Faculty Reflections of Pedagogical Transformation in Active Learning Classrooms
Increasingly, Active Learning Classrooms (ALCs) are being designed and built by higher education institutions to support instructors in adopting and implementing active learning pedagogies. In this study, we explore how instructors perceive changes in their teaching after teaching in ALCs. Our study...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Innovative higher education 2021-04, Vol.46 (2), p.205-221 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 221 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 205 |
container_title | Innovative higher education |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Copridge, Keeley Webb Uttamchandani, Suraj Birdwell, Tracey |
description | Increasingly, Active Learning Classrooms (ALCs) are being designed and built by higher education institutions to support instructors in adopting and implementing active learning pedagogies. In this study, we explore how instructors perceive changes in their teaching after teaching in ALCs. Our study focuses on the perceptions of faculty members who have completed a year-long professional development around teaching in ALCs. We conduct place-based interviews with nine such faculty members to examine their perceptions of their changing pedagogies of specific ALCs. Using thematic analysis, we categorized faculty’s perceptions of the affordances of ALCs for their teaching and student learning into three major themes: (1) ALCs afford visibility and instructor presence, (2) ALCs afford better feedback and apprenticeship, and (3) ALCs afford intimate conversations and student dialogue. Finally, we draw on data from the interviews to explicate each theme in turn before discussing commonalities and tensions among the themes. These three themes present an entry point for professional development designers, instructors, and other institutional stakeholders to understand how instructors orient active learning pedagogues to learning spaces. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10755-021-09544-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2506941578</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1292426</ericid><sourcerecordid>2506941578</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-32cd12406a53948e6baeba2132464574fb3766ced445be692046a6b8c6035093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRsFb_gCAEXI_eeSfLUlofFCrS_TCZTkJKmqkzqZB_79SI7lzdxXfOufcehG4JPBAA9RgJKCEwUIKhEJzj4QxNiFAMEyXyczQBxSkWkqpLdBXjDgBIIhO0Xhp7bPshe3dV62zf-C5mvsre3NbUvm6sabNNMF2sfNibE86aLpsl4afLVs6ErunqbN6aGIP3-3iNLirTRnfzM6dos1xs5s94tX56mc9W2DJOesyo3RLKQRrBCp47WRpXGkoY5ZILxauSKSmt23IuSicLClwaWeZWAhNQsCm6H2MPwX8cXez1zh9DlzZqKkAWPP2eJxUdVTb4dJ-r9CE0exMGTUCfetNjbzr1pr9700My3Y0mFxr7a1i8ElpQTmXibOQxsa524W_1P6lfzCh5wQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2506941578</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Faculty Reflections of Pedagogical Transformation in Active Learning Classrooms</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Copridge, Keeley Webb ; Uttamchandani, Suraj ; Birdwell, Tracey</creator><creatorcontrib>Copridge, Keeley Webb ; Uttamchandani, Suraj ; Birdwell, Tracey</creatorcontrib><description>Increasingly, Active Learning Classrooms (ALCs) are being designed and built by higher education institutions to support instructors in adopting and implementing active learning pedagogies. In this study, we explore how instructors perceive changes in their teaching after teaching in ALCs. Our study focuses on the perceptions of faculty members who have completed a year-long professional development around teaching in ALCs. We conduct place-based interviews with nine such faculty members to examine their perceptions of their changing pedagogies of specific ALCs. Using thematic analysis, we categorized faculty’s perceptions of the affordances of ALCs for their teaching and student learning into three major themes: (1) ALCs afford visibility and instructor presence, (2) ALCs afford better feedback and apprenticeship, and (3) ALCs afford intimate conversations and student dialogue. Finally, we draw on data from the interviews to explicate each theme in turn before discussing commonalities and tensions among the themes. These three themes present an entry point for professional development designers, instructors, and other institutional stakeholders to understand how instructors orient active learning pedagogues to learning spaces.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0742-5627</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10755-021-09544-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Active Learning ; Affordances ; Classroom Design ; Classrooms ; College Faculty ; Conversation ; Education ; Faculty Development ; Feedback ; Feedback (Response) ; Higher Education ; Instructional Improvement ; Interviews ; Learning ; Pedagogy ; Perceptions ; Professional development ; Space Utilization ; Students ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teacher education ; Teacher Student Relationship ; Teaching ; University faculty</subject><ispartof>Innovative higher education, 2021-04, Vol.46 (2), p.205-221</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-32cd12406a53948e6baeba2132464574fb3766ced445be692046a6b8c6035093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-32cd12406a53948e6baeba2132464574fb3766ced445be692046a6b8c6035093</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8205-228X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10755-021-09544-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10755-021-09544-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1292426$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Copridge, Keeley Webb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uttamchandani, Suraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birdwell, Tracey</creatorcontrib><title>Faculty Reflections of Pedagogical Transformation in Active Learning Classrooms</title><title>Innovative higher education</title><addtitle>Innov High Educ</addtitle><description>Increasingly, Active Learning Classrooms (ALCs) are being designed and built by higher education institutions to support instructors in adopting and implementing active learning pedagogies. In this study, we explore how instructors perceive changes in their teaching after teaching in ALCs. Our study focuses on the perceptions of faculty members who have completed a year-long professional development around teaching in ALCs. We conduct place-based interviews with nine such faculty members to examine their perceptions of their changing pedagogies of specific ALCs. Using thematic analysis, we categorized faculty’s perceptions of the affordances of ALCs for their teaching and student learning into three major themes: (1) ALCs afford visibility and instructor presence, (2) ALCs afford better feedback and apprenticeship, and (3) ALCs afford intimate conversations and student dialogue. Finally, we draw on data from the interviews to explicate each theme in turn before discussing commonalities and tensions among the themes. These three themes present an entry point for professional development designers, instructors, and other institutional stakeholders to understand how instructors orient active learning pedagogues to learning spaces.</description><subject>Active Learning</subject><subject>Affordances</subject><subject>Classroom Design</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>Conversation</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Faculty Development</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Instructional Improvement</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Space Utilization</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher education</subject><subject>Teacher Student Relationship</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>University faculty</subject><issn>0742-5627</issn><issn>1573-1758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLw0AUhQdRsFb_gCAEXI_eeSfLUlofFCrS_TCZTkJKmqkzqZB_79SI7lzdxXfOufcehG4JPBAA9RgJKCEwUIKhEJzj4QxNiFAMEyXyczQBxSkWkqpLdBXjDgBIIhO0Xhp7bPshe3dV62zf-C5mvsre3NbUvm6sabNNMF2sfNibE86aLpsl4afLVs6ErunqbN6aGIP3-3iNLirTRnfzM6dos1xs5s94tX56mc9W2DJOesyo3RLKQRrBCp47WRpXGkoY5ZILxauSKSmt23IuSicLClwaWeZWAhNQsCm6H2MPwX8cXez1zh9DlzZqKkAWPP2eJxUdVTb4dJ-r9CE0exMGTUCfetNjbzr1pr9700My3Y0mFxr7a1i8ElpQTmXibOQxsa524W_1P6lfzCh5wQ</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Copridge, Keeley Webb</creator><creator>Uttamchandani, Suraj</creator><creator>Birdwell, Tracey</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8205-228X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Faculty Reflections of Pedagogical Transformation in Active Learning Classrooms</title><author>Copridge, Keeley Webb ; Uttamchandani, Suraj ; Birdwell, Tracey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-32cd12406a53948e6baeba2132464574fb3766ced445be692046a6b8c6035093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Active Learning</topic><topic>Affordances</topic><topic>Classroom Design</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>Conversation</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Faculty Development</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Instructional Improvement</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Space Utilization</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher education</topic><topic>Teacher Student Relationship</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>University faculty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Copridge, Keeley Webb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uttamchandani, Suraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birdwell, Tracey</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Innovative higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Copridge, Keeley Webb</au><au>Uttamchandani, Suraj</au><au>Birdwell, Tracey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1292426</ericid><atitle>Faculty Reflections of Pedagogical Transformation in Active Learning Classrooms</atitle><jtitle>Innovative higher education</jtitle><stitle>Innov High Educ</stitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>205</spage><epage>221</epage><pages>205-221</pages><issn>0742-5627</issn><eissn>1573-1758</eissn><abstract>Increasingly, Active Learning Classrooms (ALCs) are being designed and built by higher education institutions to support instructors in adopting and implementing active learning pedagogies. In this study, we explore how instructors perceive changes in their teaching after teaching in ALCs. Our study focuses on the perceptions of faculty members who have completed a year-long professional development around teaching in ALCs. We conduct place-based interviews with nine such faculty members to examine their perceptions of their changing pedagogies of specific ALCs. Using thematic analysis, we categorized faculty’s perceptions of the affordances of ALCs for their teaching and student learning into three major themes: (1) ALCs afford visibility and instructor presence, (2) ALCs afford better feedback and apprenticeship, and (3) ALCs afford intimate conversations and student dialogue. Finally, we draw on data from the interviews to explicate each theme in turn before discussing commonalities and tensions among the themes. These three themes present an entry point for professional development designers, instructors, and other institutional stakeholders to understand how instructors orient active learning pedagogues to learning spaces.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10755-021-09544-y</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8205-228X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0742-5627 |
ispartof | Innovative higher education, 2021-04, Vol.46 (2), p.205-221 |
issn | 0742-5627 1573-1758 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2506941578 |
source | EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Active Learning Affordances Classroom Design Classrooms College Faculty Conversation Education Faculty Development Feedback Feedback (Response) Higher Education Instructional Improvement Interviews Learning Pedagogy Perceptions Professional development Space Utilization Students Teacher Attitudes Teacher education Teacher Student Relationship Teaching University faculty |
title | Faculty Reflections of Pedagogical Transformation in Active Learning Classrooms |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T18%3A16%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Faculty%20Reflections%20of%20Pedagogical%20Transformation%20in%20Active%20Learning%20Classrooms&rft.jtitle=Innovative%20higher%20education&rft.au=Copridge,%20Keeley%20Webb&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=205&rft.epage=221&rft.pages=205-221&rft.issn=0742-5627&rft.eissn=1573-1758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10755-021-09544-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2506941578%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2506941578&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1292426&rfr_iscdi=true |