Computational Methods for Production-Based Asset Pricing Models with Recursive Utility
We compare local and global polynomial solution methods for DSGE models with Epstein- Zin-Weil utility. We show that model implications for macroeconomic quantities are relatively invariant to choice of solution method but that a global method can yield substantial improvements for asset prices and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Studies in nonlinear dynamics and econometrics 2021-02, Vol.25 (1), p.1-26 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 26 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Studies in nonlinear dynamics and econometrics |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Aldrich, Eric Mark Kung, Howard |
description | We compare local and global polynomial solution methods for DSGE models with Epstein- Zin-Weil utility. We show that model implications for macroeconomic quantities are relatively invariant to choice of solution method but that a global method can yield substantial improvements for asset prices and welfare costs. The divergence in solution quality is highly dependent on parameters which affect value function sensitivity to TFP volatility, as well as the magnitude of TFP volatility itself. This problem is pronounced for calibrations at the extreme of those accepted in the asset pricing literature and disappears for more traditional macroeconomic parameterizations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/snde-2017-0003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2502903240</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2502903240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-591000a74eb01bfbe0db56685fa76bfa72b483dac7a1626fe146e5c2bc1bade3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUMtOwzAQjBBIlMKVsyXOKbYTx86xVLykViBUuEZ-bFpXaVxsh6p_T6Ii9cJld7U7M5qdJLkleEIYYfehNZBSTHiKMc7OkhFhTKQZx-K8n7EgKRG0uEyuQthgTJgo6Sj5mrntrosyWtfKBi0grp0JqHYevXtnOj0c0gcZwKBpCBD7tdW2XaGFM9AEtLdxjT5Adz7YH0Cf0TY2Hq6Ti1o2AW7--jhZPj0uZy_p_O35dTadpzrPeUxZSXqvkuegMFG1AmwUKwrBaskL1ReqcpEZqbkkBS1qIHkBTFOliZIGsnFyd5TdeffdQYjVxnW-fyRUlGFa4ozmuEdNjijtXQge6mrn7Vb6Q0VwNURXDdFVQ3TVEF1PQEcCaNfacIJzhvO8FHzQLI-QvWwieAMr3x364WTgf23KSPYLS1GA0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2502903240</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computational Methods for Production-Based Asset Pricing Models with Recursive Utility</title><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Aldrich, Eric Mark ; Kung, Howard</creator><creatorcontrib>Aldrich, Eric Mark ; Kung, Howard</creatorcontrib><description>We compare local and global polynomial solution methods for DSGE models with Epstein- Zin-Weil utility. We show that model implications for macroeconomic quantities are relatively invariant to choice of solution method but that a global method can yield substantial improvements for asset prices and welfare costs. The divergence in solution quality is highly dependent on parameters which affect value function sensitivity to TFP volatility, as well as the magnitude of TFP volatility itself. This problem is pronounced for calibrations at the extreme of those accepted in the asset pricing literature and disappears for more traditional macroeconomic parameterizations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1081-1826</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-3708</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/snde-2017-0003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: De Gruyter</publisher><subject>Asset pricing ; Assets ; DSGE models ; Macroeconomics ; nonlinear solution methods ; numerical dynamic programming ; Parameter sensitivity ; Polynomials ; Prices ; Pricing ; Pricing policies ; Production methods ; recursive utility ; Volatility ; Welfare</subject><ispartof>Studies in nonlinear dynamics and econometrics, 2021-02, Vol.25 (1), p.1-26</ispartof><rights>Copyright Walter de Gruyter GmbH Feb 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-591000a74eb01bfbe0db56685fa76bfa72b483dac7a1626fe146e5c2bc1bade3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-591000a74eb01bfbe0db56685fa76bfa72b483dac7a1626fe146e5c2bc1bade3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/snde-2017-0003/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/snde-2017-0003/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,66497,68281</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aldrich, Eric Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kung, Howard</creatorcontrib><title>Computational Methods for Production-Based Asset Pricing Models with Recursive Utility</title><title>Studies in nonlinear dynamics and econometrics</title><description>We compare local and global polynomial solution methods for DSGE models with Epstein- Zin-Weil utility. We show that model implications for macroeconomic quantities are relatively invariant to choice of solution method but that a global method can yield substantial improvements for asset prices and welfare costs. The divergence in solution quality is highly dependent on parameters which affect value function sensitivity to TFP volatility, as well as the magnitude of TFP volatility itself. This problem is pronounced for calibrations at the extreme of those accepted in the asset pricing literature and disappears for more traditional macroeconomic parameterizations.</description><subject>Asset pricing</subject><subject>Assets</subject><subject>DSGE models</subject><subject>Macroeconomics</subject><subject>nonlinear solution methods</subject><subject>numerical dynamic programming</subject><subject>Parameter sensitivity</subject><subject>Polynomials</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Pricing</subject><subject>Pricing policies</subject><subject>Production methods</subject><subject>recursive utility</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><subject>Welfare</subject><issn>1081-1826</issn><issn>1558-3708</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptUMtOwzAQjBBIlMKVsyXOKbYTx86xVLykViBUuEZ-bFpXaVxsh6p_T6Ii9cJld7U7M5qdJLkleEIYYfehNZBSTHiKMc7OkhFhTKQZx-K8n7EgKRG0uEyuQthgTJgo6Sj5mrntrosyWtfKBi0grp0JqHYevXtnOj0c0gcZwKBpCBD7tdW2XaGFM9AEtLdxjT5Adz7YH0Cf0TY2Hq6Ti1o2AW7--jhZPj0uZy_p_O35dTadpzrPeUxZSXqvkuegMFG1AmwUKwrBaskL1ReqcpEZqbkkBS1qIHkBTFOliZIGsnFyd5TdeffdQYjVxnW-fyRUlGFa4ozmuEdNjijtXQge6mrn7Vb6Q0VwNURXDdFVQ3TVEF1PQEcCaNfacIJzhvO8FHzQLI-QvWwieAMr3x364WTgf23KSPYLS1GA0w</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Aldrich, Eric Mark</creator><creator>Kung, Howard</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><general>Walter de Gruyter GmbH</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Computational Methods for Production-Based Asset Pricing Models with Recursive Utility</title><author>Aldrich, Eric Mark ; Kung, Howard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-591000a74eb01bfbe0db56685fa76bfa72b483dac7a1626fe146e5c2bc1bade3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Asset pricing</topic><topic>Assets</topic><topic>DSGE models</topic><topic>Macroeconomics</topic><topic>nonlinear solution methods</topic><topic>numerical dynamic programming</topic><topic>Parameter sensitivity</topic><topic>Polynomials</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Pricing</topic><topic>Pricing policies</topic><topic>Production methods</topic><topic>recursive utility</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><topic>Welfare</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aldrich, Eric Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kung, Howard</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Studies in nonlinear dynamics and econometrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aldrich, Eric Mark</au><au>Kung, Howard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computational Methods for Production-Based Asset Pricing Models with Recursive Utility</atitle><jtitle>Studies in nonlinear dynamics and econometrics</jtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>1-26</pages><issn>1081-1826</issn><eissn>1558-3708</eissn><abstract>We compare local and global polynomial solution methods for DSGE models with Epstein- Zin-Weil utility. We show that model implications for macroeconomic quantities are relatively invariant to choice of solution method but that a global method can yield substantial improvements for asset prices and welfare costs. The divergence in solution quality is highly dependent on parameters which affect value function sensitivity to TFP volatility, as well as the magnitude of TFP volatility itself. This problem is pronounced for calibrations at the extreme of those accepted in the asset pricing literature and disappears for more traditional macroeconomic parameterizations.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>De Gruyter</pub><doi>10.1515/snde-2017-0003</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1081-1826 |
ispartof | Studies in nonlinear dynamics and econometrics, 2021-02, Vol.25 (1), p.1-26 |
issn | 1081-1826 1558-3708 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2502903240 |
source | De Gruyter journals |
subjects | Asset pricing Assets DSGE models Macroeconomics nonlinear solution methods numerical dynamic programming Parameter sensitivity Polynomials Prices Pricing Pricing policies Production methods recursive utility Volatility Welfare |
title | Computational Methods for Production-Based Asset Pricing Models with Recursive Utility |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T19%3A56%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computational%20Methods%20for%20Production-Based%20Asset%20Pricing%20Models%20with%20Recursive%20Utility&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20nonlinear%20dynamics%20and%20econometrics&rft.au=Aldrich,%20Eric%20Mark&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=1-26&rft.issn=1081-1826&rft.eissn=1558-3708&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/snde-2017-0003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2502903240%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2502903240&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |