Qualitative methods III: On different ways of describing our work

Qualitative methods III: On different ways of describing our work

In two previous reviews, we examined how human geographers currently report on projects involving their preferred qualitative methods – interviews and ethnographic observation. This final review steps back from specific techniques to evaluate some of the broader presentational conventions that typif...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Progress in human geography 2021-04, Vol.45 (2), p.394-403
Hauptverfasser: Hitchings, Russell, Latham, Alan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Conventions
Data collection
Fieldwork
Geographers
Human geography
Qualitative research
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 403
container_issue 2
container_start_page 394
container_title Progress in human geography
container_volume 45
creator Hitchings, Russell
Latham, Alan
description In two previous reviews, we examined how human geographers currently report on projects involving their preferred qualitative methods – interviews and ethnographic observation. This final review steps back from specific techniques to evaluate some of the broader presentational conventions that typify this work. What can be inferred from where these geographers discuss data collection in their papers? Why do they develop new methods and what do they say about fieldwork failures? How often do they reflect on the provisional status of their findings? And what are the implications of how they define their purpose in working with qualitative material?
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0309132520901753
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2510162863</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0309132520901753</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2510162863</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-a61993a615898a285f28944b48a83fb764f5e497dc78bce914a0299b5f1837d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRMFbvHhc8R2f2I7vrrRQ_AoUi6Dlskt2a2iZ1N7X0vzclgiB4mTm833szPEKuEW4RlboDDgY5kwwMoJL8hCQolEqBaX1KkqOcHvVzchHjCgCkYjIh05edXTe97ZsvRzeuf-_qSPM8v6eLltaN9y64tqd7e4i087R2sQpN2bRL2u0C3Xfh45KcebuO7upnT8jb48Pr7DmdL57y2XSeVlxin9oMjeHDlNpoy7T0TBshSqGt5r5UmfDSCaPqSumycgaFBWZMKT1qruqMT8jNmLsN3efOxb5YDS-0w8mCSQTMmM74QMFIVaGLMThfbEOzseFQIBTHooq_RQ2WdLREu3S_of_y38sfZV8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2510162863</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Qualitative methods III: On different ways of describing our work</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Hitchings, Russell ; Latham, Alan</creator><creatorcontrib>Hitchings, Russell ; Latham, Alan</creatorcontrib><description>In two previous reviews, we examined how human geographers currently report on projects involving their preferred qualitative methods – interviews and ethnographic observation. This final review steps back from specific techniques to evaluate some of the broader presentational conventions that typify this work. What can be inferred from where these geographers discuss data collection in their papers? Why do they develop new methods and what do they say about fieldwork failures? How often do they reflect on the provisional status of their findings? And what are the implications of how they define their purpose in working with qualitative material?</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-1325</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0309132520901753</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Conventions ; Data collection ; Fieldwork ; Geographers ; Human geography ; Qualitative research</subject><ispartof>Progress in human geography, 2021-04, Vol.45 (2), p.394-403</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-a61993a615898a285f28944b48a83fb764f5e497dc78bce914a0299b5f1837d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-a61993a615898a285f28944b48a83fb764f5e497dc78bce914a0299b5f1837d63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1171-8064</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0309132520901753$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0309132520901753$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27905,27906,33755,43602,43603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hitchings, Russell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latham, Alan</creatorcontrib><title>Qualitative methods III: On different ways of describing our work</title><title>Progress in human geography</title><description>In two previous reviews, we examined how human geographers currently report on projects involving their preferred qualitative methods – interviews and ethnographic observation. This final review steps back from specific techniques to evaluate some of the broader presentational conventions that typify this work. What can be inferred from where these geographers discuss data collection in their papers? Why do they develop new methods and what do they say about fieldwork failures? How often do they reflect on the provisional status of their findings? And what are the implications of how they define their purpose in working with qualitative material?</description><subject>Conventions</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Fieldwork</subject><subject>Geographers</subject><subject>Human geography</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><issn>0309-1325</issn><issn>1477-0288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRMFbvHhc8R2f2I7vrrRQ_AoUi6Dlskt2a2iZ1N7X0vzclgiB4mTm833szPEKuEW4RlboDDgY5kwwMoJL8hCQolEqBaX1KkqOcHvVzchHjCgCkYjIh05edXTe97ZsvRzeuf-_qSPM8v6eLltaN9y64tqd7e4i087R2sQpN2bRL2u0C3Xfh45KcebuO7upnT8jb48Pr7DmdL57y2XSeVlxin9oMjeHDlNpoy7T0TBshSqGt5r5UmfDSCaPqSumycgaFBWZMKT1qruqMT8jNmLsN3efOxb5YDS-0w8mCSQTMmM74QMFIVaGLMThfbEOzseFQIBTHooq_RQ2WdLREu3S_of_y38sfZV8</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Hitchings, Russell</creator><creator>Latham, Alan</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1171-8064</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Qualitative methods III: On different ways of describing our work</title><author>Hitchings, Russell ; Latham, Alan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-a61993a615898a285f28944b48a83fb764f5e497dc78bce914a0299b5f1837d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Conventions</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Fieldwork</topic><topic>Geographers</topic><topic>Human geography</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hitchings, Russell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latham, Alan</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Progress in human geography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hitchings, Russell</au><au>Latham, Alan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Qualitative methods III: On different ways of describing our work</atitle><jtitle>Progress in human geography</jtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>394</spage><epage>403</epage><pages>394-403</pages><issn>0309-1325</issn><eissn>1477-0288</eissn><abstract>In two previous reviews, we examined how human geographers currently report on projects involving their preferred qualitative methods – interviews and ethnographic observation. This final review steps back from specific techniques to evaluate some of the broader presentational conventions that typify this work. What can be inferred from where these geographers discuss data collection in their papers? Why do they develop new methods and what do they say about fieldwork failures? How often do they reflect on the provisional status of their findings? And what are the implications of how they define their purpose in working with qualitative material?</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0309132520901753</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1171-8064</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0309-1325
ispartof Progress in human geography, 2021-04, Vol.45 (2), p.394-403
issn 0309-1325
1477-0288
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2510162863
source SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Conventions
Data collection
Fieldwork
Geographers
Human geography
Qualitative research
title Qualitative methods III: On different ways of describing our work
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T14%3A49%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Qualitative%20methods%20III:%20On%20different%20ways%20of%20describing%20our%20work&rft.jtitle=Progress%20in%20human%20geography&rft.au=Hitchings,%20Russell&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=394&rft.epage=403&rft.pages=394-403&rft.issn=0309-1325&rft.eissn=1477-0288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0309132520901753&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2510162863%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2510162863&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0309132520901753&rfr_iscdi=true