Optimising accuracy of performance predictions using available morphophysiological information in wheat breeding germplasm

Wheat breeding programmes often harbour large number of developed progenies. Testing of all progenies in many target environments is not considered cost‐effective, so the genomic predictions are employed. Genomic predictions might be enhanced with adaptational traits given the cost‐effectiveness of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of applied biology 2021-03, Vol.178 (2), p.367-376
Hauptverfasser: Guberac, Sunčica, Galić, Vlatko, Rebekić, Andrijana, Čupić, Tihomir, Petrović, Sonja
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 376
container_issue 2
container_start_page 367
container_title Annals of applied biology
container_volume 178
creator Guberac, Sunčica
Galić, Vlatko
Rebekić, Andrijana
Čupić, Tihomir
Petrović, Sonja
description Wheat breeding programmes often harbour large number of developed progenies. Testing of all progenies in many target environments is not considered cost‐effective, so the genomic predictions are employed. Genomic predictions might be enhanced with adaptational traits given the cost‐effectiveness of their phenotyping. The aim of this study was to assess effectiveness of adding a priori available phenotyping data of adaptational morpho‐physiological traits to genomic predictions in Bayesian framework. The panel of 120 winter wheat genotypes was sown over four growing seasons (2013/2014–2016/2017) in field conditions in two replicates and phenotyped for target traits grain yield and plant height along with nine distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) traits. Five genotype groups were defined by the K‐means clustering method based on nine DUS traits. DUS traits were used as fixed covariates in five different genomic prediction models with different assumptions about the distribution densities of marker effects: Bayes A, Bayes B, Bayes C, Bayesian ridge regression and Bayesian lasso. Adding DUS traits as covariates significantly improved accuracies and reduced the root mean square errors (RMSEP) of genomic predictions. Marginal differences between different models were observed. Adding covariates to genomic prediction models might be good strategy to improve accuracies of the predictions by accounting for environmental adaptations, provided their a priori availability or low costs of additional phenotyping. Models fitting the genomewide markers have been proved as efficient tool for performance predictions. These genomic prediction models can be enhanced by adding the DUS traits, available in most breeding programs as covariates into the DUS‐enhanced genomic prediction models at the same cost.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/aab.12672
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2509231806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2509231806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-25266f5933f3cc319b95fb6834257ff1a863586cbe024ea19b761028e9993b6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4A8ssWKR1o_EiZel4iVV6gbWlmPs1lUSGzuhCl-PS9gym5nRnHtHugDcYrTAqZZS1gtMWEnOwAyXeZ6VNK_OwQwhRLO8zNkluIrxkFaOOJmB763vbWuj7XZQKjUEqUboDPQ6GBda2SkNfdAfVvXWdREOE_klbSPrRsPWBb93fj9G6xq3s0o20Ha_0pMgzfC417KHddDJJWl3OrS-kbG9BhdGNlHf_PU5eH96fFu_ZJvt8-t6tckU4SXJSEEYMwWn1FClKOY1L0zNKpqTojQGy4rRomKq1ojkWqZ7yTAileac05oZOgd3k68P7nPQsRcHN4QuvRSkSCFQXCGWqPuJUsHFGLQRPthWhlFgJE7RihSt-I02scuJPdpGj_-DYrV6mBQ_OM58pA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2509231806</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimising accuracy of performance predictions using available morphophysiological information in wheat breeding germplasm</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Guberac, Sunčica ; Galić, Vlatko ; Rebekić, Andrijana ; Čupić, Tihomir ; Petrović, Sonja</creator><creatorcontrib>Guberac, Sunčica ; Galić, Vlatko ; Rebekić, Andrijana ; Čupić, Tihomir ; Petrović, Sonja</creatorcontrib><description>Wheat breeding programmes often harbour large number of developed progenies. Testing of all progenies in many target environments is not considered cost‐effective, so the genomic predictions are employed. Genomic predictions might be enhanced with adaptational traits given the cost‐effectiveness of their phenotyping. The aim of this study was to assess effectiveness of adding a priori available phenotyping data of adaptational morpho‐physiological traits to genomic predictions in Bayesian framework. The panel of 120 winter wheat genotypes was sown over four growing seasons (2013/2014–2016/2017) in field conditions in two replicates and phenotyped for target traits grain yield and plant height along with nine distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) traits. Five genotype groups were defined by the K‐means clustering method based on nine DUS traits. DUS traits were used as fixed covariates in five different genomic prediction models with different assumptions about the distribution densities of marker effects: Bayes A, Bayes B, Bayes C, Bayesian ridge regression and Bayesian lasso. Adding DUS traits as covariates significantly improved accuracies and reduced the root mean square errors (RMSEP) of genomic predictions. Marginal differences between different models were observed. Adding covariates to genomic prediction models might be good strategy to improve accuracies of the predictions by accounting for environmental adaptations, provided their a priori availability or low costs of additional phenotyping. Models fitting the genomewide markers have been proved as efficient tool for performance predictions. These genomic prediction models can be enhanced by adding the DUS traits, available in most breeding programs as covariates into the DUS‐enhanced genomic prediction models at the same cost.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-7348</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aab.12672</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Adaptation ; Bayesian analysis ; Clustering ; Crop yield ; genomic predictions ; Genomics ; Genotypes ; Germplasm ; Mathematical models ; Phenotyping ; Plant breeding ; Prediction models ; stress ; Wheat ; wheat breeding ; Winter wheat</subject><ispartof>Annals of applied biology, 2021-03, Vol.178 (2), p.367-376</ispartof><rights>2021 Association of Applied Biologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-25266f5933f3cc319b95fb6834257ff1a863586cbe024ea19b761028e9993b6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-25266f5933f3cc319b95fb6834257ff1a863586cbe024ea19b761028e9993b6f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5191-2953 ; 0000-0002-7873-6347 ; 0000-0003-1291-4769 ; 0000-0001-7491-9800 ; 0000-0001-9798-375X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Faab.12672$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Faab.12672$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guberac, Sunčica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galić, Vlatko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rebekić, Andrijana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Čupić, Tihomir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrović, Sonja</creatorcontrib><title>Optimising accuracy of performance predictions using available morphophysiological information in wheat breeding germplasm</title><title>Annals of applied biology</title><description>Wheat breeding programmes often harbour large number of developed progenies. Testing of all progenies in many target environments is not considered cost‐effective, so the genomic predictions are employed. Genomic predictions might be enhanced with adaptational traits given the cost‐effectiveness of their phenotyping. The aim of this study was to assess effectiveness of adding a priori available phenotyping data of adaptational morpho‐physiological traits to genomic predictions in Bayesian framework. The panel of 120 winter wheat genotypes was sown over four growing seasons (2013/2014–2016/2017) in field conditions in two replicates and phenotyped for target traits grain yield and plant height along with nine distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) traits. Five genotype groups were defined by the K‐means clustering method based on nine DUS traits. DUS traits were used as fixed covariates in five different genomic prediction models with different assumptions about the distribution densities of marker effects: Bayes A, Bayes B, Bayes C, Bayesian ridge regression and Bayesian lasso. Adding DUS traits as covariates significantly improved accuracies and reduced the root mean square errors (RMSEP) of genomic predictions. Marginal differences between different models were observed. Adding covariates to genomic prediction models might be good strategy to improve accuracies of the predictions by accounting for environmental adaptations, provided their a priori availability or low costs of additional phenotyping. Models fitting the genomewide markers have been proved as efficient tool for performance predictions. These genomic prediction models can be enhanced by adding the DUS traits, available in most breeding programs as covariates into the DUS‐enhanced genomic prediction models at the same cost.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>genomic predictions</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Germplasm</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Phenotyping</subject><subject>Plant breeding</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>stress</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><subject>wheat breeding</subject><subject>Winter wheat</subject><issn>0003-4746</issn><issn>1744-7348</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4A8ssWKR1o_EiZel4iVV6gbWlmPs1lUSGzuhCl-PS9gym5nRnHtHugDcYrTAqZZS1gtMWEnOwAyXeZ6VNK_OwQwhRLO8zNkluIrxkFaOOJmB763vbWuj7XZQKjUEqUboDPQ6GBda2SkNfdAfVvXWdREOE_klbSPrRsPWBb93fj9G6xq3s0o20Ha_0pMgzfC417KHddDJJWl3OrS-kbG9BhdGNlHf_PU5eH96fFu_ZJvt8-t6tckU4SXJSEEYMwWn1FClKOY1L0zNKpqTojQGy4rRomKq1ojkWqZ7yTAileac05oZOgd3k68P7nPQsRcHN4QuvRSkSCFQXCGWqPuJUsHFGLQRPthWhlFgJE7RihSt-I02scuJPdpGj_-DYrV6mBQ_OM58pA</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Guberac, Sunčica</creator><creator>Galić, Vlatko</creator><creator>Rebekić, Andrijana</creator><creator>Čupić, Tihomir</creator><creator>Petrović, Sonja</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5191-2953</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7873-6347</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1291-4769</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7491-9800</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9798-375X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Optimising accuracy of performance predictions using available morphophysiological information in wheat breeding germplasm</title><author>Guberac, Sunčica ; Galić, Vlatko ; Rebekić, Andrijana ; Čupić, Tihomir ; Petrović, Sonja</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-25266f5933f3cc319b95fb6834257ff1a863586cbe024ea19b761028e9993b6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>genomic predictions</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Germplasm</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Phenotyping</topic><topic>Plant breeding</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>stress</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><topic>wheat breeding</topic><topic>Winter wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guberac, Sunčica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galić, Vlatko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rebekić, Andrijana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Čupić, Tihomir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrović, Sonja</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Annals of applied biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guberac, Sunčica</au><au>Galić, Vlatko</au><au>Rebekić, Andrijana</au><au>Čupić, Tihomir</au><au>Petrović, Sonja</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimising accuracy of performance predictions using available morphophysiological information in wheat breeding germplasm</atitle><jtitle>Annals of applied biology</jtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>178</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>367</spage><epage>376</epage><pages>367-376</pages><issn>0003-4746</issn><eissn>1744-7348</eissn><abstract>Wheat breeding programmes often harbour large number of developed progenies. Testing of all progenies in many target environments is not considered cost‐effective, so the genomic predictions are employed. Genomic predictions might be enhanced with adaptational traits given the cost‐effectiveness of their phenotyping. The aim of this study was to assess effectiveness of adding a priori available phenotyping data of adaptational morpho‐physiological traits to genomic predictions in Bayesian framework. The panel of 120 winter wheat genotypes was sown over four growing seasons (2013/2014–2016/2017) in field conditions in two replicates and phenotyped for target traits grain yield and plant height along with nine distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) traits. Five genotype groups were defined by the K‐means clustering method based on nine DUS traits. DUS traits were used as fixed covariates in five different genomic prediction models with different assumptions about the distribution densities of marker effects: Bayes A, Bayes B, Bayes C, Bayesian ridge regression and Bayesian lasso. Adding DUS traits as covariates significantly improved accuracies and reduced the root mean square errors (RMSEP) of genomic predictions. Marginal differences between different models were observed. Adding covariates to genomic prediction models might be good strategy to improve accuracies of the predictions by accounting for environmental adaptations, provided their a priori availability or low costs of additional phenotyping. Models fitting the genomewide markers have been proved as efficient tool for performance predictions. These genomic prediction models can be enhanced by adding the DUS traits, available in most breeding programs as covariates into the DUS‐enhanced genomic prediction models at the same cost.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/aab.12672</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5191-2953</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7873-6347</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1291-4769</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7491-9800</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9798-375X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4746
ispartof Annals of applied biology, 2021-03, Vol.178 (2), p.367-376
issn 0003-4746
1744-7348
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2509231806
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Accounting
Adaptation
Bayesian analysis
Clustering
Crop yield
genomic predictions
Genomics
Genotypes
Germplasm
Mathematical models
Phenotyping
Plant breeding
Prediction models
stress
Wheat
wheat breeding
Winter wheat
title Optimising accuracy of performance predictions using available morphophysiological information in wheat breeding germplasm
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T02%3A08%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimising%20accuracy%20of%20performance%20predictions%20using%20available%20morphophysiological%20information%20in%20wheat%20breeding%20germplasm&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20applied%20biology&rft.au=Guberac,%20Sun%C4%8Dica&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=178&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=367&rft.epage=376&rft.pages=367-376&rft.issn=0003-4746&rft.eissn=1744-7348&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aab.12672&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2509231806%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2509231806&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true