Stochastic bidding of volume and price in constrained energy and reserve markets

•Five EV scheduling models are proposed for optimal bidding reserve price and volume•Each model has different tradeoffs between scalability and meeting the users demands•A minimum-volume bid constraint for multiple EVs significantly affects scalability•Computational issues should not be the sole arg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Electric power systems research 2021-02, Vol.191, p.106868, Article 106868
Hauptverfasser: Romero, Natalia, Linden, Koos van der, Morales-España, Germán, Weerdt, Mathijs M. de
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 106868
container_title Electric power systems research
container_volume 191
creator Romero, Natalia
Linden, Koos van der
Morales-España, Germán
Weerdt, Mathijs M. de
description •Five EV scheduling models are proposed for optimal bidding reserve price and volume•Each model has different tradeoffs between scalability and meeting the users demands•A minimum-volume bid constraint for multiple EVs significantly affects scalability•Computational issues should not be the sole argument for removing market conditions•All models, parameters and data are provided online as open source The power system is undergoing a significant change as it adapts to the intermittency and uncertainty from renewable generation. Flexibility from loads such as electric vehicles (EVs) can serve as reserves to sustain the supply-demand balance in the grid. Some reserve markets have rules for participation that are computationally challenging for aggregators of such flexible loads: they are asked to bid both volume and price, and on top of this there is a minimum-volume requirement, a constraint currently under discussion both in the US and European markets. Several state-of-the-art methods to find a bidding strategy for the demand scheduling of large fleets of flexible loads in the day-ahead and reserve market are adapted to deal with such a shared constraint, and are compared based on costs, unscheduled demand, and running time. The experimental analysis shows that although such a shared constraint significantly affects scalability, some of the proposed adaptations can deal with this without much loss in quality. This comparison also shows the importance of including good uncertainty models for dealing with the risk of not meeting the users’ demands, and that it is possible to find an optimal single price per time unit for scheduling a fleet of EVs.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106868
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2510604663</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378779620306660</els_id><sourcerecordid>2510604663</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-c45064a5551079c836fa3cca08514653bf80921c2b10b5cb687ebf36447ad3833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIPcLLEOcWP-BGJC6p4SUggAWfLcTbFobWLnVbq35MQzpxW2p2ZnRmELilZUELldbeAbU4LRti4kFrqIzSjWvGCkVIeoxnhShdKVfIUneXcEUJkpcQMvb710X3a3HuHa980PqxwbPE-rncbwDY0eJu8A-wDdjHkPlkfoMEQIK0Ov_cEGdIe8MamL-jzOTpp7TrDxd-co4_7u_flY_H88vC0vH0uHFesL1wpiCytEIISVTnNZWu5c5ZoQUspeN1qUjHqWE1JLVwttYK65bIslW245nyOribdbYrfO8i96eIuheGlYYOmHGLLEcUmlEsx5wStGeIMTg-GEjM2ZzozNmfG5szU3EC6mUgw-N97SCY7D8FB4xO43jTR_0f_AY-jdnw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2510604663</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stochastic bidding of volume and price in constrained energy and reserve markets</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Romero, Natalia ; Linden, Koos van der ; Morales-España, Germán ; Weerdt, Mathijs M. de</creator><creatorcontrib>Romero, Natalia ; Linden, Koos van der ; Morales-España, Germán ; Weerdt, Mathijs M. de</creatorcontrib><description>•Five EV scheduling models are proposed for optimal bidding reserve price and volume•Each model has different tradeoffs between scalability and meeting the users demands•A minimum-volume bid constraint for multiple EVs significantly affects scalability•Computational issues should not be the sole argument for removing market conditions•All models, parameters and data are provided online as open source The power system is undergoing a significant change as it adapts to the intermittency and uncertainty from renewable generation. Flexibility from loads such as electric vehicles (EVs) can serve as reserves to sustain the supply-demand balance in the grid. Some reserve markets have rules for participation that are computationally challenging for aggregators of such flexible loads: they are asked to bid both volume and price, and on top of this there is a minimum-volume requirement, a constraint currently under discussion both in the US and European markets. Several state-of-the-art methods to find a bidding strategy for the demand scheduling of large fleets of flexible loads in the day-ahead and reserve market are adapted to deal with such a shared constraint, and are compared based on costs, unscheduled demand, and running time. The experimental analysis shows that although such a shared constraint significantly affects scalability, some of the proposed adaptations can deal with this without much loss in quality. This comparison also shows the importance of including good uncertainty models for dealing with the risk of not meeting the users’ demands, and that it is possible to find an optimal single price per time unit for scheduling a fleet of EVs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-7796</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2046</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106868</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Constraints ; Cost analysis ; Demand ; Electric power systems ; Electric vehicle (EV) aggregator ; Electric vehicles ; Energy market ; Loads (forces) ; Renewable resources ; Reserve market ; Scheduling ; Scheduling algorithms ; Stochastic models ; Stochastic optimization ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Electric power systems research, 2021-02, Vol.191, p.106868, Article 106868</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Feb 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-c45064a5551079c836fa3cca08514653bf80921c2b10b5cb687ebf36447ad3833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-c45064a5551079c836fa3cca08514653bf80921c2b10b5cb687ebf36447ad3833</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0470-6241 ; 0000-0002-6372-6197</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106868$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Romero, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linden, Koos van der</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morales-España, Germán</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weerdt, Mathijs M. de</creatorcontrib><title>Stochastic bidding of volume and price in constrained energy and reserve markets</title><title>Electric power systems research</title><description>•Five EV scheduling models are proposed for optimal bidding reserve price and volume•Each model has different tradeoffs between scalability and meeting the users demands•A minimum-volume bid constraint for multiple EVs significantly affects scalability•Computational issues should not be the sole argument for removing market conditions•All models, parameters and data are provided online as open source The power system is undergoing a significant change as it adapts to the intermittency and uncertainty from renewable generation. Flexibility from loads such as electric vehicles (EVs) can serve as reserves to sustain the supply-demand balance in the grid. Some reserve markets have rules for participation that are computationally challenging for aggregators of such flexible loads: they are asked to bid both volume and price, and on top of this there is a minimum-volume requirement, a constraint currently under discussion both in the US and European markets. Several state-of-the-art methods to find a bidding strategy for the demand scheduling of large fleets of flexible loads in the day-ahead and reserve market are adapted to deal with such a shared constraint, and are compared based on costs, unscheduled demand, and running time. The experimental analysis shows that although such a shared constraint significantly affects scalability, some of the proposed adaptations can deal with this without much loss in quality. This comparison also shows the importance of including good uncertainty models for dealing with the risk of not meeting the users’ demands, and that it is possible to find an optimal single price per time unit for scheduling a fleet of EVs.</description><subject>Constraints</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Demand</subject><subject>Electric power systems</subject><subject>Electric vehicle (EV) aggregator</subject><subject>Electric vehicles</subject><subject>Energy market</subject><subject>Loads (forces)</subject><subject>Renewable resources</subject><subject>Reserve market</subject><subject>Scheduling</subject><subject>Scheduling algorithms</subject><subject>Stochastic models</subject><subject>Stochastic optimization</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0378-7796</issn><issn>1873-2046</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIPcLLEOcWP-BGJC6p4SUggAWfLcTbFobWLnVbq35MQzpxW2p2ZnRmELilZUELldbeAbU4LRti4kFrqIzSjWvGCkVIeoxnhShdKVfIUneXcEUJkpcQMvb710X3a3HuHa980PqxwbPE-rncbwDY0eJu8A-wDdjHkPlkfoMEQIK0Ov_cEGdIe8MamL-jzOTpp7TrDxd-co4_7u_flY_H88vC0vH0uHFesL1wpiCytEIISVTnNZWu5c5ZoQUspeN1qUjHqWE1JLVwttYK65bIslW245nyOribdbYrfO8i96eIuheGlYYOmHGLLEcUmlEsx5wStGeIMTg-GEjM2ZzozNmfG5szU3EC6mUgw-N97SCY7D8FB4xO43jTR_0f_AY-jdnw</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Romero, Natalia</creator><creator>Linden, Koos van der</creator><creator>Morales-España, Germán</creator><creator>Weerdt, Mathijs M. de</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0470-6241</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6372-6197</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Stochastic bidding of volume and price in constrained energy and reserve markets</title><author>Romero, Natalia ; Linden, Koos van der ; Morales-España, Germán ; Weerdt, Mathijs M. de</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-c45064a5551079c836fa3cca08514653bf80921c2b10b5cb687ebf36447ad3833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Constraints</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Demand</topic><topic>Electric power systems</topic><topic>Electric vehicle (EV) aggregator</topic><topic>Electric vehicles</topic><topic>Energy market</topic><topic>Loads (forces)</topic><topic>Renewable resources</topic><topic>Reserve market</topic><topic>Scheduling</topic><topic>Scheduling algorithms</topic><topic>Stochastic models</topic><topic>Stochastic optimization</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Romero, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linden, Koos van der</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morales-España, Germán</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weerdt, Mathijs M. de</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Electric power systems research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Romero, Natalia</au><au>Linden, Koos van der</au><au>Morales-España, Germán</au><au>Weerdt, Mathijs M. de</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stochastic bidding of volume and price in constrained energy and reserve markets</atitle><jtitle>Electric power systems research</jtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>191</volume><spage>106868</spage><pages>106868-</pages><artnum>106868</artnum><issn>0378-7796</issn><eissn>1873-2046</eissn><abstract>•Five EV scheduling models are proposed for optimal bidding reserve price and volume•Each model has different tradeoffs between scalability and meeting the users demands•A minimum-volume bid constraint for multiple EVs significantly affects scalability•Computational issues should not be the sole argument for removing market conditions•All models, parameters and data are provided online as open source The power system is undergoing a significant change as it adapts to the intermittency and uncertainty from renewable generation. Flexibility from loads such as electric vehicles (EVs) can serve as reserves to sustain the supply-demand balance in the grid. Some reserve markets have rules for participation that are computationally challenging for aggregators of such flexible loads: they are asked to bid both volume and price, and on top of this there is a minimum-volume requirement, a constraint currently under discussion both in the US and European markets. Several state-of-the-art methods to find a bidding strategy for the demand scheduling of large fleets of flexible loads in the day-ahead and reserve market are adapted to deal with such a shared constraint, and are compared based on costs, unscheduled demand, and running time. The experimental analysis shows that although such a shared constraint significantly affects scalability, some of the proposed adaptations can deal with this without much loss in quality. This comparison also shows the importance of including good uncertainty models for dealing with the risk of not meeting the users’ demands, and that it is possible to find an optimal single price per time unit for scheduling a fleet of EVs.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106868</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0470-6241</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6372-6197</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-7796
ispartof Electric power systems research, 2021-02, Vol.191, p.106868, Article 106868
issn 0378-7796
1873-2046
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2510604663
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Constraints
Cost analysis
Demand
Electric power systems
Electric vehicle (EV) aggregator
Electric vehicles
Energy market
Loads (forces)
Renewable resources
Reserve market
Scheduling
Scheduling algorithms
Stochastic models
Stochastic optimization
Uncertainty
title Stochastic bidding of volume and price in constrained energy and reserve markets
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T23%3A49%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stochastic%20bidding%20of%20volume%20and%20price%20in%20constrained%20energy%20and%20reserve%20markets&rft.jtitle=Electric%20power%20systems%20research&rft.au=Romero,%20Natalia&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=191&rft.spage=106868&rft.pages=106868-&rft.artnum=106868&rft.issn=0378-7796&rft.eissn=1873-2046&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106868&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2510604663%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2510604663&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378779620306660&rfr_iscdi=true