkOYpuKatU-t7-vzRdh31M5rmjrJM0Nfh85DeBGcTfeps20d63dk4p-PgV-_zRNtsWk2js9H3tqNX30sX2k_XJ3qW_2_n9ME3rosHZGdmu-gO_-4-eb2-ehndFpPHm7vR5aSouZCpEIAoS66rWjpeTzUwObOqVgiuxEZX0AinZamnwipWijozDWouGZdaWcf4Pjnd5C6D_1q5mMzCr0JuFg0TiFwLhlWmYEPVwccY3Mwsc2kbfgyCWW9p1luascHKrLc0mC3HG0tvozV9CjkQGAgAJpjK8slGXsTkw38ckxVXlVD8F36Cdjs</recordid><startdate>20200715</startdate><enddate>20200715</enddate><creator>DeAngelis, Anthony M.</creator><creator>Wang, Hailan</creator><creator>Koster, Randal D.</creator><creator>Schubert, Siegfried D.</creator><creator>Chang, Yehui</creator><creator>Marshak, Jelena</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><general>AMS</general><scope>CYE</scope><scope>CYI</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200715</creationdate><title>Prediction Skill of the 2012 U.S. Great Plains Flash Drought in Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) Models</title><author>DeAngelis, Anthony M. ; Wang, Hailan ; Koster, Randal D. ; Schubert, Siegfried D. ; Chang, Yehui ; Marshak, Jelena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-501164389c6e3cb8026fa7c710e41d890d5e8648b5a7245c3cbd183623687ae23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural ecosystems</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Anomalies</topic><topic>Atmospheric circulation</topic><topic>Atmospheric circulation anomalies</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Extreme weather</topic><topic>Initial conditions</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Meteorology And Climatology</topic><topic>Planetary waves</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Rossby waves</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil conditions</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Wave trains</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DeAngelis, Anthony M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hailan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koster, Randal D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schubert, Siegfried D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Yehui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshak, Jelena</creatorcontrib><collection>NASA Scientific and Technical Information</collection><collection>NASA Technical Reports Server</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of climate</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DeAngelis, Anthony M.</au><au>Wang, Hailan</au><au>Koster, Randal D.</au><au>Schubert, Siegfried D.</au><au>Chang, Yehui</au><au>Marshak, Jelena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prediction Skill of the 2012 U.S. Great Plains Flash Drought in Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) Models</atitle><jtitle>Journal of climate</jtitle><date>2020-07-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>6229</spage><epage>6253</epage><pages>6229-6253</pages><issn>0894-8755</issn><eissn>1520-0442</eissn><abstract>Rapid-onset droughts, known as flash droughts, can have devastating impacts on agriculture, water resources, and ecosystems. The ability to predict flash droughts in advance would greatly enhance our preparation for them and potentially mitigate their impacts. Here, we investigate the prediction skill of the extreme 2012 flash drought over the U.S. Great Plains at subseasonal lead times (3 weeks or more in advance) in global forecast systems participating in the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX). An additional comprehensive set of subseasonal hindcasts with NASA’s GEOS model, a SubX model with relatively high prediction skill, was performed to investigate the separate contributions of atmospheric and land initial conditions to flash drought prediction skill. The results show that the prediction skill of the SubX models is quite variable. While skillful predictions are restricted to within the first two forecast weeks in most models, skill is considerably better (3–4 weeks or more) for certain models and initialization dates. The enhanced prediction skill is found to originate from two robust sources: 1) accurate soil moisture initialization once dry soil conditions are established, and 2) the satisfactory representation of quasi-stationary cross-Pacific Rossby wave trains that lead to the rapid intensification of flash droughts. Evidence is provided that the importance of soil moisture initialization applies more generally to central U.S. summer flash droughts. Our results corroborate earlier findings that accurate soil moisture initialization is important for skillful subseasonal forecasts and highlight the need for additional research on the sources and predictability of drought-inducing quasi-stationary atmospheric circulation anomalies.</abstract><cop>Goddard Space Flight Center</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0863.1</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0894-8755
ispartof Journal of climate, 2020-07, Vol.33 (14), p.6229-6253
issn 0894-8755
1520-0442
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2511385219
source American Meteorological Society; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; NASA Technical Reports Server; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Agricultural ecosystems
Agriculture
Anomalies
Atmospheric circulation
Atmospheric circulation anomalies
Atmospheric models
Drought
Extreme weather
Initial conditions
Mathematical models
Meteorology And Climatology
Planetary waves
Predictions
Rossby waves
Soil
Soil conditions
Soil moisture
Water resources
Wave trains
title Prediction Skill of the 2012 U.S. Great Plains Flash Drought in Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) Models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T23%3A40%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prediction%20Skill%20of%20the%202012%20U.S.%20Great%20Plains%20Flash%20Drought%20in%20Subseasonal%20Experiment%20(SubX)%20Models&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20climate&rft.au=DeAngelis,%20Anthony%20M.&rft.date=2020-07-15&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=6229&rft.epage=6253&rft.pages=6229-6253&rft.issn=0894-8755&rft.eissn=1520-0442&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0863.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26937957%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2511385219&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26937957&rfr_iscdi=true