The change in beneficial interest within the Liechtenstein Private Purpose Foundation—can the principles of solidification and flexibility coexist?
Abstract The article deals with the principles of solidification and flexibility within private foundations. Typically, private foundations are used as will substitutes or as essential elements within an overall asset protection strategy. One of the key advantages of foundations, as compared to othe...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Trusts & trustees 2020-07, Vol.26 (6), p.556-563 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 563 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 556 |
| container_title | Trusts & trustees |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Schurr, Francesco A |
| description | Abstract
The article deals with the principles of solidification and flexibility within private foundations. Typically, private foundations are used as will substitutes or as essential elements within an overall asset protection strategy. One of the key advantages of foundations, as compared to other instruments, is the high level of stability combined with very limited instruments to change the purpose as well as the beneficial interest. An adjustment of the statutory provisions related to the purpose can be required due to a change of circumstances, but might violate the governance regime. The article deals with the different legal issues involved and tries to give some guidelines for practitioners by discussing a case study to illustrate the legal issues addressed in this article. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/tandt/ttaa052 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2502888457</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A697614285</galeid><oup_id>10.1093/tandt/ttaa052</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A697614285</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-66936ca665827525bf3bbe82e40cee9145732c9d9f8a6229c7e4b55e8120f12d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFO3DAQhqOqSCDYI3dLXHpJsZ3YcU4IoVKQVuoe4Gw5zpidKtip7bTdWx8CXrBPgmFRrz3NjP35H__6q-qU0c-M9s15Nn7M5zkbQwX_UB2xTvCaM0Y_lr6RTc06RQ-rVUo40LaTLeOiPaqe77ZA7Nb4ByDoyQAeHFo0U5kyREiZ_MK8LVe5gGsEu83gU4Zyson402QgmyXOIQG5DosfTcbg__55smb_ZI7oLc4TJBIcSWHCEcuGN4yUPxM3wW8ccMK8IzaUPuWLk-rAmSnB6r0eV_fXX-6ubur1t6-3V5fr2vKO5lrKvpHWSCkUL3bF4JphAMWhpRagZ63oGm77sXfKSM5720E7CAGKceoYH5vj6myvO8fwYylm9fewRF9Wai4oV0q9SvyjHswEGr0LORr7iMnqS9l3krVciULVe8rGkFIEp4v1RxN3mlH9GpF-i0i_R1T4T3s-LPN_0BdgfZc6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2502888457</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The change in beneficial interest within the Liechtenstein Private Purpose Foundation—can the principles of solidification and flexibility coexist?</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Schurr, Francesco A</creator><creatorcontrib>Schurr, Francesco A</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
The article deals with the principles of solidification and flexibility within private foundations. Typically, private foundations are used as will substitutes or as essential elements within an overall asset protection strategy. One of the key advantages of foundations, as compared to other instruments, is the high level of stability combined with very limited instruments to change the purpose as well as the beneficial interest. An adjustment of the statutory provisions related to the purpose can be required due to a change of circumstances, but might violate the governance regime. The article deals with the different legal issues involved and tries to give some guidelines for practitioners by discussing a case study to illustrate the legal issues addressed in this article.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1363-1780</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-2110</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/tandt/ttaa052</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Advantages ; Aims and objectives ; Analysis ; Beneficiaries ; Foundations ; Foundations (Endowments) ; Goal setting ; Intent (Law) ; Interest (Law) ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Management</subject><ispartof>Trusts & trustees, 2020-07, Vol.26 (6), p.556-563</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) (2020). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>The Author(s) (2020). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schurr, Francesco A</creatorcontrib><title>The change in beneficial interest within the Liechtenstein Private Purpose Foundation—can the principles of solidification and flexibility coexist?</title><title>Trusts & trustees</title><description>Abstract
The article deals with the principles of solidification and flexibility within private foundations. Typically, private foundations are used as will substitutes or as essential elements within an overall asset protection strategy. One of the key advantages of foundations, as compared to other instruments, is the high level of stability combined with very limited instruments to change the purpose as well as the beneficial interest. An adjustment of the statutory provisions related to the purpose can be required due to a change of circumstances, but might violate the governance regime. The article deals with the different legal issues involved and tries to give some guidelines for practitioners by discussing a case study to illustrate the legal issues addressed in this article.</description><subject>Advantages</subject><subject>Aims and objectives</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Beneficiaries</subject><subject>Foundations</subject><subject>Foundations (Endowments)</subject><subject>Goal setting</subject><subject>Intent (Law)</subject><subject>Interest (Law)</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Management</subject><issn>1363-1780</issn><issn>1752-2110</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFO3DAQhqOqSCDYI3dLXHpJsZ3YcU4IoVKQVuoe4Gw5zpidKtip7bTdWx8CXrBPgmFRrz3NjP35H__6q-qU0c-M9s15Nn7M5zkbQwX_UB2xTvCaM0Y_lr6RTc06RQ-rVUo40LaTLeOiPaqe77ZA7Nb4ByDoyQAeHFo0U5kyREiZ_MK8LVe5gGsEu83gU4Zyson402QgmyXOIQG5DosfTcbg__55smb_ZI7oLc4TJBIcSWHCEcuGN4yUPxM3wW8ccMK8IzaUPuWLk-rAmSnB6r0eV_fXX-6ubur1t6-3V5fr2vKO5lrKvpHWSCkUL3bF4JphAMWhpRagZ63oGm77sXfKSM5720E7CAGKceoYH5vj6myvO8fwYylm9fewRF9Wai4oV0q9SvyjHswEGr0LORr7iMnqS9l3krVciULVe8rGkFIEp4v1RxN3mlH9GpF-i0i_R1T4T3s-LPN_0BdgfZc6</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Schurr, Francesco A</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>The change in beneficial interest within the Liechtenstein Private Purpose Foundation—can the principles of solidification and flexibility coexist?</title><author>Schurr, Francesco A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-66936ca665827525bf3bbe82e40cee9145732c9d9f8a6229c7e4b55e8120f12d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Advantages</topic><topic>Aims and objectives</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Beneficiaries</topic><topic>Foundations</topic><topic>Foundations (Endowments)</topic><topic>Goal setting</topic><topic>Intent (Law)</topic><topic>Interest (Law)</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Management</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schurr, Francesco A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>UK & Ireland Database</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Trusts & trustees</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schurr, Francesco A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The change in beneficial interest within the Liechtenstein Private Purpose Foundation—can the principles of solidification and flexibility coexist?</atitle><jtitle>Trusts & trustees</jtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>556</spage><epage>563</epage><pages>556-563</pages><issn>1363-1780</issn><eissn>1752-2110</eissn><abstract>Abstract
The article deals with the principles of solidification and flexibility within private foundations. Typically, private foundations are used as will substitutes or as essential elements within an overall asset protection strategy. One of the key advantages of foundations, as compared to other instruments, is the high level of stability combined with very limited instruments to change the purpose as well as the beneficial interest. An adjustment of the statutory provisions related to the purpose can be required due to a change of circumstances, but might violate the governance regime. The article deals with the different legal issues involved and tries to give some guidelines for practitioners by discussing a case study to illustrate the legal issues addressed in this article.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/tandt/ttaa052</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1363-1780 |
| ispartof | Trusts & trustees, 2020-07, Vol.26 (6), p.556-563 |
| issn | 1363-1780 1752-2110 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2502888457 |
| source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
| subjects | Advantages Aims and objectives Analysis Beneficiaries Foundations Foundations (Endowments) Goal setting Intent (Law) Interest (Law) Laws, regulations and rules Management |
| title | The change in beneficial interest within the Liechtenstein Private Purpose Foundation—can the principles of solidification and flexibility coexist? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T10%3A20%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20change%20in%20beneficial%20interest%20within%20the%20Liechtenstein%20Private%20Purpose%20Foundation%E2%80%94can%20the%20principles%20of%20solidification%20and%20flexibility%20coexist?&rft.jtitle=Trusts%20&%20trustees&rft.au=Schurr,%20Francesco%20A&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=556&rft.epage=563&rft.pages=556-563&rft.issn=1363-1780&rft.eissn=1752-2110&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/tandt/ttaa052&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA697614285%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2502888457&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A697614285&rft_oup_id=10.1093/tandt/ttaa052&rfr_iscdi=true |