Proofreading revisited: Interrogating assumptions about postsecondary student users of proofreading
As the pressure to attain “standard written English” faces writers at every level of higher education, this standard is sometimes met through the involvement of others besides named authors in the production of texts, known as literacy brokering. One form of literacy brokering in which students may...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of English for academic purposes 2020-07, Vol.46, p.100871, Article 100871 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 100871 |
container_title | Journal of English for academic purposes |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Conrad, Nina L. |
description | As the pressure to attain “standard written English” faces writers at every level of higher education, this standard is sometimes met through the involvement of others besides named authors in the production of texts, known as literacy brokering. One form of literacy brokering in which students may engage is proofreading, defined as third-party corrective interventions in student writing. Most prior proofreading research has given little attention to proofreading practices among undergraduate students or proofreading of other genres of student writing, and other potential settings of proofreading aside from commercial or institutionally embedded services have not received due consideration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100871 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2505410888</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1475158519305351</els_id><sourcerecordid>2505410888</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-58a92a2abdb5b02d79751044cbea841c6034972c71f1c558b9e100e9700766d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LxDAQDaLguvoHPAU8d02yTZOKF1n8WFjQg55DmkyXFLepSbrgvzelHjx5mmHmvXnzHkLXlKwoodVtt-pADytG2DQgUtATtKBSyIKWtTjNfSl4Qbnk5-gixo4QKmXFF8i8Be_bANq6fo8DHF10Cewd3vYJQvB7naaFjnE8DMn5PmLd-DHhwccUwfje6vCNYxot9AmPEULEvsXDn7OX6KzVnxGufusSfTw9vm9eit3r83bzsCvMmslUcKlrpplubMMbwqyoBaekLE0DWpbUVGSdvTAjaEsN57KpIVuFWhAiqsqK9RLdzHez-NcIManOj6HPkopxwktKpJQZxWaUCT7GAK0agjtkE4oSNYWpOjWFqaYw1RxmJt3PJMj_Hx0EFY2D3oB1AUxS1rv_6D84lX72</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2505410888</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Proofreading revisited: Interrogating assumptions about postsecondary student users of proofreading</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Conrad, Nina L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Conrad, Nina L.</creatorcontrib><description>As the pressure to attain “standard written English” faces writers at every level of higher education, this standard is sometimes met through the involvement of others besides named authors in the production of texts, known as literacy brokering. One form of literacy brokering in which students may engage is proofreading, defined as third-party corrective interventions in student writing. Most prior proofreading research has given little attention to proofreading practices among undergraduate students or proofreading of other genres of student writing, and other potential settings of proofreading aside from commercial or institutionally embedded services have not received due consideration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1475-1585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1497</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100871</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Academic writing ; College students ; Editing ; Higher education ; Literacy ; Student writing</subject><ispartof>Journal of English for academic purposes, 2020-07, Vol.46, p.100871, Article 100871</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jul 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-58a92a2abdb5b02d79751044cbea841c6034972c71f1c558b9e100e9700766d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-58a92a2abdb5b02d79751044cbea841c6034972c71f1c558b9e100e9700766d73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100871$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Conrad, Nina L.</creatorcontrib><title>Proofreading revisited: Interrogating assumptions about postsecondary student users of proofreading</title><title>Journal of English for academic purposes</title><description>As the pressure to attain “standard written English” faces writers at every level of higher education, this standard is sometimes met through the involvement of others besides named authors in the production of texts, known as literacy brokering. One form of literacy brokering in which students may engage is proofreading, defined as third-party corrective interventions in student writing. Most prior proofreading research has given little attention to proofreading practices among undergraduate students or proofreading of other genres of student writing, and other potential settings of proofreading aside from commercial or institutionally embedded services have not received due consideration.</description><subject>Academic writing</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Editing</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Student writing</subject><issn>1475-1585</issn><issn>1878-1497</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UE1LxDAQDaLguvoHPAU8d02yTZOKF1n8WFjQg55DmkyXFLepSbrgvzelHjx5mmHmvXnzHkLXlKwoodVtt-pADytG2DQgUtATtKBSyIKWtTjNfSl4Qbnk5-gixo4QKmXFF8i8Be_bANq6fo8DHF10Cewd3vYJQvB7naaFjnE8DMn5PmLd-DHhwccUwfje6vCNYxot9AmPEULEvsXDn7OX6KzVnxGufusSfTw9vm9eit3r83bzsCvMmslUcKlrpplubMMbwqyoBaekLE0DWpbUVGSdvTAjaEsN57KpIVuFWhAiqsqK9RLdzHez-NcIManOj6HPkopxwktKpJQZxWaUCT7GAK0agjtkE4oSNYWpOjWFqaYw1RxmJt3PJMj_Hx0EFY2D3oB1AUxS1rv_6D84lX72</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Conrad, Nina L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Proofreading revisited: Interrogating assumptions about postsecondary student users of proofreading</title><author>Conrad, Nina L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-58a92a2abdb5b02d79751044cbea841c6034972c71f1c558b9e100e9700766d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Academic writing</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Editing</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Student writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Conrad, Nina L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of English for academic purposes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Conrad, Nina L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Proofreading revisited: Interrogating assumptions about postsecondary student users of proofreading</atitle><jtitle>Journal of English for academic purposes</jtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>46</volume><spage>100871</spage><pages>100871-</pages><artnum>100871</artnum><issn>1475-1585</issn><eissn>1878-1497</eissn><abstract>As the pressure to attain “standard written English” faces writers at every level of higher education, this standard is sometimes met through the involvement of others besides named authors in the production of texts, known as literacy brokering. One form of literacy brokering in which students may engage is proofreading, defined as third-party corrective interventions in student writing. Most prior proofreading research has given little attention to proofreading practices among undergraduate students or proofreading of other genres of student writing, and other potential settings of proofreading aside from commercial or institutionally embedded services have not received due consideration.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100871</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1475-1585 |
ispartof | Journal of English for academic purposes, 2020-07, Vol.46, p.100871, Article 100871 |
issn | 1475-1585 1878-1497 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2505410888 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Academic writing College students Editing Higher education Literacy Student writing |
title | Proofreading revisited: Interrogating assumptions about postsecondary student users of proofreading |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T19%3A28%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Proofreading%20revisited:%20Interrogating%20assumptions%20about%20postsecondary%20student%20users%20of%20proofreading&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20English%20for%20academic%20purposes&rft.au=Conrad,%20Nina%20L.&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=46&rft.spage=100871&rft.pages=100871-&rft.artnum=100871&rft.issn=1475-1585&rft.eissn=1878-1497&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100871&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2505410888%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2505410888&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1475158519305351&rfr_iscdi=true |