Imaginaries and Crystallization Processes in Bitcoin Infrastructuring
Imaginaries is a concept from Neumann and Star that signifies ‘points of understanding’ of the various stakeholder visions of an infrastructuring project. Stakeholders use imaginaries to negotiate their differences and identify shared visions. The ways in which these stakeholders negotiate these dif...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Computer supported cooperative work 2018-04, Vol.27 (2), p.209-232 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 232 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 209 |
container_title | Computer supported cooperative work |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Kow, Yong Ming Lustig, Caitlin |
description | Imaginaries is a concept from Neumann and Star that signifies ‘points of understanding’ of the various stakeholder visions of an infrastructuring project. Stakeholders use imaginaries to negotiate their differences and identify shared visions. The ways in which these stakeholders negotiate these differences to agree on concrete artifacts and practices is known as crystallization. However, the CSCW literature has not studied crystallization in detail. Our case study examines imaginaries and crystallization within the infrastructuring of Bitcoin, an open source digital currency and payment platform that is the first of emerging forms of peer-to-peer computer networks facilitating digital transactions. We conducted participant observation of two Bitcoin conferences held in December 2015. Each conference lasted between two to three days, amounting to 40 hours of observation. In these conferences, we examined Bitcoin infrastructuring taking place across different contexts, including open source development and startup communities. Each of these contexts contains pre-existing infrastructures along with powerful gatekeepers (e.g., software committers and financial regulators) who maintain its system of practices and artifacts. The Bitcoin actors, including open source developers and entrepreneurs, make use of imaginaries to identify differences among them, negotiate, and reach points of crystallization in order to integrate with these infrastructures. Based on these findings, we contribute the concept of imaginaries branching and discuss roles of imaginaries in an expansive infrastructuring work interacting with multiple installed bases, some of which also introduce practical limits to the imagined information system. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10606-017-9300-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2506710109</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2506710109</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-f0d871fe44557c8d138fc8325936dc5017bf37e26a0d5f419aac6333d20564b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1PAyEUJEYTa_UHeNvEM_qABXaP2lTdpIkeeieUhYamZSuwh_rrpVkTT57m8ObjzSB0T-CRAMinRECAwEAkbhkAphdoRrhkWHJOLtEMWspxK2l9jW5S2gEAr4WYoWV30FsfdPQ2VTr01SKeUtb7vf_W2Q-h-oyDsSmVqw_Vi89mKNgFF3XKcTR5jD5sb9GV0_tk735xjtavy_XiHa8-3rrF8wobRkTGDvpGEmfrmnNpmp6wxpmGUd4y0Rtent84Ji0VGnruatJqbQRjrKfARb1hc_Qw2R7j8DXalNVuGGMoiYpyEJIAgbawyMQycUgpWqeO0R90PCkC6jyWmsZSJU-dx1K0aOikScdzHxv_nP8X_QBHNmwk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2506710109</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Imaginaries and Crystallization Processes in Bitcoin Infrastructuring</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Kow, Yong Ming ; Lustig, Caitlin</creator><creatorcontrib>Kow, Yong Ming ; Lustig, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><description>Imaginaries is a concept from Neumann and Star that signifies ‘points of understanding’ of the various stakeholder visions of an infrastructuring project. Stakeholders use imaginaries to negotiate their differences and identify shared visions. The ways in which these stakeholders negotiate these differences to agree on concrete artifacts and practices is known as crystallization. However, the CSCW literature has not studied crystallization in detail. Our case study examines imaginaries and crystallization within the infrastructuring of Bitcoin, an open source digital currency and payment platform that is the first of emerging forms of peer-to-peer computer networks facilitating digital transactions. We conducted participant observation of two Bitcoin conferences held in December 2015. Each conference lasted between two to three days, amounting to 40 hours of observation. In these conferences, we examined Bitcoin infrastructuring taking place across different contexts, including open source development and startup communities. Each of these contexts contains pre-existing infrastructures along with powerful gatekeepers (e.g., software committers and financial regulators) who maintain its system of practices and artifacts. The Bitcoin actors, including open source developers and entrepreneurs, make use of imaginaries to identify differences among them, negotiate, and reach points of crystallization in order to integrate with these infrastructures. Based on these findings, we contribute the concept of imaginaries branching and discuss roles of imaginaries in an expansive infrastructuring work interacting with multiple installed bases, some of which also introduce practical limits to the imagined information system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-9724</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7551</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10606-017-9300-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Computer networks ; Computer Science ; Crystallization ; Digital computers ; Digital currencies ; Payment systems ; Psychology ; Regulators ; Social networks ; Social Sciences ; User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</subject><ispartof>Computer supported cooperative work, 2018-04, Vol.27 (2), p.209-232</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-f0d871fe44557c8d138fc8325936dc5017bf37e26a0d5f419aac6333d20564b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-f0d871fe44557c8d138fc8325936dc5017bf37e26a0d5f419aac6333d20564b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8993-7080</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10606-017-9300-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10606-017-9300-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kow, Yong Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lustig, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><title>Imaginaries and Crystallization Processes in Bitcoin Infrastructuring</title><title>Computer supported cooperative work</title><addtitle>Comput Supported Coop Work</addtitle><description>Imaginaries is a concept from Neumann and Star that signifies ‘points of understanding’ of the various stakeholder visions of an infrastructuring project. Stakeholders use