Two‐Dimensional Velocity of the Magnetic Structure Observed on July 11, 2017 by the Magnetospheric Multiscale Spacecraft
In order to determine particle velocities and electric field in the frame of the magnetic structure, one first needs to determine the velocity of the magnetic structure in the frame of the spacecraft observations. Here, we demonstrate two methods to determine a two‐dimensional magnetic structure vel...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Space physics 2021-03, Vol.126 (3), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Space physics |
container_volume | 126 |
creator | Denton, Richard E. Torbert, Roy B. Hasegawa, Hiroshi Genestreti, Kevin J. Manuzzo, Roberto Belmont, Gerard Rezeau, Laurence Califano, Francesco Nakamura, Rumi Egedal, Jan Le Contel, Olivier Burch, James L. Gershman, Daniel J. Dors, Ivan Argall, Matthew R. Russell, Christopher T. Strangeway, Robert J. Giles, Barbara L. |
description | In order to determine particle velocities and electric field in the frame of the magnetic structure, one first needs to determine the velocity of the magnetic structure in the frame of the spacecraft observations. Here, we demonstrate two methods to determine a two‐dimensional magnetic structure velocity for the magnetic reconnection event observed in the magnetotail by the Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) spacecraft on July 11, 2017, Spatio‐Temporal Difference (STD) and the recently developed polynomial reconstruction method. Both of these methods use the magnetic field measurements; the reconstruction technique also uses the current density measured by the particle instrument. We find rough agreement between the results of our methods and with other velocity determinations previously published. We also explain a number of features of STD and show that the polynomial reconstruction technique is most likely to be valid within a distance of 2 spacecraft spacings from the centroid of the MMS spacecraft. Both of these methods are susceptible to contamination by magnetometer calibration errors.
Key Points
We demonstrate use of Spatio‐Temporal Difference (STD) and polynomial reconstruction to determine the 2‐D velocity of a magnetic structure
Velocities from STD and reconstruction roughly agree with each other and with estimates from other references for the July 11, 2017 event
Polynomial reconstruction is most likely to be accurate within a distance of 2 spacecraft spacings from the centroid of the Magnetospheric Multiscale spacecraft |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2020JA028705 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2509226176</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2509226176</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4116-9628e7397c6779d9c1373cbc4255c5602dd2d00a344fb4d094f19e47d241ed373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kNFKwzAUhosoOHR3PkDA202TNE2ayzF1OjYGbnpb2vTUdXRNTVJHvfIRfEafxMgUduXhwDkcvv-H8wfBBcFXBFN5TTHF0xGmscDRUdCjhMuhZJge_-1hjE-DvrUb7Cv2JxL1gvfVTn99fN6UW6htqeu0Qs9QaVW6DukCuTWgefpSgysVWjrTKtcaQIvMgnmDHOkaTduqQ4QMEMVEoKw70GjbrMF45bytXGlVWgFaNqkCZdLCnQcnRVpZ6P_Os-Dp7nY1vh_OFpOH8Wg2VIwQPpScxiBCKRQXQuZSkVCEKlOMRpGKOKZ5TnOM05CxImM5lqwgEpjIKSOQe_YsuNz7Nka_tmBdstGt8Z_ahEZYUsqJ4J4a7ClltLUGiqQx5TY1XUJw8hNwchiwx8M9visr6P5lk-nkcRTx0Pc3HxB7ig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2509226176</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two‐Dimensional Velocity of the Magnetic Structure Observed on July 11, 2017 by the Magnetospheric Multiscale Spacecraft</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><creator>Denton, Richard E. ; Torbert, Roy B. ; Hasegawa, Hiroshi ; Genestreti, Kevin J. ; Manuzzo, Roberto ; Belmont, Gerard ; Rezeau, Laurence ; Califano, Francesco ; Nakamura, Rumi ; Egedal, Jan ; Le Contel, Olivier ; Burch, James L. ; Gershman, Daniel J. ; Dors, Ivan ; Argall, Matthew R. ; Russell, Christopher T. ; Strangeway, Robert J. ; Giles, Barbara L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Denton, Richard E. ; Torbert, Roy B. ; Hasegawa, Hiroshi ; Genestreti, Kevin J. ; Manuzzo, Roberto ; Belmont, Gerard ; Rezeau, Laurence ; Califano, Francesco ; Nakamura, Rumi ; Egedal, Jan ; Le Contel, Olivier ; Burch, James L. ; Gershman, Daniel J. ; Dors, Ivan ; Argall, Matthew R. ; Russell, Christopher T. ; Strangeway, Robert J. ; Giles, Barbara L.</creatorcontrib><description>In order to determine particle velocities and electric field in the frame of the magnetic structure, one first needs to determine the velocity of the magnetic structure in the frame of the spacecraft observations. Here, we demonstrate two methods to determine a two‐dimensional magnetic structure velocity for the magnetic reconnection event observed in the magnetotail by the Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) spacecraft on July 11, 2017, Spatio‐Temporal Difference (STD) and the recently developed polynomial reconstruction method. Both of these methods use the magnetic field measurements; the reconstruction technique also uses the current density measured by the particle instrument. We find rough agreement between the results of our methods and with other velocity determinations previously published. We also explain a number of features of STD and show that the polynomial reconstruction technique is most likely to be valid within a distance of 2 spacecraft spacings from the centroid of the MMS spacecraft. Both of these methods are susceptible to contamination by magnetometer calibration errors.
Key Points
We demonstrate use of Spatio‐Temporal Difference (STD) and polynomial reconstruction to determine the 2‐D velocity of a magnetic structure
Velocities from STD and reconstruction roughly agree with each other and with estimates from other references for the July 11, 2017 event
Polynomial reconstruction is most likely to be accurate within a distance of 2 spacecraft spacings from the centroid of the Magnetospheric Multiscale spacecraft</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2020JA028705</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Centroids ; Electric fields ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetic reconnection ; Magnetic structure ; magnetic structure velocity ; Magnetometers ; Magnetospheres ; Magnetospheric Multiscale ; Magnetotails ; MMS ; multi‐spacecraft techniques ; polynomial reconstruction ; Polynomials ; Reconstruction ; Spacecraft ; Spacecraft contamination ; spatio‐temporal difference ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2021-03, Vol.126 (3), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2021. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4116-9628e7397c6779d9c1373cbc4255c5602dd2d00a344fb4d094f19e47d241ed373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4116-9628e7397c6779d9c1373cbc4255c5602dd2d00a344fb4d094f19e47d241ed373</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0452-8403 ; 0000-0002-7040-5519 ; 0000-0001-9839-1828 ; 0000-0001-8054-825X ; 0000-0003-1639-8298 ; 0000-0002-9626-4371 ; 0000-0002-6398-337X ; 0000-0002-2620-9211 ; 0000-0002-8398-496X ; 0000-0001-7753-1529 ; 0000-0001-6890-2973 ; 0000-0002-8544-0501 ; 0000-0002-1172-021X ; 0000-0003-2713-7966 ; 0000-0003-1304-4769 ; 0000-0001-6315-1613 ; 0000-0001-7188-8690</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2020JA028705$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2020JA028705$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Denton, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torbert, Roy B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genestreti, Kevin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manuzzo, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belmont, Gerard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezeau, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Califano, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Rumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egedal, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Contel, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burch, James L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gershman, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dors, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argall, Matthew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Christopher T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strangeway, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giles, Barbara L.</creatorcontrib><title>Two‐Dimensional Velocity of the Magnetic Structure Observed on July 11, 2017 by the Magnetospheric Multiscale Spacecraft</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</title><description>In order to determine particle velocities and electric field in the frame of the magnetic structure, one first needs to determine the velocity of the magnetic structure in the frame of the spacecraft observations. Here, we demonstrate two methods to determine a two‐dimensional magnetic structure velocity for the magnetic reconnection event observed in the magnetotail by the Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) spacecraft on July 11, 2017, Spatio‐Temporal Difference (STD) and the recently developed polynomial reconstruction method. Both of these methods use the magnetic field measurements; the reconstruction technique also uses the current density measured by the particle instrument. We find rough agreement between the results of our methods and with other velocity determinations previously published. We also explain a number of features of STD and show that the polynomial reconstruction technique is most likely to be valid within a distance of 2 spacecraft spacings from the centroid of the MMS spacecraft. Both of these methods are susceptible to contamination by magnetometer calibration errors.
Key Points
We demonstrate use of Spatio‐Temporal Difference (STD) and polynomial reconstruction to determine the 2‐D velocity of a magnetic structure
Velocities from STD and reconstruction roughly agree with each other and with estimates from other references for the July 11, 2017 event
Polynomial reconstruction is most likely to be accurate within a distance of 2 spacecraft spacings from the centroid of the Magnetospheric Multiscale spacecraft</description><subject>Centroids</subject><subject>Electric fields</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetic reconnection</subject><subject>Magnetic structure</subject><subject>magnetic structure velocity</subject><subject>Magnetometers</subject><subject>Magnetospheres</subject><subject>Magnetospheric Multiscale</subject><subject>Magnetotails</subject><subject>MMS</subject><subject>multi‐spacecraft techniques</subject><subject>polynomial reconstruction</subject><subject>Polynomials</subject><subject>Reconstruction</subject><subject>Spacecraft</subject><subject>Spacecraft contamination</subject><subject>spatio‐temporal difference</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>2169-9380</issn><issn>2169-9402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kNFKwzAUhosoOHR3PkDA202TNE2ayzF1OjYGbnpb2vTUdXRNTVJHvfIRfEafxMgUduXhwDkcvv-H8wfBBcFXBFN5TTHF0xGmscDRUdCjhMuhZJge_-1hjE-DvrUb7Cv2JxL1gvfVTn99fN6UW6htqeu0Qs9QaVW6DukCuTWgefpSgysVWjrTKtcaQIvMgnmDHOkaTduqQ4QMEMVEoKw70GjbrMF45bytXGlVWgFaNqkCZdLCnQcnRVpZ6P_Os-Dp7nY1vh_OFpOH8Wg2VIwQPpScxiBCKRQXQuZSkVCEKlOMRpGKOKZ5TnOM05CxImM5lqwgEpjIKSOQe_YsuNz7Nka_tmBdstGt8Z_ahEZYUsqJ4J4a7ClltLUGiqQx5TY1XUJw8hNwchiwx8M9visr6P5lk-nkcRTx0Pc3HxB7ig</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Denton, Richard E.</creator><creator>Torbert, Roy B.</creator><creator>Hasegawa, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Genestreti, Kevin J.</creator><creator>Manuzzo, Roberto</creator><creator>Belmont, Gerard</creator><creator>Rezeau, Laurence</creator><creator>Califano, Francesco</creator><creator>Nakamura, Rumi</creator><creator>Egedal, Jan</creator><creator>Le Contel, Olivier</creator><creator>Burch, James L.</creator><creator>Gershman, Daniel J.</creator><creator>Dors, Ivan</creator><creator>Argall, Matthew R.</creator><creator>Russell, Christopher T.</creator><creator>Strangeway, Robert J.</creator><creator>Giles, Barbara L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0452-8403</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7040-5519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9839-1828</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8054-825X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1639-8298</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9626-4371</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6398-337X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2620-9211</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8398-496X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7753-1529</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6890-2973</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8544-0501</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1172-021X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2713-7966</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1304-4769</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6315-1613</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7188-8690</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Two‐Dimensional Velocity of the Magnetic Structure Observed on July 11, 2017 by the Magnetospheric Multiscale Spacecraft</title><author>Denton, Richard E. ; Torbert, Roy B. ; Hasegawa, Hiroshi ; Genestreti, Kevin J. ; Manuzzo, Roberto ; Belmont, Gerard ; Rezeau, Laurence ; Califano, Francesco ; Nakamura, Rumi ; Egedal, Jan ; Le Contel, Olivier ; Burch, James L. ; Gershman, Daniel J. ; Dors, Ivan ; Argall, Matthew R. ; Russell, Christopher T. ; Strangeway, Robert J. ; Giles, Barbara L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4116-9628e7397c6779d9c1373cbc4255c5602dd2d00a344fb4d094f19e47d241ed373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Centroids</topic><topic>Electric fields</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetic reconnection</topic><topic>Magnetic structure</topic><topic>magnetic structure velocity</topic><topic>Magnetometers</topic><topic>Magnetospheres</topic><topic>Magnetospheric Multiscale</topic><topic>Magnetotails</topic><topic>MMS</topic><topic>multi‐spacecraft techniques</topic><topic>polynomial reconstruction</topic><topic>Polynomials</topic><topic>Reconstruction</topic><topic>Spacecraft</topic><topic>Spacecraft contamination</topic><topic>spatio‐temporal difference</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Denton, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torbert, Roy B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasegawa, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genestreti, Kevin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manuzzo, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belmont, Gerard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezeau, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Califano, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Rumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egedal, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Contel, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burch, James L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gershman, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dors, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argall, Matthew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Christopher T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strangeway, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giles, Barbara L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Denton, Richard E.</au><au>Torbert, Roy B.</au><au>Hasegawa, Hiroshi</au><au>Genestreti, Kevin J.</au><au>Manuzzo, Roberto</au><au>Belmont, Gerard</au><au>Rezeau, Laurence</au><au>Califano, Francesco</au><au>Nakamura, Rumi</au><au>Egedal, Jan</au><au>Le Contel, Olivier</au><au>Burch, James L.</au><au>Gershman, Daniel J.</au><au>Dors, Ivan</au><au>Argall, Matthew R.</au><au>Russell, Christopher T.</au><au>Strangeway, Robert J.</au><au>Giles, Barbara L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Two‐Dimensional Velocity of the Magnetic Structure Observed on July 11, 2017 by the Magnetospheric Multiscale Spacecraft</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>3</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-9380</issn><eissn>2169-9402</eissn><abstract>In order to determine particle velocities and electric field in the frame of the magnetic structure, one first needs to determine the velocity of the magnetic structure in the frame of the spacecraft observations. Here, we demonstrate two methods to determine a two‐dimensional magnetic structure velocity for the magnetic reconnection event observed in the magnetotail by the Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) spacecraft on July 11, 2017, Spatio‐Temporal Difference (STD) and the recently developed polynomial reconstruction method. Both of these methods use the magnetic field measurements; the reconstruction technique also uses the current density measured by the particle instrument. We find rough agreement between the results of our methods and with other velocity determinations previously published. We also explain a number of features of STD and show that the polynomial reconstruction technique is most likely to be valid within a distance of 2 spacecraft spacings from the centroid of the MMS spacecraft. Both of these methods are susceptible to contamination by magnetometer calibration errors.
Key Points
We demonstrate use of Spatio‐Temporal Difference (STD) and polynomial reconstruction to determine the 2‐D velocity of a magnetic structure
Velocities from STD and reconstruction roughly agree with each other and with estimates from other references for the July 11, 2017 event
Polynomial reconstruction is most likely to be accurate within a distance of 2 spacecraft spacings from the centroid of the Magnetospheric Multiscale spacecraft</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2020JA028705</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0452-8403</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7040-5519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9839-1828</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8054-825X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1639-8298</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9626-4371</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6398-337X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2620-9211</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8398-496X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7753-1529</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6890-2973</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8544-0501</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1172-021X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2713-7966</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1304-4769</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6315-1613</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7188-8690</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-9380 |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2021-03, Vol.126 (3), p.n/a |
issn | 2169-9380 2169-9402 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2509226176 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content |
subjects | Centroids Electric fields Magnetic fields Magnetic reconnection Magnetic structure magnetic structure velocity Magnetometers Magnetospheres Magnetospheric Multiscale Magnetotails MMS multi‐spacecraft techniques polynomial reconstruction Polynomials Reconstruction Spacecraft Spacecraft contamination spatio‐temporal difference Velocity |
title | Two‐Dimensional Velocity of the Magnetic Structure Observed on July 11, 2017 by the Magnetospheric Multiscale Spacecraft |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T01%3A14%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two%E2%80%90Dimensional%20Velocity%20of%20the%20Magnetic%20Structure%20Observed%20on%20July%2011,%202017%20by%20the%20Magnetospheric%20Multiscale%20Spacecraft&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Space%20physics&rft.au=Denton,%20Richard%20E.&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=3&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-9380&rft.eissn=2169-9402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2020JA028705&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2509226176%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2509226176&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |