Quinoline‐Proline, Triazole Hybrids: Design, Synthesis, Antituberculosis, Molecular Docking, and ADMET Studies

A series of novel quinoline‐proline hybrids (11a‐g) and quinoline‐proline‐1,2,3‐triazole hybrids (12‐14) were synthesized by click chemistry based on molecular hybridization concept and were characterized by NMR, mass spectrometry, and elemental analysis. All the titled target compounds were tested...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of heterocyclic chemistry 2021-04, Vol.58 (4), p.952-968
Hauptverfasser: Ganesan, Moorthiamma Sarathy, Raja, Kamatchi Kanmani, Murugesan, Sankaranarayanan, Karankumar, Banoth, Faheem, Faheem, Thirunavukkarasu, Sappanimuthu, Shetye, Gauri, Ma, Rui, Franzblau, Scott G., Wan, Baojie, Rajagopal, Gurusamy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 968
container_issue 4
container_start_page 952
container_title Journal of heterocyclic chemistry
container_volume 58
creator Ganesan, Moorthiamma Sarathy
Raja, Kamatchi Kanmani
Murugesan, Sankaranarayanan
Karankumar, Banoth
Faheem, Faheem
Thirunavukkarasu, Sappanimuthu
Shetye, Gauri
Ma, Rui
Franzblau, Scott G.
Wan, Baojie
Rajagopal, Gurusamy
description A series of novel quinoline‐proline hybrids (11a‐g) and quinoline‐proline‐1,2,3‐triazole hybrids (12‐14) were synthesized by click chemistry based on molecular hybridization concept and were characterized by NMR, mass spectrometry, and elemental analysis. All the titled target compounds were tested for antitubercular activity by MABA and LORA methods by in vitro. Interestingly, two compounds (2R,4S)‐1‐((2‐cyclopropyl‐4‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐quinolin‐3‐yl)‐methyl)‐4‐(4‐nitrobenzamido)‐N‐phenylpyrrolidine‐2‐carboxamide (11b) and (2R,4S)‐1‐((2‐cyclopropyl‐4‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐quinolin‐3‐yl)‐methyl)‐4‐(4‐fluorobenzamido)‐N‐phenylpyrrolidine‐2‐carboxamide (11c) exhibited significant activity against the tested Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv strain. Further, the cytotoxicity (CC50) profile of the titled compounds against the Vero cell was performed and discussed. A molecular docking study of the hit compounds (11b and 11c) was also performed to find their putative binding interaction with the active site of the target proteins. Finally, in silico ADMET properties were also predicted for all the synthesized molecules to evaluate their drug‐likeness behavior.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jhet.4229
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2509223082</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2509223082</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-51aa15b898a9b1bd0226c7dc15795bcb14b3d8df6ff6b6717aa63bf3fbaa12183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kN1OwjAUxxujiYhe-AZNvDLZYG3ZR70jgKKBqGEm3jXt1kFxdtBuMfPKR_AZfRILeOvV-fr9zzn5A3CJgh4KAtxfr2TdG2BMj0AH0QHxQ0TJMei4GfZRiF9PwZm1a1ciEscdsHlulK5KpeXP1_eT2WceTI3in1Up4bQVRuX2Bo6lVUvtwUWr65XLrQeHulZ1I6TJmrLad-ZO4gpu4LjK3pReepDrHA7H80kKF3WTK2nPwUnBSysv_mIXvNxO0tHUnz3e3Y-GMz_DNKbubc5RKBKacCqQyN37URbnGQpjGopMoIEgeZIXUVFEIopRzHlEREEK4XQYJaQLrg57N6baNtLWbF01RruTDIcBxZgECXbU9YHKTGWtkQXbGPXOTctQwHaGsp2hbGeoY_sH9kOVsv0fZA_TSbpX_AJQ7Hmt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2509223082</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quinoline‐Proline, Triazole Hybrids: Design, Synthesis, Antituberculosis, Molecular Docking, and ADMET Studies</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Ganesan, Moorthiamma Sarathy ; Raja, Kamatchi Kanmani ; Murugesan, Sankaranarayanan ; Karankumar, Banoth ; Faheem, Faheem ; Thirunavukkarasu, Sappanimuthu ; Shetye, Gauri ; Ma, Rui ; Franzblau, Scott G. ; Wan, Baojie ; Rajagopal, Gurusamy</creator><creatorcontrib>Ganesan, Moorthiamma Sarathy ; Raja, Kamatchi Kanmani ; Murugesan, Sankaranarayanan ; Karankumar, Banoth ; Faheem, Faheem ; Thirunavukkarasu, Sappanimuthu ; Shetye, Gauri ; Ma, Rui ; Franzblau, Scott G. ; Wan, Baojie ; Rajagopal, Gurusamy</creatorcontrib><description>A series of novel quinoline‐proline hybrids (11a‐g) and quinoline‐proline‐1,2,3‐triazole hybrids (12‐14) were synthesized by click chemistry based on molecular hybridization concept and were characterized by NMR, mass spectrometry, and elemental analysis. All the titled target compounds were tested for antitubercular activity by MABA and LORA methods by in vitro. Interestingly, two compounds (2R,4S)‐1‐((2‐cyclopropyl‐4‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐quinolin‐3‐yl)‐methyl)‐4‐(4‐nitrobenzamido)‐N‐phenylpyrrolidine‐2‐carboxamide (11b) and (2R,4S)‐1‐((2‐cyclopropyl‐4‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐quinolin‐3‐yl)‐methyl)‐4‐(4‐fluorobenzamido)‐N‐phenylpyrrolidine‐2‐carboxamide (11c) exhibited significant activity against the tested Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv strain. Further, the cytotoxicity (CC50) profile of the titled compounds against the Vero cell was performed and discussed. A molecular docking study of the hit compounds (11b and 11c) was also performed to find their putative binding interaction with the active site of the target proteins. Finally, in silico ADMET properties were also predicted for all the synthesized molecules to evaluate their drug‐likeness behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-152X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5193</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jhet.4229</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Chemical synthesis ; In vitro methods and tests ; Mass spectrometry ; Molecular docking ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Organic compounds ; Proline ; Quinoline ; Toxicity ; Triazoles ; Tuberculosis</subject><ispartof>Journal of heterocyclic chemistry, 2021-04, Vol.58 (4), p.952-968</ispartof><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-51aa15b898a9b1bd0226c7dc15795bcb14b3d8df6ff6b6717aa63bf3fbaa12183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-51aa15b898a9b1bd0226c7dc15795bcb14b3d8df6ff6b6717aa63bf3fbaa12183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjhet.4229$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjhet.4229$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ganesan, Moorthiamma Sarathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raja, Kamatchi Kanmani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murugesan, Sankaranarayanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karankumar, Banoth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faheem, Faheem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thirunavukkarasu, Sappanimuthu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shetye, Gauri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franzblau, Scott G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Baojie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajagopal, Gurusamy</creatorcontrib><title>Quinoline‐Proline, Triazole Hybrids: Design, Synthesis, Antituberculosis, Molecular Docking, and ADMET Studies</title><title>Journal of heterocyclic chemistry</title><description>A series of novel quinoline‐proline hybrids (11a‐g) and quinoline‐proline‐1,2,3‐triazole hybrids (12‐14) were synthesized by click chemistry based on molecular hybridization concept and were characterized by NMR, mass spectrometry, and elemental analysis. All the titled target compounds were tested for antitubercular activity by MABA and LORA methods by in vitro. Interestingly, two compounds (2R,4S)‐1‐((2‐cyclopropyl‐4‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐quinolin‐3‐yl)‐methyl)‐4‐(4‐nitrobenzamido)‐N‐phenylpyrrolidine‐2‐carboxamide (11b) and (2R,4S)‐1‐((2‐cyclopropyl‐4‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐quinolin‐3‐yl)‐methyl)‐4‐(4‐fluorobenzamido)‐N‐phenylpyrrolidine‐2‐carboxamide (11c) exhibited significant activity against the tested Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv strain. Further, the cytotoxicity (CC50) profile of the titled compounds against the Vero cell was performed and discussed. A molecular docking study of the hit compounds (11b and 11c) was also performed to find their putative binding interaction with the active site of the target proteins. Finally, in silico ADMET properties were also predicted for all the synthesized molecules to evaluate their drug‐likeness behavior.</description><subject>Chemical synthesis</subject><subject>In vitro methods and tests</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Molecular docking</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Organic compounds</subject><subject>Proline</subject><subject>Quinoline</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Triazoles</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><issn>0022-152X</issn><issn>1943-5193</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kN1OwjAUxxujiYhe-AZNvDLZYG3ZR70jgKKBqGEm3jXt1kFxdtBuMfPKR_AZfRILeOvV-fr9zzn5A3CJgh4KAtxfr2TdG2BMj0AH0QHxQ0TJMei4GfZRiF9PwZm1a1ciEscdsHlulK5KpeXP1_eT2WceTI3in1Up4bQVRuX2Bo6lVUvtwUWr65XLrQeHulZ1I6TJmrLad-ZO4gpu4LjK3pReepDrHA7H80kKF3WTK2nPwUnBSysv_mIXvNxO0tHUnz3e3Y-GMz_DNKbubc5RKBKacCqQyN37URbnGQpjGopMoIEgeZIXUVFEIopRzHlEREEK4XQYJaQLrg57N6baNtLWbF01RruTDIcBxZgECXbU9YHKTGWtkQXbGPXOTctQwHaGsp2hbGeoY_sH9kOVsv0fZA_TSbpX_AJQ7Hmt</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Ganesan, Moorthiamma Sarathy</creator><creator>Raja, Kamatchi Kanmani</creator><creator>Murugesan, Sankaranarayanan</creator><creator>Karankumar, Banoth</creator><creator>Faheem, Faheem</creator><creator>Thirunavukkarasu, Sappanimuthu</creator><creator>Shetye, Gauri</creator><creator>Ma, Rui</creator><creator>Franzblau, Scott G.