Optimising accuracy of performance predictions using available morphophysiological information in wheat breeding germplasm
Wheat breeding programmes often harbour large number of developed progenies. Testing of all progenies in many target environments is not considered cost‐effective, so the genomic predictions are employed. Genomic predictions might be enhanced with adaptational traits given the cost‐effectiveness of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of applied biology 2021-03, Vol.178 (2), p.367-376 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 376 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 367 |
container_title | Annals of applied biology |
container_volume | 178 |
creator | Guberac, Sunčica Galić, Vlatko Rebekić, Andrijana Čupić, Tihomir Petrović, Sonja |
description | Wheat breeding programmes often harbour large number of developed progenies. Testing of all progenies in many target environments is not considered cost‐effective, so the genomic predictions are employed. Genomic predictions might be enhanced with adaptational traits given the cost‐effectiveness of their phenotyping. The aim of this study was to assess effectiveness of adding a priori available phenotyping data of adaptational morpho‐physiological traits to genomic predictions in Bayesian framework. The panel of 120 winter wheat genotypes was sown over four growing seasons (2013/2014–2016/2017) in field conditions in two replicates and phenotyped for target traits grain yield and plant height along with nine distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) traits. Five genotype groups were defined by the K‐means clustering method based on nine DUS traits. DUS traits were used as fixed covariates in five different genomic prediction models with different assumptions about the distribution densities of marker effects: Bayes A, Bayes B, Bayes C, Bayesian ridge regression and Bayesian lasso. Adding DUS traits as covariates significantly improved accuracies and reduced the root mean square errors (RMSEP) of genomic predictions. Marginal differences between different models were observed. Adding covariates to genomic prediction models might be good strategy to improve accuracies of the predictions by accounting for environmental adaptations, provided their a priori availability or low costs of additional phenotyping.
Models fitting the genomewide markers have been proved as efficient tool for performance predictions. These genomic prediction models can be enhanced by adding the DUS traits, available in most breeding programs as covariates into the DUS‐enhanced genomic prediction models at the same cost. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/aab.12672 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2509231806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2509231806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-25266f5933f3cc319b95fb6834257ff1a863586cbe024ea19b761028e9993b6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4A8ssWKR1o_EiZel4iVV6gbWlmPs1lUSGzuhCl-PS9gym5nRnHtHugDcYrTAqZZS1gtMWEnOwAyXeZ6VNK_OwQwhRLO8zNkluIrxkFaOOJmB763vbWuj7XZQKjUEqUboDPQ6GBda2SkNfdAfVvXWdREOE_klbSPrRsPWBb93fj9G6xq3s0o20Ha_0pMgzfC417KHddDJJWl3OrS-kbG9BhdGNlHf_PU5eH96fFu_ZJvt8-t6tckU4SXJSEEYMwWn1FClKOY1L0zNKpqTojQGy4rRomKq1ojkWqZ7yTAileac05oZOgd3k68P7nPQsRcHN4QuvRSkSCFQXCGWqPuJUsHFGLQRPthWhlFgJE7RihSt-I02scuJPdpGj_-DYrV6mBQ_OM58pA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2509231806</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimising accuracy of performance predictions using available morphophysiological information in wheat breeding germplasm</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Guberac, Sunčica ; Galić, Vlatko ; Rebekić, Andrijana ; Čupić, Tihomir ; Petrović, Sonja</creator><creatorcontrib>Guberac, Sunčica ; Galić, Vlatko ; Rebekić, Andrijana ; Čupić, Tihomir ; Petrović, Sonja</creatorcontrib><description>Wheat breeding programmes often harbour large number of developed progenies. Testing of all progenies in many target environments is not considered cost‐effective, so the genomic predictions are employed. Genomic predictions might be enhanced with adaptational traits given the cost‐effectiveness of their phenotyping. The aim of this study was to assess effectiveness of adding a priori available phenotyping data of adaptational morpho‐physiological traits to genomic predictions in Bayesian framework. The panel of 120 winter wheat genotypes was sown over four growing seasons (2013/2014–2016/2017) in field conditions in two replicates and phenotyped for target traits grain yield and plant height along with nine distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) traits. Five genotype groups were defined by the K‐means clustering method based on nine DUS traits. DUS traits were used as fixed covariates in five different genomic prediction models with different assumptions about the distribution densities of marker effects: Bayes A, Bayes B, Bayes C, Bayesian ridge regression and Bayesian lasso. Adding DUS traits as covariates significantly improved accuracies and reduced the root mean square errors (RMSEP) of genomic predictions. Marginal differences between different models were observed. Adding covariates to genomic prediction models might be good strategy to improve accuracies of the predictions by accounting for environmental adaptations, provided their a priori availability or low costs of additional phenotyping.
Models fitting the genomewide markers have been proved as efficient tool for performance predictions. These genomic prediction models can be enhanced by adding the DUS traits, available in most breeding programs as covariates into the DUS‐enhanced genomic prediction models at the same cost.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-7348</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aab.12672</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Adaptation ; Bayesian analysis ; Clustering ; Crop yield ; genomic predictions ; Genomics ; Genotypes ; Germplasm ; Mathematical models ; Phenotyping ; Plant breeding ; Prediction models ; stress ; Wheat ; wheat breeding ; Winter wheat</subject><ispartof>Annals of applied biology, 2021-03, Vol.178 (2), p.367-376</ispartof><rights>2021 Association of Applied Biologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-25266f5933f3cc319b95fb6834257ff1a863586cbe024ea19b761028e9993b6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-25266f5933f3cc319b95fb6834257ff1a863586cbe024ea19b761028e9993b6f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5191-2953 ; 0000-0002-7873-6347 ; 0000-0003-1291-4769 ; 0000-0001-7491-9800 ; 0000-0001-9798-375X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Faab.12672$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Faab.12672$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guberac, Sunčica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galić, Vlatko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rebekić, Andrijana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Čupić, Tihomir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrović, Sonja</creatorcontrib><title>Optimising accuracy of performance predictions using available morphophysiological information in wheat breeding germplasm</title><title>Annals of applied biology</title><description>Wheat breeding programmes often harbour large number of developed progenies. Testing of all progenies in many target environments is not considered cost‐effective, so the genomic predictions are employed. Genomic predictions might be enhanced with adaptational traits given the cost‐effectiveness of their phenotyping. The aim of this study was to assess effectiveness of adding a priori available phenotyping data of adaptational morpho‐physiological traits to genomic predictions in Bayesian framework. The panel of 120 winter wheat genotypes was sown over four growing seasons (2013/2014–2016/2017) in field conditions in two replicates and phenotyped for target traits grain yield and plant height along with nine distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) traits. Five genotype groups were defined by the K‐means clustering method based on nine DUS traits. DUS traits were used as fixed covariates in five different genomic prediction models with different assumptions about the distribution densities of marker effects: Bayes A, Bayes B, Bayes C, Bayesian ridge regression and Bayesian lasso. Adding DUS traits as covariates significantly improved accuracies and reduced the root mean square errors (RMSEP) of genomic predictions. Marginal differences between different models were observed. Adding covariates to genomic prediction models might be good strategy to improve accuracies of the predictions by accounting for environmental adaptations, provided their a priori availability or low costs of additional phenotyping.
Models fitting the genomewide markers have been proved as efficient tool for performance predictions. These genomic prediction models can be enhanced by adding the DUS traits, available in most breeding programs as covariates into the DUS‐enhanced genomic prediction models at the same cost.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>genomic predictions</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Germplasm</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Phenotyping</subject><subject>Plant breeding</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>stress</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><subject>wheat breeding</subject><subject>Winter wheat</subject><issn>0003-4746</issn><issn>1744-7348</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4A8ssWKR1o_EiZel4iVV6gbWlmPs1lUSGzuhCl-PS9gym5nRnHtHugDcYrTAqZZS1gtMWEnOwAyXeZ6VNK_OwQwhRLO8zNkluIrxkFaOOJmB763vbWuj7XZQKjUEqUboDPQ6GBda2SkNfdAfVvXWdREOE_klbSPrRsPWBb93fj9G6xq3s0o20Ha_0pMgzfC417KHddDJJWl3OrS-kbG9BhdGNlHf_PU5eH96fFu_ZJvt8-t6tckU4SXJSEEYMwWn1FClKOY1L0zNKpqTojQGy4rRomKq1ojkWqZ7yTAileac05oZOgd3k68P7nPQsRcHN4QuvRSkSCFQXCGWqPuJUsHFGLQRPthWhlFgJE7RihSt-I02scuJPdpGj_-DYrV6mBQ_OM58pA</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Guberac, Sunčica</creator><creator>Galić, Vlatko</creator><creator>Rebekić, Andrijana</creator><creator>Čupić, Tihomir</creator><creator>Petrović, Sonja</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5191-2953</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7873-6347</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1291-4769</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7491-9800</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9798-375X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Optimising accuracy of performance predictions using available morphophysiological information in wheat breeding germplasm</title><author>Guberac, Sunčica ; Galić, Vlatko ; Rebekić, Andrijana ; Čupić, Tihomir ; Petrović, Sonja</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-25266f5933f3cc319b95fb6834257ff1a863586cbe024ea19b761028e9993b6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>genomic predictions</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Germplasm</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Phenotyping</topic><topic>Plant breeding</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>stress</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><topic>wheat breeding</topic><topic>Winter wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guberac, Sunčica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galić, Vlatko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rebekić, Andrijana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Čupić, Tihomir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrović, Sonja</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Annals of applied biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guberac, Sunčica</au><au>Galić, Vlatko</au><au>Rebekić, Andrijana</au><au>Čupić, Tihomir</au><au>Petrović, Sonja</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimising accuracy of performance predictions using available morphophysiological information in wheat breeding germplasm</atitle><jtitle>Annals of applied biology</jtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>178</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>367</spage><epage>376</epage><pages>367-376</pages><issn>0003-4746</issn><eissn>1744-7348</eissn><abstract>Wheat breeding programmes often harbour large number of developed progenies. Testing of all progenies in many target environments is not considered cost‐effective, so the genomic predictions are employed. Genomic predictions might be enhanced with adaptational traits given the cost‐effectiveness of their phenotyping. The aim of this study was to assess effectiveness of adding a priori available phenotyping data of adaptational morpho‐physiological traits to genomic predictions in Bayesian framework. The panel of 120 winter wheat genotypes was sown over four growing seasons (2013/2014–2016/2017) in field conditions in two replicates and phenotyped for target traits grain yield and plant height along with nine distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) traits. Five genotype groups were defined by the K‐means clustering method based on nine DUS traits. DUS traits were used as fixed covariates in five different genomic prediction models with different assumptions about the distribution densities of marker effects: Bayes A, Bayes B, Bayes C, Bayesian ridge regression and Bayesian lasso. Adding DUS traits as covariates significantly improved accuracies and reduced the root mean square errors (RMSEP) of genomic predictions. Marginal differences between different models were observed. Adding covariates to genomic prediction models might be good strategy to improve accuracies of the predictions by accounting for environmental adaptations, provided their a priori availability or low costs of additional phenotyping.
Models fitting the genomewide markers have been proved as efficient tool for performance predictions. These genomic prediction models can be enhanced by adding the DUS traits, available in most breeding programs as covariates into the DUS‐enhanced genomic prediction models at the same cost.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/aab.12672</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5191-2953</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7873-6347</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1291-4769</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7491-9800</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9798-375X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-4746 |
ispartof | Annals of applied biology, 2021-03, Vol.178 (2), p.367-376 |
issn | 0003-4746 1744-7348 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2509231806 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Accounting Adaptation Bayesian analysis Clustering Crop yield genomic predictions Genomics Genotypes Germplasm Mathematical models Phenotyping Plant breeding Prediction models stress Wheat wheat breeding Winter wheat |
title | Optimising accuracy of performance predictions using available morphophysiological information in wheat breeding germplasm |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T02%3A08%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimising%20accuracy%20of%20performance%20predictions%20using%20available%20morphophysiological%20information%20in%20wheat%20breeding%20germplasm&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20applied%20biology&rft.au=Guberac,%20Sun%C4%8Dica&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=178&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=367&rft.epage=376&rft.pages=367-376&rft.issn=0003-4746&rft.eissn=1744-7348&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aab.12672&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2509231806%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2509231806&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |