Operational and emerging capabilities for surface water flood forecasting
Surface water (or pluvial) flooding is caused by intense rainfall before it enters rivers or drainage systems. As the climate changes and urban populations grow, the number of people around the world at risk of surface water flooding is increasing. Although it may not be possible to prevent such flo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Water 2021-05, Vol.8 (3), p.e1517-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e1517 |
container_title | Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Water |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Speight, Linda J. Cranston, Michael D. White, Christopher J. Kelly, Laura |
description | Surface water (or pluvial) flooding is caused by intense rainfall before it enters rivers or drainage systems. As the climate changes and urban populations grow, the number of people around the world at risk of surface water flooding is increasing. Although it may not be possible to prevent such flooding, reliable and timely flood forecasts can help improve preparedness and recovery. Unlike riverine and coastal flooding where forecasting methods are well established, surface water flood forecasting presents a unique challenge due to the high uncertainties around predicting the location, timing, and impact of what are typically localized events. Over the past 5 years, there has been rapid development of convection‐permitting numerical weather prediction models, ensemble forecasting, and computational ability. It is now theoretically feasible to develop operational surface water forecasting systems. This paper identifies three approaches to surface water forecasting utilizing state‐of‐the‐art meteorological forecasts: empirical‐based scenarios, hydrological forecasts linked to presimulated impact scenarios, and real‐time hydrodynamic simulation. Reviewing operational examples of each approach provides an opportunity to learn from international best practice to develop targeted, impact‐based, surface water forecasts to support informed decision‐making. Although the emergence of new meteorological and hydrological forecasting capabilities is promising, there remains a scientific limit to the predictability of convective rainfall. To overcome this challenge, we suggest that a rethink of the established role of flood forecasting is needed, alongside the development of interdisciplinary solutions for communicating uncertainty and making the best use of all available data to increase preparedness.
This article is categorized under:
Engineering Water > Engineering Water
Recent improvements in forecasting intense rainfall mean it is now possible to forecast surface water flooding. However, operational practices need to adapt to deal with short lead times and high uncertainty in decision‐making. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/wat2.1517 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2509221588</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2509221588</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3857-f99bb37f71a63b1d6a3aba295d87342ea94a1742bad77fba8a8f6fa0de6c0ac33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1rwzAQhkVpoSHN0H9g6NTBiT4sSxpD6EcgkCWlozjJUnBwIldyCPn3tesOXTrdcTzv3fEg9EjwnGBMFxfo6JxwIm7QhOJC5UQV8vZPf49mKR0wxoRgzhSfoPW2dRG6OpygyeBUZe7o4r4-7TMLLZi6qbvapcyHmKVz9GBd1l9xMfNNCNUwdxZS1wce0J2HJrnZb52ij9eX3eo932zf1qvlJrdMcpF7pYxhwgsCJTOkKoGBAap4JQUrqANVABEFNVAJ4Q1IkL70gCtXWgyWsSl6Gve2MXydXer0IZxj_37SlGNFKeFS9tTzSNkYUorO6zbWR4hXTbAeZOlBlh5k9exiZC91467_g_pzuaM_iW_sRGwY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2509221588</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Operational and emerging capabilities for surface water flood forecasting</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><creator>Speight, Linda J. ; Cranston, Michael D. ; White, Christopher J. ; Kelly, Laura</creator><creatorcontrib>Speight, Linda J. ; Cranston, Michael D. ; White, Christopher J. ; Kelly, Laura</creatorcontrib><description>Surface water (or pluvial) flooding is caused by intense rainfall before it enters rivers or drainage systems. As the climate changes and urban populations grow, the number of people around the world at risk of surface water flooding is increasing. Although it may not be possible to prevent such flooding, reliable and timely flood forecasts can help improve preparedness and recovery. Unlike riverine and coastal flooding where forecasting methods are well established, surface water flood forecasting presents a unique challenge due to the high uncertainties around predicting the location, timing, and impact of what are typically localized events. Over the past 5 years, there has been rapid development of convection‐permitting numerical weather prediction models, ensemble forecasting, and computational ability. It is now theoretically feasible to develop operational surface water forecasting systems. This paper identifies three approaches to surface water forecasting utilizing state‐of‐the‐art meteorological forecasts: empirical‐based scenarios, hydrological forecasts linked to presimulated impact scenarios, and real‐time hydrodynamic simulation. Reviewing operational examples of each approach provides an opportunity to learn from international best practice to develop targeted, impact‐based, surface water forecasts to support informed decision‐making. Although the emergence of new meteorological and hydrological forecasting capabilities is promising, there remains a scientific limit to the predictability of convective rainfall. To overcome this challenge, we suggest that a rethink of the established role of flood forecasting is needed, alongside the development of interdisciplinary solutions for communicating uncertainty and making the best use of all available data to increase preparedness.
This article is categorized under:
Engineering Water > Engineering Water
Recent improvements in forecasting intense rainfall mean it is now possible to forecast surface water flooding. However, operational practices need to adapt to deal with short lead times and high uncertainty in decision‐making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-1948</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-1948</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/wat2.1517</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Best practice ; Climate change ; Climate models ; Computer applications ; Convection ; Decision making ; Drainage systems ; Engineering ; Environmental risk ; Flood forecasting ; Flooding ; Floods ; Hydrodynamics ; Hydrology ; Numerical weather forecasting ; operational ; pluvial ; Prediction models ; Rain ; Rainfall ; Risk communication ; River discharge ; Rivers ; Surface water ; Uncertainty ; Urban populations ; Weather forecasting</subject><ispartof>Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Water, 2021-05, Vol.8 (3), p.e1517-n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3857-f99bb37f71a63b1d6a3aba295d87342ea94a1742bad77fba8a8f6fa0de6c0ac33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3857-f99bb37f71a63b1d6a3aba295d87342ea94a1742bad77fba8a8f6fa0de6c0ac33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8700-157X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fwat2.1517$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fwat2.1517$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Speight, Linda J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cranston, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Laura</creatorcontrib><title>Operational and emerging capabilities for surface water flood forecasting</title><title>Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Water</title><description>Surface water (or pluvial) flooding is caused by intense rainfall before it enters rivers or drainage systems. As the climate changes and urban populations grow, the number of people around the world at risk of surface water flooding is increasing. Although it may not be possible to prevent such flooding, reliable and timely flood forecasts can help improve preparedness and recovery. Unlike riverine and coastal flooding where forecasting methods are well established, surface water flood forecasting presents a unique challenge due to the high uncertainties around predicting the location, timing, and impact of what are typically localized events. Over the past 5 years, there has been rapid development of convection‐permitting numerical weather prediction models, ensemble forecasting, and computational ability. It is now theoretically feasible to develop operational surface water forecasting systems. This paper identifies three approaches to surface water forecasting utilizing state‐of‐the‐art meteorological forecasts: empirical‐based scenarios, hydrological forecasts linked to presimulated impact scenarios, and real‐time hydrodynamic simulation. Reviewing operational examples of each approach provides an opportunity to learn from international best practice to develop targeted, impact‐based, surface water forecasts to support informed decision‐making. Although the emergence of new meteorological and hydrological forecasting capabilities is promising, there remains a scientific limit to the predictability of convective rainfall. To overcome this challenge, we suggest that a rethink of the established role of flood forecasting is needed, alongside the development of interdisciplinary solutions for communicating uncertainty and making the best use of all available data to increase preparedness.
This article is categorized under:
Engineering Water > Engineering Water
Recent improvements in forecasting intense rainfall mean it is now possible to forecast surface water flooding. However, operational practices need to adapt to deal with short lead times and high uncertainty in decision‐making.</description><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Convection</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Drainage systems</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Flood forecasting</subject><subject>Flooding</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Numerical weather forecasting</subject><subject>operational</subject><subject>pluvial</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Risk communication</subject><subject>River discharge</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Urban populations</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><issn>2049-1948</issn><issn>2049-1948</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1rwzAQhkVpoSHN0H9g6NTBiT4sSxpD6EcgkCWlozjJUnBwIldyCPn3tesOXTrdcTzv3fEg9EjwnGBMFxfo6JxwIm7QhOJC5UQV8vZPf49mKR0wxoRgzhSfoPW2dRG6OpygyeBUZe7o4r4-7TMLLZi6qbvapcyHmKVz9GBd1l9xMfNNCNUwdxZS1wce0J2HJrnZb52ij9eX3eo932zf1qvlJrdMcpF7pYxhwgsCJTOkKoGBAap4JQUrqANVABEFNVAJ4Q1IkL70gCtXWgyWsSl6Gve2MXydXer0IZxj_37SlGNFKeFS9tTzSNkYUorO6zbWR4hXTbAeZOlBlh5k9exiZC91467_g_pzuaM_iW_sRGwY</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Speight, Linda J.</creator><creator>Cranston, Michael D.</creator><creator>White, Christopher J.</creator><creator>Kelly, Laura</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8700-157X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Operational and emerging capabilities for surface water flood forecasting</title><author>Speight, Linda J. ; Cranston, Michael D. ; White, Christopher J. ; Kelly, Laura</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3857-f99bb37f71a63b1d6a3aba295d87342ea94a1742bad77fba8a8f6fa0de6c0ac33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Convection</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Drainage systems</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Flood forecasting</topic><topic>Flooding</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Numerical weather forecasting</topic><topic>operational</topic><topic>pluvial</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Risk communication</topic><topic>River discharge</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Urban populations</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Speight, Linda J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cranston, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Laura</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles(OpenAccess)</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Backfiles</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Water</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Speight, Linda J.</au><au>Cranston, Michael D.</au><au>White, Christopher J.</au><au>Kelly, Laura</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Operational and emerging capabilities for surface water flood forecasting</atitle><jtitle>Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Water</jtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e1517</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e1517-n/a</pages><issn>2049-1948</issn><eissn>2049-1948</eissn><abstract>Surface water (or pluvial) flooding is caused by intense rainfall before it enters rivers or drainage systems. As the climate changes and urban populations grow, the number of people around the world at risk of surface water flooding is increasing. Although it may not be possible to prevent such flooding, reliable and timely flood forecasts can help improve preparedness and recovery. Unlike riverine and coastal flooding where forecasting methods are well established, surface water flood forecasting presents a unique challenge due to the high uncertainties around predicting the location, timing, and impact of what are typically localized events. Over the past 5 years, there has been rapid development of convection‐permitting numerical weather prediction models, ensemble forecasting, and computational ability. It is now theoretically feasible to develop operational surface water forecasting systems. This paper identifies three approaches to surface water forecasting utilizing state‐of‐the‐art meteorological forecasts: empirical‐based scenarios, hydrological forecasts linked to presimulated impact scenarios, and real‐time hydrodynamic simulation. Reviewing operational examples of each approach provides an opportunity to learn from international best practice to develop targeted, impact‐based, surface water forecasts to support informed decision‐making. Although the emergence of new meteorological and hydrological forecasting capabilities is promising, there remains a scientific limit to the predictability of convective rainfall. To overcome this challenge, we suggest that a rethink of the established role of flood forecasting is needed, alongside the development of interdisciplinary solutions for communicating uncertainty and making the best use of all available data to increase preparedness.
This article is categorized under:
Engineering Water > Engineering Water
Recent improvements in forecasting intense rainfall mean it is now possible to forecast surface water flooding. However, operational practices need to adapt to deal with short lead times and high uncertainty in decision‐making.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/wat2.1517</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8700-157X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2049-1948 |
ispartof | Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Water, 2021-05, Vol.8 (3), p.e1517-n/a |
issn | 2049-1948 2049-1948 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2509221588 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals |
subjects | Best practice Climate change Climate models Computer applications Convection Decision making Drainage systems Engineering Environmental risk Flood forecasting Flooding Floods Hydrodynamics Hydrology Numerical weather forecasting operational pluvial Prediction models Rain Rainfall Risk communication River discharge Rivers Surface water Uncertainty Urban populations Weather forecasting |
title | Operational and emerging capabilities for surface water flood forecasting |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T23%3A06%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Operational%20and%20emerging%20capabilities%20for%20surface%20water%20flood%20forecasting&rft.jtitle=Wiley%20interdisciplinary%20reviews.%20Water&rft.au=Speight,%20Linda%20J.&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e1517&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e1517-n/a&rft.issn=2049-1948&rft.eissn=2049-1948&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/wat2.1517&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2509221588%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2509221588&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |