Gauging detention dosage: Assessing the impact of pretrial detention on sentencing outcomes using propensity score modeling

A small but growing body of scholarship suggests that defendants held in pretrial detention may be more likely to receive prison sentences. This study investigates this relationship in Oregon amidst an aim to reform pretrial processes and simultaneously curb prison reliance. We employ a quasi-experi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of criminal justice 2020-09, Vol.70, p.101719, Article 101719
Hauptverfasser: Campbell, Christopher M., Labrecque, Ryan M., Weinerman, Michael, Sanchagrin, Ken
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 101719
container_title Journal of criminal justice
container_volume 70
creator Campbell, Christopher M.
Labrecque, Ryan M.
Weinerman, Michael
Sanchagrin, Ken
description A small but growing body of scholarship suggests that defendants held in pretrial detention may be more likely to receive prison sentences. This study investigates this relationship in Oregon amidst an aim to reform pretrial processes and simultaneously curb prison reliance. We employ a quasi-experimental design using propensity score modeling to assess the effects of being detained through disposition and detention dosage on sentence type and length. Using a sample of 3390 criminal defendants from nine Oregon counties, we use a doubly robust approach to modeling the effects of pretrial detention. Our analyses reveal that detained defendants possess odds of being sentenced to prison are twice that of those released prior to their disposition. Additionally, the longer one spends in pretrial detention the greater the likelihood receiving a sentence if incarceration. Implications of these findings suggest that counties should explore options to reduce their application and duration of pretrial detention.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101719
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2506560376</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0047235220302130</els_id><sourcerecordid>2506560376</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-254aa3f50a0fe49854ad2707c6b9870a205c3391262668cdb38e2606e158a3bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFFLwzAQx4MoOKdfQQI-d16TNe18cohOQfBFn0OWXmfK1tRcKgy_vNmm4JsQuFzu_7_c_Ri7zGGSQ66u20lrg9u0A00EiP1jmc-O2CivSpkpAfKYjQCmZSZkIU7ZGVELSQNlOWJfCzOsXLfiNUbsovMdrz2ZFd7wORES7WrxHbnb9MZG7hveB4zBmfUfSzqUrtjZndwP0foNEh_27j74HjtyccvJ-oB842tcp8o5O2nMmvDiJ47Z28P9691j9vyyeLqbP2dWTiFmopgaI5sCDDQ4nVUprUWa3qrlrCrBCCislLNcKKFUZeulrFAoUJgXlZHLWo7Z1aFvmuRjQIq69UPo0pdaFKAKBbJUSaUOKhs8UcBG94mqCVudg96B1q3-Ba13oPUBdDLeHoyYdvh0GDRZl1Bg7QLaqGvv_mvxDcFojFk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2506560376</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gauging detention dosage: Assessing the impact of pretrial detention on sentencing outcomes using propensity score modeling</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Campbell, Christopher M. ; Labrecque, Ryan M. ; Weinerman, Michael ; Sanchagrin, Ken</creator><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Christopher M. ; Labrecque, Ryan M. ; Weinerman, Michael ; Sanchagrin, Ken</creatorcontrib><description>A small but growing body of scholarship suggests that defendants held in pretrial detention may be more likely to receive prison sentences. This study investigates this relationship in Oregon amidst an aim to reform pretrial processes and simultaneously curb prison reliance. We employ a quasi-experimental design using propensity score modeling to assess the effects of being detained through disposition and detention dosage on sentence type and length. Using a sample of 3390 criminal defendants from nine Oregon counties, we use a doubly robust approach to modeling the effects of pretrial detention. Our analyses reveal that detained defendants possess odds of being sentenced to prison are twice that of those released prior to their disposition. Additionally, the longer one spends in pretrial detention the greater the likelihood receiving a sentence if incarceration. Implications of these findings suggest that counties should explore options to reduce their application and duration of pretrial detention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2352</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101719</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Criminal courts ; Criminal sentences ; Criminal sentencing ; Defendants ; Detention ; Dosage ; Imprisonment ; Justice reinvestment ; Pretrial ; Pretrial detention ; Prisons ; Propensity ; Propensity score modeling ; Quasi-experimental methods ; Research design</subject><ispartof>Journal of criminal justice, 2020-09, Vol.70, p.101719, Article 101719</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Sep/Oct 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-254aa3f50a0fe49854ad2707c6b9870a205c3391262668cdb38e2606e158a3bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-254aa3f50a0fe49854ad2707c6b9870a205c3391262668cdb38e2606e158a3bd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235220302130$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30976,33751,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labrecque, Ryan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinerman, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchagrin, Ken</creatorcontrib><title>Gauging detention dosage: Assessing the impact of pretrial detention on sentencing outcomes using propensity score modeling</title><title>Journal of criminal justice</title><description>A small but growing body of scholarship suggests that defendants held in pretrial detention may be more likely to receive prison sentences. This study investigates this relationship in Oregon amidst an aim to reform pretrial processes and simultaneously curb prison reliance. We employ a quasi-experimental design using propensity score modeling to assess the effects of being detained through disposition and detention dosage on sentence type and length. Using a sample of 3390 criminal defendants from nine Oregon counties, we use a doubly robust approach to modeling the effects of pretrial detention. Our analyses reveal that detained defendants possess odds of being sentenced to prison are twice that of those released prior to their disposition. Additionally, the longer one spends in pretrial detention the greater the likelihood receiving a sentence if incarceration. Implications of these findings suggest that counties should explore options to reduce their application and duration of pretrial detention.</description><subject>Criminal courts</subject><subject>Criminal sentences</subject><subject>Criminal sentencing</subject><subject>Defendants</subject><subject>Detention</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Justice reinvestment</subject><subject>Pretrial</subject><subject>Pretrial detention</subject><subject>Prisons</subject><subject>Propensity</subject><subject>Propensity score modeling</subject><subject>Quasi-experimental methods</subject><subject>Research design</subject><issn>0047-2352</issn><issn>1873-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkFFLwzAQx4MoOKdfQQI-d16TNe18cohOQfBFn0OWXmfK1tRcKgy_vNmm4JsQuFzu_7_c_Ri7zGGSQ66u20lrg9u0A00EiP1jmc-O2CivSpkpAfKYjQCmZSZkIU7ZGVELSQNlOWJfCzOsXLfiNUbsovMdrz2ZFd7wORES7WrxHbnb9MZG7hveB4zBmfUfSzqUrtjZndwP0foNEh_27j74HjtyccvJ-oB842tcp8o5O2nMmvDiJ47Z28P9691j9vyyeLqbP2dWTiFmopgaI5sCDDQ4nVUprUWa3qrlrCrBCCislLNcKKFUZeulrFAoUJgXlZHLWo7Z1aFvmuRjQIq69UPo0pdaFKAKBbJUSaUOKhs8UcBG94mqCVudg96B1q3-Ba13oPUBdDLeHoyYdvh0GDRZl1Bg7QLaqGvv_mvxDcFojFk</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Campbell, Christopher M.</creator><creator>Labrecque, Ryan M.</creator><creator>Weinerman, Michael</creator><creator>Sanchagrin, Ken</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Gauging detention dosage: Assessing the impact of pretrial detention on sentencing outcomes using propensity score modeling</title><author>Campbell, Christopher M. ; Labrecque, Ryan M. ; Weinerman, Michael ; Sanchagrin, Ken</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-254aa3f50a0fe49854ad2707c6b9870a205c3391262668cdb38e2606e158a3bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Criminal courts</topic><topic>Criminal sentences</topic><topic>Criminal sentencing</topic><topic>Defendants</topic><topic>Detention</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Justice reinvestment</topic><topic>Pretrial</topic><topic>Pretrial detention</topic><topic>Prisons</topic><topic>Propensity</topic><topic>Propensity score modeling</topic><topic>Quasi-experimental methods</topic><topic>Research design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labrecque, Ryan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinerman, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchagrin, Ken</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of criminal justice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Campbell, Christopher M.</au><au>Labrecque, Ryan M.</au><au>Weinerman, Michael</au><au>Sanchagrin, Ken</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gauging detention dosage: Assessing the impact of pretrial detention on sentencing outcomes using propensity score modeling</atitle><jtitle>Journal of criminal justice</jtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>70</volume><spage>101719</spage><pages>101719-</pages><artnum>101719</artnum><issn>0047-2352</issn><eissn>1873-6203</eissn><abstract>A small but growing body of scholarship suggests that defendants held in pretrial detention may be more likely to receive prison sentences. This study investigates this relationship in Oregon amidst an aim to reform pretrial processes and simultaneously curb prison reliance. We employ a quasi-experimental design using propensity score modeling to assess the effects of being detained through disposition and detention dosage on sentence type and length. Using a sample of 3390 criminal defendants from nine Oregon counties, we use a doubly robust approach to modeling the effects of pretrial detention. Our analyses reveal that detained defendants possess odds of being sentenced to prison are twice that of those released prior to their disposition. Additionally, the longer one spends in pretrial detention the greater the likelihood receiving a sentence if incarceration. Implications of these findings suggest that counties should explore options to reduce their application and duration of pretrial detention.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101719</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0047-2352
ispartof Journal of criminal justice, 2020-09, Vol.70, p.101719, Article 101719
issn 0047-2352
1873-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2506560376
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Criminal courts
Criminal sentences
Criminal sentencing
Defendants
Detention
Dosage
Imprisonment
Justice reinvestment
Pretrial
Pretrial detention
Prisons
Propensity
Propensity score modeling
Quasi-experimental methods
Research design
title Gauging detention dosage: Assessing the impact of pretrial detention on sentencing outcomes using propensity score modeling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T17%3A31%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gauging%20detention%20dosage:%20Assessing%20the%20impact%20of%20pretrial%20detention%20on%20sentencing%20outcomes%20using%20propensity%20score%20modeling&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20criminal%20justice&rft.au=Campbell,%20Christopher%20M.&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=70&rft.spage=101719&rft.pages=101719-&rft.artnum=101719&rft.issn=0047-2352&rft.eissn=1873-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101719&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2506560376%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2506560376&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0047235220302130&rfr_iscdi=true