The influence of two wildfires and biological control agents on the population dynamics of Melaleuca quinquenervia in a seasonally inundated wetland
The potential of Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) S.T. Blake to reinvade cleared areas was evaluated over a 13-yr period that included two wildfires and the introduction of biological control agents. The first wildfire occurred in 1998 and was followed by a mean of 591.5 recruited seedlings m–2. Recru...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Invasive plant science and management 2021-03, Vol.14 (1), p.3-8 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 8 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 3 |
container_title | Invasive plant science and management |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Tipping, Philip W. Martin, Melissa R. Foley, Jeremiah R. Pierce, Ryan M. Gettys, Lyn A. |
description | The potential of Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) S.T. Blake to reinvade cleared areas was evaluated over a 13-yr period that included two wildfires and the introduction of biological control agents. The first wildfire occurred in 1998 and was followed by a mean of 591.5 recruited seedlings m–2. Recruits from that fire were cleared 7 yr later in July 2005 for a second experiment to evaluate seedling recruitment into cleared areas. Seed rain, seedling recruitment and mortality, and sapling growth rates were measured in four plots located around individual large reproductive trees. A second natural wildfire in 2007 burned through those plots, leading to increases in seed rain followed by a pulse in recruitment of 21.04 seedlings m–2, 96.5% fewer than after the 1998 fire. Recruits in half of the plots around each tree were then treated with regular applications of an insecticide to restrict herbivory by biological control agents, while herbivory was not restricted in the other half. There was no difference in seedling mortality between treatments 1,083 d post-fire (2007) with 96.6% seedling mortality in the unrestricted herbivory treatment and 89.4% mortality in the restricted herbivory treatment. Recruits subjected to the restricted herbivory treatment grew taller than those in the unrestricted herbivory treatment, 101.3 cm versus 37.4 cm. Many of the recruits were attacked by the biological control agents, which slowed their growth. Although solitary M. quinquenervia trees retain some capacity to reinvade areas under specific circumstances, there was a downward trend in their overall invasiveness at this site, with progressively smaller recruitment cohorts due to biological control agents. Land managers should prioritize removing large reproductive trees over treating recently recruited populations, which can be left for many years for the biological control agents to suppress before any additional treatment would be needed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/inp.2021.4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2504758252</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_inp_2021_4</cupid><sourcerecordid>2504758252</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b365t-5a299bc13fd651ddff475dae528b6c1022455e68eb2ae031815f31ce140c14153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEURgdRUKsbnyDgRsTWJDOZdpYi_oHiRsHdcCe5qZE0GZOMpe_hA5tSxY24Si6ce77LVxRHjE4YZdNz4_oJp5xNqq1ijzVlM55W05ftnz9v2G6xH-MbpTWt62av-Hx6RWKctgM6icRrkpaeLI1V2gSMBJwinfHWz40ES6R3KXhLYI4uReIdSXm_9_1gIZk8qpWDhZFxbXpACxYHCeR9MO49J2D4MJDjCJCIEL0Da1d5HpyChIosMdmceFDsaLARD7_fUfF8ffV0eTu-f7y5u7y4H3dlLdJYAG-aTrJSq1owpbSupkIBCj7rasko55UQWM-w44C0ZDMmdMkksopKVjFRjorjjbcPPp8XU_vmh5CPii0XNMtmXPBMnW4oGXyMAXXbB7OAsGoZbdett7n1dt16W2X47BuGRReMmuOv80_8ZIPnjr3D_8xfhfOUag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2504758252</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The influence of two wildfires and biological control agents on the population dynamics of Melaleuca quinquenervia in a seasonally inundated wetland</title><source>Cambridge Journals - CAUL Collection</source><creator>Tipping, Philip W. ; Martin, Melissa R. ; Foley, Jeremiah R. ; Pierce, Ryan M. ; Gettys, Lyn A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tipping, Philip W. ; Martin, Melissa R. ; Foley, Jeremiah R. ; Pierce, Ryan M. ; Gettys, Lyn A.</creatorcontrib><description>The potential of Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) S.T. Blake to reinvade cleared areas was evaluated over a 13-yr period that included two wildfires and the introduction of biological control agents. The first wildfire occurred in 1998 and was followed by a mean of 591.5 recruited seedlings m–2. Recruits from that fire were cleared 7 yr later in July 2005 for a second experiment to evaluate seedling recruitment into cleared areas. Seed rain, seedling recruitment and mortality, and sapling growth rates were measured in four plots located around individual large reproductive trees. A second natural wildfire in 2007 burned through those plots, leading to increases in seed rain followed by a pulse in recruitment of 21.04 seedlings m–2, 96.5% fewer than after the 1998 fire. Recruits in half of the plots around each tree were then treated with regular applications of an insecticide to restrict herbivory by biological control agents, while herbivory was not restricted in the other half. There was no difference in seedling mortality between treatments 1,083 d post-fire (2007) with 96.6% seedling mortality in the unrestricted herbivory treatment and 89.4% mortality in the restricted herbivory treatment. Recruits subjected to the restricted herbivory treatment grew taller than those in the unrestricted herbivory treatment, 101.3 cm versus 37.4 cm. Many of the recruits were attacked by the biological control agents, which slowed their growth. Although solitary M. quinquenervia trees retain some capacity to reinvade areas under specific circumstances, there was a downward trend in their overall invasiveness at this site, with progressively smaller recruitment cohorts due to biological control agents. Land managers should prioritize removing large reproductive trees over treating recently recruited populations, which can be left for many years for the biological control agents to suppress before any additional treatment would be needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1939-7291</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-747X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/inp.2021.4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: The Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Biocontrol ; Biological control ; Biomass ; Cohorts ; Evaluation ; Experiments ; Fires ; Growth rate ; Herbicides ; Herbivory ; Hydrology ; Insecticides ; integrated weed management ; Invasiveness ; Land management ; Melaleuca quinquenervia ; Mortality ; Population dynamics ; Rain ; Reagents ; Recruitment ; Recruitment (fisheries) ; seedbank ; Seedlings ; Seeds ; Trees ; weed ; Wildfires</subject><ispartof>Invasive plant science and management, 2021-03, Vol.14 (1), p.3-8</ispartof><rights>USDA-ARS, 2021. This is a work of the US Government and is not subject to copyright protection within the United States. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America.</rights><rights>USDA-ARS, 2021. This is a work of the US Government and is not subject to copyright protection within the United States. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b365t-5a299bc13fd651ddff475dae528b6c1022455e68eb2ae031815f31ce140c14153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b365t-5a299bc13fd651ddff475dae528b6c1022455e68eb2ae031815f31ce140c14153</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5054-7990</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1939729121000043/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27923,27924,55627</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tipping, Philip W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Melissa R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, Jeremiah R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Ryan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gettys, Lyn A.</creatorcontrib><title>The influence of two wildfires and biological control agents on the population dynamics of Melaleuca quinquenervia in a seasonally inundated wetland</title><title>Invasive plant science and management</title><addtitle>Invasive plant sci. manag</addtitle><description>The potential of Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) S.T. Blake to reinvade cleared areas was evaluated over a 13-yr period that included two wildfires and the introduction of biological control agents. The first wildfire occurred in 1998 and was followed by a mean of 591.5 recruited seedlings m–2. Recruits from that fire were cleared 7 yr later in July 2005 for a second experiment to evaluate seedling recruitment into cleared areas. Seed rain, seedling recruitment and mortality, and sapling growth rates were measured in four plots located around individual large reproductive trees. A second natural wildfire in 2007 burned through those plots, leading to increases in seed rain followed by a pulse in recruitment of 21.04 seedlings m–2, 96.5% fewer than after the 1998 fire. Recruits in half of the plots around each tree were then treated with regular applications of an insecticide to restrict herbivory by biological control agents, while herbivory was not restricted in the other half. There was no difference in seedling mortality between treatments 1,083 d post-fire (2007) with 96.6% seedling mortality in the unrestricted herbivory treatment and 89.4% mortality in the restricted herbivory treatment. Recruits subjected to the restricted herbivory treatment grew taller than those in the unrestricted herbivory treatment, 101.3 cm versus 37.4 cm. Many of the recruits were attacked by the biological control agents, which slowed their growth. Although solitary M. quinquenervia trees retain some capacity to reinvade areas under specific circumstances, there was a downward trend in their overall invasiveness at this site, with progressively smaller recruitment cohorts due to biological control agents. Land managers should prioritize removing large reproductive trees over treating recently recruited populations, which can be left for many years for the biological control agents to suppress before any additional treatment would be needed.</description><subject>Biocontrol</subject><subject>Biological control</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Cohorts</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fires</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>integrated weed management</subject><subject>Invasiveness</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Melaleuca quinquenervia</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Population dynamics</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Reagents</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Recruitment (fisheries)</subject><subject>seedbank</subject><subject>Seedlings</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>weed</subject><subject>Wildfires</subject><issn>1939-7291</issn><issn>1939-747X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEURgdRUKsbnyDgRsTWJDOZdpYi_oHiRsHdcCe5qZE0GZOMpe_hA5tSxY24Si6ce77LVxRHjE4YZdNz4_oJp5xNqq1ijzVlM55W05ftnz9v2G6xH-MbpTWt62av-Hx6RWKctgM6icRrkpaeLI1V2gSMBJwinfHWz40ES6R3KXhLYI4uReIdSXm_9_1gIZk8qpWDhZFxbXpACxYHCeR9MO49J2D4MJDjCJCIEL0Da1d5HpyChIosMdmceFDsaLARD7_fUfF8ffV0eTu-f7y5u7y4H3dlLdJYAG-aTrJSq1owpbSupkIBCj7rasko55UQWM-w44C0ZDMmdMkksopKVjFRjorjjbcPPp8XU_vmh5CPii0XNMtmXPBMnW4oGXyMAXXbB7OAsGoZbdett7n1dt16W2X47BuGRReMmuOv80_8ZIPnjr3D_8xfhfOUag</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Tipping, Philip W.</creator><creator>Martin, Melissa R.</creator><creator>Foley, Jeremiah R.</creator><creator>Pierce, Ryan M.</creator><creator>Gettys, Lyn A.</creator><general>The Weed Science Society of America</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5054-7990</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>The influence of two wildfires and biological control agents on the population dynamics of Melaleuca quinquenervia in a seasonally inundated wetland</title><author>Tipping, Philip W. ; Martin, Melissa R. ; Foley, Jeremiah R. ; Pierce, Ryan M. ; Gettys, Lyn A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b365t-5a299bc13fd651ddff475dae528b6c1022455e68eb2ae031815f31ce140c14153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biocontrol</topic><topic>Biological control</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Cohorts</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fires</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>integrated weed management</topic><topic>Invasiveness</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Melaleuca quinquenervia</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Population dynamics</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Reagents</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Recruitment (fisheries)</topic><topic>seedbank</topic><topic>Seedlings</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>weed</topic><topic>Wildfires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tipping, Philip W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Melissa R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, Jeremiah R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Ryan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gettys, Lyn A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Invasive plant science and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tipping, Philip W.</au><au>Martin, Melissa R.</au><au>Foley, Jeremiah R.</au><au>Pierce, Ryan M.</au><au>Gettys, Lyn A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The influence of two wildfires and biological control agents on the population dynamics of Melaleuca quinquenervia in a seasonally inundated wetland</atitle><jtitle>Invasive plant science and management</jtitle><addtitle>Invasive plant sci. manag</addtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>3-8</pages><issn>1939-7291</issn><eissn>1939-747X</eissn><abstract>The potential of Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) S.T. Blake to reinvade cleared areas was evaluated over a 13-yr period that included two wildfires and the introduction of biological control agents. The first wildfire occurred in 1998 and was followed by a mean of 591.5 recruited seedlings m–2. Recruits from that fire were cleared 7 yr later in July 2005 for a second experiment to evaluate seedling recruitment into cleared areas. Seed rain, seedling recruitment and mortality, and sapling growth rates were measured in four plots located around individual large reproductive trees. A second natural wildfire in 2007 burned through those plots, leading to increases in seed rain followed by a pulse in recruitment of 21.04 seedlings m–2, 96.5% fewer than after the 1998 fire. Recruits in half of the plots around each tree were then treated with regular applications of an insecticide to restrict herbivory by biological control agents, while herbivory was not restricted in the other half. There was no difference in seedling mortality between treatments 1,083 d post-fire (2007) with 96.6% seedling mortality in the unrestricted herbivory treatment and 89.4% mortality in the restricted herbivory treatment. Recruits subjected to the restricted herbivory treatment grew taller than those in the unrestricted herbivory treatment, 101.3 cm versus 37.4 cm. Many of the recruits were attacked by the biological control agents, which slowed their growth. Although solitary M. quinquenervia trees retain some capacity to reinvade areas under specific circumstances, there was a downward trend in their overall invasiveness at this site, with progressively smaller recruitment cohorts due to biological control agents. Land managers should prioritize removing large reproductive trees over treating recently recruited populations, which can be left for many years for the biological control agents to suppress before any additional treatment would be needed.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>The Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1017/inp.2021.4</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5054-7990</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1939-7291 |
ispartof | Invasive plant science and management, 2021-03, Vol.14 (1), p.3-8 |
issn | 1939-7291 1939-747X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2504758252 |
source | Cambridge Journals - CAUL Collection |
subjects | Biocontrol Biological control Biomass Cohorts Evaluation Experiments Fires Growth rate Herbicides Herbivory Hydrology Insecticides integrated weed management Invasiveness Land management Melaleuca quinquenervia Mortality Population dynamics Rain Reagents Recruitment Recruitment (fisheries) seedbank Seedlings Seeds Trees weed Wildfires |
title | The influence of two wildfires and biological control agents on the population dynamics of Melaleuca quinquenervia in a seasonally inundated wetland |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T08%3A11%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20influence%20of%20two%20wildfires%20and%20biological%20control%20agents%20on%20the%20population%20dynamics%20of%20Melaleuca%20quinquenervia%20in%20a%20seasonally%20inundated%20wetland&rft.jtitle=Invasive%20plant%20science%20and%20management&rft.au=Tipping,%20Philip%20W.&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=3-8&rft.issn=1939-7291&rft.eissn=1939-747X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/inp.2021.4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2504758252%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2504758252&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_inp_2021_4&rfr_iscdi=true |