imaginaries to negotiate their differences and identify shared visions. The ways in which these stakeholders negotiate these differences to agree on concrete artifacts and practices is known as crystallization. However, the CSCW literature has not studied crystallization in detail. Our case study examines imaginaries and crystallization within the infrastructuring of Bitcoin, an open source digital currency and payment platform that is the first of emerging forms of peer-to-peer computer networks facilitating digital transactions. We conducted participant observation of two Bitcoin conferences held in December 2015. Each conference lasted between two to three days, amounting to 40 hours of observation. In these conferences, we examined Bitcoin infrastructuring taking place across different contexts, including open source development and startup communities. Each of these contexts contains pre-existing infrastructures along with powerful gatekeepers (e.g., software committers and financial regulators) who maintain its system of practices and artifacts. The Bitcoin actors, including open source developers and entrepreneurs, make use of imaginaries to identify differences among them, negotiate, and reach points of crystallization in order to integrate with these infrastructures. Based on these findings, we contribute the concept of imaginaries branching and discuss roles of imaginaries in an expansive infrastructuring work interacting with multiple installed bases, some of which also introduce practical limits to the imagined information system.</description><subject>Computer networks</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Crystallization</subject><subject>Digital computers</subject><subject>Digital currencies</subject><subject>Payment systems</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Regulators</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</subject><issn>0925-9724</issn><issn>1573-7551</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1PAyEUJEYTa_UHeNvEM_qABXaP2lTdpIkeeieUhYamZSuwh_rrpVkTT57m8ObjzSB0T-CRAMinRECAwEAkbhkAphdoRrhkWHJOLtEMWspxK2l9jW5S2gEAr4WYoWV30FsfdPQ2VTr01SKeUtb7vf_W2Q-h-oyDsSmVqw_Vi89mKNgFF3XKcTR5jD5sb9GV0_tk735xjtavy_XiHa8-3rrF8wobRkTGDvpGEmfrmnNpmp6wxpmGUd4y0Rtent84Ji0VGnruatJqbQRjrKfARb1hc_Qw2R7j8DXalNVuGGMoiYpyEJIAgbawyMQycUgpWqeO0R90PCkC6jyWmsZSJU-dx1K0aOikScdzHxv_nP8X_QBHNmwk</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Kow, Yong Ming</creator><creator>Lustig, Caitlin</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8993-7080</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Imaginaries and Crystallization Processes in Bitcoin Infrastructuring</title><author>Kow, Yong Ming ; Lustig, Caitlin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-f0d871fe44557c8d138fc8325936dc5017bf37e26a0d5f419aac6333d20564b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Computer networks</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Crystallization</topic><topic>Digital computers</topic><topic>Digital currencies</topic><topic>Payment systems</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Regulators</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kow, Yong Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lustig, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Computer supported cooperative work</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kow, Yong Ming</au><au>Lustig, Caitlin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Imaginaries and Crystallization Processes in Bitcoin Infrastructuring</atitle><jtitle>Computer supported cooperative work</jtitle><stitle>Comput Supported Coop Work</stitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>232</epage><pages>209-232</pages><issn>0925-9724</issn><eissn>1573-7551</eissn><abstract>Imaginaries is a concept from Neumann and Star that signifies ‘points of understanding’ of the various stakeholder visions of an infrastructuring project. Stakeholders use imaginaries to negotiate their differences and identify shared visions. The ways in which these stakeholders negotiate these differences to agree on concrete artifacts and practices is known as crystallization. However, the CSCW literature has not studied crystallization in detail. Our case study examines imaginaries and crystallization within the infrastructuring of Bitcoin, an open source digital currency and payment platform that is the first of emerging forms of peer-to-peer computer networks facilitating digital transactions. We conducted participant observation of two Bitcoin conferences held in December 2015. Each conference lasted between two to three days, amounting to 40 hours of observation. In these conferences, we examined Bitcoin infrastructuring taking place across different contexts, including open source development and startup communities. Each of these contexts contains pre-existing infrastructures along with powerful gatekeepers (e.g., software committers and financial regulators) who maintain its system of practices and artifacts. The Bitcoin actors, including open source developers and entrepreneurs, make use of imaginaries to identify differences among them, negotiate, and reach points of crystallization in order to integrate with these infrastructures. Based on these findings, we contribute the concept of imaginaries branching and discuss roles of imaginaries in an expansive infrastructuring work interacting with multiple installed bases, some of which also introduce practical limits to the imagined information system.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10606-017-9300-2</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8993-7080</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0925-9724 |
ispartof | Computer supported cooperative work, 2018-04, Vol.27 (2), p.209-232 |
issn | 0925-9724 1573-7551 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2506710109 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Computer networks Computer Science Crystallization Digital computers Digital currencies Payment systems Psychology Regulators Social networks Social Sciences User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction |
title | Imaginaries and Crystallization Processes in Bitcoin Infrastructuring |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T21%3A20%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Imaginaries%20and%20Crystallization%20Processes%20in%20Bitcoin%20Infrastructuring&rft.jtitle=Computer%20supported%20cooperative%20work&rft.au=Kow,%20Yong%20Ming&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=232&rft.pages=209-232&rft.issn=0925-9724&rft.eissn=1573-7551&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10606-017-9300-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2506710109%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2506710109&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |