Strength evaluation of granite block samples with different predictive models
Over the last decade, application of soft computing techniques has rapidly grown up in different scientific fields, especially in rock mechanics. One of these cases relates to indirect assessment of uniaxial compressive strength ( UCS ) of rock samples with different artificial intelligent-based met...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Engineering with computers 2021-04, Vol.37 (2), p.891-908 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 908 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 891 |
container_title | Engineering with computers |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Fang, Qiancheng Yazdani Bejarbaneh, Behnam Vatandoust, Mohammad Jahed Armaghani, Danial Ramesh Murlidhar, Bhatawdekar Tonnizam Mohamad, Edy |
description | Over the last decade, application of soft computing techniques has rapidly grown up in different scientific fields, especially in rock mechanics. One of these cases relates to indirect assessment of uniaxial compressive strength (
UCS
) of rock samples with different artificial intelligent-based methods. In fact, the main advantage of such systems is to readily remove some difficulties arising in direct assessment of
UCS
, such as time-consuming and costly
UCS
test procedure. This study puts an effort to propose four accurate and practical predictive models of
UCS
using artificial neural network (ANN), hybrid ANN with imperialism competitive algorithm (ICA–ANN), hybrid ANN with artificial bee colony (ABC–ANN) and genetic programming (GP) approaches. To reach the aim of the current study, an experimental database containing a total of 71 data sets was set up by performing a number of laboratory tests on the rock samples collected from a tunnel site in Malaysia. To construct the desired predictive models of
UCS
based on training and test patterns, a combination of several rock characteristics with the most influence on
UCS
has been used as input parameters, i.e. porosity (
n
), Schmidt hammer rebound number (
R
), p-wave velocity (
V
p
) and point load strength index (
I
s(50)). To evaluate and compare the prediction precision of the developed models, a series of statistical indices, such as root mean squared error (RMSE), determination coefficient (
R
2
) and variance account for (VAF) are utilized. Based on the simulation results and the measured indices, it was observed that the proposed GP model with the training and test RMSE values 0.0726 and 0.0691, respectively, gives better performance as compared to the other proposed models with values of (0.0740 and 0.0885), (0.0785 and 0.0742), and (0.0746 and 0.0771) for ANN, ICA–ANN and ABC–ANN, respectively. Moreover, a parametric analysis is accomplished on the proposed GP model to further verify its generalization capability. Hence, this GP-based model can be considered as a new applicable equation to accurately estimate the uniaxial compressive strength of granite block samples. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00366-019-00872-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2503536729</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2503536729</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b86b587060ecb46867d60894c4f84ef87eca964f575fc42dcc67788118b43c073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQRi0EEqXwB5gsMRvOsWM7I6qAIhUxALOVOOeSkibBdov49wSCxMZ0y3vfSY-Qcw6XHEBfRQChFANeMACjMyYPyIxLkbNcKXFIZsC1ZqCUPiYnMW4AuAAoZuThKQXs1umV4r5sd2Vq-o72nq5D2TUJadX27o3Gcju0GOlHM4J14z2OUqJDwLpxqdkj3fY1tvGUHPmyjXj2e-fk5fbmebFkq8e7-8X1ijnBi8Qqo6rcaFCArpLKKF0rMIV00huJ3mh0ZaGkz3Xuncxq55TWxnBuKikcaDEnF9PuEPr3HcZkN_0udONLm-UgcqF0VoxUNlEu9DEG9HYIzbYMn5aD_c5mp2x2zGZ_slk5SmKS4gh3awx_0_9YX_eGcBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2503536729</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strength evaluation of granite block samples with different predictive models</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Fang, Qiancheng ; Yazdani Bejarbaneh, Behnam ; Vatandoust, Mohammad ; Jahed Armaghani, Danial ; Ramesh Murlidhar, Bhatawdekar ; Tonnizam Mohamad, Edy</creator><creatorcontrib>Fang, Qiancheng ; Yazdani Bejarbaneh, Behnam ; Vatandoust, Mohammad ; Jahed Armaghani, Danial ; Ramesh Murlidhar, Bhatawdekar ; Tonnizam Mohamad, Edy</creatorcontrib><description>Over the last decade, application of soft computing techniques has rapidly grown up in different scientific fields, especially in rock mechanics. One of these cases relates to indirect assessment of uniaxial compressive strength (
UCS
) of rock samples with different artificial intelligent-based methods. In fact, the main advantage of such systems is to readily remove some difficulties arising in direct assessment of
UCS
, such as time-consuming and costly
UCS
test procedure. This study puts an effort to propose four accurate and practical predictive models of
UCS
using artificial neural network (ANN), hybrid ANN with imperialism competitive algorithm (ICA–ANN), hybrid ANN with artificial bee colony (ABC–ANN) and genetic programming (GP) approaches. To reach the aim of the current study, an experimental database containing a total of 71 data sets was set up by performing a number of laboratory tests on the rock samples collected from a tunnel site in Malaysia. To construct the desired predictive models of
UCS
based on training and test patterns, a combination of several rock characteristics with the most influence on
UCS
has been used as input parameters, i.e. porosity (
n
), Schmidt hammer rebound number (
R
), p-wave velocity (
V
p
) and point load strength index (
I
s(50)). To evaluate and compare the prediction precision of the developed models, a series of statistical indices, such as root mean squared error (RMSE), determination coefficient (
R
2
) and variance account for (VAF) are utilized. Based on the simulation results and the measured indices, it was observed that the proposed GP model with the training and test RMSE values 0.0726 and 0.0691, respectively, gives better performance as compared to the other proposed models with values of (0.0740 and 0.0885), (0.0785 and 0.0742), and (0.0746 and 0.0771) for ANN, ICA–ANN and ABC–ANN, respectively. Moreover, a parametric analysis is accomplished on the proposed GP model to further verify its generalization capability. Hence, this GP-based model can be considered as a new applicable equation to accurately estimate the uniaxial compressive strength of granite block samples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0177-0667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-5663</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00366-019-00872-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Artificial intelligence ; Artificial neural networks ; CAE) and Design ; Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control; Optimization ; Classical Mechanics ; Compressive strength ; Computer Science ; Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD ; Control ; Genetic algorithms ; Granite ; Laboratory tests ; Math. Applications in Chemistry ; Mathematical and Computational Engineering ; Original Article ; P waves ; Parametric analysis ; Parametric statistics ; Porosity ; Prediction models ; Rock mechanics ; Root-mean-square errors ; Soft computing ; Statistical methods ; Swarm intelligence ; Systems Theory ; Test procedures ; Training ; Tunnel construction ; Wave velocity</subject><ispartof>Engineering with computers, 2021-04, Vol.37 (2), p.891-908</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b86b587060ecb46867d60894c4f84ef87eca964f575fc42dcc67788118b43c073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b86b587060ecb46867d60894c4f84ef87eca964f575fc42dcc67788118b43c073</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8170-6296</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00366-019-00872-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00366-019-00872-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fang, Qiancheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazdani Bejarbaneh, Behnam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vatandoust, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahed Armaghani, Danial</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramesh Murlidhar, Bhatawdekar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonnizam Mohamad, Edy</creatorcontrib><title>Strength evaluation of granite block samples with different predictive models</title><title>Engineering with computers</title><addtitle>Engineering with Computers</addtitle><description>Over the last decade, application of soft computing techniques has rapidly grown up in different scientific fields, especially in rock mechanics. One of these cases relates to indirect assessment of uniaxial compressive strength (
UCS
) of rock samples with different artificial intelligent-based methods. In fact, the main advantage of such systems is to readily remove some difficulties arising in direct assessment of
UCS
, such as time-consuming and costly
UCS
test procedure. This study puts an effort to propose four accurate and practical predictive models of
UCS
using artificial neural network (ANN), hybrid ANN with imperialism competitive algorithm (ICA–ANN), hybrid ANN with artificial bee colony (ABC–ANN) and genetic programming (GP) approaches. To reach the aim of the current study, an experimental database containing a total of 71 data sets was set up by performing a number of laboratory tests on the rock samples collected from a tunnel site in Malaysia. To construct the desired predictive models of
UCS
based on training and test patterns, a combination of several rock characteristics with the most influence on
UCS
has been used as input parameters, i.e. porosity (
n
), Schmidt hammer rebound number (
R
), p-wave velocity (
V
p
) and point load strength index (
I
s(50)). To evaluate and compare the prediction precision of the developed models, a series of statistical indices, such as root mean squared error (RMSE), determination coefficient (
R
2
) and variance account for (VAF) are utilized. Based on the simulation results and the measured indices, it was observed that the proposed GP model with the training and test RMSE values 0.0726 and 0.0691, respectively, gives better performance as compared to the other proposed models with values of (0.0740 and 0.0885), (0.0785 and 0.0742), and (0.0746 and 0.0771) for ANN, ICA–ANN and ABC–ANN, respectively. Moreover, a parametric analysis is accomplished on the proposed GP model to further verify its generalization capability. Hence, this GP-based model can be considered as a new applicable equation to accurately estimate the uniaxial compressive strength of granite block samples.</description><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>CAE) and Design</subject><subject>Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control; Optimization</subject><subject>Classical Mechanics</subject><subject>Compressive strength</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Genetic algorithms</subject><subject>Granite</subject><subject>Laboratory tests</subject><subject>Math. Applications in Chemistry</subject><subject>Mathematical and Computational Engineering</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>P waves</subject><subject>Parametric analysis</subject><subject>Parametric statistics</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Rock mechanics</subject><subject>Root-mean-square errors</subject><subject>Soft computing</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Swarm intelligence</subject><subject>Systems Theory</subject><subject>Test procedures</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Tunnel construction</subject><subject>Wave velocity</subject><issn>0177-0667</issn><issn>1435-5663</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDFPwzAQRi0EEqXwB5gsMRvOsWM7I6qAIhUxALOVOOeSkibBdov49wSCxMZ0y3vfSY-Qcw6XHEBfRQChFANeMACjMyYPyIxLkbNcKXFIZsC1ZqCUPiYnMW4AuAAoZuThKQXs1umV4r5sd2Vq-o72nq5D2TUJadX27o3Gcju0GOlHM4J14z2OUqJDwLpxqdkj3fY1tvGUHPmyjXj2e-fk5fbmebFkq8e7-8X1ijnBi8Qqo6rcaFCArpLKKF0rMIV00huJ3mh0ZaGkz3Xuncxq55TWxnBuKikcaDEnF9PuEPr3HcZkN_0udONLm-UgcqF0VoxUNlEu9DEG9HYIzbYMn5aD_c5mp2x2zGZ_slk5SmKS4gh3awx_0_9YX_eGcBg</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Fang, Qiancheng</creator><creator>Yazdani Bejarbaneh, Behnam</creator><creator>Vatandoust, Mohammad</creator><creator>Jahed Armaghani, Danial</creator><creator>Ramesh Murlidhar, Bhatawdekar</creator><creator>Tonnizam Mohamad, Edy</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8170-6296</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Strength evaluation of granite block samples with different predictive models</title><author>Fang, Qiancheng ; Yazdani Bejarbaneh, Behnam ; Vatandoust, Mohammad ; Jahed Armaghani, Danial ; Ramesh Murlidhar, Bhatawdekar ; Tonnizam Mohamad, Edy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b86b587060ecb46867d60894c4f84ef87eca964f575fc42dcc67788118b43c073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>CAE) and Design</topic><topic>Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control; Optimization</topic><topic>Classical Mechanics</topic><topic>Compressive strength</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Genetic algorithms</topic><topic>Granite</topic><topic>Laboratory tests</topic><topic>Math. Applications in Chemistry</topic><topic>Mathematical and Computational Engineering</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>P waves</topic><topic>Parametric analysis</topic><topic>Parametric statistics</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Rock mechanics</topic><topic>Root-mean-square errors</topic><topic>Soft computing</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Swarm intelligence</topic><topic>Systems Theory</topic><topic>Test procedures</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Tunnel construction</topic><topic>Wave velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fang, Qiancheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazdani Bejarbaneh, Behnam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vatandoust, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahed Armaghani, Danial</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramesh Murlidhar, Bhatawdekar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonnizam Mohamad, Edy</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Engineering with computers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fang, Qiancheng</au><au>Yazdani Bejarbaneh, Behnam</au><au>Vatandoust, Mohammad</au><au>Jahed Armaghani, Danial</au><au>Ramesh Murlidhar, Bhatawdekar</au><au>Tonnizam Mohamad, Edy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strength evaluation of granite block samples with different predictive models</atitle><jtitle>Engineering with computers</jtitle><stitle>Engineering with Computers</stitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>891</spage><epage>908</epage><pages>891-908</pages><issn>0177-0667</issn><eissn>1435-5663</eissn><abstract>Over the last decade, application of soft computing techniques has rapidly grown up in different scientific fields, especially in rock mechanics. One of these cases relates to indirect assessment of uniaxial compressive strength (
UCS
) of rock samples with different artificial intelligent-based methods. In fact, the main advantage of such systems is to readily remove some difficulties arising in direct assessment of
UCS
, such as time-consuming and costly
UCS
test procedure. This study puts an effort to propose four accurate and practical predictive models of
UCS
using artificial neural network (ANN), hybrid ANN with imperialism competitive algorithm (ICA–ANN), hybrid ANN with artificial bee colony (ABC–ANN) and genetic programming (GP) approaches. To reach the aim of the current study, an experimental database containing a total of 71 data sets was set up by performing a number of laboratory tests on the rock samples collected from a tunnel site in Malaysia. To construct the desired predictive models of
UCS
based on training and test patterns, a combination of several rock characteristics with the most influence on
UCS
has been used as input parameters, i.e. porosity (
n
), Schmidt hammer rebound number (
R
), p-wave velocity (
V
p
) and point load strength index (
I
s(50)). To evaluate and compare the prediction precision of the developed models, a series of statistical indices, such as root mean squared error (RMSE), determination coefficient (
R
2
) and variance account for (VAF) are utilized. Based on the simulation results and the measured indices, it was observed that the proposed GP model with the training and test RMSE values 0.0726 and 0.0691, respectively, gives better performance as compared to the other proposed models with values of (0.0740 and 0.0885), (0.0785 and 0.0742), and (0.0746 and 0.0771) for ANN, ICA–ANN and ABC–ANN, respectively. Moreover, a parametric analysis is accomplished on the proposed GP model to further verify its generalization capability. Hence, this GP-based model can be considered as a new applicable equation to accurately estimate the uniaxial compressive strength of granite block samples.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><doi>10.1007/s00366-019-00872-4</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8170-6296</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0177-0667 |
ispartof | Engineering with computers, 2021-04, Vol.37 (2), p.891-908 |
issn | 0177-0667 1435-5663 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2503536729 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Artificial intelligence Artificial neural networks CAE) and Design Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control Optimization Classical Mechanics Compressive strength Computer Science Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD Control Genetic algorithms Granite Laboratory tests Math. Applications in Chemistry Mathematical and Computational Engineering Original Article P waves Parametric analysis Parametric statistics Porosity Prediction models Rock mechanics Root-mean-square errors Soft computing Statistical methods Swarm intelligence Systems Theory Test procedures Training Tunnel construction Wave velocity |
title | Strength evaluation of granite block samples with different predictive models |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T18%3A50%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strength%20evaluation%20of%20granite%20block%20samples%20with%20different%20predictive%20models&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20with%20computers&rft.au=Fang,%20Qiancheng&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=891&rft.epage=908&rft.pages=891-908&rft.issn=0177-0667&rft.eissn=1435-5663&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00366-019-00872-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2503536729%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2503536729&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |