Proofreading revisited: Interrogating assumptions about postsecondary student users of proofreading

As the pressure to attain “standard written English” faces writers at every level of higher education, this standard is sometimes met through the involvement of others besides named authors in the production of texts, known as literacy brokering. One form of literacy brokering in which students may...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of English for academic purposes 2020-07, Vol.46, p.100871, Article 100871
1. Verfasser: Conrad, Nina L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 100871
container_title Journal of English for academic purposes
container_volume 46
creator Conrad, Nina L.
description As the pressure to attain “standard written English” faces writers at every level of higher education, this standard is sometimes met through the involvement of others besides named authors in the production of texts, known as literacy brokering. One form of literacy brokering in which students may engage is proofreading, defined as third-party corrective interventions in student writing. Most prior proofreading research has given little attention to proofreading practices among undergraduate students or proofreading of other genres of student writing, and other potential settings of proofreading aside from commercial or institutionally embedded services have not received due consideration.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100871
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2505410888</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1475158519305351</els_id><sourcerecordid>2505410888</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-58a92a2abdb5b02d79751044cbea841c6034972c71f1c558b9e100e9700766d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LxDAQDaLguvoHPAU8d02yTZOKF1n8WFjQg55DmkyXFLepSbrgvzelHjx5mmHmvXnzHkLXlKwoodVtt-pADytG2DQgUtATtKBSyIKWtTjNfSl4Qbnk5-gixo4QKmXFF8i8Be_bANq6fo8DHF10Cewd3vYJQvB7naaFjnE8DMn5PmLd-DHhwccUwfje6vCNYxot9AmPEULEvsXDn7OX6KzVnxGufusSfTw9vm9eit3r83bzsCvMmslUcKlrpplubMMbwqyoBaekLE0DWpbUVGSdvTAjaEsN57KpIVuFWhAiqsqK9RLdzHez-NcIManOj6HPkopxwktKpJQZxWaUCT7GAK0agjtkE4oSNYWpOjWFqaYw1RxmJt3PJMj_Hx0EFY2D3oB1AUxS1rv_6D84lX72</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2505410888</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Proofreading revisited: Interrogating assumptions about postsecondary student users of proofreading</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Conrad, Nina L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Conrad, Nina L.</creatorcontrib><description>As the pressure to attain “standard written English” faces writers at every level of higher education, this standard is sometimes met through the involvement of others besides named authors in the production of texts, known as literacy brokering. One form of literacy brokering in which students may engage is proofreading, defined as third-party corrective interventions in student writing. Most prior proofreading research has given little attention to proofreading practices among undergraduate students or proofreading of other genres of student writing, and other potential settings of proofreading aside from commercial or institutionally embedded services have not received due consideration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1475-1585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1497</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100871</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Academic writing ; College students ; Editing ; Higher education ; Literacy ; Student writing</subject><ispartof>Journal of English for academic purposes, 2020-07, Vol.46, p.100871, Article 100871</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jul 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-58a92a2abdb5b02d79751044cbea841c6034972c71f1c558b9e100e9700766d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-58a92a2abdb5b02d79751044cbea841c6034972c71f1c558b9e100e9700766d73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100871$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Conrad, Nina L.</creatorcontrib><title>Proofreading revisited: Interrogating assumptions about postsecondary student users of proofreading</title><title>Journal of English for academic purposes</title><description>As the pressure to attain “standard written English” faces writers at every level of higher education, this standard is sometimes met through the involvement of others besides named authors in the production of texts, known as literacy brokering. One form of literacy brokering in which students may engage is proofreading, defined as third-party corrective interventions in student writing. Most prior proofreading research has given little attention to proofreading practices among undergraduate students or proofreading of other genres of student writing, and other potential settings of proofreading aside from commercial or institutionally embedded services have not received due consideration.</description><subject>Academic writing</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Editing</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Student writing</subject><issn>1475-1585</issn><issn>1878-1497</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UE1LxDAQDaLguvoHPAU8d02yTZOKF1n8WFjQg55DmkyXFLepSbrgvzelHjx5mmHmvXnzHkLXlKwoodVtt-pADytG2DQgUtATtKBSyIKWtTjNfSl4Qbnk5-gixo4QKmXFF8i8Be_bANq6fo8DHF10Cewd3vYJQvB7naaFjnE8DMn5PmLd-DHhwccUwfje6vCNYxot9AmPEULEvsXDn7OX6KzVnxGufusSfTw9vm9eit3r83bzsCvMmslUcKlrpplubMMbwqyoBaekLE0DWpbUVGSdvTAjaEsN57KpIVuFWhAiqsqK9RLdzHez-NcIManOj6HPkopxwktKpJQZxWaUCT7GAK0agjtkE4oSNYWpOjWFqaYw1RxmJt3PJMj_Hx0EFY2D3oB1AUxS1rv_6D84lX72</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Conrad, Nina L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Proofreading revisited: Interrogating assumptions about postsecondary student users of proofreading</title><author>Conrad, Nina L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-58a92a2abdb5b02d79751044cbea841c6034972c71f1c558b9e100e9700766d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Academic writing</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Editing</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Student writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Conrad, Nina L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of English for academic purposes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Conrad, Nina L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Proofreading revisited: Interrogating assumptions about postsecondary student users of proofreading</atitle><jtitle>Journal of English for academic purposes</jtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>46</volume><spage>100871</spage><pages>100871-</pages><artnum>100871</artnum><issn>1475-1585</issn><eissn>1878-1497</eissn><abstract>As the pressure to attain “standard written English” faces writers at every level of higher education, this standard is sometimes met through the involvement of others besides named authors in the production of texts, known as literacy brokering. One form of literacy brokering in which students may engage is proofreading, defined as third-party corrective interventions in student writing. Most prior proofreading research has given little attention to proofreading practices among undergraduate students or proofreading of other genres of student writing, and other potential settings of proofreading aside from commercial or institutionally embedded services have not received due consideration.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100871</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1475-1585
ispartof Journal of English for academic purposes, 2020-07, Vol.46, p.100871, Article 100871
issn 1475-1585
1878-1497
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2505410888
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Academic writing
College students
Editing
Higher education
Literacy
Student writing
title Proofreading revisited: Interrogating assumptions about postsecondary student users of proofreading
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T19%3A28%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Proofreading%20revisited:%20Interrogating%20assumptions%20about%20postsecondary%20student%20users%20of%20proofreading&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20English%20for%20academic%20purposes&rft.au=Conrad,%20Nina%20L.&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=46&rft.spage=100871&rft.pages=100871-&rft.artnum=100871&rft.issn=1475-1585&rft.eissn=1878-1497&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100871&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2505410888%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2505410888&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1475158519305351&rfr_iscdi=true