Assessing climate change impacts on streamflow and sediment load in the upstream of the Mekong River basin

Assessments of climate change impacts on streamflow and sediment processes are essential for developing science‐based sustainable watershed management plans. We assessed climate change impacts on streamflow and sediment load in the upstream of the Mekong River Basin, as a case study. Future climate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of climatology 2021-04, Vol.41 (5), p.3391-3410
Hauptverfasser: Ma, Di, Qian, Budong, Gu, Haiting, Sun, Zhilin, Xu, Yue‐Ping
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3410
container_issue 5
container_start_page 3391
container_title International journal of climatology
container_volume 41
creator Ma, Di
Qian, Budong
Gu, Haiting
Sun, Zhilin
Xu, Yue‐Ping
description Assessments of climate change impacts on streamflow and sediment processes are essential for developing science‐based sustainable watershed management plans. We assessed climate change impacts on streamflow and sediment load in the upstream of the Mekong River Basin, as a case study. Future climate scenarios including an ensemble‐mean climate scenario (EnM scenario) were generated based on 20 GCMs in CMIP5, using a stochastic weather generator (LARS‐WG) coupled with a distribution‐free shuffle procedure. The SWAT model was applied to simulate changes in streamflow and sediment load for the future period 2071–2100 under RCP8.5 with respect to the baseline period 1971–2000. Results show that mean monthly maximum and minimum temperature were projected to increase by all the 20 GCMs, with an ensemble‐mean increase of 4.6–5.7°C and 4.2–5.8°C across the 12 months, respectively. An increase in mean annual precipitation (3.4–55.8%) and streamflow (1.0–72.7%) was also projected by all GCMs. However, projected changes in sediment load were not consistent. One half of the GCMs projected an increase (5.2–53.2%) in annual sediment load while the other half projected a decrease (5.1%–43.2%). In each month, at least three‐quarters of the GCMs projected an increase in monthly streamflow. For monthly sediment load, an increase in May to July was projected by over half of the GCMs, while a decrease was projected by a majority of the GCMs for other months. Our results indicate large uncertainties in streamflow and sediment projections under climate change, demonstrating the need to use multi‐model ensembles in climate change impact studies. Moreover, it was found that the streamflow and sediment loads simulated using the EnM scenario were often close to the ensemble means simulated using the 20 GCMs, which implies that the single EnM scenario has the potential of effectively and efficiently estimating the ensemble means of projections in a multi‐model ensemble. Future temperature, precipitation and streamflow are projected to increase but uncertainties are large. Projected changes in sediment load are not consistent and more uncertain than streamflow. A single ensemble‐mean climate scenario generated using a stochastic approach has the potential of effectively estimating ensemble means of the simulated streamflow and sediment load in a multi‐GCM ensemble.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/joc.7025
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2509226580</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2509226580</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-7f4ef6c8ec2f38505d64da38cd3ea217dc36183f6f5a066aeecf5fe3cd0ee2233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10N9LwzAQB_AgCs4p-CcEfPGl85Isafo4hj-ZDESfS0wvW2fb1KRz7L-3W3316Tj43Pe4I-SawYQB8LuNt5MUuDwhIwZZmgBofUpGoLMs0VOmz8lFjBsAyDKmRmQzixFjLJsVtVVZmw6pXZtmhbSsW2O7SH1DYxfQ1K7yO2qagkYsyhqbjlbeFLRsaLdGum0HRb079q_45fvQt_IHA_00_YZLcuZMFfHqr47Jx8P9-_wpWSwfn-ezRWJ5JmSSuik6ZTVa7oSWIAs1LYzQthBoOEsLKxTTwiknDShlEK2TDoUtAJFzIcbkZshtg__eYuzyjd-Gpl-ZcwkZ50pq6NXtoGzwMQZ0eRv6-8M-Z5AfPtlP2fzwyZ4mA92VFe7_dfnLcn70v761dgo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2509226580</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing climate change impacts on streamflow and sediment load in the upstream of the Mekong River basin</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Ma, Di ; Qian, Budong ; Gu, Haiting ; Sun, Zhilin ; Xu, Yue‐Ping</creator><creatorcontrib>Ma, Di ; Qian, Budong ; Gu, Haiting ; Sun, Zhilin ; Xu, Yue‐Ping</creatorcontrib><description>Assessments of climate change impacts on streamflow and sediment processes are essential for developing science‐based sustainable watershed management plans. We assessed climate change impacts on streamflow and sediment load in the upstream of the Mekong River Basin, as a case study. Future climate scenarios including an ensemble‐mean climate scenario (EnM scenario) were generated based on 20 GCMs in CMIP5, using a stochastic weather generator (LARS‐WG) coupled with a distribution‐free shuffle procedure. The SWAT model was applied to simulate changes in streamflow and sediment load for the future period 2071–2100 under RCP8.5 with respect to the baseline period 1971–2000. Results show that mean monthly maximum and minimum temperature were projected to increase by all the 20 GCMs, with an ensemble‐mean increase of 4.6–5.7°C and 4.2–5.8°C across the 12 months, respectively. An increase in mean annual precipitation (3.4–55.8%) and streamflow (1.0–72.7%) was also projected by all GCMs. However, projected changes in sediment load were not consistent. One half of the GCMs projected an increase (5.2–53.2%) in annual sediment load while the other half projected a decrease (5.1%–43.2%). In each month, at least three‐quarters of the GCMs projected an increase in monthly streamflow. For monthly sediment load, an increase in May to July was projected by over half of the GCMs, while a decrease was projected by a majority of the GCMs for other months. Our results indicate large uncertainties in streamflow and sediment projections under climate change, demonstrating the need to use multi‐model ensembles in climate change impact studies. Moreover, it was found that the streamflow and sediment loads simulated using the EnM scenario were often close to the ensemble means simulated using the 20 GCMs, which implies that the single EnM scenario has the potential of effectively and efficiently estimating the ensemble means of projections in a multi‐model ensemble. Future temperature, precipitation and streamflow are projected to increase but uncertainties are large. Projected changes in sediment load are not consistent and more uncertain than streamflow. A single ensemble‐mean climate scenario generated using a stochastic approach has the potential of effectively estimating ensemble means of the simulated streamflow and sediment load in a multi‐GCM ensemble.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-8418</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0088</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/joc.7025</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Annual precipitation ; Climate change ; Climate models ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental impact ; Future climates ; GCMs ; Load ; Mean annual precipitation ; Minimum temperatures ; Monthly ; projection ; River basins ; Rivers ; Sediment ; Sediment load ; Sediments ; Simulation ; Stochasticity ; Stream discharge ; Stream flow ; streamflow ; SWAT model ; Upstream ; Watershed management ; Weather</subject><ispartof>International journal of climatology, 2021-04, Vol.41 (5), p.3391-3410</ispartof><rights>2021 Royal Meteorological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-7f4ef6c8ec2f38505d64da38cd3ea217dc36183f6f5a066aeecf5fe3cd0ee2233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-7f4ef6c8ec2f38505d64da38cd3ea217dc36183f6f5a066aeecf5fe3cd0ee2233</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6534-4504</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjoc.7025$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjoc.7025$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ma, Di</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Budong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Haiting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Zhilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yue‐Ping</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing climate change impacts on streamflow and sediment load in the upstream of the Mekong River basin</title><title>International journal of climatology</title><description>Assessments of climate change impacts on streamflow and sediment processes are essential for developing science‐based sustainable watershed management plans. We assessed climate change impacts on streamflow and sediment load in the upstream of the Mekong River Basin, as a case study. Future climate scenarios including an ensemble‐mean climate scenario (EnM scenario) were generated based on 20 GCMs in CMIP5, using a stochastic weather generator (LARS‐WG) coupled with a distribution‐free shuffle procedure. The SWAT model was applied to simulate changes in streamflow and sediment load for the future period 2071–2100 under RCP8.5 with respect to the baseline period 1971–2000. Results show that mean monthly maximum and minimum temperature were projected to increase by all the 20 GCMs, with an ensemble‐mean increase of 4.6–5.7°C and 4.2–5.8°C across the 12 months, respectively. An increase in mean annual precipitation (3.4–55.8%) and streamflow (1.0–72.7%) was also projected by all GCMs. However, projected changes in sediment load were not consistent. One half of the GCMs projected an increase (5.2–53.2%) in annual sediment load while the other half projected a decrease (5.1%–43.2%). In each month, at least three‐quarters of the GCMs projected an increase in monthly streamflow. For monthly sediment load, an increase in May to July was projected by over half of the GCMs, while a decrease was projected by a majority of the GCMs for other months. Our results indicate large uncertainties in streamflow and sediment projections under climate change, demonstrating the need to use multi‐model ensembles in climate change impact studies. Moreover, it was found that the streamflow and sediment loads simulated using the EnM scenario were often close to the ensemble means simulated using the 20 GCMs, which implies that the single EnM scenario has the potential of effectively and efficiently estimating the ensemble means of projections in a multi‐model ensemble. Future temperature, precipitation and streamflow are projected to increase but uncertainties are large. Projected changes in sediment load are not consistent and more uncertain than streamflow. A single ensemble‐mean climate scenario generated using a stochastic approach has the potential of effectively estimating ensemble means of the simulated streamflow and sediment load in a multi‐GCM ensemble.</description><subject>Annual precipitation</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Future climates</subject><subject>GCMs</subject><subject>Load</subject><subject>Mean annual precipitation</subject><subject>Minimum temperatures</subject><subject>Monthly</subject><subject>projection</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Sediment load</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Stochasticity</subject><subject>Stream discharge</subject><subject>Stream flow</subject><subject>streamflow</subject><subject>SWAT model</subject><subject>Upstream</subject><subject>Watershed management</subject><subject>Weather</subject><issn>0899-8418</issn><issn>1097-0088</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10N9LwzAQB_AgCs4p-CcEfPGl85Isafo4hj-ZDESfS0wvW2fb1KRz7L-3W3316Tj43Pe4I-SawYQB8LuNt5MUuDwhIwZZmgBofUpGoLMs0VOmz8lFjBsAyDKmRmQzixFjLJsVtVVZmw6pXZtmhbSsW2O7SH1DYxfQ1K7yO2qagkYsyhqbjlbeFLRsaLdGum0HRb079q_45fvQt_IHA_00_YZLcuZMFfHqr47Jx8P9-_wpWSwfn-ezRWJ5JmSSuik6ZTVa7oSWIAs1LYzQthBoOEsLKxTTwiknDShlEK2TDoUtAJFzIcbkZshtg__eYuzyjd-Gpl-ZcwkZ50pq6NXtoGzwMQZ0eRv6-8M-Z5AfPtlP2fzwyZ4mA92VFe7_dfnLcn70v761dgo</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Ma, Di</creator><creator>Qian, Budong</creator><creator>Gu, Haiting</creator><creator>Sun, Zhilin</creator><creator>Xu, Yue‐Ping</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6534-4504</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Assessing climate change impacts on streamflow and sediment load in the upstream of the Mekong River basin</title><author>Ma, Di ; Qian, Budong ; Gu, Haiting ; Sun, Zhilin ; Xu, Yue‐Ping</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2935-7f4ef6c8ec2f38505d64da38cd3ea217dc36183f6f5a066aeecf5fe3cd0ee2233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Annual precipitation</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Future climates</topic><topic>GCMs</topic><topic>Load</topic><topic>Mean annual precipitation</topic><topic>Minimum temperatures</topic><topic>Monthly</topic><topic>projection</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Sediment load</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Stochasticity</topic><topic>Stream discharge</topic><topic>Stream flow</topic><topic>streamflow</topic><topic>SWAT model</topic><topic>Upstream</topic><topic>Watershed management</topic><topic>Weather</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ma, Di</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Budong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Haiting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Zhilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yue‐Ping</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal of climatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ma, Di</au><au>Qian, Budong</au><au>Gu, Haiting</au><au>Sun, Zhilin</au><au>Xu, Yue‐Ping</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing climate change impacts on streamflow and sediment load in the upstream of the Mekong River basin</atitle><jtitle>International journal of climatology</jtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>3391</spage><epage>3410</epage><pages>3391-3410</pages><issn>0899-8418</issn><eissn>1097-0088</eissn><abstract>Assessments of climate change impacts on streamflow and sediment processes are essential for developing science‐based sustainable watershed management plans. We assessed climate change impacts on streamflow and sediment load in the upstream of the Mekong River Basin, as a case study. Future climate scenarios including an ensemble‐mean climate scenario (EnM scenario) were generated based on 20 GCMs in CMIP5, using a stochastic weather generator (LARS‐WG) coupled with a distribution‐free shuffle procedure. The SWAT model was applied to simulate changes in streamflow and sediment load for the future period 2071–2100 under RCP8.5 with respect to the baseline period 1971–2000. Results show that mean monthly maximum and minimum temperature were projected to increase by all the 20 GCMs, with an ensemble‐mean increase of 4.6–5.7°C and 4.2–5.8°C across the 12 months, respectively. An increase in mean annual precipitation (3.4–55.8%) and streamflow (1.0–72.7%) was also projected by all GCMs. However, projected changes in sediment load were not consistent. One half of the GCMs projected an increase (5.2–53.2%) in annual sediment load while the other half projected a decrease (5.1%–43.2%). In each month, at least three‐quarters of the GCMs projected an increase in monthly streamflow. For monthly sediment load, an increase in May to July was projected by over half of the GCMs, while a decrease was projected by a majority of the GCMs for other months. Our results indicate large uncertainties in streamflow and sediment projections under climate change, demonstrating the need to use multi‐model ensembles in climate change impact studies. Moreover, it was found that the streamflow and sediment loads simulated using the EnM scenario were often close to the ensemble means simulated using the 20 GCMs, which implies that the single EnM scenario has the potential of effectively and efficiently estimating the ensemble means of projections in a multi‐model ensemble. Future temperature, precipitation and streamflow are projected to increase but uncertainties are large. Projected changes in sediment load are not consistent and more uncertain than streamflow. A single ensemble‐mean climate scenario generated using a stochastic approach has the potential of effectively estimating ensemble means of the simulated streamflow and sediment load in a multi‐GCM ensemble.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/joc.7025</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6534-4504</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-8418
ispartof International journal of climatology, 2021-04, Vol.41 (5), p.3391-3410
issn 0899-8418
1097-0088
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2509226580
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Annual precipitation
Climate change
Climate models
Environmental assessment
Environmental impact
Future climates
GCMs
Load
Mean annual precipitation
Minimum temperatures
Monthly
projection
River basins
Rivers
Sediment
Sediment load
Sediments
Simulation
Stochasticity
Stream discharge
Stream flow
streamflow
SWAT model
Upstream
Watershed management
Weather
title Assessing climate change impacts on streamflow and sediment load in the upstream of the Mekong River basin
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T09%3A12%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20climate%20change%20impacts%20on%20streamflow%20and%20sediment%20load%20in%20the%20upstream%20of%20the%20Mekong%20River%20basin&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20climatology&rft.au=Ma,%20Di&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=3391&rft.epage=3410&rft.pages=3391-3410&rft.issn=0899-8418&rft.eissn=1097-0088&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/joc.7025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2509226580%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2509226580&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true