</creator><creator>Wan, Baojie</creator><creator>Rajagopal, Gurusamy</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Quinoline‐Proline, Triazole Hybrids: Design, Synthesis, Antituberculosis, Molecular Docking, and ADMET Studies</title><author>Ganesan, Moorthiamma Sarathy ; Raja, Kamatchi Kanmani ; Murugesan, Sankaranarayanan ; Karankumar, Banoth ; Faheem, Faheem ; Thirunavukkarasu, Sappanimuthu ; Shetye, Gauri ; Ma, Rui ; Franzblau, Scott G. ; Wan, Baojie ; Rajagopal, Gurusamy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-51aa15b898a9b1bd0226c7dc15795bcb14b3d8df6ff6b6717aa63bf3fbaa12183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Chemical synthesis</topic><topic>In vitro methods and tests</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Molecular docking</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Organic compounds</topic><topic>Proline</topic><topic>Quinoline</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Triazoles</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ganesan, Moorthiamma Sarathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raja, Kamatchi Kanmani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murugesan, Sankaranarayanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karankumar, Banoth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faheem, Faheem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thirunavukkarasu, Sappanimuthu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shetye, Gauri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franzblau, Scott G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Baojie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajagopal, Gurusamy</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of heterocyclic chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ganesan, Moorthiamma Sarathy</au><au>Raja, Kamatchi Kanmani</au><au>Murugesan, Sankaranarayanan</au><au>Karankumar, Banoth</au><au>Faheem, Faheem</au><au>Thirunavukkarasu, Sappanimuthu</au><au>Shetye, Gauri</au><au>Ma, Rui</au><au>Franzblau, Scott G.</au><au>Wan, Baojie</au><au>Rajagopal, Gurusamy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quinoline‐Proline, Triazole Hybrids: Design, Synthesis, Antituberculosis, Molecular Docking, and ADMET Studies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of heterocyclic chemistry</jtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>952</spage><epage>968</epage><pages>952-968</pages><issn>0022-152X</issn><eissn>1943-5193</eissn><abstract>A series of novel quinoline‐proline hybrids (11a‐g) and quinoline‐proline‐1,2,3‐triazole hybrids (12‐14) were synthesized by click chemistry based on molecular hybridization concept and were characterized by NMR, mass spectrometry, and elemental analysis. All the titled target compounds were tested for antitubercular activity by MABA and LORA methods by in vitro. Interestingly, two compounds (2R,4S)‐1‐((2‐cyclopropyl‐4‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐quinolin‐3‐yl)‐methyl)‐4‐(4‐nitrobenzamido)‐N‐phenylpyrrolidine‐2‐carboxamide (11b) and (2R,4S)‐1‐((2‐cyclopropyl‐4‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐quinolin‐3‐yl)‐methyl)‐4‐(4‐fluorobenzamido)‐N‐phenylpyrrolidine‐2‐carboxamide (11c) exhibited significant activity against the tested Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv strain. Further, the cytotoxicity (CC50) profile of the titled compounds against the Vero cell was performed and discussed. A molecular docking study of the hit compounds (11b and 11c) was also performed to find their putative binding interaction with the active site of the target proteins. Finally, in silico ADMET properties were also predicted for all the synthesized molecules to evaluate their drug‐likeness behavior.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/jhet.4229</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-152X
ispartof Journal of heterocyclic chemistry, 2021-04, Vol.58 (4), p.952-968
issn 0022-152X
1943-5193
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2509223082
source Wiley Journals
subjects Chemical synthesis
In vitro methods and tests
Mass spectrometry
Molecular docking
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Organic compounds
Proline
Quinoline
Toxicity
Triazoles
Tuberculosis
title Quinoline‐Proline, Triazole Hybrids: Design, Synthesis, Antituberculosis, Molecular Docking, and ADMET Studies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T18%3A49%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quinoline%E2%80%90Proline,%20Triazole%20Hybrids:%20Design,%20Synthesis,%20Antituberculosis,%20Molecular%20Docking,%20and%20ADMET%20Studies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20heterocyclic%20chemistry&rft.au=Ganesan,%20Moorthiamma%20Sarathy&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=952&rft.epage=968&rft.pages=952-968&rft.issn=0022-152X&rft.eissn=1943-5193&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jhet.4229&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2509223082%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2509223082&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true