Interspecific variation in ephippial size between Daphnia galeata and D. pulicaria in Lake Biwa, Japan
Daphnia , keystone herbivores in lakes, routinely produce immediately hatching eggs; additionally, they also produce resting eggs enveloped by an ephippial case, a thickened carapace that allows population survival under harsh environmental conditions. To examine differences in ephippial morphology...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Limnology 2021-04, Vol.22 (2), p.197-207 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 207 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 197 |
container_title | Limnology |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Tsugeki, Narumi K. Honjo, Mie N. Kuwae, Michinobu |
description | Daphnia
, keystone herbivores in lakes, routinely produce immediately hatching eggs; additionally, they also produce resting eggs enveloped by an ephippial case, a thickened carapace that allows population survival under harsh environmental conditions. To examine differences in ephippial morphology between
Daphnia
species in different subgenera, we conducted microscopic observations and genetic analyses based on the mitochondrial
12S rRNA
gene in ephippia from surface sediment in Lake Biwa, Japan. The lengths and heights of ephippia identified as
Daphnia galeata
Sars (
Hyalodaphnia
) were less than 0.82 and 0.50 mm, respectively, whereas those of
Daphnia pulicaria
Forbes (
Daphnia
) were greater than 0.87 and 0.53 mm, respectively, with the ephippial lengths of the two species differing significantly. The results indicate that
D. galeata
and
D. pulicaria
inhabiting Lake Biwa can be distinguished based on ephippium size, with a boundary ephippium length of approximately 0.86 mm. In concordance with this inference, historical data indicated that the length of ephippia recovered from sediment cores did not exceed 0.86 mm prior to the 1980s when
D. galeata
was the predominant species; however, it exceeded the threshold after 2000, coinciding with the coexistence of
D. galeata
and
D. pulicaria
. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10201-020-00646-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2503912923</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2503912923</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-b6b455d04c9997321c11535dba3a71a31d04e9af9e98966d933dea92f6983f333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwBzhZ4kqK187LR2h5FFXiAhI3a5M4rUtwjZ1Swa8nIQhuXGZX2vlmpSHkFNgEGMsuAjDOIOokYiyN0yjfIyOIhYzyVDzv_-4cDslRCGvGIEshHpF6blvtg9OlqU1J39EbbM3GUmOpdivjnMGGBvOpaaHbndaWztCtrEG6xEZjixRtRWcT6raNKXu8Rxf4oumV2eE5vUeH9pgc1NgEffIzx-Tp5vpxehctHm7n08tFVMbA26hIizhJKhaXUspMcCgBEpFUBQrMAAV0Jy2xllrmMk0rKUSlUfI6lbmohRBjcjbkOr952-rQqvVm6233UvGECQlc8t7FB1fpNyF4XSvnzSv6DwVM9X2qoU_VifruU-UdJAYodGa71P4v-h_qC6Asd1s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2503912923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interspecific variation in ephippial size between Daphnia galeata and D. pulicaria in Lake Biwa, Japan</title><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><creator>Tsugeki, Narumi K. ; Honjo, Mie N. ; Kuwae, Michinobu</creator><creatorcontrib>Tsugeki, Narumi K. ; Honjo, Mie N. ; Kuwae, Michinobu</creatorcontrib><description>Daphnia
, keystone herbivores in lakes, routinely produce immediately hatching eggs; additionally, they also produce resting eggs enveloped by an ephippial case, a thickened carapace that allows population survival under harsh environmental conditions. To examine differences in ephippial morphology between
Daphnia
species in different subgenera, we conducted microscopic observations and genetic analyses based on the mitochondrial
12S rRNA
gene in ephippia from surface sediment in Lake Biwa, Japan. The lengths and heights of ephippia identified as
Daphnia galeata
Sars (
Hyalodaphnia
) were less than 0.82 and 0.50 mm, respectively, whereas those of
Daphnia pulicaria
Forbes (
Daphnia
) were greater than 0.87 and 0.53 mm, respectively, with the ephippial lengths of the two species differing significantly. The results indicate that
D. galeata
and
D. pulicaria
inhabiting Lake Biwa can be distinguished based on ephippium size, with a boundary ephippium length of approximately 0.86 mm. In concordance with this inference, historical data indicated that the length of ephippia recovered from sediment cores did not exceed 0.86 mm prior to the 1980s when
D. galeata
was the predominant species; however, it exceeded the threshold after 2000, coinciding with the coexistence of
D. galeata
and
D. pulicaria
.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1439-8621</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-863X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10201-020-00646-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Singapore</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Carapace ; Coexistence ; Cores ; Daphnia ; Daphnia galeata ; Ecology ; Eggs ; Environment ; Environmental conditions ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Freshwater crustaceans ; Genetic analysis ; Hatching ; Herbivores ; History ; Interspecific ; Lake sediments ; Lakes ; Length ; Life Sciences ; Mitochondria ; Morphology ; Research Paper ; Resting eggs ; rRNA 12S ; Sediment ; Species ; Survival</subject><ispartof>Limnology, 2021-04, Vol.22 (2), p.197-207</ispartof><rights>The Japanese Society of Limnology 2020</rights><rights>The Japanese Society of Limnology 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-b6b455d04c9997321c11535dba3a71a31d04e9af9e98966d933dea92f6983f333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-b6b455d04c9997321c11535dba3a71a31d04e9af9e98966d933dea92f6983f333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10201-020-00646-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10201-020-00646-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tsugeki, Narumi K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honjo, Mie N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuwae, Michinobu</creatorcontrib><title>Interspecific variation in ephippial size between Daphnia galeata and D. pulicaria in Lake Biwa, Japan</title><title>Limnology</title><addtitle>Limnology</addtitle><description>Daphnia
, keystone herbivores in lakes, routinely produce immediately hatching eggs; additionally, they also produce resting eggs enveloped by an ephippial case, a thickened carapace that allows population survival under harsh environmental conditions. To examine differences in ephippial morphology between
Daphnia
species in different subgenera, we conducted microscopic observations and genetic analyses based on the mitochondrial
12S rRNA
gene in ephippia from surface sediment in Lake Biwa, Japan. The lengths and heights of ephippia identified as
Daphnia galeata
Sars (
Hyalodaphnia
) were less than 0.82 and 0.50 mm, respectively, whereas those of
Daphnia pulicaria
Forbes (
Daphnia
) were greater than 0.87 and 0.53 mm, respectively, with the ephippial lengths of the two species differing significantly. The results indicate that
D. galeata
and
D. pulicaria
inhabiting Lake Biwa can be distinguished based on ephippium size, with a boundary ephippium length of approximately 0.86 mm. In concordance with this inference, historical data indicated that the length of ephippia recovered from sediment cores did not exceed 0.86 mm prior to the 1980s when
D. galeata
was the predominant species; however, it exceeded the threshold after 2000, coinciding with the coexistence of
D. galeata
and
D. pulicaria
.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Carapace</subject><subject>Coexistence</subject><subject>Cores</subject><subject>Daphnia</subject><subject>Daphnia galeata</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater crustaceans</subject><subject>Genetic analysis</subject><subject>Hatching</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Interspecific</subject><subject>Lake sediments</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Length</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mitochondria</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Resting eggs</subject><subject>rRNA 12S</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Survival</subject><issn>1439-8621</issn><issn>1439-863X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwBzhZ4kqK187LR2h5FFXiAhI3a5M4rUtwjZ1Swa8nIQhuXGZX2vlmpSHkFNgEGMsuAjDOIOokYiyN0yjfIyOIhYzyVDzv_-4cDslRCGvGIEshHpF6blvtg9OlqU1J39EbbM3GUmOpdivjnMGGBvOpaaHbndaWztCtrEG6xEZjixRtRWcT6raNKXu8Rxf4oumV2eE5vUeH9pgc1NgEffIzx-Tp5vpxehctHm7n08tFVMbA26hIizhJKhaXUspMcCgBEpFUBQrMAAV0Jy2xllrmMk0rKUSlUfI6lbmohRBjcjbkOr952-rQqvVm6233UvGECQlc8t7FB1fpNyF4XSvnzSv6DwVM9X2qoU_VifruU-UdJAYodGa71P4v-h_qC6Asd1s</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Tsugeki, Narumi K.</creator><creator>Honjo, Mie N.</creator><creator>Kuwae, Michinobu</creator><general>Springer Singapore</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Interspecific variation in ephippial size between Daphnia galeata and D. pulicaria in Lake Biwa, Japan</title><author>Tsugeki, Narumi K. ; Honjo, Mie N. ; Kuwae, Michinobu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-b6b455d04c9997321c11535dba3a71a31d04e9af9e98966d933dea92f6983f333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Carapace</topic><topic>Coexistence</topic><topic>Cores</topic><topic>Daphnia</topic><topic>Daphnia galeata</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater crustaceans</topic><topic>Genetic analysis</topic><topic>Hatching</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Interspecific</topic><topic>Lake sediments</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Length</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mitochondria</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Resting eggs</topic><topic>rRNA 12S</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Survival</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tsugeki, Narumi K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honjo, Mie N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuwae, Michinobu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Limnology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tsugeki, Narumi K.</au><au>Honjo, Mie N.</au><au>Kuwae, Michinobu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interspecific variation in ephippial size between Daphnia galeata and D. pulicaria in Lake Biwa, Japan</atitle><jtitle>Limnology</jtitle><stitle>Limnology</stitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>197</spage><epage>207</epage><pages>197-207</pages><issn>1439-8621</issn><eissn>1439-863X</eissn><abstract>Daphnia
, keystone herbivores in lakes, routinely produce immediately hatching eggs; additionally, they also produce resting eggs enveloped by an ephippial case, a thickened carapace that allows population survival under harsh environmental conditions. To examine differences in ephippial morphology between
Daphnia
species in different subgenera, we conducted microscopic observations and genetic analyses based on the mitochondrial
12S rRNA
gene in ephippia from surface sediment in Lake Biwa, Japan. The lengths and heights of ephippia identified as
Daphnia galeata
Sars (
Hyalodaphnia
) were less than 0.82 and 0.50 mm, respectively, whereas those of
Daphnia pulicaria
Forbes (
Daphnia
) were greater than 0.87 and 0.53 mm, respectively, with the ephippial lengths of the two species differing significantly. The results indicate that
D. galeata
and
D. pulicaria
inhabiting Lake Biwa can be distinguished based on ephippium size, with a boundary ephippium length of approximately 0.86 mm. In concordance with this inference, historical data indicated that the length of ephippia recovered from sediment cores did not exceed 0.86 mm prior to the 1980s when
D. galeata
was the predominant species; however, it exceeded the threshold after 2000, coinciding with the coexistence of
D. galeata
and
D. pulicaria
.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Singapore</pub><doi>10.1007/s10201-020-00646-8</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1439-8621 |
ispartof | Limnology, 2021-04, Vol.22 (2), p.197-207 |
issn | 1439-8621 1439-863X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2503912923 |
source | SpringerLink (Online service) |
subjects | Biomedical and Life Sciences Carapace Coexistence Cores Daphnia Daphnia galeata Ecology Eggs Environment Environmental conditions Freshwater & Marine Ecology Freshwater crustaceans Genetic analysis Hatching Herbivores History Interspecific Lake sediments Lakes Length Life Sciences Mitochondria Morphology Research Paper Resting eggs rRNA 12S Sediment Species Survival |
title | Interspecific variation in ephippial size between Daphnia galeata and D. pulicaria in Lake Biwa, Japan |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T12%3A50%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interspecific%20variation%20in%20ephippial%20size%20between%20Daphnia%20galeata%20and%20D.%20pulicaria%20in%20Lake%20Biwa,%20Japan&rft.jtitle=Limnology&rft.au=Tsugeki,%20Narumi%20K.&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=197&rft.epage=207&rft.pages=197-207&rft.issn=1439-8621&rft.eissn=1439-863X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10201-020-00646-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2503912923%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2503912923&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |