Interspecific variation in ephippial size between Daphnia galeata and D. pulicaria in Lake Biwa, Japan

Daphnia , keystone herbivores in lakes, routinely produce immediately hatching eggs; additionally, they also produce resting eggs enveloped by an ephippial case, a thickened carapace that allows population survival under harsh environmental conditions. To examine differences in ephippial morphology...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Limnology 2021-04, Vol.22 (2), p.197-207
Hauptverfasser: Tsugeki, Narumi K., Honjo, Mie N., Kuwae, Michinobu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 207
container_issue 2
container_start_page 197
container_title Limnology
container_volume 22
creator Tsugeki, Narumi K.
Honjo, Mie N.
Kuwae, Michinobu
description Daphnia , keystone herbivores in lakes, routinely produce immediately hatching eggs; additionally, they also produce resting eggs enveloped by an ephippial case, a thickened carapace that allows population survival under harsh environmental conditions. To examine differences in ephippial morphology between Daphnia species in different subgenera, we conducted microscopic observations and genetic analyses based on the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene in ephippia from surface sediment in Lake Biwa, Japan. The lengths and heights of ephippia identified as Daphnia galeata Sars ( Hyalodaphnia ) were less than 0.82 and 0.50 mm, respectively, whereas those of Daphnia pulicaria Forbes ( Daphnia ) were greater than 0.87 and 0.53 mm, respectively, with the ephippial lengths of the two species differing significantly. The results indicate that D. galeata and D. pulicaria inhabiting Lake Biwa can be distinguished based on ephippium size, with a boundary ephippium length of approximately 0.86 mm. In concordance with this inference, historical data indicated that the length of ephippia recovered from sediment cores did not exceed 0.86 mm prior to the 1980s when D. galeata was the predominant species; however, it exceeded the threshold after 2000, coinciding with the coexistence of D. galeata and D. pulicaria .
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10201-020-00646-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2503912923</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2503912923</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-b6b455d04c9997321c11535dba3a71a31d04e9af9e98966d933dea92f6983f333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwBzhZ4kqK187LR2h5FFXiAhI3a5M4rUtwjZ1Swa8nIQhuXGZX2vlmpSHkFNgEGMsuAjDOIOokYiyN0yjfIyOIhYzyVDzv_-4cDslRCGvGIEshHpF6blvtg9OlqU1J39EbbM3GUmOpdivjnMGGBvOpaaHbndaWztCtrEG6xEZjixRtRWcT6raNKXu8Rxf4oumV2eE5vUeH9pgc1NgEffIzx-Tp5vpxehctHm7n08tFVMbA26hIizhJKhaXUspMcCgBEpFUBQrMAAV0Jy2xllrmMk0rKUSlUfI6lbmohRBjcjbkOr952-rQqvVm6233UvGECQlc8t7FB1fpNyF4XSvnzSv6DwVM9X2qoU_VifruU-UdJAYodGa71P4v-h_qC6Asd1s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2503912923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interspecific variation in ephippial size between Daphnia galeata and D. pulicaria in Lake Biwa, Japan</title><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><creator>Tsugeki, Narumi K. ; Honjo, Mie N. ; Kuwae, Michinobu</creator><creatorcontrib>Tsugeki, Narumi K. ; Honjo, Mie N. ; Kuwae, Michinobu</creatorcontrib><description>Daphnia , keystone herbivores in lakes, routinely produce immediately hatching eggs; additionally, they also produce resting eggs enveloped by an ephippial case, a thickened carapace that allows population survival under harsh environmental conditions. To examine differences in ephippial morphology between Daphnia species in different subgenera, we conducted microscopic observations and genetic analyses based on the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene in ephippia from surface sediment in Lake Biwa, Japan. The lengths and heights of ephippia identified as Daphnia galeata Sars ( Hyalodaphnia ) were less than 0.82 and 0.50 mm, respectively, whereas those of Daphnia pulicaria Forbes ( Daphnia ) were greater than 0.87 and 0.53 mm, respectively, with the ephippial lengths of the two species differing significantly. The results indicate that D. galeata and D. pulicaria inhabiting Lake Biwa can be distinguished based on ephippium size, with a boundary ephippium length of approximately 0.86 mm. In concordance with this inference, historical data indicated that the length of ephippia recovered from sediment cores did not exceed 0.86 mm prior to the 1980s when D. galeata was the predominant species; however, it exceeded the threshold after 2000, coinciding with the coexistence of D. galeata and D. pulicaria .</description><identifier>ISSN: 1439-8621</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-863X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10201-020-00646-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Singapore</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Carapace ; Coexistence ; Cores ; Daphnia ; Daphnia galeata ; Ecology ; Eggs ; Environment ; Environmental conditions ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Freshwater crustaceans ; Genetic analysis ; Hatching ; Herbivores ; History ; Interspecific ; Lake sediments ; Lakes ; Length ; Life Sciences ; Mitochondria ; Morphology ; Research Paper ; Resting eggs ; rRNA 12S ; Sediment ; Species ; Survival</subject><ispartof>Limnology, 2021-04, Vol.22 (2), p.197-207</ispartof><rights>The Japanese Society of Limnology 2020</rights><rights>The Japanese Society of Limnology 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-b6b455d04c9997321c11535dba3a71a31d04e9af9e98966d933dea92f6983f333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-b6b455d04c9997321c11535dba3a71a31d04e9af9e98966d933dea92f6983f333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10201-020-00646-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10201-020-00646-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tsugeki, Narumi K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honjo, Mie N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuwae, Michinobu</creatorcontrib><title>Interspecific variation in ephippial size between Daphnia galeata and D. pulicaria in Lake Biwa, Japan</title><title>Limnology</title><addtitle>Limnology</addtitle><description>Daphnia , keystone herbivores in lakes, routinely produce immediately hatching eggs; additionally, they also produce resting eggs enveloped by an ephippial case, a thickened carapace that allows population survival under harsh environmental conditions. To examine differences in ephippial morphology between Daphnia species in different subgenera, we conducted microscopic observations and genetic analyses based on the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene in ephippia from surface sediment in Lake Biwa, Japan. The lengths and heights of ephippia identified as Daphnia galeata Sars ( Hyalodaphnia ) were less than 0.82 and 0.50 mm, respectively, whereas those of Daphnia pulicaria Forbes ( Daphnia ) were greater than 0.87 and 0.53 mm, respectively, with the ephippial lengths of the two species differing significantly. The results indicate that D. galeata and D. pulicaria inhabiting Lake Biwa can be distinguished based on ephippium size, with a boundary ephippium length of approximately 0.86 mm. In concordance with this inference, historical data indicated that the length of ephippia recovered from sediment cores did not exceed 0.86 mm prior to the 1980s when D. galeata was the predominant species; however, it exceeded the threshold after 2000, coinciding with the coexistence of D. galeata and D. pulicaria .</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Carapace</subject><subject>Coexistence</subject><subject>Cores</subject><subject>Daphnia</subject><subject>Daphnia galeata</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater crustaceans</subject><subject>Genetic analysis</subject><subject>Hatching</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Interspecific</subject><subject>Lake sediments</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Length</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mitochondria</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Resting eggs</subject><subject>rRNA 12S</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Survival</subject><issn>1439-8621</issn><issn>1439-863X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwBzhZ4kqK187LR2h5FFXiAhI3a5M4rUtwjZ1Swa8nIQhuXGZX2vlmpSHkFNgEGMsuAjDOIOokYiyN0yjfIyOIhYzyVDzv_-4cDslRCGvGIEshHpF6blvtg9OlqU1J39EbbM3GUmOpdivjnMGGBvOpaaHbndaWztCtrEG6xEZjixRtRWcT6raNKXu8Rxf4oumV2eE5vUeH9pgc1NgEffIzx-Tp5vpxehctHm7n08tFVMbA26hIizhJKhaXUspMcCgBEpFUBQrMAAV0Jy2xllrmMk0rKUSlUfI6lbmohRBjcjbkOr952-rQqvVm6233UvGECQlc8t7FB1fpNyF4XSvnzSv6DwVM9X2qoU_VifruU-UdJAYodGa71P4v-h_qC6Asd1s</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Tsugeki, Narumi K.</creator><creator>Honjo, Mie N.</creator><creator>Kuwae, Michinobu</creator><general>Springer Singapore</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Interspecific variation in ephippial size between Daphnia galeata and D. pulicaria in Lake Biwa, Japan</title><author>Tsugeki, Narumi K. ; Honjo, Mie N. ; Kuwae, Michinobu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-b6b455d04c9997321c11535dba3a71a31d04e9af9e98966d933dea92f6983f333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Carapace</topic><topic>Coexistence</topic><topic>Cores</topic><topic>Daphnia</topic><topic>Daphnia galeata</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater crustaceans</topic><topic>Genetic analysis</topic><topic>Hatching</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Interspecific</topic><topic>Lake sediments</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Length</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mitochondria</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Resting eggs</topic><topic>rRNA 12S</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Survival</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tsugeki, Narumi K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honjo, Mie N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuwae, Michinobu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Limnology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tsugeki, Narumi K.</au><au>Honjo, Mie N.</au><au>Kuwae, Michinobu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interspecific variation in ephippial size between Daphnia galeata and D. pulicaria in Lake Biwa, Japan</atitle><jtitle>Limnology</jtitle><stitle>Limnology</stitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>197</spage><epage>207</epage><pages>197-207</pages><issn>1439-8621</issn><eissn>1439-863X</eissn><abstract>Daphnia , keystone herbivores in lakes, routinely produce immediately hatching eggs; additionally, they also produce resting eggs enveloped by an ephippial case, a thickened carapace that allows population survival under harsh environmental conditions. To examine differences in ephippial morphology between Daphnia species in different subgenera, we conducted microscopic observations and genetic analyses based on the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene in ephippia from surface sediment in Lake Biwa, Japan. The lengths and heights of ephippia identified as Daphnia galeata Sars ( Hyalodaphnia ) were less than 0.82 and 0.50 mm, respectively, whereas those of Daphnia pulicaria Forbes ( Daphnia ) were greater than 0.87 and 0.53 mm, respectively, with the ephippial lengths of the two species differing significantly. The results indicate that D. galeata and D. pulicaria inhabiting Lake Biwa can be distinguished based on ephippium size, with a boundary ephippium length of approximately 0.86 mm. In concordance with this inference, historical data indicated that the length of ephippia recovered from sediment cores did not exceed 0.86 mm prior to the 1980s when D. galeata was the predominant species; however, it exceeded the threshold after 2000, coinciding with the coexistence of D. galeata and D. pulicaria .</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Singapore</pub><doi>10.1007/s10201-020-00646-8</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1439-8621
ispartof Limnology, 2021-04, Vol.22 (2), p.197-207
issn 1439-8621
1439-863X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2503912923
source SpringerLink (Online service)
subjects Biomedical and Life Sciences
Carapace
Coexistence
Cores
Daphnia
Daphnia galeata
Ecology
Eggs
Environment
Environmental conditions
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Freshwater crustaceans
Genetic analysis
Hatching
Herbivores
History
Interspecific
Lake sediments
Lakes
Length
Life Sciences
Mitochondria
Morphology
Research Paper
Resting eggs
rRNA 12S
Sediment
Species
Survival
title Interspecific variation in ephippial size between Daphnia galeata and D. pulicaria in Lake Biwa, Japan
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T12%3A50%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interspecific%20variation%20in%20ephippial%20size%20between%20Daphnia%20galeata%20and%20D.%20pulicaria%20in%20Lake%20Biwa,%20Japan&rft.jtitle=Limnology&rft.au=Tsugeki,%20Narumi%20K.&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=197&rft.epage=207&rft.pages=197-207&rft.issn=1439-8621&rft.eissn=1439-863X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10201-020-00646-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2503912923%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2503912923&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true