Eugenics and the Interwar Approach to Inventors and Invention: The Case of Seabury Gilfillan
Seabury Gilfillan was an American sociologist who is considered a seminal but neglected author in invention studies. Gilfillan published his first important contributions to the sociology of invention at the end of the 1920s, and he corresponded with Schumpeter in the 1930s. Comparisons between the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | History of political economy 2021-02, Vol.53 (1), p.1 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | History of political economy |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Ballandonne, Matthieu |
description | Seabury Gilfillan was an American sociologist who is considered a seminal but neglected author in invention studies. Gilfillan published his first important contributions to the sociology of invention at the end of the 1920s, and he corresponded with Schumpeter in the 1930s. Comparisons between the two authors show that they are closer than we might expect. Gilfillan rejected the hero and genius accounts of inventors and supported instead an anonymous view of the invention process. Nevertheless, as shown by previous literature, Gilfillan could not fully get rid of a genius representation of inventors. We argue that Gilfillan’s elitism can be explained by his lifelong support of eugenics, which he also used in his policy prescriptions to increase the “quality” of inventors. Engaging with Gilfillan’s adoption of eugenics is indispensable to understand his approach to inventors and inventions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1215/00182702-8816589 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2507997376</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2507997376</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g248t-81090aa10736fbc72b7de0f8ad00f3429cc5c9596f16e78c0e380d4ec4e9b7e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotTs9LwzAUDqJgnd49BjxXX5Lml7cx5hwMPDhvwkjTl62jpDNtFf97O-rp4_v13kfIPYNHxpl8AmCGa-C5MUxJYy9IxiTXObPMXpLsbOdn_5rcdN0RAGwhVUY-l8MeY-076mJF-wPSdewx_bhE56dTap0_0L4dxW-MfZum2MTqNj7T7dhYuA5pG-g7unJIv3RVN6FuGhdvyVVwTYd3_zgjHy_L7eI137yt1ov5Jt_zwvS5YWDBOQZaqFB6zUtdIQTjKoAgCm69l95KqwJTqI0HFAaqAn2BttQoxIw8THfHwV8Ddv3u2A4pji93XIK2VgutxB90llTP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2507997376</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Eugenics and the Interwar Approach to Inventors and Invention: The Case of Seabury Gilfillan</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Ballandonne, Matthieu</creator><creatorcontrib>Ballandonne, Matthieu</creatorcontrib><description>Seabury Gilfillan was an American sociologist who is considered a seminal but neglected author in invention studies. Gilfillan published his first important contributions to the sociology of invention at the end of the 1920s, and he corresponded with Schumpeter in the 1930s. Comparisons between the two authors show that they are closer than we might expect. Gilfillan rejected the hero and genius accounts of inventors and supported instead an anonymous view of the invention process. Nevertheless, as shown by previous literature, Gilfillan could not fully get rid of a genius representation of inventors. We argue that Gilfillan’s elitism can be explained by his lifelong support of eugenics, which he also used in his policy prescriptions to increase the “quality” of inventors. Engaging with Gilfillan’s adoption of eugenics is indispensable to understand his approach to inventors and inventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-2702</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1919</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1215/00182702-8816589</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Durham: Duke University Press, NC & IL</publisher><subject>Elitism ; Eugenics ; Genetic engineering ; Inventions ; Inventors ; Prescription drugs</subject><ispartof>History of political economy, 2021-02, Vol.53 (1), p.1</ispartof><rights>Copyright Duke University Press, NC & IL Feb 1, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ballandonne, Matthieu</creatorcontrib><title>Eugenics and the Interwar Approach to Inventors and Invention: The Case of Seabury Gilfillan</title><title>History of political economy</title><description>Seabury Gilfillan was an American sociologist who is considered a seminal but neglected author in invention studies. Gilfillan published his first important contributions to the sociology of invention at the end of the 1920s, and he corresponded with Schumpeter in the 1930s. Comparisons between the two authors show that they are closer than we might expect. Gilfillan rejected the hero and genius accounts of inventors and supported instead an anonymous view of the invention process. Nevertheless, as shown by previous literature, Gilfillan could not fully get rid of a genius representation of inventors. We argue that Gilfillan’s elitism can be explained by his lifelong support of eugenics, which he also used in his policy prescriptions to increase the “quality” of inventors. Engaging with Gilfillan’s adoption of eugenics is indispensable to understand his approach to inventors and inventions.</description><subject>Elitism</subject><subject>Eugenics</subject><subject>Genetic engineering</subject><subject>Inventions</subject><subject>Inventors</subject><subject>Prescription drugs</subject><issn>0018-2702</issn><issn>1527-1919</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNotTs9LwzAUDqJgnd49BjxXX5Lml7cx5hwMPDhvwkjTl62jpDNtFf97O-rp4_v13kfIPYNHxpl8AmCGa-C5MUxJYy9IxiTXObPMXpLsbOdn_5rcdN0RAGwhVUY-l8MeY-076mJF-wPSdewx_bhE56dTap0_0L4dxW-MfZum2MTqNj7T7dhYuA5pG-g7unJIv3RVN6FuGhdvyVVwTYd3_zgjHy_L7eI137yt1ov5Jt_zwvS5YWDBOQZaqFB6zUtdIQTjKoAgCm69l95KqwJTqI0HFAaqAn2BttQoxIw8THfHwV8Ddv3u2A4pji93XIK2VgutxB90llTP</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Ballandonne, Matthieu</creator><general>Duke University Press, NC & IL</general><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Eugenics and the Interwar Approach to Inventors and Invention: The Case of Seabury Gilfillan</title><author>Ballandonne, Matthieu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g248t-81090aa10736fbc72b7de0f8ad00f3429cc5c9596f16e78c0e380d4ec4e9b7e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Elitism</topic><topic>Eugenics</topic><topic>Genetic engineering</topic><topic>Inventions</topic><topic>Inventors</topic><topic>Prescription drugs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ballandonne, Matthieu</creatorcontrib><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>History of political economy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ballandonne, Matthieu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Eugenics and the Interwar Approach to Inventors and Invention: The Case of Seabury Gilfillan</atitle><jtitle>History of political economy</jtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>0018-2702</issn><eissn>1527-1919</eissn><abstract>Seabury Gilfillan was an American sociologist who is considered a seminal but neglected author in invention studies. Gilfillan published his first important contributions to the sociology of invention at the end of the 1920s, and he corresponded with Schumpeter in the 1930s. Comparisons between the two authors show that they are closer than we might expect. Gilfillan rejected the hero and genius accounts of inventors and supported instead an anonymous view of the invention process. Nevertheless, as shown by previous literature, Gilfillan could not fully get rid of a genius representation of inventors. We argue that Gilfillan’s elitism can be explained by his lifelong support of eugenics, which he also used in his policy prescriptions to increase the “quality” of inventors. Engaging with Gilfillan’s adoption of eugenics is indispensable to understand his approach to inventors and inventions.</abstract><cop>Durham</cop><pub>Duke University Press, NC & IL</pub><doi>10.1215/00182702-8816589</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-2702 |
ispartof | History of political economy, 2021-02, Vol.53 (1), p.1 |
issn | 0018-2702 1527-1919 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2507997376 |
source | Political Science Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Elitism Eugenics Genetic engineering Inventions Inventors Prescription drugs |
title | Eugenics and the Interwar Approach to Inventors and Invention: The Case of Seabury Gilfillan |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T09%3A11%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Eugenics%20and%20the%20Interwar%20Approach%20to%20Inventors%20and%20Invention:%20The%20Case%20of%20Seabury%20Gilfillan&rft.jtitle=History%20of%20political%20economy&rft.au=Ballandonne,%20Matthieu&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=0018-2702&rft.eissn=1527-1919&rft_id=info:doi/10.1215/00182702-8816589&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2507997376%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2507997376&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |