Effects of Nonresponse, Measurement, and Coverage Bias in Survey Estimates of Voting

Objective The objective is to estimate the relative contributions of nonresponse, coverage, and measurement biases in survey estimates of voting. Methods We survey 3,000 Boston‐area households sampled from an address‐based frame matched, when possible, to telephone numbers. A two‐phase sampling desi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social science quarterly 2021-03, Vol.102 (2), p.939-954
1. Verfasser: Brenner, Philip S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 954
container_issue 2
container_start_page 939
container_title Social science quarterly
container_volume 102
creator Brenner, Philip S.
description Objective The objective is to estimate the relative contributions of nonresponse, coverage, and measurement biases in survey estimates of voting. Methods We survey 3,000 Boston‐area households sampled from an address‐based frame matched, when possible, to telephone numbers. A two‐phase sampling design was used to follow up nonrespondents from phone interviews with personal interviews. All cases were then linked to voting records. Results Nonresponse, coverage, and measurement‐biased survey estimates at varying stages of the study design. Coverage error linked to missing telephone numbers biased estimates that excluded nonphone households. Overall estimates including nonphone households and nonrespondent interviews include 25 percent relative bias equally attributable to measurement and nonresponse. Conclusion Bias in voting measures is not limited to measurement bias. Researchers should also assess the potential for nonresponse and coverage biases.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ssqu.12935
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2509226887</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2509226887</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3705-7b71f5ee3e0743aa55405fd79ba972aa55a74a8889dc1493751fc6432dac30733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9PAjEQxRujiYhe_ARNvCmL7ba73T3qBv8kqDGA101ZpmQJtNB2MXx7C0s8GucyM8nvzbw8hK4p6dNQ985tmj6Nc5acoA5NOInSmIlT1CGEZRHPOT1HF84tCCE85lkHjQdKQeUdNgq_G23BrY120MNvIF1jYQXa97DUM1yYLVg5B_xYS4drjUeN3cIOD5yvV9LD4cSX8bWeX6IzJZcOro69iyZPg3HxEg0_nl-Lh2FUMUGSSEwFVQkAAyI4kzIJfhM1E_lU5iLe71JwmWVZPqsoz5lIqKpSzuKZrBgRjHXRTXt3bc2mAefLhWmsDi_LOCF5HKdZJgJ121KVNc5ZUOXaBsd2V1JS7lMr96mVh9QCfNfC3zA1ylU16Ap-BSG2lKR5moowERro7P90UXvpa6ML02gfpPQorZew-8NSORp9TlpzP6fNj2Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2509226887</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Nonresponse, Measurement, and Coverage Bias in Survey Estimates of Voting</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Brenner, Philip S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brenner, Philip S.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The objective is to estimate the relative contributions of nonresponse, coverage, and measurement biases in survey estimates of voting. Methods We survey 3,000 Boston‐area households sampled from an address‐based frame matched, when possible, to telephone numbers. A two‐phase sampling design was used to follow up nonrespondents from phone interviews with personal interviews. All cases were then linked to voting records. Results Nonresponse, coverage, and measurement‐biased survey estimates at varying stages of the study design. Coverage error linked to missing telephone numbers biased estimates that excluded nonphone households. Overall estimates including nonphone households and nonrespondent interviews include 25 percent relative bias equally attributable to measurement and nonresponse. Conclusion Bias in voting measures is not limited to measurement bias. Researchers should also assess the potential for nonresponse and coverage biases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-4941</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6237</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12935</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>HOBOKEN: Wiley</publisher><subject>Bias ; Estimates ; Government &amp; Law ; Households ; Interviews ; Measurement ; Political Science ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Responses ; Sampling ; Social Sciences ; Sociology ; Voting</subject><ispartof>Social science quarterly, 2021-03, Vol.102 (2), p.939-954</ispartof><rights>2021 by the Southwestern Social Science Association</rights><rights>2021 Southwestern Social Science Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>1</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000606966700001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3705-7b71f5ee3e0743aa55405fd79ba972aa55a74a8889dc1493751fc6432dac30733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3705-7b71f5ee3e0743aa55405fd79ba972aa55a74a8889dc1493751fc6432dac30733</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8848-1114</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fssqu.12935$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fssqu.12935$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,33779,39262,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brenner, Philip S.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Nonresponse, Measurement, and Coverage Bias in Survey Estimates of Voting</title><title>Social science quarterly</title><addtitle>SOC SCI QUART</addtitle><description>Objective The objective is to estimate the relative contributions of nonresponse, coverage, and measurement biases in survey estimates of voting. Methods We survey 3,000 Boston‐area households sampled from an address‐based frame matched, when possible, to telephone numbers. A two‐phase sampling design was used to follow up nonrespondents from phone interviews with personal interviews. All cases were then linked to voting records. Results Nonresponse, coverage, and measurement‐biased survey estimates at varying stages of the study design. Coverage error linked to missing telephone numbers biased estimates that excluded nonphone households. Overall estimates including nonphone households and nonrespondent interviews include 25 percent relative bias equally attributable to measurement and nonresponse. Conclusion Bias in voting measures is not limited to measurement bias. Researchers should also assess the potential for nonresponse and coverage biases.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Government &amp; Law</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>0038-4941</issn><issn>1540-6237</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GIZIO</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE9PAjEQxRujiYhe_ARNvCmL7ba73T3qBv8kqDGA101ZpmQJtNB2MXx7C0s8GucyM8nvzbw8hK4p6dNQ985tmj6Nc5acoA5NOInSmIlT1CGEZRHPOT1HF84tCCE85lkHjQdKQeUdNgq_G23BrY120MNvIF1jYQXa97DUM1yYLVg5B_xYS4drjUeN3cIOD5yvV9LD4cSX8bWeX6IzJZcOro69iyZPg3HxEg0_nl-Lh2FUMUGSSEwFVQkAAyI4kzIJfhM1E_lU5iLe71JwmWVZPqsoz5lIqKpSzuKZrBgRjHXRTXt3bc2mAefLhWmsDi_LOCF5HKdZJgJ121KVNc5ZUOXaBsd2V1JS7lMr96mVh9QCfNfC3zA1ylU16Ap-BSG2lKR5moowERro7P90UXvpa6ML02gfpPQorZew-8NSORp9TlpzP6fNj2Y</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Brenner, Philip S.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>GIZIO</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8848-1114</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Effects of Nonresponse, Measurement, and Coverage Bias in Survey Estimates of Voting</title><author>Brenner, Philip S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3705-7b71f5ee3e0743aa55405fd79ba972aa55a74a8889dc1493751fc6432dac30733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Government &amp; Law</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brenner, Philip S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI &amp; AHCI)</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social science quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brenner, Philip S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Nonresponse, Measurement, and Coverage Bias in Survey Estimates of Voting</atitle><jtitle>Social science quarterly</jtitle><stitle>SOC SCI QUART</stitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>939</spage><epage>954</epage><pages>939-954</pages><issn>0038-4941</issn><eissn>1540-6237</eissn><abstract>Objective The objective is to estimate the relative contributions of nonresponse, coverage, and measurement biases in survey estimates of voting. Methods We survey 3,000 Boston‐area households sampled from an address‐based frame matched, when possible, to telephone numbers. A two‐phase sampling design was used to follow up nonrespondents from phone interviews with personal interviews. All cases were then linked to voting records. Results Nonresponse, coverage, and measurement‐biased survey estimates at varying stages of the study design. Coverage error linked to missing telephone numbers biased estimates that excluded nonphone households. Overall estimates including nonphone households and nonrespondent interviews include 25 percent relative bias equally attributable to measurement and nonresponse. Conclusion Bias in voting measures is not limited to measurement bias. Researchers should also assess the potential for nonresponse and coverage biases.</abstract><cop>HOBOKEN</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/ssqu.12935</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8848-1114</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-4941
ispartof Social science quarterly, 2021-03, Vol.102 (2), p.939-954
issn 0038-4941
1540-6237
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2509226887
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete; Sociological Abstracts; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects Bias
Estimates
Government & Law
Households
Interviews
Measurement
Political Science
Polls & surveys
Responses
Sampling
Social Sciences
Sociology
Voting
title Effects of Nonresponse, Measurement, and Coverage Bias in Survey Estimates of Voting
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T12%3A10%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Nonresponse,%20Measurement,%20and%20Coverage%20Bias%20in%20Survey%20Estimates%20of%20Voting&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20quarterly&rft.au=Brenner,%20Philip%20S.&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=939&rft.epage=954&rft.pages=939-954&rft.issn=0038-4941&rft.eissn=1540-6237&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ssqu.12935&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2509226887%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2509226887&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true