Optimization of integrated fuzzy decision tree and regression models for selection of oil spill response method in the Arctic

The challenging oil spill response in the Arctic calls for effective response decision support tools. In this study, a framework comprising the development of various integrated fuzzy decision tree and regression (FDTR) models as well as model optimization was developed to facilitate the selection o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Knowledge-based systems 2021-02, Vol.213, p.106676, Article 106676
Hauptverfasser: Mohammadiun, Saeed, Hu, Guangji, Alavi Gharahbagh, Abdorreza, Mirshahi, Reza, Li, Jianbing, Hewage, Kasun, Sadiq, Rehan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 106676
container_title Knowledge-based systems
container_volume 213
creator Mohammadiun, Saeed
Hu, Guangji
Alavi Gharahbagh, Abdorreza
Mirshahi, Reza
Li, Jianbing
Hewage, Kasun
Sadiq, Rehan
description The challenging oil spill response in the Arctic calls for effective response decision support tools. In this study, a framework comprising the development of various integrated fuzzy decision tree and regression (FDTR) models as well as model optimization was developed to facilitate the selection of suitable response methods for oil spill accidents in Arctic waters. The FDTR models took into account the influential attributes affecting the effectiveness of oil spill response in harsh Arctic environments. Different FDTR models were developed based on the combinations of three regression analyses, including linear, non-linear, and Gaussian process regression (GPR) and four information evaluation measures for splitting a decision tree, including information gain, deviance, GINI impurities (GINI), and misclassification error. Non-dominated sorting differential evolution (NSDE) optimization was employed to enhance the predictive performance of the FDTR models. The prediction performance of the FDTR models was compared using an oil spill dataset. Using this framework, the average prediction accuracy and the number of rules (representing the robustness) of FDTRs were increased by 14% and decreased by 57%, respectively. A set of optimal prediction models to promptly select an appropriate response method can be obtained using this framework. Among all models, GPR-GINI performed the best concerning optimal values of objective functions. [Display omitted] •Fuzzy decision trees (FDTs) were optimized for selecting oil spill response in the Arctic.•Multi-objective metaheuristic optimization improved the training of FDTs.•Different regression analyses were coupled with FDTs to improve prediction accuracy.•Four information discrimination measures were evaluated to construct efficient FDTs.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106676
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2502228846</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0950705120308054</els_id><sourcerecordid>2502228846</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-866d7264897cfc88bb9b6a632082d10b8472953578acc84d7277d10573efcb5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-Aw8Bz13TtE3Si7AsfsHCXvQc2mTqpnabmmSFXfC_m1q9ehp455l34EHoOiWLlKTstl2899Yf_IISOkaMcXaCZqngNOE5KU_RjJQFSTgp0nN04X1LCKE0FTP0tRmC2ZljFYztsW2w6QO8uSqAxs3-eDxgDcr4cRkcAK56jV0EwP9kO6uh87ixDnvoQP21WNNhP5iui7AfbO8B7yBsrY79OGwBL11k1SU6a6rOw9XvnKPXh_uX1VOy3jw-r5brRGVZHhLBmOaU5aLkqlFC1HVZs4pllAiqU1KLnNOyyAouKqVEHlnOY17wDBpVF002RzdT7-Dsxx58kK3duz6-lLSIJqgQOYtUPlHKWe8dNHJwZle5g0yJHEXLVk6i5ShaTqLj2d10Fk3ApwEnvTLQK9DGRSNSW_N_wTc4uoqU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2502228846</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimization of integrated fuzzy decision tree and regression models for selection of oil spill response method in the Arctic</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Mohammadiun, Saeed ; Hu, Guangji ; Alavi Gharahbagh, Abdorreza ; Mirshahi, Reza ; Li, Jianbing ; Hewage, Kasun ; Sadiq, Rehan</creator><creatorcontrib>Mohammadiun, Saeed ; Hu, Guangji ; Alavi Gharahbagh, Abdorreza ; Mirshahi, Reza ; Li, Jianbing ; Hewage, Kasun ; Sadiq, Rehan</creatorcontrib><description>The challenging oil spill response in the Arctic calls for effective response decision support tools. In this study, a framework comprising the development of various integrated fuzzy decision tree and regression (FDTR) models as well as model optimization was developed to facilitate the selection of suitable response methods for oil spill accidents in Arctic waters. The FDTR models took into account the influential attributes affecting the effectiveness of oil spill response in harsh Arctic environments. Different FDTR models were developed based on the combinations of three regression analyses, including linear, non-linear, and Gaussian process regression (GPR) and four information evaluation measures for splitting a decision tree, including information gain, deviance, GINI impurities (GINI), and misclassification error. Non-dominated sorting differential evolution (NSDE) optimization was employed to enhance the predictive performance of the FDTR models. The prediction performance of the FDTR models was compared using an oil spill dataset. Using this framework, the average prediction accuracy and the number of rules (representing the robustness) of FDTRs were increased by 14% and decreased by 57%, respectively. A set of optimal prediction models to promptly select an appropriate response method can be obtained using this framework. Among all models, GPR-GINI performed the best concerning optimal values of objective functions. [Display omitted] •Fuzzy decision trees (FDTs) were optimized for selecting oil spill response in the Arctic.•Multi-objective metaheuristic optimization improved the training of FDTs.•Different regression analyses were coupled with FDTs to improve prediction accuracy.•Four information discrimination measures were evaluated to construct efficient FDTs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-7051</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106676</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Decision trees ; Decision-making tool ; Environment models ; Evolutionary computation ; Fuzzy decision tree ; Gaussian process ; Ice environments ; Information discrimination power ; Multi-objective optimization ; Oil spill response ; Oil spills ; Optimization ; Performance prediction ; Prediction models ; Regression analysis ; Regression models</subject><ispartof>Knowledge-based systems, 2021-02, Vol.213, p.106676, Article 106676</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Feb 15, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-866d7264897cfc88bb9b6a632082d10b8472953578acc84d7277d10573efcb5f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-866d7264897cfc88bb9b6a632082d10b8472953578acc84d7277d10573efcb5f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7978-0534 ; 0000-0003-0863-1977 ; 0000-0002-5997-6417</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106676$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mohammadiun, Saeed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Guangji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alavi Gharahbagh, Abdorreza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirshahi, Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jianbing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hewage, Kasun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadiq, Rehan</creatorcontrib><title>Optimization of integrated fuzzy decision tree and regression models for selection of oil spill response method in the Arctic</title><title>Knowledge-based systems</title><description>The challenging oil spill response in the Arctic calls for effective response decision support tools. In this study, a framework comprising the development of various integrated fuzzy decision tree and regression (FDTR) models as well as model optimization was developed to facilitate the selection of suitable response methods for oil spill accidents in Arctic waters. The FDTR models took into account the influential attributes affecting the effectiveness of oil spill response in harsh Arctic environments. Different FDTR models were developed based on the combinations of three regression analyses, including linear, non-linear, and Gaussian process regression (GPR) and four information evaluation measures for splitting a decision tree, including information gain, deviance, GINI impurities (GINI), and misclassification error. Non-dominated sorting differential evolution (NSDE) optimization was employed to enhance the predictive performance of the FDTR models. The prediction performance of the FDTR models was compared using an oil spill dataset. Using this framework, the average prediction accuracy and the number of rules (representing the robustness) of FDTRs were increased by 14% and decreased by 57%, respectively. A set of optimal prediction models to promptly select an appropriate response method can be obtained using this framework. Among all models, GPR-GINI performed the best concerning optimal values of objective functions. [Display omitted] •Fuzzy decision trees (FDTs) were optimized for selecting oil spill response in the Arctic.•Multi-objective metaheuristic optimization improved the training of FDTs.•Different regression analyses were coupled with FDTs to improve prediction accuracy.•Four information discrimination measures were evaluated to construct efficient FDTs.</description><subject>Decision trees</subject><subject>Decision-making tool</subject><subject>Environment models</subject><subject>Evolutionary computation</subject><subject>Fuzzy decision tree</subject><subject>Gaussian process</subject><subject>Ice environments</subject><subject>Information discrimination power</subject><subject>Multi-objective optimization</subject><subject>Oil spill response</subject><subject>Oil spills</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Performance prediction</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><issn>0950-7051</issn><issn>1872-7409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-Aw8Bz13TtE3Si7AsfsHCXvQc2mTqpnabmmSFXfC_m1q9ehp455l34EHoOiWLlKTstl2899Yf_IISOkaMcXaCZqngNOE5KU_RjJQFSTgp0nN04X1LCKE0FTP0tRmC2ZljFYztsW2w6QO8uSqAxs3-eDxgDcr4cRkcAK56jV0EwP9kO6uh87ixDnvoQP21WNNhP5iui7AfbO8B7yBsrY79OGwBL11k1SU6a6rOw9XvnKPXh_uX1VOy3jw-r5brRGVZHhLBmOaU5aLkqlFC1HVZs4pllAiqU1KLnNOyyAouKqVEHlnOY17wDBpVF002RzdT7-Dsxx58kK3duz6-lLSIJqgQOYtUPlHKWe8dNHJwZle5g0yJHEXLVk6i5ShaTqLj2d10Fk3ApwEnvTLQK9DGRSNSW_N_wTc4uoqU</recordid><startdate>20210215</startdate><enddate>20210215</enddate><creator>Mohammadiun, Saeed</creator><creator>Hu, Guangji</creator><creator>Alavi Gharahbagh, Abdorreza</creator><creator>Mirshahi, Reza</creator><creator>Li, Jianbing</creator><creator>Hewage, Kasun</creator><creator>Sadiq, Rehan</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7978-0534</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0863-1977</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5997-6417</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210215</creationdate><title>Optimization of integrated fuzzy decision tree and regression models for selection of oil spill response method in the Arctic</title><author>Mohammadiun, Saeed ; Hu, Guangji ; Alavi Gharahbagh, Abdorreza ; Mirshahi, Reza ; Li, Jianbing ; Hewage, Kasun ; Sadiq, Rehan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-866d7264897cfc88bb9b6a632082d10b8472953578acc84d7277d10573efcb5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Decision trees</topic><topic>Decision-making tool</topic><topic>Environment models</topic><topic>Evolutionary computation</topic><topic>Fuzzy decision tree</topic><topic>Gaussian process</topic><topic>Ice environments</topic><topic>Information discrimination power</topic><topic>Multi-objective optimization</topic><topic>Oil spill response</topic><topic>Oil spills</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Performance prediction</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mohammadiun, Saeed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Guangji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alavi Gharahbagh, Abdorreza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirshahi, Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jianbing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hewage, Kasun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadiq, Rehan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Knowledge-based systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mohammadiun, Saeed</au><au>Hu, Guangji</au><au>Alavi Gharahbagh, Abdorreza</au><au>Mirshahi, Reza</au><au>Li, Jianbing</au><au>Hewage, Kasun</au><au>Sadiq, Rehan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimization of integrated fuzzy decision tree and regression models for selection of oil spill response method in the Arctic</atitle><jtitle>Knowledge-based systems</jtitle><date>2021-02-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>213</volume><spage>106676</spage><pages>106676-</pages><artnum>106676</artnum><issn>0950-7051</issn><eissn>1872-7409</eissn><abstract>The challenging oil spill response in the Arctic calls for effective response decision support tools. In this study, a framework comprising the development of various integrated fuzzy decision tree and regression (FDTR) models as well as model optimization was developed to facilitate the selection of suitable response methods for oil spill accidents in Arctic waters. The FDTR models took into account the influential attributes affecting the effectiveness of oil spill response in harsh Arctic environments. Different FDTR models were developed based on the combinations of three regression analyses, including linear, non-linear, and Gaussian process regression (GPR) and four information evaluation measures for splitting a decision tree, including information gain, deviance, GINI impurities (GINI), and misclassification error. Non-dominated sorting differential evolution (NSDE) optimization was employed to enhance the predictive performance of the FDTR models. The prediction performance of the FDTR models was compared using an oil spill dataset. Using this framework, the average prediction accuracy and the number of rules (representing the robustness) of FDTRs were increased by 14% and decreased by 57%, respectively. A set of optimal prediction models to promptly select an appropriate response method can be obtained using this framework. Among all models, GPR-GINI performed the best concerning optimal values of objective functions. [Display omitted] •Fuzzy decision trees (FDTs) were optimized for selecting oil spill response in the Arctic.•Multi-objective metaheuristic optimization improved the training of FDTs.•Different regression analyses were coupled with FDTs to improve prediction accuracy.•Four information discrimination measures were evaluated to construct efficient FDTs.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106676</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7978-0534</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0863-1977</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5997-6417</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0950-7051
ispartof Knowledge-based systems, 2021-02, Vol.213, p.106676, Article 106676
issn 0950-7051
1872-7409
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2502228846
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Decision trees
Decision-making tool
Environment models
Evolutionary computation
Fuzzy decision tree
Gaussian process
Ice environments
Information discrimination power
Multi-objective optimization
Oil spill response
Oil spills
Optimization
Performance prediction
Prediction models
Regression analysis
Regression models
title Optimization of integrated fuzzy decision tree and regression models for selection of oil spill response method in the Arctic
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A16%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimization%20of%20integrated%20fuzzy%20decision%20tree%20and%20regression%20models%20for%20selection%20of%20oil%20spill%20response%20method%20in%20the%20Arctic&rft.jtitle=Knowledge-based%20systems&rft.au=Mohammadiun,%20Saeed&rft.date=2021-02-15&rft.volume=213&rft.spage=106676&rft.pages=106676-&rft.artnum=106676&rft.issn=0950-7051&rft.eissn=1872-7409&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106676&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2502228846%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2502228846&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0950705120308054&rfr_iscdi=true