Effects of Nonresponse, Measurement, and Coverage Bias in Survey Estimates of Voting
Objective The objective is to estimate the relative contributions of nonresponse, coverage, and measurement biases in survey estimates of voting. Methods We survey 3,000 Boston‐area households sampled from an address‐based frame matched, when possible, to telephone numbers. A two‐phase sampling desi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social science quarterly 2021-03, Vol.102 (2), p.939-954 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 954 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 939 |
container_title | Social science quarterly |
container_volume | 102 |
creator | Brenner, Philip S. |
description | Objective
The objective is to estimate the relative contributions of nonresponse, coverage, and measurement biases in survey estimates of voting.
Methods
We survey 3,000 Boston‐area households sampled from an address‐based frame matched, when possible, to telephone numbers. A two‐phase sampling design was used to follow up nonrespondents from phone interviews with personal interviews. All cases were then linked to voting records.
Results
Nonresponse, coverage, and measurement‐biased survey estimates at varying stages of the study design. Coverage error linked to missing telephone numbers biased estimates that excluded nonphone households. Overall estimates including nonphone households and nonrespondent interviews include 25 percent relative bias equally attributable to measurement and nonresponse.
Conclusion
Bias in voting measures is not limited to measurement bias. Researchers should also assess the potential for nonresponse and coverage biases. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ssqu.12935 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2509226887</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2509226887</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3705-7b71f5ee3e0743aa55405fd79ba972aa55a74a8889dc1493751fc6432dac30733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9PAjEQxRujiYhe_ARNvCmL7ba73T3qBv8kqDGA101ZpmQJtNB2MXx7C0s8GucyM8nvzbw8hK4p6dNQ985tmj6Nc5acoA5NOInSmIlT1CGEZRHPOT1HF84tCCE85lkHjQdKQeUdNgq_G23BrY120MNvIF1jYQXa97DUM1yYLVg5B_xYS4drjUeN3cIOD5yvV9LD4cSX8bWeX6IzJZcOro69iyZPg3HxEg0_nl-Lh2FUMUGSSEwFVQkAAyI4kzIJfhM1E_lU5iLe71JwmWVZPqsoz5lIqKpSzuKZrBgRjHXRTXt3bc2mAefLhWmsDi_LOCF5HKdZJgJ121KVNc5ZUOXaBsd2V1JS7lMr96mVh9QCfNfC3zA1ylU16Ap-BSG2lKR5moowERro7P90UXvpa6ML02gfpPQorZew-8NSORp9TlpzP6fNj2Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2509226887</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Nonresponse, Measurement, and Coverage Bias in Survey Estimates of Voting</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><creator>Brenner, Philip S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brenner, Philip S.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
The objective is to estimate the relative contributions of nonresponse, coverage, and measurement biases in survey estimates of voting.
Methods
We survey 3,000 Boston‐area households sampled from an address‐based frame matched, when possible, to telephone numbers. A two‐phase sampling design was used to follow up nonrespondents from phone interviews with personal interviews. All cases were then linked to voting records.
Results
Nonresponse, coverage, and measurement‐biased survey estimates at varying stages of the study design. Coverage error linked to missing telephone numbers biased estimates that excluded nonphone households. Overall estimates including nonphone households and nonrespondent interviews include 25 percent relative bias equally attributable to measurement and nonresponse.
Conclusion
Bias in voting measures is not limited to measurement bias. Researchers should also assess the potential for nonresponse and coverage biases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-4941</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6237</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12935</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>HOBOKEN: Wiley</publisher><subject>Bias ; Estimates ; Government & Law ; Households ; Interviews ; Measurement ; Political Science ; Polls & surveys ; Responses ; Sampling ; Social Sciences ; Sociology ; Voting</subject><ispartof>Social science quarterly, 2021-03, Vol.102 (2), p.939-954</ispartof><rights>2021 by the Southwestern Social Science Association</rights><rights>2021 Southwestern Social Science Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>1</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000606966700001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3705-7b71f5ee3e0743aa55405fd79ba972aa55a74a8889dc1493751fc6432dac30733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3705-7b71f5ee3e0743aa55405fd79ba972aa55a74a8889dc1493751fc6432dac30733</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8848-1114</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fssqu.12935$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fssqu.12935$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,33779,39262,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brenner, Philip S.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Nonresponse, Measurement, and Coverage Bias in Survey Estimates of Voting</title><title>Social science quarterly</title><addtitle>SOC SCI QUART</addtitle><description>Objective
The objective is to estimate the relative contributions of nonresponse, coverage, and measurement biases in survey estimates of voting.
Methods
We survey 3,000 Boston‐area households sampled from an address‐based frame matched, when possible, to telephone numbers. A two‐phase sampling design was used to follow up nonrespondents from phone interviews with personal interviews. All cases were then linked to voting records.
Results
Nonresponse, coverage, and measurement‐biased survey estimates at varying stages of the study design. Coverage error linked to missing telephone numbers biased estimates that excluded nonphone households. Overall estimates including nonphone households and nonrespondent interviews include 25 percent relative bias equally attributable to measurement and nonresponse.
Conclusion
Bias in voting measures is not limited to measurement bias. Researchers should also assess the potential for nonresponse and coverage biases.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Government & Law</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>0038-4941</issn><issn>1540-6237</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GIZIO</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE9PAjEQxRujiYhe_ARNvCmL7ba73T3qBv8kqDGA101ZpmQJtNB2MXx7C0s8GucyM8nvzbw8hK4p6dNQ985tmj6Nc5acoA5NOInSmIlT1CGEZRHPOT1HF84tCCE85lkHjQdKQeUdNgq_G23BrY120MNvIF1jYQXa97DUM1yYLVg5B_xYS4drjUeN3cIOD5yvV9LD4cSX8bWeX6IzJZcOro69iyZPg3HxEg0_nl-Lh2FUMUGSSEwFVQkAAyI4kzIJfhM1E_lU5iLe71JwmWVZPqsoz5lIqKpSzuKZrBgRjHXRTXt3bc2mAefLhWmsDi_LOCF5HKdZJgJ121KVNc5ZUOXaBsd2V1JS7lMr96mVh9QCfNfC3zA1ylU16Ap-BSG2lKR5moowERro7P90UXvpa6ML02gfpPQorZew-8NSORp9TlpzP6fNj2Y</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Brenner, Philip S.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>GIZIO</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8848-1114</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Effects of Nonresponse, Measurement, and Coverage Bias in Survey Estimates of Voting</title><author>Brenner, Philip S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3705-7b71f5ee3e0743aa55405fd79ba972aa55a74a8889dc1493751fc6432dac30733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Government & Law</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brenner, Philip S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI & AHCI)</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social science quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brenner, Philip S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Nonresponse, Measurement, and Coverage Bias in Survey Estimates of Voting</atitle><jtitle>Social science quarterly</jtitle><stitle>SOC SCI QUART</stitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>939</spage><epage>954</epage><pages>939-954</pages><issn>0038-4941</issn><eissn>1540-6237</eissn><abstract>Objective
The objective is to estimate the relative contributions of nonresponse, coverage, and measurement biases in survey estimates of voting.
Methods
We survey 3,000 Boston‐area households sampled from an address‐based frame matched, when possible, to telephone numbers. A two‐phase sampling design was used to follow up nonrespondents from phone interviews with personal interviews. All cases were then linked to voting records.
Results
Nonresponse, coverage, and measurement‐biased survey estimates at varying stages of the study design. Coverage error linked to missing telephone numbers biased estimates that excluded nonphone households. Overall estimates including nonphone households and nonrespondent interviews include 25 percent relative bias equally attributable to measurement and nonresponse.
Conclusion
Bias in voting measures is not limited to measurement bias. Researchers should also assess the potential for nonresponse and coverage biases.</abstract><cop>HOBOKEN</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/ssqu.12935</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8848-1114</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0038-4941 |
ispartof | Social science quarterly, 2021-03, Vol.102 (2), p.939-954 |
issn | 0038-4941 1540-6237 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2509226887 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete; Sociological Abstracts; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /> |
subjects | Bias Estimates Government & Law Households Interviews Measurement Political Science Polls & surveys Responses Sampling Social Sciences Sociology Voting |
title | Effects of Nonresponse, Measurement, and Coverage Bias in Survey Estimates of Voting |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T12%3A10%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Nonresponse,%20Measurement,%20and%20Coverage%20Bias%20in%20Survey%20Estimates%20of%20Voting&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20quarterly&rft.au=Brenner,%20Philip%20S.&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=939&rft.epage=954&rft.pages=939-954&rft.issn=0038-4941&rft.eissn=1540-6237&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ssqu.12935&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2509226887%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2509226887&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |