Quinoline‐Proline, Triazole Hybrids: Design, Synthesis, Antituberculosis, Molecular Docking, and ADMET Studies
A series of novel quinoline‐proline hybrids (11a‐g) and quinoline‐proline‐1,2,3‐triazole hybrids (12‐14) were synthesized by click chemistry based on molecular hybridization concept and were characterized by NMR, mass spectrometry, and elemental analysis. All the titled target compounds were tested...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of heterocyclic chemistry 2021-04, Vol.58 (4), p.952-968 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 968 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 952 |
container_title | Journal of heterocyclic chemistry |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Ganesan, Moorthiamma Sarathy Raja, Kamatchi Kanmani Murugesan, Sankaranarayanan Karankumar, Banoth Faheem, Faheem Thirunavukkarasu, Sappanimuthu Shetye, Gauri Ma, Rui Franzblau, Scott G. Wan, Baojie Rajagopal, Gurusamy |
description | A series of novel quinoline‐proline hybrids (11a‐g) and quinoline‐proline‐1,2,3‐triazole hybrids (12‐14) were synthesized by click chemistry based on molecular hybridization concept and were characterized by NMR, mass spectrometry, and elemental analysis. All the titled target compounds were tested for antitubercular activity by MABA and LORA methods by in vitro. Interestingly, two compounds (2R,4S)‐1‐((2‐cyclopropyl‐4‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐quinolin‐3‐yl)‐methyl)‐4‐(4‐nitrobenzamido)‐N‐phenylpyrrolidine‐2‐carboxamide (11b) and (2R,4S)‐1‐((2‐cyclopropyl‐4‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐quinolin‐3‐yl)‐methyl)‐4‐(4‐fluorobenzamido)‐N‐phenylpyrrolidine‐2‐carboxamide (11c) exhibited significant activity against the tested Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv strain. Further, the cytotoxicity (CC50) profile of the titled compounds against the Vero cell was performed and discussed. A molecular docking study of the hit compounds (11b and 11c) was also performed to find their putative binding interaction with the active site of the target proteins. Finally, in silico ADMET properties were also predicted for all the synthesized molecules to evaluate their drug‐likeness behavior. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jhet.4229 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2509223082</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2509223082</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-51aa15b898a9b1bd0226c7dc15795bcb14b3d8df6ff6b6717aa63bf3fbaa12183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kN1OwjAUxxujiYhe-AZNvDLZYG3ZR70jgKKBqGEm3jXt1kFxdtBuMfPKR_AZfRILeOvV-fr9zzn5A3CJgh4KAtxfr2TdG2BMj0AH0QHxQ0TJMei4GfZRiF9PwZm1a1ciEscdsHlulK5KpeXP1_eT2WceTI3in1Up4bQVRuX2Bo6lVUvtwUWr65XLrQeHulZ1I6TJmrLad-ZO4gpu4LjK3pReepDrHA7H80kKF3WTK2nPwUnBSysv_mIXvNxO0tHUnz3e3Y-GMz_DNKbubc5RKBKacCqQyN37URbnGQpjGopMoIEgeZIXUVFEIopRzHlEREEK4XQYJaQLrg57N6baNtLWbF01RruTDIcBxZgECXbU9YHKTGWtkQXbGPXOTctQwHaGsp2hbGeoY_sH9kOVsv0fZA_TSbpX_AJQ7Hmt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2509223082</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quinoline‐Proline, Triazole Hybrids: Design, Synthesis, Antituberculosis, Molecular Docking, and ADMET Studies</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Ganesan, Moorthiamma Sarathy ; Raja, Kamatchi Kanmani ; Murugesan, Sankaranarayanan ; Karankumar, Banoth ; Faheem, Faheem ; Thirunavukkarasu, Sappanimuthu ; Shetye, Gauri ; Ma, Rui ; Franzblau, Scott G. ; Wan, Baojie ; Rajagopal, Gurusamy</creator><creatorcontrib>Ganesan, Moorthiamma Sarathy ; Raja, Kamatchi Kanmani ; Murugesan, Sankaranarayanan ; Karankumar, Banoth ; Faheem, Faheem ; Thirunavukkarasu, Sappanimuthu ; Shetye, Gauri ; Ma, Rui ; Franzblau, Scott G. ; Wan, Baojie ; Rajagopal, Gurusamy</creatorcontrib><description>A series of novel quinoline‐proline hybrids (11a‐g) and quinoline‐proline‐1,2,3‐triazole hybrids (12‐14) were synthesized by click chemistry based on molecular hybridization concept and were characterized by NMR, mass spectrometry, and elemental analysis. All the titled target compounds were tested for antitubercular activity by MABA and LORA methods by in vitro. Interestingly, two compounds (2R,4S)‐1‐((2‐cyclopropyl‐4‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐quinolin‐3‐yl)‐methyl)‐4‐(4‐nitrobenzamido)‐N‐phenylpyrrolidine‐2‐carboxamide (11b) and (2R,4S)‐1‐((2‐cyclopropyl‐4‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐quinolin‐3‐yl)‐methyl)‐4‐(4‐fluorobenzamido)‐N‐phenylpyrrolidine‐2‐carboxamide (11c) exhibited significant activity against the tested Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv strain. Further, the cytotoxicity (CC50) profile of the titled compounds against the Vero cell was performed and discussed. A molecular docking study of the hit compounds (11b and 11c) was also performed to find their putative binding interaction with the active site of the target proteins. Finally, in silico ADMET properties were also predicted for all the synthesized molecules to evaluate their drug‐likeness behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-152X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5193</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jhet.4229</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Chemical synthesis ; In vitro methods and tests ; Mass spectrometry ; Molecular docking ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Organic compounds ; Proline ; Quinoline ; Toxicity ; Triazoles ; Tuberculosis</subject><ispartof>Journal of heterocyclic chemistry, 2021-04, Vol.58 (4), p.952-968</ispartof><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-51aa15b898a9b1bd0226c7dc15795bcb14b3d8df6ff6b6717aa63bf3fbaa12183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-51aa15b898a9b1bd0226c7dc15795bcb14b3d8df6ff6b6717aa63bf3fbaa12183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjhet.4229$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjhet.4229$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ganesan, Moorthiamma Sarathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raja, Kamatchi Kanmani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murugesan, Sankaranarayanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karankumar, Banoth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faheem, Faheem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thirunavukkarasu, Sappanimuthu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shetye, Gauri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franzblau, Scott G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Baojie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajagopal, Gurusamy</creatorcontrib><title>Quinoline‐Proline, Triazole Hybrids: Design, Synthesis, Antituberculosis, Molecular Docking, and ADMET Studies</title><title>Journal of heterocyclic chemistry</title><description>A series of novel quinoline‐proline hybrids (11a‐g) and quinoline‐proline‐1,2,3‐triazole hybrids (12‐14) were synthesized by click chemistry based on molecular hybridization concept and were characterized by NMR, mass spectrometry, and elemental analysis. All the titled target compounds were tested for antitubercular activity by MABA and LORA methods by in vitro. Interestingly, two compounds (2R,4S)‐1‐((2‐cyclopropyl‐4‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐quinolin‐3‐yl)‐methyl)‐4‐(4‐nitrobenzamido)‐N‐phenylpyrrolidine‐2‐carboxamide (11b) and (2R,4S)‐1‐((2‐cyclopropyl‐4‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐quinolin‐3‐yl)‐methyl)‐4‐(4‐fluorobenzamido)‐N‐phenylpyrrolidine‐2‐carboxamide (11c) exhibited significant activity against the tested Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv strain. Further, the cytotoxicity (CC50) profile of the titled compounds against the Vero cell was performed and discussed. A molecular docking study of the hit compounds (11b and 11c) was also performed to find their putative binding interaction with the active site of the target proteins. Finally, in silico ADMET properties were also predicted for all the synthesized molecules to evaluate their drug‐likeness behavior.</description><subject>Chemical synthesis</subject><subject>In vitro methods and tests</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Molecular docking</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Organic compounds</subject><subject>Proline</subject><subject>Quinoline</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Triazoles</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><issn>0022-152X</issn><issn>1943-5193</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kN1OwjAUxxujiYhe-AZNvDLZYG3ZR70jgKKBqGEm3jXt1kFxdtBuMfPKR_AZfRILeOvV-fr9zzn5A3CJgh4KAtxfr2TdG2BMj0AH0QHxQ0TJMei4GfZRiF9PwZm1a1ciEscdsHlulK5KpeXP1_eT2WceTI3in1Up4bQVRuX2Bo6lVUvtwUWr65XLrQeHulZ1I6TJmrLad-ZO4gpu4LjK3pReepDrHA7H80kKF3WTK2nPwUnBSysv_mIXvNxO0tHUnz3e3Y-GMz_DNKbubc5RKBKacCqQyN37URbnGQpjGopMoIEgeZIXUVFEIopRzHlEREEK4XQYJaQLrg57N6baNtLWbF01RruTDIcBxZgECXbU9YHKTGWtkQXbGPXOTctQwHaGsp2hbGeoY_sH9kOVsv0fZA_TSbpX_AJQ7Hmt</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Ganesan, Moorthiamma Sarathy</creator><creator>Raja, Kamatchi Kanmani</creator><creator>Murugesan, Sankaranarayanan</creator><creator>Karankumar, Banoth</creator><creator>Faheem, Faheem</creator><creator>Thirunavukkarasu, Sappanimuthu</creator><creator>Shetye, Gauri</creator><creator>Ma, Rui</creator><creator>Franzblau, Scott G.</creator><creator>Wan, Baojie</creator><creator>Rajagopal, Gurusamy</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Quinoline‐Proline, Triazole Hybrids: Design, Synthesis, Antituberculosis, Molecular Docking, and ADMET Studies</title><author>Ganesan, Moorthiamma Sarathy ; Raja, Kamatchi Kanmani ; Murugesan, Sankaranarayanan ; Karankumar, Banoth ; Faheem, Faheem ; Thirunavukkarasu, Sappanimuthu ; Shetye, Gauri ; Ma, Rui ; Franzblau, Scott G. ; Wan, Baojie ; Rajagopal, Gurusamy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-51aa15b898a9b1bd0226c7dc15795bcb14b3d8df6ff6b6717aa63bf3fbaa12183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Chemical synthesis</topic><topic>In vitro methods and tests</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Molecular docking</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Organic compounds</topic><topic>Proline</topic><topic>Quinoline</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Triazoles</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ganesan, Moorthiamma Sarathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raja, Kamatchi Kanmani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murugesan, Sankaranarayanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karankumar, Banoth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faheem, Faheem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thirunavukkarasu, Sappanimuthu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shetye, Gauri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franzblau, Scott G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Baojie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajagopal, Gurusamy</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of heterocyclic chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ganesan, Moorthiamma Sarathy</au><au>Raja, Kamatchi Kanmani</au><au>Murugesan, Sankaranarayanan</au><au>Karankumar, Banoth</au><au>Faheem, Faheem</au><au>Thirunavukkarasu, Sappanimuthu</au><au>Shetye, Gauri</au><au>Ma, Rui</au><au>Franzblau, Scott G.</au><au>Wan, Baojie</au><au>Rajagopal, Gurusamy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quinoline‐Proline, Triazole Hybrids: Design, Synthesis, Antituberculosis, Molecular Docking, and ADMET Studies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of heterocyclic chemistry</jtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>952</spage><epage>968</epage><pages>952-968</pages><issn>0022-152X</issn><eissn>1943-5193</eissn><abstract>A series of novel quinoline‐proline hybrids (11a‐g) and quinoline‐proline‐1,2,3‐triazole hybrids (12‐14) were synthesized by click chemistry based on molecular hybridization concept and were characterized by NMR, mass spectrometry, and elemental analysis. All the titled target compounds were tested for antitubercular activity by MABA and LORA methods by in vitro. Interestingly, two compounds (2R,4S)‐1‐((2‐cyclopropyl‐4‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐quinolin‐3‐yl)‐methyl)‐4‐(4‐nitrobenzamido)‐N‐phenylpyrrolidine‐2‐carboxamide (11b) and (2R,4S)‐1‐((2‐cyclopropyl‐4‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐quinolin‐3‐yl)‐methyl)‐4‐(4‐fluorobenzamido)‐N‐phenylpyrrolidine‐2‐carboxamide (11c) exhibited significant activity against the tested Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv strain. Further, the cytotoxicity (CC50) profile of the titled compounds against the Vero cell was performed and discussed. A molecular docking study of the hit compounds (11b and 11c) was also performed to find their putative binding interaction with the active site of the target proteins. Finally, in silico ADMET properties were also predicted for all the synthesized molecules to evaluate their drug‐likeness behavior.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/jhet.4229</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-152X |
ispartof | Journal of heterocyclic chemistry, 2021-04, Vol.58 (4), p.952-968 |
issn | 0022-152X 1943-5193 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2509223082 |
source | Wiley Journals |
subjects | Chemical synthesis In vitro methods and tests Mass spectrometry Molecular docking NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Organic compounds Proline Quinoline Toxicity Triazoles Tuberculosis |
title | Quinoline‐Proline, Triazole Hybrids: Design, Synthesis, Antituberculosis, Molecular Docking, and ADMET Studies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T18%3A49%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quinoline%E2%80%90Proline,%20Triazole%20Hybrids:%20Design,%20Synthesis,%20Antituberculosis,%20Molecular%20Docking,%20and%20ADMET%20Studies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20heterocyclic%20chemistry&rft.au=Ganesan,%20Moorthiamma%20Sarathy&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=952&rft.epage=968&rft.pages=952-968&rft.issn=0022-152X&rft.eissn=1943-5193&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jhet.4229&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2509223082%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2509223082&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |