Strength evaluation of granite block samples with different predictive models

Over the last decade, application of soft computing techniques has rapidly grown up in different scientific fields, especially in rock mechanics. One of these cases relates to indirect assessment of uniaxial compressive strength ( UCS ) of rock samples with different artificial intelligent-based met...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Engineering with computers 2021-04, Vol.37 (2), p.891-908
Hauptverfasser: Fang, Qiancheng, Yazdani Bejarbaneh, Behnam, Vatandoust, Mohammad, Jahed Armaghani, Danial, Ramesh Murlidhar, Bhatawdekar, Tonnizam Mohamad, Edy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 908
container_issue 2
container_start_page 891
container_title Engineering with computers
container_volume 37
creator Fang, Qiancheng
Yazdani Bejarbaneh, Behnam
Vatandoust, Mohammad
Jahed Armaghani, Danial
Ramesh Murlidhar, Bhatawdekar
Tonnizam Mohamad, Edy
description Over the last decade, application of soft computing techniques has rapidly grown up in different scientific fields, especially in rock mechanics. One of these cases relates to indirect assessment of uniaxial compressive strength ( UCS ) of rock samples with different artificial intelligent-based methods. In fact, the main advantage of such systems is to readily remove some difficulties arising in direct assessment of UCS , such as time-consuming and costly UCS test procedure. This study puts an effort to propose four accurate and practical predictive models of UCS using artificial neural network (ANN), hybrid ANN with imperialism competitive algorithm (ICA–ANN), hybrid ANN with artificial bee colony (ABC–ANN) and genetic programming (GP) approaches. To reach the aim of the current study, an experimental database containing a total of 71 data sets was set up by performing a number of laboratory tests on the rock samples collected from a tunnel site in Malaysia. To construct the desired predictive models of UCS based on training and test patterns, a combination of several rock characteristics with the most influence on UCS has been used as input parameters, i.e. porosity ( n ), Schmidt hammer rebound number ( R ), p-wave velocity ( V p ) and point load strength index ( I s(50)). To evaluate and compare the prediction precision of the developed models, a series of statistical indices, such as root mean squared error (RMSE), determination coefficient ( R 2 ) and variance account for (VAF) are utilized. Based on the simulation results and the measured indices, it was observed that the proposed GP model with the training and test RMSE values 0.0726 and 0.0691, respectively, gives better performance as compared to the other proposed models with values of (0.0740 and 0.0885), (0.0785 and 0.0742), and (0.0746 and 0.0771) for ANN, ICA–ANN and ABC–ANN, respectively. Moreover, a parametric analysis is accomplished on the proposed GP model to further verify its generalization capability. Hence, this GP-based model can be considered as a new applicable equation to accurately estimate the uniaxial compressive strength of granite block samples.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00366-019-00872-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2503536729</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2503536729</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b86b587060ecb46867d60894c4f84ef87eca964f575fc42dcc67788118b43c073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQRi0EEqXwB5gsMRvOsWM7I6qAIhUxALOVOOeSkibBdov49wSCxMZ0y3vfSY-Qcw6XHEBfRQChFANeMACjMyYPyIxLkbNcKXFIZsC1ZqCUPiYnMW4AuAAoZuThKQXs1umV4r5sd2Vq-o72nq5D2TUJadX27o3Gcju0GOlHM4J14z2OUqJDwLpxqdkj3fY1tvGUHPmyjXj2e-fk5fbmebFkq8e7-8X1ijnBi8Qqo6rcaFCArpLKKF0rMIV00huJ3mh0ZaGkz3Xuncxq55TWxnBuKikcaDEnF9PuEPr3HcZkN_0udONLm-UgcqF0VoxUNlEu9DEG9HYIzbYMn5aD_c5mp2x2zGZ_slk5SmKS4gh3awx_0_9YX_eGcBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2503536729</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strength evaluation of granite block samples with different predictive models</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Fang, Qiancheng ; Yazdani Bejarbaneh, Behnam ; Vatandoust, Mohammad ; Jahed Armaghani, Danial ; Ramesh Murlidhar, Bhatawdekar ; Tonnizam Mohamad, Edy</creator><creatorcontrib>Fang, Qiancheng ; Yazdani Bejarbaneh, Behnam ; Vatandoust, Mohammad ; Jahed Armaghani, Danial ; Ramesh Murlidhar, Bhatawdekar ; Tonnizam Mohamad, Edy</creatorcontrib><description>Over the last decade, application of soft computing techniques has rapidly grown up in different scientific fields, especially in rock mechanics. One of these cases relates to indirect assessment of uniaxial compressive strength ( UCS ) of rock samples with different artificial intelligent-based methods. In fact, the main advantage of such systems is to readily remove some difficulties arising in direct assessment of UCS , such as time-consuming and costly UCS test procedure. This study puts an effort to propose four accurate and practical predictive models of UCS using artificial neural network (ANN), hybrid ANN with imperialism competitive algorithm (ICA–ANN), hybrid ANN with artificial bee colony (ABC–ANN) and genetic programming (GP) approaches. To reach the aim of the current study, an experimental database containing a total of 71 data sets was set up by performing a number of laboratory tests on the rock samples collected from a tunnel site in Malaysia. To construct the desired predictive models of UCS based on training and test patterns, a combination of several rock characteristics with the most influence on UCS has been used as input parameters, i.e. porosity ( n ), Schmidt hammer rebound number ( R ), p-wave velocity ( V p ) and point load strength index ( I s(50)). To evaluate and compare the prediction precision of the developed models, a series of statistical indices, such as root mean squared error (RMSE), determination coefficient ( R 2 ) and variance account for (VAF) are utilized. Based on the simulation results and the measured indices, it was observed that the proposed GP model with the training and test RMSE values 0.0726 and 0.0691, respectively, gives better performance as compared to the other proposed models with values of (0.0740 and 0.0885), (0.0785 and 0.0742), and (0.0746 and 0.0771) for ANN, ICA–ANN and ABC–ANN, respectively. Moreover, a parametric analysis is accomplished on the proposed GP model to further verify its generalization capability. Hence, this GP-based model can be considered as a new applicable equation to accurately estimate the uniaxial compressive strength of granite block samples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0177-0667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-5663</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00366-019-00872-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Artificial intelligence ; Artificial neural networks ; CAE) and Design ; Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control; Optimization ; Classical Mechanics ; Compressive strength ; Computer Science ; Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD ; Control ; Genetic algorithms ; Granite ; Laboratory tests ; Math. Applications in Chemistry ; Mathematical and Computational Engineering ; Original Article ; P waves ; Parametric analysis ; Parametric statistics ; Porosity ; Prediction models ; Rock mechanics ; Root-mean-square errors ; Soft computing ; Statistical methods ; Swarm intelligence ; Systems Theory ; Test procedures ; Training ; Tunnel construction ; Wave velocity</subject><ispartof>Engineering with computers, 2021-04, Vol.37 (2), p.891-908</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b86b587060ecb46867d60894c4f84ef87eca964f575fc42dcc67788118b43c073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b86b587060ecb46867d60894c4f84ef87eca964f575fc42dcc67788118b43c073</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8170-6296</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00366-019-00872-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00366-019-00872-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fang, Qiancheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazdani Bejarbaneh, Behnam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vatandoust, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahed Armaghani, Danial</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramesh Murlidhar, Bhatawdekar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonnizam Mohamad, Edy</creatorcontrib><title>Strength evaluation of granite block samples with different predictive models</title><title>Engineering with computers</title><addtitle>Engineering with Computers</addtitle><description>Over the last decade, application of soft computing techniques has rapidly grown up in different scientific fields, especially in rock mechanics. One of these cases relates to indirect assessment of uniaxial compressive strength ( UCS ) of rock samples with different artificial intelligent-based methods. In fact, the main advantage of such systems is to readily remove some difficulties arising in direct assessment of UCS , such as time-consuming and costly UCS test procedure. This study puts an effort to propose four accurate and practical predictive models of UCS using artificial neural network (ANN), hybrid ANN with imperialism competitive algorithm (ICA–ANN), hybrid ANN with artificial bee colony (ABC–ANN) and genetic programming (GP) approaches. To reach the aim of the current study, an experimental database containing a total of 71 data sets was set up by performing a number of laboratory tests on the rock samples collected from a tunnel site in Malaysia. To construct the desired predictive models of UCS based on training and test patterns, a combination of several rock characteristics with the most influence on UCS has been used as input parameters, i.e. porosity ( n ), Schmidt hammer rebound number ( R ), p-wave velocity ( V p ) and point load strength index ( I s(50)). To evaluate and compare the prediction precision of the developed models, a series of statistical indices, such as root mean squared error (RMSE), determination coefficient ( R 2 ) and variance account for (VAF) are utilized. Based on the simulation results and the measured indices, it was observed that the proposed GP model with the training and test RMSE values 0.0726 and 0.0691, respectively, gives better performance as compared to the other proposed models with values of (0.0740 and 0.0885), (0.0785 and 0.0742), and (0.0746 and 0.0771) for ANN, ICA–ANN and ABC–ANN, respectively. Moreover, a parametric analysis is accomplished on the proposed GP model to further verify its generalization capability. Hence, this GP-based model can be considered as a new applicable equation to accurately estimate the uniaxial compressive strength of granite block samples.</description><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>CAE) and Design</subject><subject>Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control; Optimization</subject><subject>Classical Mechanics</subject><subject>Compressive strength</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Genetic algorithms</subject><subject>Granite</subject><subject>Laboratory tests</subject><subject>Math. Applications in Chemistry</subject><subject>Mathematical and Computational Engineering</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>P waves</subject><subject>Parametric analysis</subject><subject>Parametric statistics</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Rock mechanics</subject><subject>Root-mean-square errors</subject><subject>Soft computing</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Swarm intelligence</subject><subject>Systems Theory</subject><subject>Test procedures</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Tunnel construction</subject><subject>Wave velocity</subject><issn>0177-0667</issn><issn>1435-5663</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQRi0EEqXwB5gsMRvOsWM7I6qAIhUxALOVOOeSkibBdov49wSCxMZ0y3vfSY-Qcw6XHEBfRQChFANeMACjMyYPyIxLkbNcKXFIZsC1ZqCUPiYnMW4AuAAoZuThKQXs1umV4r5sd2Vq-o72nq5D2TUJadX27o3Gcju0GOlHM4J14z2OUqJDwLpxqdkj3fY1tvGUHPmyjXj2e-fk5fbmebFkq8e7-8X1ijnBi8Qqo6rcaFCArpLKKF0rMIV00huJ3mh0ZaGkz3Xuncxq55TWxnBuKikcaDEnF9PuEPr3HcZkN_0udONLm-UgcqF0VoxUNlEu9DEG9HYIzbYMn5aD_c5mp2x2zGZ_slk5SmKS4gh3awx_0_9YX_eGcBg</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Fang, Qiancheng</creator><creator>Yazdani Bejarbaneh, Behnam</creator><creator>Vatandoust, Mohammad</creator><creator>Jahed Armaghani, Danial</creator><creator>Ramesh Murlidhar, Bhatawdekar</creator><creator>Tonnizam Mohamad, Edy</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8170-6296</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Strength evaluation of granite block samples with different predictive models</title><author>Fang, Qiancheng ; Yazdani Bejarbaneh, Behnam ; Vatandoust, Mohammad ; Jahed Armaghani, Danial ; Ramesh Murlidhar, Bhatawdekar ; Tonnizam Mohamad, Edy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b86b587060ecb46867d60894c4f84ef87eca964f575fc42dcc67788118b43c073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>CAE) and Design</topic><topic>Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control; Optimization</topic><topic>Classical Mechanics</topic><topic>Compressive strength</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Genetic algorithms</topic><topic>Granite</topic><topic>Laboratory tests</topic><topic>Math. Applications in Chemistry</topic><topic>Mathematical and Computational Engineering</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>P waves</topic><topic>Parametric analysis</topic><topic>Parametric statistics</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Rock mechanics</topic><topic>Root-mean-square errors</topic><topic>Soft computing</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Swarm intelligence</topic><topic>Systems Theory</topic><topic>Test procedures</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Tunnel construction</topic><topic>Wave velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fang, Qiancheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazdani Bejarbaneh, Behnam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vatandoust, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahed Armaghani, Danial</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramesh Murlidhar, Bhatawdekar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonnizam Mohamad, Edy</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Engineering with computers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fang, Qiancheng</au><au>Yazdani Bejarbaneh, Behnam</au><au>Vatandoust, Mohammad</au><au>Jahed Armaghani, Danial</au><au>Ramesh Murlidhar, Bhatawdekar</au><au>Tonnizam Mohamad, Edy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strength evaluation of granite block samples with different predictive models</atitle><jtitle>Engineering with computers</jtitle><stitle>Engineering with Computers</stitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>891</spage><epage>908</epage><pages>891-908</pages><issn>0177-0667</issn><eissn>1435-5663</eissn><abstract>Over the last decade, application of soft computing techniques has rapidly grown up in different scientific fields, especially in rock mechanics. One of these cases relates to indirect assessment of uniaxial compressive strength ( UCS ) of rock samples with different artificial intelligent-based methods. In fact, the main advantage of such systems is to readily remove some difficulties arising in direct assessment of UCS , such as time-consuming and costly UCS test procedure. This study puts an effort to propose four accurate and practical predictive models of UCS using artificial neural network (ANN), hybrid ANN with imperialism competitive algorithm (ICA–ANN), hybrid ANN with artificial bee colony (ABC–ANN) and genetic programming (GP) approaches. To reach the aim of the current study, an experimental database containing a total of 71 data sets was set up by performing a number of laboratory tests on the rock samples collected from a tunnel site in Malaysia. To construct the desired predictive models of UCS based on training and test patterns, a combination of several rock characteristics with the most influence on UCS has been used as input parameters, i.e. porosity ( n ), Schmidt hammer rebound number ( R ), p-wave velocity ( V p ) and point load strength index ( I s(50)). To evaluate and compare the prediction precision of the developed models, a series of statistical indices, such as root mean squared error (RMSE), determination coefficient ( R 2 ) and variance account for (VAF) are utilized. Based on the simulation results and the measured indices, it was observed that the proposed GP model with the training and test RMSE values 0.0726 and 0.0691, respectively, gives better performance as compared to the other proposed models with values of (0.0740 and 0.0885), (0.0785 and 0.0742), and (0.0746 and 0.0771) for ANN, ICA–ANN and ABC–ANN, respectively. Moreover, a parametric analysis is accomplished on the proposed GP model to further verify its generalization capability. Hence, this GP-based model can be considered as a new applicable equation to accurately estimate the uniaxial compressive strength of granite block samples.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><doi>10.1007/s00366-019-00872-4</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8170-6296</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0177-0667
ispartof Engineering with computers, 2021-04, Vol.37 (2), p.891-908
issn 0177-0667
1435-5663
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2503536729
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Artificial intelligence
Artificial neural networks
CAE) and Design
Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control
Optimization
Classical Mechanics
Compressive strength
Computer Science
Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD
Control
Genetic algorithms
Granite
Laboratory tests
Math. Applications in Chemistry
Mathematical and Computational Engineering
Original Article
P waves
Parametric analysis
Parametric statistics
Porosity
Prediction models
Rock mechanics
Root-mean-square errors
Soft computing
Statistical methods
Swarm intelligence
Systems Theory
Test procedures
Training
Tunnel construction
Wave velocity
title Strength evaluation of granite block samples with different predictive models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T18%3A50%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strength%20evaluation%20of%20granite%20block%20samples%20with%20different%20predictive%20models&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20with%20computers&rft.au=Fang,%20Qiancheng&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=891&rft.epage=908&rft.pages=891-908&rft.issn=0177-0667&rft.eissn=1435-5663&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00366-019-00872-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2503536729%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2503536729&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true