Stochastic bidding of volume and price in constrained energy and reserve markets
•Five EV scheduling models are proposed for optimal bidding reserve price and volume•Each model has different tradeoffs between scalability and meeting the users demands•A minimum-volume bid constraint for multiple EVs significantly affects scalability•Computational issues should not be the sole arg...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Electric power systems research 2021-02, Vol.191, p.106868, Article 106868 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 106868 |
container_title | Electric power systems research |
container_volume | 191 |
creator | Romero, Natalia Linden, Koos van der Morales-España, Germán Weerdt, Mathijs M. de |
description | •Five EV scheduling models are proposed for optimal bidding reserve price and volume•Each model has different tradeoffs between scalability and meeting the users demands•A minimum-volume bid constraint for multiple EVs significantly affects scalability•Computational issues should not be the sole argument for removing market conditions•All models, parameters and data are provided online as open source
The power system is undergoing a significant change as it adapts to the intermittency and uncertainty from renewable generation. Flexibility from loads such as electric vehicles (EVs) can serve as reserves to sustain the supply-demand balance in the grid. Some reserve markets have rules for participation that are computationally challenging for aggregators of such flexible loads: they are asked to bid both volume and price, and on top of this there is a minimum-volume requirement, a constraint currently under discussion both in the US and European markets. Several state-of-the-art methods to find a bidding strategy for the demand scheduling of large fleets of flexible loads in the day-ahead and reserve market are adapted to deal with such a shared constraint, and are compared based on costs, unscheduled demand, and running time. The experimental analysis shows that although such a shared constraint significantly affects scalability, some of the proposed adaptations can deal with this without much loss in quality. This comparison also shows the importance of including good uncertainty models for dealing with the risk of not meeting the users’ demands, and that it is possible to find an optimal single price per time unit for scheduling a fleet of EVs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106868 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2510604663</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378779620306660</els_id><sourcerecordid>2510604663</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-c45064a5551079c836fa3cca08514653bf80921c2b10b5cb687ebf36447ad3833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIPcLLEOcWP-BGJC6p4SUggAWfLcTbFobWLnVbq35MQzpxW2p2ZnRmELilZUELldbeAbU4LRti4kFrqIzSjWvGCkVIeoxnhShdKVfIUneXcEUJkpcQMvb710X3a3HuHa980PqxwbPE-rncbwDY0eJu8A-wDdjHkPlkfoMEQIK0Ov_cEGdIe8MamL-jzOTpp7TrDxd-co4_7u_flY_H88vC0vH0uHFesL1wpiCytEIISVTnNZWu5c5ZoQUspeN1qUjHqWE1JLVwttYK65bIslW245nyOribdbYrfO8i96eIuheGlYYOmHGLLEcUmlEsx5wStGeIMTg-GEjM2ZzozNmfG5szU3EC6mUgw-N97SCY7D8FB4xO43jTR_0f_AY-jdnw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2510604663</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stochastic bidding of volume and price in constrained energy and reserve markets</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Romero, Natalia ; Linden, Koos van der ; Morales-España, Germán ; Weerdt, Mathijs M. de</creator><creatorcontrib>Romero, Natalia ; Linden, Koos van der ; Morales-España, Germán ; Weerdt, Mathijs M. de</creatorcontrib><description>•Five EV scheduling models are proposed for optimal bidding reserve price and volume•Each model has different tradeoffs between scalability and meeting the users demands•A minimum-volume bid constraint for multiple EVs significantly affects scalability•Computational issues should not be the sole argument for removing market conditions•All models, parameters and data are provided online as open source
The power system is undergoing a significant change as it adapts to the intermittency and uncertainty from renewable generation. Flexibility from loads such as electric vehicles (EVs) can serve as reserves to sustain the supply-demand balance in the grid. Some reserve markets have rules for participation that are computationally challenging for aggregators of such flexible loads: they are asked to bid both volume and price, and on top of this there is a minimum-volume requirement, a constraint currently under discussion both in the US and European markets. Several state-of-the-art methods to find a bidding strategy for the demand scheduling of large fleets of flexible loads in the day-ahead and reserve market are adapted to deal with such a shared constraint, and are compared based on costs, unscheduled demand, and running time. The experimental analysis shows that although such a shared constraint significantly affects scalability, some of the proposed adaptations can deal with this without much loss in quality. This comparison also shows the importance of including good uncertainty models for dealing with the risk of not meeting the users’ demands, and that it is possible to find an optimal single price per time unit for scheduling a fleet of EVs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-7796</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2046</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106868</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Constraints ; Cost analysis ; Demand ; Electric power systems ; Electric vehicle (EV) aggregator ; Electric vehicles ; Energy market ; Loads (forces) ; Renewable resources ; Reserve market ; Scheduling ; Scheduling algorithms ; Stochastic models ; Stochastic optimization ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Electric power systems research, 2021-02, Vol.191, p.106868, Article 106868</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Feb 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-c45064a5551079c836fa3cca08514653bf80921c2b10b5cb687ebf36447ad3833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-c45064a5551079c836fa3cca08514653bf80921c2b10b5cb687ebf36447ad3833</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0470-6241 ; 0000-0002-6372-6197</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106868$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Romero, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linden, Koos van der</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morales-España, Germán</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weerdt, Mathijs M. de</creatorcontrib><title>Stochastic bidding of volume and price in constrained energy and reserve markets</title><title>Electric power systems research</title><description>•Five EV scheduling models are proposed for optimal bidding reserve price and volume•Each model has different tradeoffs between scalability and meeting the users demands•A minimum-volume bid constraint for multiple EVs significantly affects scalability•Computational issues should not be the sole argument for removing market conditions•All models, parameters and data are provided online as open source
The power system is undergoing a significant change as it adapts to the intermittency and uncertainty from renewable generation. Flexibility from loads such as electric vehicles (EVs) can serve as reserves to sustain the supply-demand balance in the grid. Some reserve markets have rules for participation that are computationally challenging for aggregators of such flexible loads: they are asked to bid both volume and price, and on top of this there is a minimum-volume requirement, a constraint currently under discussion both in the US and European markets. Several state-of-the-art methods to find a bidding strategy for the demand scheduling of large fleets of flexible loads in the day-ahead and reserve market are adapted to deal with such a shared constraint, and are compared based on costs, unscheduled demand, and running time. The experimental analysis shows that although such a shared constraint significantly affects scalability, some of the proposed adaptations can deal with this without much loss in quality. This comparison also shows the importance of including good uncertainty models for dealing with the risk of not meeting the users’ demands, and that it is possible to find an optimal single price per time unit for scheduling a fleet of EVs.</description><subject>Constraints</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Demand</subject><subject>Electric power systems</subject><subject>Electric vehicle (EV) aggregator</subject><subject>Electric vehicles</subject><subject>Energy market</subject><subject>Loads (forces)</subject><subject>Renewable resources</subject><subject>Reserve market</subject><subject>Scheduling</subject><subject>Scheduling algorithms</subject><subject>Stochastic models</subject><subject>Stochastic optimization</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0378-7796</issn><issn>1873-2046</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIPcLLEOcWP-BGJC6p4SUggAWfLcTbFobWLnVbq35MQzpxW2p2ZnRmELilZUELldbeAbU4LRti4kFrqIzSjWvGCkVIeoxnhShdKVfIUneXcEUJkpcQMvb710X3a3HuHa980PqxwbPE-rncbwDY0eJu8A-wDdjHkPlkfoMEQIK0Ov_cEGdIe8MamL-jzOTpp7TrDxd-co4_7u_flY_H88vC0vH0uHFesL1wpiCytEIISVTnNZWu5c5ZoQUspeN1qUjHqWE1JLVwttYK65bIslW245nyOribdbYrfO8i96eIuheGlYYOmHGLLEcUmlEsx5wStGeIMTg-GEjM2ZzozNmfG5szU3EC6mUgw-N97SCY7D8FB4xO43jTR_0f_AY-jdnw</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Romero, Natalia</creator><creator>Linden, Koos van der</creator><creator>Morales-España, Germán</creator><creator>Weerdt, Mathijs M. de</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0470-6241</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6372-6197</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Stochastic bidding of volume and price in constrained energy and reserve markets</title><author>Romero, Natalia ; Linden, Koos van der ; Morales-España, Germán ; Weerdt, Mathijs M. de</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-c45064a5551079c836fa3cca08514653bf80921c2b10b5cb687ebf36447ad3833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Constraints</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Demand</topic><topic>Electric power systems</topic><topic>Electric vehicle (EV) aggregator</topic><topic>Electric vehicles</topic><topic>Energy market</topic><topic>Loads (forces)</topic><topic>Renewable resources</topic><topic>Reserve market</topic><topic>Scheduling</topic><topic>Scheduling algorithms</topic><topic>Stochastic models</topic><topic>Stochastic optimization</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Romero, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linden, Koos van der</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morales-España, Germán</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weerdt, Mathijs M. de</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Electric power systems research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Romero, Natalia</au><au>Linden, Koos van der</au><au>Morales-España, Germán</au><au>Weerdt, Mathijs M. de</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stochastic bidding of volume and price in constrained energy and reserve markets</atitle><jtitle>Electric power systems research</jtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>191</volume><spage>106868</spage><pages>106868-</pages><artnum>106868</artnum><issn>0378-7796</issn><eissn>1873-2046</eissn><abstract>•Five EV scheduling models are proposed for optimal bidding reserve price and volume•Each model has different tradeoffs between scalability and meeting the users demands•A minimum-volume bid constraint for multiple EVs significantly affects scalability•Computational issues should not be the sole argument for removing market conditions•All models, parameters and data are provided online as open source
The power system is undergoing a significant change as it adapts to the intermittency and uncertainty from renewable generation. Flexibility from loads such as electric vehicles (EVs) can serve as reserves to sustain the supply-demand balance in the grid. Some reserve markets have rules for participation that are computationally challenging for aggregators of such flexible loads: they are asked to bid both volume and price, and on top of this there is a minimum-volume requirement, a constraint currently under discussion both in the US and European markets. Several state-of-the-art methods to find a bidding strategy for the demand scheduling of large fleets of flexible loads in the day-ahead and reserve market are adapted to deal with such a shared constraint, and are compared based on costs, unscheduled demand, and running time. The experimental analysis shows that although such a shared constraint significantly affects scalability, some of the proposed adaptations can deal with this without much loss in quality. This comparison also shows the importance of including good uncertainty models for dealing with the risk of not meeting the users’ demands, and that it is possible to find an optimal single price per time unit for scheduling a fleet of EVs.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106868</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0470-6241</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6372-6197</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-7796 |
ispartof | Electric power systems research, 2021-02, Vol.191, p.106868, Article 106868 |
issn | 0378-7796 1873-2046 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2510604663 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Constraints Cost analysis Demand Electric power systems Electric vehicle (EV) aggregator Electric vehicles Energy market Loads (forces) Renewable resources Reserve market Scheduling Scheduling algorithms Stochastic models Stochastic optimization Uncertainty |
title | Stochastic bidding of volume and price in constrained energy and reserve markets |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T23%3A49%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stochastic%20bidding%20of%20volume%20and%20price%20in%20constrained%20energy%20and%20reserve%20markets&rft.jtitle=Electric%20power%20systems%20research&rft.au=Romero,%20Natalia&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=191&rft.spage=106868&rft.pages=106868-&rft.artnum=106868&rft.issn=0378-7796&rft.eissn=1873-2046&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106868&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2510604663%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2510604663&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378779620306660&rfr_iscdi=true |