Computational Methods for Production-Based Asset Pricing Models with Recursive Utility

We compare local and global polynomial solution methods for DSGE models with Epstein- Zin-Weil utility. We show that model implications for macroeconomic quantities are relatively invariant to choice of solution method but that a global method can yield substantial improvements for asset prices and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Studies in nonlinear dynamics and econometrics 2021-02, Vol.25 (1), p.1-26
Hauptverfasser: Aldrich, Eric Mark, Kung, Howard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 26
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Studies in nonlinear dynamics and econometrics
container_volume 25
creator Aldrich, Eric Mark
Kung, Howard
description We compare local and global polynomial solution methods for DSGE models with Epstein- Zin-Weil utility. We show that model implications for macroeconomic quantities are relatively invariant to choice of solution method but that a global method can yield substantial improvements for asset prices and welfare costs. The divergence in solution quality is highly dependent on parameters which affect value function sensitivity to TFP volatility, as well as the magnitude of TFP volatility itself. This problem is pronounced for calibrations at the extreme of those accepted in the asset pricing literature and disappears for more traditional macroeconomic parameterizations.
doi_str_mv 10.1515/snde-2017-0003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2502903240</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2502903240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-591000a74eb01bfbe0db56685fa76bfa72b483dac7a1626fe146e5c2bc1bade3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUMtOwzAQjBBIlMKVsyXOKbYTx86xVLykViBUuEZ-bFpXaVxsh6p_T6Ii9cJld7U7M5qdJLkleEIYYfehNZBSTHiKMc7OkhFhTKQZx-K8n7EgKRG0uEyuQthgTJgo6Sj5mrntrosyWtfKBi0grp0JqHYevXtnOj0c0gcZwKBpCBD7tdW2XaGFM9AEtLdxjT5Adz7YH0Cf0TY2Hq6Ti1o2AW7--jhZPj0uZy_p_O35dTadpzrPeUxZSXqvkuegMFG1AmwUKwrBaskL1ReqcpEZqbkkBS1qIHkBTFOliZIGsnFyd5TdeffdQYjVxnW-fyRUlGFa4ozmuEdNjijtXQge6mrn7Vb6Q0VwNURXDdFVQ3TVEF1PQEcCaNfacIJzhvO8FHzQLI-QvWwieAMr3x364WTgf23KSPYLS1GA0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2502903240</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computational Methods for Production-Based Asset Pricing Models with Recursive Utility</title><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Aldrich, Eric Mark ; Kung, Howard</creator><creatorcontrib>Aldrich, Eric Mark ; Kung, Howard</creatorcontrib><description>We compare local and global polynomial solution methods for DSGE models with Epstein- Zin-Weil utility. We show that model implications for macroeconomic quantities are relatively invariant to choice of solution method but that a global method can yield substantial improvements for asset prices and welfare costs. The divergence in solution quality is highly dependent on parameters which affect value function sensitivity to TFP volatility, as well as the magnitude of TFP volatility itself. This problem is pronounced for calibrations at the extreme of those accepted in the asset pricing literature and disappears for more traditional macroeconomic parameterizations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1081-1826</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-3708</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/snde-2017-0003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: De Gruyter</publisher><subject>Asset pricing ; Assets ; DSGE models ; Macroeconomics ; nonlinear solution methods ; numerical dynamic programming ; Parameter sensitivity ; Polynomials ; Prices ; Pricing ; Pricing policies ; Production methods ; recursive utility ; Volatility ; Welfare</subject><ispartof>Studies in nonlinear dynamics and econometrics, 2021-02, Vol.25 (1), p.1-26</ispartof><rights>Copyright Walter de Gruyter GmbH Feb 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-591000a74eb01bfbe0db56685fa76bfa72b483dac7a1626fe146e5c2bc1bade3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-591000a74eb01bfbe0db56685fa76bfa72b483dac7a1626fe146e5c2bc1bade3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/snde-2017-0003/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/snde-2017-0003/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,66497,68281</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aldrich, Eric Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kung, Howard</creatorcontrib><title>Computational Methods for Production-Based Asset Pricing Models with Recursive Utility</title><title>Studies in nonlinear dynamics and econometrics</title><description>We compare local and global polynomial solution methods for DSGE models with Epstein- Zin-Weil utility. We show that model implications for macroeconomic quantities are relatively invariant to choice of solution method but that a global method can yield substantial improvements for asset prices and welfare costs. The divergence in solution quality is highly dependent on parameters which affect value function sensitivity to TFP volatility, as well as the magnitude of TFP volatility itself. This problem is pronounced for calibrations at the extreme of those accepted in the asset pricing literature and disappears for more traditional macroeconomic parameterizations.</description><subject>Asset pricing</subject><subject>Assets</subject><subject>DSGE models</subject><subject>Macroeconomics</subject><subject>nonlinear solution methods</subject><subject>numerical dynamic programming</subject><subject>Parameter sensitivity</subject><subject>Polynomials</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Pricing</subject><subject>Pricing policies</subject><subject>Production methods</subject><subject>recursive utility</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><subject>Welfare</subject><issn>1081-1826</issn><issn>1558-3708</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptUMtOwzAQjBBIlMKVsyXOKbYTx86xVLykViBUuEZ-bFpXaVxsh6p_T6Ii9cJld7U7M5qdJLkleEIYYfehNZBSTHiKMc7OkhFhTKQZx-K8n7EgKRG0uEyuQthgTJgo6Sj5mrntrosyWtfKBi0grp0JqHYevXtnOj0c0gcZwKBpCBD7tdW2XaGFM9AEtLdxjT5Adz7YH0Cf0TY2Hq6Ti1o2AW7--jhZPj0uZy_p_O35dTadpzrPeUxZSXqvkuegMFG1AmwUKwrBaskL1ReqcpEZqbkkBS1qIHkBTFOliZIGsnFyd5TdeffdQYjVxnW-fyRUlGFa4ozmuEdNjijtXQge6mrn7Vb6Q0VwNURXDdFVQ3TVEF1PQEcCaNfacIJzhvO8FHzQLI-QvWwieAMr3x364WTgf23KSPYLS1GA0w</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Aldrich, Eric Mark</creator><creator>Kung, Howard</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><general>Walter de Gruyter GmbH</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Computational Methods for Production-Based Asset Pricing Models with Recursive Utility</title><author>Aldrich, Eric Mark ; Kung, Howard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-591000a74eb01bfbe0db56685fa76bfa72b483dac7a1626fe146e5c2bc1bade3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Asset pricing</topic><topic>Assets</topic><topic>DSGE models</topic><topic>Macroeconomics</topic><topic>nonlinear solution methods</topic><topic>numerical dynamic programming</topic><topic>Parameter sensitivity</topic><topic>Polynomials</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Pricing</topic><topic>Pricing policies</topic><topic>Production methods</topic><topic>recursive utility</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><topic>Welfare</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aldrich, Eric Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kung, Howard</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Studies in nonlinear dynamics and econometrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aldrich, Eric Mark</au><au>Kung, Howard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computational Methods for Production-Based Asset Pricing Models with Recursive Utility</atitle><jtitle>Studies in nonlinear dynamics and econometrics</jtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>1-26</pages><issn>1081-1826</issn><eissn>1558-3708</eissn><abstract>We compare local and global polynomial solution methods for DSGE models with Epstein- Zin-Weil utility. We show that model implications for macroeconomic quantities are relatively invariant to choice of solution method but that a global method can yield substantial improvements for asset prices and welfare costs. The divergence in solution quality is highly dependent on parameters which affect value function sensitivity to TFP volatility, as well as the magnitude of TFP volatility itself. This problem is pronounced for calibrations at the extreme of those accepted in the asset pricing literature and disappears for more traditional macroeconomic parameterizations.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>De Gruyter</pub><doi>10.1515/snde-2017-0003</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1081-1826
ispartof Studies in nonlinear dynamics and econometrics, 2021-02, Vol.25 (1), p.1-26
issn 1081-1826
1558-3708
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2502903240
source De Gruyter journals
subjects Asset pricing
Assets
DSGE models
Macroeconomics
nonlinear solution methods
numerical dynamic programming
Parameter sensitivity
Polynomials
Prices
Pricing
Pricing policies
Production methods
recursive utility
Volatility
Welfare
title Computational Methods for Production-Based Asset Pricing Models with Recursive Utility
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T19%3A56%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computational%20Methods%20for%20Production-Based%20Asset%20Pricing%20Models%20with%20Recursive%20Utility&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20nonlinear%20dynamics%20and%20econometrics&rft.au=Aldrich,%20Eric%20Mark&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=1-26&rft.issn=1081-1826&rft.eissn=1558-3708&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/snde-2017-0003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2502903240%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2502903240&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true