Multi-objective optimization of hydrogen liquefaction process integrated with liquefied natural gas system

•Energy consumption, cost, and CO2 emission of hydrogen liquefaction were optimized.•Maximum LNG usage and minimum GH2 and N2 flowrates ensure optimal energy and cost.•If cost increases 45% from the base case, total CO2 emissions could decrease 38%.•Specific energy consumption of optimized case show...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy conversion and management 2021-03, Vol.231, p.113835, Article 113835
Hauptverfasser: Bae, Ju-Eon, Wilailak, Supaporn, Yang, Jae-Hyeon, Yun, Dong-Yeol, Zahid, Umer, Lee, Chul-Jin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 113835
container_title Energy conversion and management
container_volume 231
creator Bae, Ju-Eon
Wilailak, Supaporn
Yang, Jae-Hyeon
Yun, Dong-Yeol
Zahid, Umer
Lee, Chul-Jin
description •Energy consumption, cost, and CO2 emission of hydrogen liquefaction were optimized.•Maximum LNG usage and minimum GH2 and N2 flowrates ensure optimal energy and cost.•If cost increases 45% from the base case, total CO2 emissions could decrease 38%.•Specific energy consumption of optimized case shows an increase of 0.37 kWh/kg-LH2. Liquid hydrogen is gaining increasing attention owing to its high energy density as 10.1 MJ/L compared to gaseous hydrogen as 5.6 MJ/L at 700 bar. However, the energy required for its cryogenic processes is significant. To reduce this energy demand, liquefied natural gas (LNG) cooling was introduced in addition to a nitrogen refrigerant to the hydrogen liquefaction process. The resultant hydrogen production from the steam methane reforming process via LNG emits carbon dioxide. Therefore, it is necessary to consider both energy and CO2 emission when optimizing this system. To minimize these factors, single and multi-objective optimizations were performed, as well as a cost analysis in order to determine the optimal performance. The results of multi-objective optimization reveal that the CO2 emissions decrease by 38%, whereas the total investment cost is increased by 45% compared to the base case. The specific energy consumption is increased from 10.76 kWh/kg-LH2 to 11.13 kWh/kg-LH2. Therefore, the compromise between the cost and the CO2 emissions is made in the proposed case. These results will provide valuable insights regarding the economic demand and CO2 emission for future decision-making processes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.113835
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2503921257</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196890421000121</els_id><sourcerecordid>2503921257</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-461a74741d8000f5ee745d23af16455bc798b9cf9df91cfe88eebea09e47caae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwCigS5wTbiZP4Bqr4k4q4wNlynHXrKImL7RSVp8el5cxptdqZ3dkPoWuCM4JJedtlMCo7DnLMKKYkIySvc3aCZqSueEoprU7RDBNepjXHxTm68L7DGOcMlzPUvU59MKltOlDBbCGxm2AG8y2DsWNidbLetc6uYEx68zmBlup3sHFWgfeJGQOsnAzQJl8mrI8iE9tRhsnJPllJn_idDzBcojMtew9XxzpHH48P74vndPn29LK4X6YqL3BIi5LIqqgK0tYxpWYAVcFamktNyoKxRlW8brjSvNWcKA11DdCAxByKSkkJ-RzdHPbGkDGND6KzkxvjSUEZzjkllFVRVR5UylnvHWixcWaQbicIFnuuohN_XMWeqzhwjca7gxHiD1sDTnhlohJa4yJD0Vrz34ofBTiH5Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2503921257</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi-objective optimization of hydrogen liquefaction process integrated with liquefied natural gas system</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Bae, Ju-Eon ; Wilailak, Supaporn ; Yang, Jae-Hyeon ; Yun, Dong-Yeol ; Zahid, Umer ; Lee, Chul-Jin</creator><creatorcontrib>Bae, Ju-Eon ; Wilailak, Supaporn ; Yang, Jae-Hyeon ; Yun, Dong-Yeol ; Zahid, Umer ; Lee, Chul-Jin</creatorcontrib><description>•Energy consumption, cost, and CO2 emission of hydrogen liquefaction were optimized.•Maximum LNG usage and minimum GH2 and N2 flowrates ensure optimal energy and cost.•If cost increases 45% from the base case, total CO2 emissions could decrease 38%.•Specific energy consumption of optimized case shows an increase of 0.37 kWh/kg-LH2. Liquid hydrogen is gaining increasing attention owing to its high energy density as 10.1 MJ/L compared to gaseous hydrogen as 5.6 MJ/L at 700 bar. However, the energy required for its cryogenic processes is significant. To reduce this energy demand, liquefied natural gas (LNG) cooling was introduced in addition to a nitrogen refrigerant to the hydrogen liquefaction process. The resultant hydrogen production from the steam methane reforming process via LNG emits carbon dioxide. Therefore, it is necessary to consider both energy and CO2 emission when optimizing this system. To minimize these factors, single and multi-objective optimizations were performed, as well as a cost analysis in order to determine the optimal performance. The results of multi-objective optimization reveal that the CO2 emissions decrease by 38%, whereas the total investment cost is increased by 45% compared to the base case. The specific energy consumption is increased from 10.76 kWh/kg-LH2 to 11.13 kWh/kg-LH2. Therefore, the compromise between the cost and the CO2 emissions is made in the proposed case. These results will provide valuable insights regarding the economic demand and CO2 emission for future decision-making processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-8904</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.113835</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Cost analysis ; Decision making ; Emission ; Energy consumption ; Energy demand ; Flux density ; Genetic Algorithm ; Hydrogen ; Hydrogen Liquefaction ; Hydrogen production ; Liquefaction ; Liquefied natural gas ; Liquid hydrogen ; Multi-objective Optimization ; Multiple objective analysis ; Natural gas ; Optimization ; Reforming ; Steam</subject><ispartof>Energy conversion and management, 2021-03, Vol.231, p.113835, Article 113835</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Mar 1, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-461a74741d8000f5ee745d23af16455bc798b9cf9df91cfe88eebea09e47caae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-461a74741d8000f5ee745d23af16455bc798b9cf9df91cfe88eebea09e47caae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.113835$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bae, Ju-Eon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilailak, Supaporn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jae-Hyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yun, Dong-Yeol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zahid, Umer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chul-Jin</creatorcontrib><title>Multi-objective optimization of hydrogen liquefaction process integrated with liquefied natural gas system</title><title>Energy conversion and management</title><description>•Energy consumption, cost, and CO2 emission of hydrogen liquefaction were optimized.•Maximum LNG usage and minimum GH2 and N2 flowrates ensure optimal energy and cost.•If cost increases 45% from the base case, total CO2 emissions could decrease 38%.•Specific energy consumption of optimized case shows an increase of 0.37 kWh/kg-LH2. Liquid hydrogen is gaining increasing attention owing to its high energy density as 10.1 MJ/L compared to gaseous hydrogen as 5.6 MJ/L at 700 bar. However, the energy required for its cryogenic processes is significant. To reduce this energy demand, liquefied natural gas (LNG) cooling was introduced in addition to a nitrogen refrigerant to the hydrogen liquefaction process. The resultant hydrogen production from the steam methane reforming process via LNG emits carbon dioxide. Therefore, it is necessary to consider both energy and CO2 emission when optimizing this system. To minimize these factors, single and multi-objective optimizations were performed, as well as a cost analysis in order to determine the optimal performance. The results of multi-objective optimization reveal that the CO2 emissions decrease by 38%, whereas the total investment cost is increased by 45% compared to the base case. The specific energy consumption is increased from 10.76 kWh/kg-LH2 to 11.13 kWh/kg-LH2. Therefore, the compromise between the cost and the CO2 emissions is made in the proposed case. These results will provide valuable insights regarding the economic demand and CO2 emission for future decision-making processes.</description><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Emission</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy demand</subject><subject>Flux density</subject><subject>Genetic Algorithm</subject><subject>Hydrogen</subject><subject>Hydrogen Liquefaction</subject><subject>Hydrogen production</subject><subject>Liquefaction</subject><subject>Liquefied natural gas</subject><subject>Liquid hydrogen</subject><subject>Multi-objective Optimization</subject><subject>Multiple objective analysis</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Reforming</subject><subject>Steam</subject><issn>0196-8904</issn><issn>1879-2227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwCigS5wTbiZP4Bqr4k4q4wNlynHXrKImL7RSVp8el5cxptdqZ3dkPoWuCM4JJedtlMCo7DnLMKKYkIySvc3aCZqSueEoprU7RDBNepjXHxTm68L7DGOcMlzPUvU59MKltOlDBbCGxm2AG8y2DsWNidbLetc6uYEx68zmBlup3sHFWgfeJGQOsnAzQJl8mrI8iE9tRhsnJPllJn_idDzBcojMtew9XxzpHH48P74vndPn29LK4X6YqL3BIi5LIqqgK0tYxpWYAVcFamktNyoKxRlW8brjSvNWcKA11DdCAxByKSkkJ-RzdHPbGkDGND6KzkxvjSUEZzjkllFVRVR5UylnvHWixcWaQbicIFnuuohN_XMWeqzhwjca7gxHiD1sDTnhlohJa4yJD0Vrz34ofBTiH5Q</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Bae, Ju-Eon</creator><creator>Wilailak, Supaporn</creator><creator>Yang, Jae-Hyeon</creator><creator>Yun, Dong-Yeol</creator><creator>Zahid, Umer</creator><creator>Lee, Chul-Jin</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Multi-objective optimization of hydrogen liquefaction process integrated with liquefied natural gas system</title><author>Bae, Ju-Eon ; Wilailak, Supaporn ; Yang, Jae-Hyeon ; Yun, Dong-Yeol ; Zahid, Umer ; Lee, Chul-Jin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-461a74741d8000f5ee745d23af16455bc798b9cf9df91cfe88eebea09e47caae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Emission</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy demand</topic><topic>Flux density</topic><topic>Genetic Algorithm</topic><topic>Hydrogen</topic><topic>Hydrogen Liquefaction</topic><topic>Hydrogen production</topic><topic>Liquefaction</topic><topic>Liquefied natural gas</topic><topic>Liquid hydrogen</topic><topic>Multi-objective Optimization</topic><topic>Multiple objective analysis</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Reforming</topic><topic>Steam</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bae, Ju-Eon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilailak, Supaporn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jae-Hyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yun, Dong-Yeol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zahid, Umer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chul-Jin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy conversion and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bae, Ju-Eon</au><au>Wilailak, Supaporn</au><au>Yang, Jae-Hyeon</au><au>Yun, Dong-Yeol</au><au>Zahid, Umer</au><au>Lee, Chul-Jin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi-objective optimization of hydrogen liquefaction process integrated with liquefied natural gas system</atitle><jtitle>Energy conversion and management</jtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>231</volume><spage>113835</spage><pages>113835-</pages><artnum>113835</artnum><issn>0196-8904</issn><eissn>1879-2227</eissn><abstract>•Energy consumption, cost, and CO2 emission of hydrogen liquefaction were optimized.•Maximum LNG usage and minimum GH2 and N2 flowrates ensure optimal energy and cost.•If cost increases 45% from the base case, total CO2 emissions could decrease 38%.•Specific energy consumption of optimized case shows an increase of 0.37 kWh/kg-LH2. Liquid hydrogen is gaining increasing attention owing to its high energy density as 10.1 MJ/L compared to gaseous hydrogen as 5.6 MJ/L at 700 bar. However, the energy required for its cryogenic processes is significant. To reduce this energy demand, liquefied natural gas (LNG) cooling was introduced in addition to a nitrogen refrigerant to the hydrogen liquefaction process. The resultant hydrogen production from the steam methane reforming process via LNG emits carbon dioxide. Therefore, it is necessary to consider both energy and CO2 emission when optimizing this system. To minimize these factors, single and multi-objective optimizations were performed, as well as a cost analysis in order to determine the optimal performance. The results of multi-objective optimization reveal that the CO2 emissions decrease by 38%, whereas the total investment cost is increased by 45% compared to the base case. The specific energy consumption is increased from 10.76 kWh/kg-LH2 to 11.13 kWh/kg-LH2. Therefore, the compromise between the cost and the CO2 emissions is made in the proposed case. These results will provide valuable insights regarding the economic demand and CO2 emission for future decision-making processes.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enconman.2021.113835</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-8904
ispartof Energy conversion and management, 2021-03, Vol.231, p.113835, Article 113835
issn 0196-8904
1879-2227
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2503921257
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Carbon dioxide
Carbon dioxide emissions
Cost analysis
Decision making
Emission
Energy consumption
Energy demand
Flux density
Genetic Algorithm
Hydrogen
Hydrogen Liquefaction
Hydrogen production
Liquefaction
Liquefied natural gas
Liquid hydrogen
Multi-objective Optimization
Multiple objective analysis
Natural gas
Optimization
Reforming
Steam
title Multi-objective optimization of hydrogen liquefaction process integrated with liquefied natural gas system
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T17%3A24%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-objective%20optimization%20of%20hydrogen%20liquefaction%20process%20integrated%20with%20liquefied%20natural%20gas%20system&rft.jtitle=Energy%20conversion%20and%20management&rft.au=Bae,%20Ju-Eon&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=231&rft.spage=113835&rft.pages=113835-&rft.artnum=113835&rft.issn=0196-8904&rft.eissn=1879-2227&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.113835&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2503921257%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2503921257&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0196890421000121&rfr_iscdi=true