Response of soil organic carbon and soil health indicators to treated wastewater irrigation in bioenergy sorghum production on an arid soil

Treated urban wastewater (WW) reuse for crop irrigation is seen as an way to mitigate prolonged drought effects and reduced freshwater (FW) availability for agriculture in arid west Texas. However, the impacts of WW on arid soil health are not clearly understood. This field study evaluated the effec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Land degradation & development 2021-04, Vol.32 (6), p.2197-2209
Hauptverfasser: Chaganti, Vijayasatya N., Ganjegunte, Girisha, Somenahally, Anil, Hargrove, William L., Ulery, April, Enciso, Juan M., Flynn, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2209
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2197
container_title Land degradation & development
container_volume 32
creator Chaganti, Vijayasatya N.
Ganjegunte, Girisha
Somenahally, Anil
Hargrove, William L.
Ulery, April
Enciso, Juan M.
Flynn, Robert
description Treated urban wastewater (WW) reuse for crop irrigation is seen as an way to mitigate prolonged drought effects and reduced freshwater (FW) availability for agriculture in arid west Texas. However, the impacts of WW on arid soil health are not clearly understood. This field study evaluated the effects of WW irrigation on soil health indicators including soil organic carbon (SOC), permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC), mineralizable carbon (MC), and soil protein under bioenergy sorghum production. Water type and gypsum + sulfur application were used as main and subplot factors in a split‐plot experimental design with growth year as a repeated measure. Results across time and soil amendments showed that the SOC of WW‐irrigated soils (3.26 g kg−1) was significantly higher than that of FW‐irrigated soils (2.96 g kg−1). This signifies the positive impact of WW to contribute to soil carbon with no associated priming effects. Wastewater and soil amendment application by themselves did not affect other soil health indicators, given their soil salinization potential. Irrespective of the water type and amendment application, soil POXC significantly increased from 245 to 262 mg kg−1 over time, indicating that a labile pool of C was added to the soil. Soil protein concentrations significantly decreased from 1.31 to 1.23 g kg−1 after 2 years, possibly due to mineralization of organic nitrogen. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that WW application did not adversely affect soil health in the short term. Long‐term studies could provide more insight into the sustained effects of WW irrigation on arid soil health.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ldr.3888
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2509219543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2509219543</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-e827817fdb91b40dc87bd3ce829d14f181040b98787ee1a5f25e0be5e6a9331a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhhdRsFbBnxDw4mVrsh9ucpT6CQWhKHgL2c3sNmWb1EmW0t_gnzbtevU0w8wz78y8SXLN6IxRmt31Gmc55_wkmTAqRMqK8uv0kPMyzbOKnycX3q8ppawqqknyswS_ddYDcS3xzvTEYaesaUijsHaWKKvH-gpUH1bEWG0aFRx6EhwJCCqAJjvlA-xiisQgmk4FE2eNJbVxYAG7fRTBbjVsyBadHppj_yhPFJpxxWVy1qrew9VfnCafz08f89d08f7yNn9YpE0mcp4Cj2-wqtW1YHVBdcOrWudNLAvNipZxRgtaC17xCoCpss1KoDWUcK9EnjOVT5ObUTee8j2AD3LtBrRxpcxKKjImyiKP1O1INei8R2jlFs1G4V4yKg9Wy2i1PFgd0XREd6aH_b-cXDwuj_wv6KiCoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2509219543</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response of soil organic carbon and soil health indicators to treated wastewater irrigation in bioenergy sorghum production on an arid soil</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Chaganti, Vijayasatya N. ; Ganjegunte, Girisha ; Somenahally, Anil ; Hargrove, William L. ; Ulery, April ; Enciso, Juan M. ; Flynn, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Chaganti, Vijayasatya N. ; Ganjegunte, Girisha ; Somenahally, Anil ; Hargrove, William L. ; Ulery, April ; Enciso, Juan M. ; Flynn, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Treated urban wastewater (WW) reuse for crop irrigation is seen as an way to mitigate prolonged drought effects and reduced freshwater (FW) availability for agriculture in arid west Texas. However, the impacts of WW on arid soil health are not clearly understood. This field study evaluated the effects of WW irrigation on soil health indicators including soil organic carbon (SOC), permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC), mineralizable carbon (MC), and soil protein under bioenergy sorghum production. Water type and gypsum + sulfur application were used as main and subplot factors in a split‐plot experimental design with growth year as a repeated measure. Results across time and soil amendments showed that the SOC of WW‐irrigated soils (3.26 g kg−1) was significantly higher than that of FW‐irrigated soils (2.96 g kg−1). This signifies the positive impact of WW to contribute to soil carbon with no associated priming effects. Wastewater and soil amendment application by themselves did not affect other soil health indicators, given their soil salinization potential. Irrespective of the water type and amendment application, soil POXC significantly increased from 245 to 262 mg kg−1 over time, indicating that a labile pool of C was added to the soil. Soil protein concentrations significantly decreased from 1.31 to 1.23 g kg−1 after 2 years, possibly due to mineralization of organic nitrogen. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that WW application did not adversely affect soil health in the short term. Long‐term studies could provide more insight into the sustained effects of WW irrigation on arid soil health.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1085-3278</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-145X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ldr.3888</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>arid soils ; Aridity ; bioenergy sorghum ; Carbon ; Design of experiments ; Drought ; Experimental design ; Gypsum ; Indicators ; Irrigation ; Mineralization ; Organic carbon ; Organic nitrogen ; Organic soils ; Priming ; Proteins ; Renewable energy ; Rio Grande basin ; Salinization ; Soil amendment ; soil organic carbon ; Soil salinity ; Soil treatment ; Soils ; Sorghum ; Sulfur ; treated urban wastewater ; Wastewater ; Wastewater irrigation ; Wastewater reuse ; Wastewater treatment ; ‘emerging’ soil health indicators</subject><ispartof>Land degradation &amp; development, 2021-04, Vol.32 (6), p.2197-2209</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-e827817fdb91b40dc87bd3ce829d14f181040b98787ee1a5f25e0be5e6a9331a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-e827817fdb91b40dc87bd3ce829d14f181040b98787ee1a5f25e0be5e6a9331a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4835-7434 ; 0000-0003-1997-6049</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fldr.3888$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fldr.3888$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chaganti, Vijayasatya N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganjegunte, Girisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Somenahally, Anil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hargrove, William L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulery, April</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enciso, Juan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Response of soil organic carbon and soil health indicators to treated wastewater irrigation in bioenergy sorghum production on an arid soil</title><title>Land degradation &amp; development</title><description>Treated urban wastewater (WW) reuse for crop irrigation is seen as an way to mitigate prolonged drought effects and reduced freshwater (FW) availability for agriculture in arid west Texas. However, the impacts of WW on arid soil health are not clearly understood. This field study evaluated the effects of WW irrigation on soil health indicators including soil organic carbon (SOC), permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC), mineralizable carbon (MC), and soil protein under bioenergy sorghum production. Water type and gypsum + sulfur application were used as main and subplot factors in a split‐plot experimental design with growth year as a repeated measure. Results across time and soil amendments showed that the SOC of WW‐irrigated soils (3.26 g kg−1) was significantly higher than that of FW‐irrigated soils (2.96 g kg−1). This signifies the positive impact of WW to contribute to soil carbon with no associated priming effects. Wastewater and soil amendment application by themselves did not affect other soil health indicators, given their soil salinization potential. Irrespective of the water type and amendment application, soil POXC significantly increased from 245 to 262 mg kg−1 over time, indicating that a labile pool of C was added to the soil. Soil protein concentrations significantly decreased from 1.31 to 1.23 g kg−1 after 2 years, possibly due to mineralization of organic nitrogen. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that WW application did not adversely affect soil health in the short term. Long‐term studies could provide more insight into the sustained effects of WW irrigation on arid soil health.</description><subject>arid soils</subject><subject>Aridity</subject><subject>bioenergy sorghum</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Design of experiments</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Experimental design</subject><subject>Gypsum</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Mineralization</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Organic nitrogen</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Priming</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Rio Grande basin</subject><subject>Salinization</subject><subject>Soil amendment</subject><subject>soil organic carbon</subject><subject>Soil salinity</subject><subject>Soil treatment</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Sorghum</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>treated urban wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater irrigation</subject><subject>Wastewater reuse</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>‘emerging’ soil health indicators</subject><issn>1085-3278</issn><issn>1099-145X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhhdRsFbBnxDw4mVrsh9ucpT6CQWhKHgL2c3sNmWb1EmW0t_gnzbtevU0w8wz78y8SXLN6IxRmt31Gmc55_wkmTAqRMqK8uv0kPMyzbOKnycX3q8ppawqqknyswS_ddYDcS3xzvTEYaesaUijsHaWKKvH-gpUH1bEWG0aFRx6EhwJCCqAJjvlA-xiisQgmk4FE2eNJbVxYAG7fRTBbjVsyBadHppj_yhPFJpxxWVy1qrew9VfnCafz08f89d08f7yNn9YpE0mcp4Cj2-wqtW1YHVBdcOrWudNLAvNipZxRgtaC17xCoCpss1KoDWUcK9EnjOVT5ObUTee8j2AD3LtBrRxpcxKKjImyiKP1O1INei8R2jlFs1G4V4yKg9Wy2i1PFgd0XREd6aH_b-cXDwuj_wv6KiCoQ</recordid><startdate>20210415</startdate><enddate>20210415</enddate><creator>Chaganti, Vijayasatya N.</creator><creator>Ganjegunte, Girisha</creator><creator>Somenahally, Anil</creator><creator>Hargrove, William L.</creator><creator>Ulery, April</creator><creator>Enciso, Juan M.</creator><creator>Flynn, Robert</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4835-7434</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1997-6049</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210415</creationdate><title>Response of soil organic carbon and soil health indicators to treated wastewater irrigation in bioenergy sorghum production on an arid soil</title><author>Chaganti, Vijayasatya N. ; Ganjegunte, Girisha ; Somenahally, Anil ; Hargrove, William L. ; Ulery, April ; Enciso, Juan M. ; Flynn, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-e827817fdb91b40dc87bd3ce829d14f181040b98787ee1a5f25e0be5e6a9331a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>arid soils</topic><topic>Aridity</topic><topic>bioenergy sorghum</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Design of experiments</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Experimental design</topic><topic>Gypsum</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Mineralization</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Organic nitrogen</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Priming</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Rio Grande basin</topic><topic>Salinization</topic><topic>Soil amendment</topic><topic>soil organic carbon</topic><topic>Soil salinity</topic><topic>Soil treatment</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Sorghum</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>treated urban wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater irrigation</topic><topic>Wastewater reuse</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>‘emerging’ soil health indicators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chaganti, Vijayasatya N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganjegunte, Girisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Somenahally, Anil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hargrove, William L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulery, April</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enciso, Juan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Land degradation &amp; development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chaganti, Vijayasatya N.</au><au>Ganjegunte, Girisha</au><au>Somenahally, Anil</au><au>Hargrove, William L.</au><au>Ulery, April</au><au>Enciso, Juan M.</au><au>Flynn, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response of soil organic carbon and soil health indicators to treated wastewater irrigation in bioenergy sorghum production on an arid soil</atitle><jtitle>Land degradation &amp; development</jtitle><date>2021-04-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2197</spage><epage>2209</epage><pages>2197-2209</pages><issn>1085-3278</issn><eissn>1099-145X</eissn><abstract>Treated urban wastewater (WW) reuse for crop irrigation is seen as an way to mitigate prolonged drought effects and reduced freshwater (FW) availability for agriculture in arid west Texas. However, the impacts of WW on arid soil health are not clearly understood. This field study evaluated the effects of WW irrigation on soil health indicators including soil organic carbon (SOC), permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC), mineralizable carbon (MC), and soil protein under bioenergy sorghum production. Water type and gypsum + sulfur application were used as main and subplot factors in a split‐plot experimental design with growth year as a repeated measure. Results across time and soil amendments showed that the SOC of WW‐irrigated soils (3.26 g kg−1) was significantly higher than that of FW‐irrigated soils (2.96 g kg−1). This signifies the positive impact of WW to contribute to soil carbon with no associated priming effects. Wastewater and soil amendment application by themselves did not affect other soil health indicators, given their soil salinization potential. Irrespective of the water type and amendment application, soil POXC significantly increased from 245 to 262 mg kg−1 over time, indicating that a labile pool of C was added to the soil. Soil protein concentrations significantly decreased from 1.31 to 1.23 g kg−1 after 2 years, possibly due to mineralization of organic nitrogen. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that WW application did not adversely affect soil health in the short term. Long‐term studies could provide more insight into the sustained effects of WW irrigation on arid soil health.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/ldr.3888</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4835-7434</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1997-6049</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1085-3278
ispartof Land degradation & development, 2021-04, Vol.32 (6), p.2197-2209
issn 1085-3278
1099-145X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2509219543
source Wiley Journals
subjects arid soils
Aridity
bioenergy sorghum
Carbon
Design of experiments
Drought
Experimental design
Gypsum
Indicators
Irrigation
Mineralization
Organic carbon
Organic nitrogen
Organic soils
Priming
Proteins
Renewable energy
Rio Grande basin
Salinization
Soil amendment
soil organic carbon
Soil salinity
Soil treatment
Soils
Sorghum
Sulfur
treated urban wastewater
Wastewater
Wastewater irrigation
Wastewater reuse
Wastewater treatment
‘emerging’ soil health indicators
title Response of soil organic carbon and soil health indicators to treated wastewater irrigation in bioenergy sorghum production on an arid soil
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T04%3A32%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20of%20soil%20organic%20carbon%20and%20soil%20health%20indicators%20to%20treated%20wastewater%20irrigation%20in%20bioenergy%20sorghum%20production%20on%20an%20arid%20soil&rft.jtitle=Land%20degradation%20&%20development&rft.au=Chaganti,%20Vijayasatya%20N.&rft.date=2021-04-15&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2197&rft.epage=2209&rft.pages=2197-2209&rft.issn=1085-3278&rft.eissn=1099-145X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ldr.3888&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2509219543%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2509219543&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true