106 Responding to the First Fall to Prevent the Second: Successful RCT in Reducing Falls using a Person Centred Approach for Older Fallers Presenting to Emergency Departments
Abstract Background The majority of older people who fall and present to Emergency Departments (EDs) are reported not to receive guideline level care to reduce future risk of falls. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate whether RESPOND, a 6-month telephone-based patient-centred...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Age and ageing 2019-12, Vol.48 (Supplement_4), p.iv18-iv27 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | iv27 |
---|---|
container_issue | Supplement_4 |
container_start_page | iv18 |
container_title | Age and ageing |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Hill, Keith Barker, Anna Cameron, Peter Flicker, Leon Arendts, Glenn Brand, Caroline Morello, Renata Etherton-Beer, Chris Forbes, Andrew Haines, Terence Hill, Anne-Marie Hunter, Peter Lowthian, Judith Nyman, Samuel Redfern, Judith Smit, DeVilliers Waldron, Nicholas Boyle, Eileen McDonald, Ellen Ayton, Darshini |
description | Abstract
Background
The majority of older people who fall and present to Emergency Departments (EDs) are reported not to receive guideline level care to reduce future risk of falls. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate whether RESPOND, a 6-month telephone-based patient-centred program had an effect on falls and fall injuries in older people presenting to ED after a fall.
Methods
541 older fallers who presented to a WA or Victorian ED were recruited (inclusion criteria: discharged home 23). Intervention participants (n=263, mean age=73) received the RESPOND intervention, comprising (1) home-based risk assessment; (2) six months telephone-based education, coaching, goal setting and support for evidence-based risk factor management; and (3) linkages to existing services; while controls (n=260, mean age=73) received usual care. Primary outcomes were falls and fall injuries in the 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included ED presentations, hospital admissions, fractures, death, falls risk, falls efficacy and quality of life.
Results
Falls rate was significantly lower in the RESPOND group (incidence rate ratio 0.65 [95%CI 0.43-0.99]; p=0.042). Although there was no significant difference in fall injuries (p=0.374), the rate of fractures was significantly lower in the RESPOND group (p=0.03). There were no significant group differences in other secondary outcomes.
Conclusion
The RESPOND falls prevention program reduced falls and fractures, in older people presenting to the ED with a fall. Key learnings for translation include: potential scalability and sustainability of a patient-centred and predominantly telephone-based program. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ageing/afz164.106 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2502744773</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ageing/afz164.106</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2502744773</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1506-5810e62680e3cdb41bbdd3e805e86e92a47c0f5232d529e16a1b11cdc90d23b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFOwzAQRS0EEqVwAHaW2BJqO4mTsKtCC0iVWrVlHTn2pE2VxsFOkMqhOCNOwwFYefzn_T8jDUL3lDxRkvgTsYOy3k1E8U154CR-gUY04LHHYj-4RCNCCPNIxJJrdGPtwX1pSNkI_TgUr8E2ulYuALcat3vA89LYFs9FVfXKysAX1O25swHp0Ge86aQEa4uuwut0i8vapahO9hm9zeLO9rXAKzBW1zh1AQYUnjaN0ULucaENXlYKzJl3UD_GOupvjdkRzA5qecIv0AjTHl3L3qKrQlQW7v7eMfqYz7bpm7dYvr6n04UnaUi4F8aUAGc8JuBLlQc0z5XyISYhxBwSJoJIkiJkPlMhS4ByQXNKpZIJUczPiT9GD0OuW_azA9tmB92Z2o3MWEhYFARR5DuKDpQ02loDRdaY8ijMKaMk68-SDWfJhrM4iTvP4-DRXfMP_BfRIZKs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2502744773</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>106 Responding to the First Fall to Prevent the Second: Successful RCT in Reducing Falls using a Person Centred Approach for Older Fallers Presenting to Emergency Departments</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals Current</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hill, Keith ; Barker, Anna ; Cameron, Peter ; Flicker, Leon ; Arendts, Glenn ; Brand, Caroline ; Morello, Renata ; Etherton-Beer, Chris ; Forbes, Andrew ; Haines, Terence ; Hill, Anne-Marie ; Hunter, Peter ; Lowthian, Judith ; Nyman, Samuel ; Redfern, Judith ; Smit, DeVilliers ; Waldron, Nicholas ; Boyle, Eileen ; McDonald, Ellen ; Ayton, Darshini</creator><creatorcontrib>Hill, Keith ; Barker, Anna ; Cameron, Peter ; Flicker, Leon ; Arendts, Glenn ; Brand, Caroline ; Morello, Renata ; Etherton-Beer, Chris ; Forbes, Andrew ; Haines, Terence ; Hill, Anne-Marie ; Hunter, Peter ; Lowthian, Judith ; Nyman, Samuel ; Redfern, Judith ; Smit, DeVilliers ; Waldron, Nicholas ; Boyle, Eileen ; McDonald, Ellen ; Ayton, Darshini</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background
The majority of older people who fall and present to Emergency Departments (EDs) are reported not to receive guideline level care to reduce future risk of falls. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate whether RESPOND, a 6-month telephone-based patient-centred program had an effect on falls and fall injuries in older people presenting to ED after a fall.
Methods
541 older fallers who presented to a WA or Victorian ED were recruited (inclusion criteria: discharged home <72 hours, could walk without hands-on assistance, use a telephone, and no cognitive impairment (MMSE>23). Intervention participants (n=263, mean age=73) received the RESPOND intervention, comprising (1) home-based risk assessment; (2) six months telephone-based education, coaching, goal setting and support for evidence-based risk factor management; and (3) linkages to existing services; while controls (n=260, mean age=73) received usual care. Primary outcomes were falls and fall injuries in the 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included ED presentations, hospital admissions, fractures, death, falls risk, falls efficacy and quality of life.
Results
Falls rate was significantly lower in the RESPOND group (incidence rate ratio 0.65 [95%CI 0.43-0.99]; p=0.042). Although there was no significant difference in fall injuries (p=0.374), the rate of fractures was significantly lower in the RESPOND group (p=0.03). There were no significant group differences in other secondary outcomes.
Conclusion
The RESPOND falls prevention program reduced falls and fractures, in older people presenting to the ED with a fall. Key learnings for translation include: potential scalability and sustainability of a patient-centred and predominantly telephone-based program.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-0729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afz164.106</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Clinical trials ; Coaching ; Cognitive ability ; Cognitive impairment ; Efficacy ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency services ; Falls ; Fractures ; Goal setting ; Home based ; Hospitalization ; Intervention ; Mini-Mental State Examination ; Older people ; Patient-centered care ; Prevention programs ; Quality of life ; Risk assessment ; Risk factors ; Risk reduction ; Telephone service ; Translation</subject><ispartof>Age and ageing, 2019-12, Vol.48 (Supplement_4), p.iv18-iv27</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2019</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hill, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barker, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flicker, Leon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arendts, Glenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brand, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morello, Renata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etherton-Beer, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forbes, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haines, Terence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Anne-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowthian, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyman, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redfern, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smit, DeVilliers</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waldron, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayton, Darshini</creatorcontrib><title>106 Responding to the First Fall to Prevent the Second: Successful RCT in Reducing Falls using a Person Centred Approach for Older Fallers Presenting to Emergency Departments</title><title>Age and ageing</title><description>Abstract
Background
The majority of older people who fall and present to Emergency Departments (EDs) are reported not to receive guideline level care to reduce future risk of falls. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate whether RESPOND, a 6-month telephone-based patient-centred program had an effect on falls and fall injuries in older people presenting to ED after a fall.
Methods
541 older fallers who presented to a WA or Victorian ED were recruited (inclusion criteria: discharged home <72 hours, could walk without hands-on assistance, use a telephone, and no cognitive impairment (MMSE>23). Intervention participants (n=263, mean age=73) received the RESPOND intervention, comprising (1) home-based risk assessment; (2) six months telephone-based education, coaching, goal setting and support for evidence-based risk factor management; and (3) linkages to existing services; while controls (n=260, mean age=73) received usual care. Primary outcomes were falls and fall injuries in the 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included ED presentations, hospital admissions, fractures, death, falls risk, falls efficacy and quality of life.
Results
Falls rate was significantly lower in the RESPOND group (incidence rate ratio 0.65 [95%CI 0.43-0.99]; p=0.042). Although there was no significant difference in fall injuries (p=0.374), the rate of fractures was significantly lower in the RESPOND group (p=0.03). There were no significant group differences in other secondary outcomes.
Conclusion
The RESPOND falls prevention program reduced falls and fractures, in older people presenting to the ED with a fall. Key learnings for translation include: potential scalability and sustainability of a patient-centred and predominantly telephone-based program.</description><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Coaching</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cognitive impairment</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency services</subject><subject>Falls</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Goal setting</subject><subject>Home based</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Mini-Mental State Examination</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Patient-centered care</subject><subject>Prevention programs</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Telephone service</subject><subject>Translation</subject><issn>0002-0729</issn><issn>1468-2834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFOwzAQRS0EEqVwAHaW2BJqO4mTsKtCC0iVWrVlHTn2pE2VxsFOkMqhOCNOwwFYefzn_T8jDUL3lDxRkvgTsYOy3k1E8U154CR-gUY04LHHYj-4RCNCCPNIxJJrdGPtwX1pSNkI_TgUr8E2ulYuALcat3vA89LYFs9FVfXKysAX1O25swHp0Ge86aQEa4uuwut0i8vapahO9hm9zeLO9rXAKzBW1zh1AQYUnjaN0ULucaENXlYKzJl3UD_GOupvjdkRzA5qecIv0AjTHl3L3qKrQlQW7v7eMfqYz7bpm7dYvr6n04UnaUi4F8aUAGc8JuBLlQc0z5XyISYhxBwSJoJIkiJkPlMhS4ByQXNKpZIJUczPiT9GD0OuW_azA9tmB92Z2o3MWEhYFARR5DuKDpQ02loDRdaY8ijMKaMk68-SDWfJhrM4iTvP4-DRXfMP_BfRIZKs</recordid><startdate>20191220</startdate><enddate>20191220</enddate><creator>Hill, Keith</creator><creator>Barker, Anna</creator><creator>Cameron, Peter</creator><creator>Flicker, Leon</creator><creator>Arendts, Glenn</creator><creator>Brand, Caroline</creator><creator>Morello, Renata</creator><creator>Etherton-Beer, Chris</creator><creator>Forbes, Andrew</creator><creator>Haines, Terence</creator><creator>Hill, Anne-Marie</creator><creator>Hunter, Peter</creator><creator>Lowthian, Judith</creator><creator>Nyman, Samuel</creator><creator>Redfern, Judith</creator><creator>Smit, DeVilliers</creator><creator>Waldron, Nicholas</creator><creator>Boyle, Eileen</creator><creator>McDonald, Ellen</creator><creator>Ayton, Darshini</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191220</creationdate><title>106 Responding to the First Fall to Prevent the Second: Successful RCT in Reducing Falls using a Person Centred Approach for Older Fallers Presenting to Emergency Departments</title><author>Hill, Keith ; Barker, Anna ; Cameron, Peter ; Flicker, Leon ; Arendts, Glenn ; Brand, Caroline ; Morello, Renata ; Etherton-Beer, Chris ; Forbes, Andrew ; Haines, Terence ; Hill, Anne-Marie ; Hunter, Peter ; Lowthian, Judith ; Nyman, Samuel ; Redfern, Judith ; Smit, DeVilliers ; Waldron, Nicholas ; Boyle, Eileen ; McDonald, Ellen ; Ayton, Darshini</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1506-5810e62680e3cdb41bbdd3e805e86e92a47c0f5232d529e16a1b11cdc90d23b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Coaching</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cognitive impairment</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency services</topic><topic>Falls</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Goal setting</topic><topic>Home based</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Mini-Mental State Examination</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Patient-centered care</topic><topic>Prevention programs</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Telephone service</topic><topic>Translation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hill, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barker, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flicker, Leon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arendts, Glenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brand, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morello, Renata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etherton-Beer, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forbes, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haines, Terence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Anne-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowthian, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyman, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redfern, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smit, DeVilliers</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waldron, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayton, Darshini</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hill, Keith</au><au>Barker, Anna</au><au>Cameron, Peter</au><au>Flicker, Leon</au><au>Arendts, Glenn</au><au>Brand, Caroline</au><au>Morello, Renata</au><au>Etherton-Beer, Chris</au><au>Forbes, Andrew</au><au>Haines, Terence</au><au>Hill, Anne-Marie</au><au>Hunter, Peter</au><au>Lowthian, Judith</au><au>Nyman, Samuel</au><au>Redfern, Judith</au><au>Smit, DeVilliers</au><au>Waldron, Nicholas</au><au>Boyle, Eileen</au><au>McDonald, Ellen</au><au>Ayton, Darshini</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>106 Responding to the First Fall to Prevent the Second: Successful RCT in Reducing Falls using a Person Centred Approach for Older Fallers Presenting to Emergency Departments</atitle><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle><date>2019-12-20</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>Supplement_4</issue><spage>iv18</spage><epage>iv27</epage><pages>iv18-iv27</pages><issn>0002-0729</issn><eissn>1468-2834</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Background
The majority of older people who fall and present to Emergency Departments (EDs) are reported not to receive guideline level care to reduce future risk of falls. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate whether RESPOND, a 6-month telephone-based patient-centred program had an effect on falls and fall injuries in older people presenting to ED after a fall.
Methods
541 older fallers who presented to a WA or Victorian ED were recruited (inclusion criteria: discharged home <72 hours, could walk without hands-on assistance, use a telephone, and no cognitive impairment (MMSE>23). Intervention participants (n=263, mean age=73) received the RESPOND intervention, comprising (1) home-based risk assessment; (2) six months telephone-based education, coaching, goal setting and support for evidence-based risk factor management; and (3) linkages to existing services; while controls (n=260, mean age=73) received usual care. Primary outcomes were falls and fall injuries in the 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included ED presentations, hospital admissions, fractures, death, falls risk, falls efficacy and quality of life.
Results
Falls rate was significantly lower in the RESPOND group (incidence rate ratio 0.65 [95%CI 0.43-0.99]; p=0.042). Although there was no significant difference in fall injuries (p=0.374), the rate of fractures was significantly lower in the RESPOND group (p=0.03). There were no significant group differences in other secondary outcomes.
Conclusion
The RESPOND falls prevention program reduced falls and fractures, in older people presenting to the ED with a fall. Key learnings for translation include: potential scalability and sustainability of a patient-centred and predominantly telephone-based program.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ageing/afz164.106</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-0729 |
ispartof | Age and ageing, 2019-12, Vol.48 (Supplement_4), p.iv18-iv27 |
issn | 0002-0729 1468-2834 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2502744773 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford University Press Journals Current; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Clinical trials Coaching Cognitive ability Cognitive impairment Efficacy Emergency medical care Emergency services Falls Fractures Goal setting Home based Hospitalization Intervention Mini-Mental State Examination Older people Patient-centered care Prevention programs Quality of life Risk assessment Risk factors Risk reduction Telephone service Translation |
title | 106 Responding to the First Fall to Prevent the Second: Successful RCT in Reducing Falls using a Person Centred Approach for Older Fallers Presenting to Emergency Departments |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T00%3A50%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=106%20Responding%20to%20the%20First%20Fall%20to%20Prevent%20the%20Second:%20Successful%20RCT%20in%20Reducing%20Falls%20using%20a%20Person%20Centred%20Approach%20for%20Older%20Fallers%20Presenting%20to%20Emergency%20Departments&rft.jtitle=Age%20and%20ageing&rft.au=Hill,%20Keith&rft.date=2019-12-20&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=Supplement_4&rft.spage=iv18&rft.epage=iv27&rft.pages=iv18-iv27&rft.issn=0002-0729&rft.eissn=1468-2834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afz164.106&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2502744773%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2502744773&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ageing/afz164.106&rfr_iscdi=true |