Direct and Indirect Effects of Individualism and Institutions on Homicides

The present paper evaluates whether people in highly individualistic cultures have a lower propensity to commit homicides, using data from 70 countries. Several previous papers report a significant negative correlation between these two variables, but it is not well established whether the effect of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social indicators research 2021-02, Vol.153 (3), p.1167-1195
Hauptverfasser: Zanchi, Vinicius V., Ehrl, Philipp, Maciel, Daniel T. G. N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1195
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1167
container_title Social indicators research
container_volume 153
creator Zanchi, Vinicius V.
Ehrl, Philipp
Maciel, Daniel T. G. N.
description The present paper evaluates whether people in highly individualistic cultures have a lower propensity to commit homicides, using data from 70 countries. Several previous papers report a significant negative correlation between these two variables, but it is not well established whether the effect of culture on this form of violent crime is direct or indirect. We estimate a structural equation model that includes: (a) the possibility that either culture or institutions affect the homicide rate, (b) a link between individualism and institutions and (c) credible exogenous information used as an instrumental variable for individualism. Our results show that individualistic nations generate a more effective judicial system, which is mainly responsible for the variation in homicide rates across countries. That is, individualism affects homicides only indirectly through the quality of legal institutions. We also find that different types of institutions have a similar relation to individualism, however, the moderating effect on homicides is more pronounced for legal or political institutions than for economic institutions.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11205-020-02531-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2509632312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2509632312</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-49fe908cf014808a87e9aa62d28f060396ec42722c077d6681c70b41664a054b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwNOC5-jkf_YotbaVghc9hzSbSEq7W5NdwW9v7Ba8eRgeM_zezPAQuiVwTwDUQyaEgsBAoZRgBPMzNCFCMQw1JedoAgwY1gzgEl3lvAUAwQWfoJenmLzrK9s21aptxmYeQpFcdeE4-4rNYHcx709U7mM_9LFrC9FWy24fXWx8vkYXwe6yvznpFL0_z99mS7x-Xaxmj2vsmKA95nXwNWgXgHAN2mrla2slbagOIIHV0jtOFaUOlGqk1MQp2HAiJbfl6Q2bortx7yF1n4PPvdl2Q2rLSUMF1JJRRmih6Ei51OWcfDCHFPc2fRsC5jczM2ZmSmbmmJnhxcRGUy5w--HT3-p_XD-aem0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2509632312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Direct and Indirect Effects of Individualism and Institutions on Homicides</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Zanchi, Vinicius V. ; Ehrl, Philipp ; Maciel, Daniel T. G. N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zanchi, Vinicius V. ; Ehrl, Philipp ; Maciel, Daniel T. G. N.</creatorcontrib><description>The present paper evaluates whether people in highly individualistic cultures have a lower propensity to commit homicides, using data from 70 countries. Several previous papers report a significant negative correlation between these two variables, but it is not well established whether the effect of culture on this form of violent crime is direct or indirect. We estimate a structural equation model that includes: (a) the possibility that either culture or institutions affect the homicide rate, (b) a link between individualism and institutions and (c) credible exogenous information used as an instrumental variable for individualism. Our results show that individualistic nations generate a more effective judicial system, which is mainly responsible for the variation in homicide rates across countries. That is, individualism affects homicides only indirectly through the quality of legal institutions. We also find that different types of institutions have a similar relation to individualism, however, the moderating effect on homicides is more pronounced for legal or political institutions than for economic institutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0303-8300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11205-020-02531-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Correlation ; Culture ; Homicide ; Human Geography ; Indirect effects ; Individualism ; Institutions ; Judicial system ; Legal institutions ; Legal system ; Microeconomics ; Original Research ; Political institutions ; Public Health ; Quality of Life Research ; Social Sciences ; Sociology ; Structural equation modeling ; Violence ; Violent crime</subject><ispartof>Social indicators research, 2021-02, Vol.153 (3), p.1167-1195</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-49fe908cf014808a87e9aa62d28f060396ec42722c077d6681c70b41664a054b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-49fe908cf014808a87e9aa62d28f060396ec42722c077d6681c70b41664a054b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6661-8976</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11205-020-02531-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-020-02531-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,27344,27924,27925,33774,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zanchi, Vinicius V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehrl, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maciel, Daniel T. G. N.</creatorcontrib><title>Direct and Indirect Effects of Individualism and Institutions on Homicides</title><title>Social indicators research</title><addtitle>Soc Indic Res</addtitle><description>The present paper evaluates whether people in highly individualistic cultures have a lower propensity to commit homicides, using data from 70 countries. Several previous papers report a significant negative correlation between these two variables, but it is not well established whether the effect of culture on this form of violent crime is direct or indirect. We estimate a structural equation model that includes: (a) the possibility that either culture or institutions affect the homicide rate, (b) a link between individualism and institutions and (c) credible exogenous information used as an instrumental variable for individualism. Our results show that individualistic nations generate a more effective judicial system, which is mainly responsible for the variation in homicide rates across countries. That is, individualism affects homicides only indirectly through the quality of legal institutions. We also find that different types of institutions have a similar relation to individualism, however, the moderating effect on homicides is more pronounced for legal or political institutions than for economic institutions.</description><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Homicide</subject><subject>Human Geography</subject><subject>Indirect effects</subject><subject>Individualism</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Judicial system</subject><subject>Legal institutions</subject><subject>Legal system</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Political institutions</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Structural equation modeling</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Violent crime</subject><issn>0303-8300</issn><issn>1573-0921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwNOC5-jkf_YotbaVghc9hzSbSEq7W5NdwW9v7Ba8eRgeM_zezPAQuiVwTwDUQyaEgsBAoZRgBPMzNCFCMQw1JedoAgwY1gzgEl3lvAUAwQWfoJenmLzrK9s21aptxmYeQpFcdeE4-4rNYHcx709U7mM_9LFrC9FWy24fXWx8vkYXwe6yvznpFL0_z99mS7x-Xaxmj2vsmKA95nXwNWgXgHAN2mrla2slbagOIIHV0jtOFaUOlGqk1MQp2HAiJbfl6Q2bortx7yF1n4PPvdl2Q2rLSUMF1JJRRmih6Ei51OWcfDCHFPc2fRsC5jczM2ZmSmbmmJnhxcRGUy5w--HT3-p_XD-aem0A</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Zanchi, Vinicius V.</creator><creator>Ehrl, Philipp</creator><creator>Maciel, Daniel T. G. N.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6661-8976</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Direct and Indirect Effects of Individualism and Institutions on Homicides</title><author>Zanchi, Vinicius V. ; Ehrl, Philipp ; Maciel, Daniel T. G. N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-49fe908cf014808a87e9aa62d28f060396ec42722c077d6681c70b41664a054b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Homicide</topic><topic>Human Geography</topic><topic>Indirect effects</topic><topic>Individualism</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Judicial system</topic><topic>Legal institutions</topic><topic>Legal system</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Political institutions</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Structural equation modeling</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Violent crime</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zanchi, Vinicius V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehrl, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maciel, Daniel T. G. N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social indicators research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zanchi, Vinicius V.</au><au>Ehrl, Philipp</au><au>Maciel, Daniel T. G. N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Direct and Indirect Effects of Individualism and Institutions on Homicides</atitle><jtitle>Social indicators research</jtitle><stitle>Soc Indic Res</stitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>153</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1167</spage><epage>1195</epage><pages>1167-1195</pages><issn>0303-8300</issn><eissn>1573-0921</eissn><abstract>The present paper evaluates whether people in highly individualistic cultures have a lower propensity to commit homicides, using data from 70 countries. Several previous papers report a significant negative correlation between these two variables, but it is not well established whether the effect of culture on this form of violent crime is direct or indirect. We estimate a structural equation model that includes: (a) the possibility that either culture or institutions affect the homicide rate, (b) a link between individualism and institutions and (c) credible exogenous information used as an instrumental variable for individualism. Our results show that individualistic nations generate a more effective judicial system, which is mainly responsible for the variation in homicide rates across countries. That is, individualism affects homicides only indirectly through the quality of legal institutions. We also find that different types of institutions have a similar relation to individualism, however, the moderating effect on homicides is more pronounced for legal or political institutions than for economic institutions.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11205-020-02531-4</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6661-8976</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0303-8300
ispartof Social indicators research, 2021-02, Vol.153 (3), p.1167-1195
issn 0303-8300
1573-0921
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2509632312
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SpringerNature Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Correlation
Culture
Homicide
Human Geography
Indirect effects
Individualism
Institutions
Judicial system
Legal institutions
Legal system
Microeconomics
Original Research
Political institutions
Public Health
Quality of Life Research
Social Sciences
Sociology
Structural equation modeling
Violence
Violent crime
title Direct and Indirect Effects of Individualism and Institutions on Homicides
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T15%3A31%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Direct%20and%20Indirect%20Effects%20of%20Individualism%20and%20Institutions%20on%20Homicides&rft.jtitle=Social%20indicators%20research&rft.au=Zanchi,%20Vinicius%20V.&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=153&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1167&rft.epage=1195&rft.pages=1167-1195&rft.issn=0303-8300&rft.eissn=1573-0921&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11205-020-02531-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2509632312%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2509632312&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true