Young Scholar Presentation: Energy and Mineral Supplementation Strategies for Beef Cattle Grazing the Northern Great Plains
Three experiments were conducted to evaluate supplementation strategies for beef cattle grazing in the Northern Great Plains. In experiment 1, 28 cow-calf pairs had access to electronic feeders (SmartFeed system; C-Lock Inc., Rapid City, SD) that monitored individual vitamin and mineral supplement (...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 2020-11, Vol.98, p.130-130 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 130 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 130 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | McCcarthy, Kacie L Underdahl, Sarah Undi, Michael Becker, Stephanie Sedivec, Kevin K cherio, J Christopher Scott, Ronald Caton, Joel S Dahlen, Carl R |
description | Three experiments were conducted to evaluate supplementation strategies for beef cattle grazing in the Northern Great Plains. In experiment 1, 28 cow-calf pairs had access to electronic feeders (SmartFeed system; C-Lock Inc., Rapid City, SD) that monitored individual vitamin and mineral supplement (VTM) intake. Cows had greater VTM intakes (81.1 ± 8.2 g/d; P < 0.01) than calves (44.2 ± 8.6 g/d) but both attended feeders a similar (P = 0.71) proportion of days. Furthermore, we noted greater (P < 0.01) concentrations of Se, Cu, and Co in livers of HIGH intake cows compared to LOW intake cows. Experiment 2, we used the SmartFeed system to regulate intake of individual heifers (n = 60) in a group pasture scenario assigned to control (CON), VTM, or energy supplement (NRG) treatments, and evaluated supplement intake, and concentrations of liver mineral and metabolites. Though no differences were observed in BW and ADG, treatments that provided VTM enhanced liver concentrations of Se, Fe, Cu, and Co (P < 0.05). No differences (P = 0.85) were observed in concentrations of NEFA; however, NRG heifers had greater (P = 0.01) glucose concentrations than CON and VTM heifers. Experiment 3 objectives were to determine the influence of feeding VTM and NRG supplements to beef heifers (n = 35) during the first 84 days of pregnancy on concentrations of progesterone (P4), corpus luteum (CL) size and fetal body measurements. Providing NRG during early gestation resulted in heavier CLs (P = 0.003) that produced more P4 (P = 0.002) and greater fetal femur growth (P = 0.009) whereas providing VTM enhanced fetal liver growth (P = 0.05). Overall, we were able to successfully monitor and control individual mineral intake, corroborated those differences in liver mineral concentrations, and observed alterations in fetal growth after mineral and energy supplementation. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2501944689</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2501944689</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_25019446893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjE1PwzAQRC0EEuHjP6zEOZLt1FXCkarABVQpvXCqVu0mdWXssN4cgD-PD3Dn9EYzT3OmKuOsqxuzbM5VpbU1ddsae6mucj5pbazrXKW-39IcR-j3xxSQYcOUKQqKT_Ee1pF4_ASMB3jxJWOAfp6mQO9_DvTCKDR6yjAkhgeiAVYoEgieGL98-ZYjwWviAo6lJBTYBPQx36iLAUOm219eq7vH9Xb1XE-cPmbKsjulmWOZdtZp0y0Wy7Zr_mf9ALIeUCU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501944689</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Young Scholar Presentation: Energy and Mineral Supplementation Strategies for Beef Cattle Grazing the Northern Great Plains</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>McCcarthy, Kacie L ; Underdahl, Sarah ; Undi, Michael ; Becker, Stephanie ; Sedivec, Kevin K ; cherio, J Christopher ; Scott, Ronald ; Caton, Joel S ; Dahlen, Carl R</creator><creatorcontrib>McCcarthy, Kacie L ; Underdahl, Sarah ; Undi, Michael ; Becker, Stephanie ; Sedivec, Kevin K ; cherio, J Christopher ; Scott, Ronald ; Caton, Joel S ; Dahlen, Carl R</creatorcontrib><description>Three experiments were conducted to evaluate supplementation strategies for beef cattle grazing in the Northern Great Plains. In experiment 1, 28 cow-calf pairs had access to electronic feeders (SmartFeed system; C-Lock Inc., Rapid City, SD) that monitored individual vitamin and mineral supplement (VTM) intake. Cows had greater VTM intakes (81.1 ± 8.2 g/d; P < 0.01) than calves (44.2 ± 8.6 g/d) but both attended feeders a similar (P = 0.71) proportion of days. Furthermore, we noted greater (P < 0.01) concentrations of Se, Cu, and Co in livers of HIGH intake cows compared to LOW intake cows. Experiment 2, we used the SmartFeed system to regulate intake of individual heifers (n = 60) in a group pasture scenario assigned to control (CON), VTM, or energy supplement (NRG) treatments, and evaluated supplement intake, and concentrations of liver mineral and metabolites. Though no differences were observed in BW and ADG, treatments that provided VTM enhanced liver concentrations of Se, Fe, Cu, and Co (P < 0.05). No differences (P = 0.85) were observed in concentrations of NEFA; however, NRG heifers had greater (P = 0.01) glucose concentrations than CON and VTM heifers. Experiment 3 objectives were to determine the influence of feeding VTM and NRG supplements to beef heifers (n = 35) during the first 84 days of pregnancy on concentrations of progesterone (P4), corpus luteum (CL) size and fetal body measurements. Providing NRG during early gestation resulted in heavier CLs (P = 0.003) that produced more P4 (P = 0.002) and greater fetal femur growth (P = 0.009) whereas providing VTM enhanced fetal liver growth (P = 0.05). Overall, we were able to successfully monitor and control individual mineral intake, corroborated those differences in liver mineral concentrations, and observed alterations in fetal growth after mineral and energy supplementation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Beef ; Beef cattle ; Body measurements ; Body size ; Calves ; Cattle ; Copper ; Corpus luteum ; Dietary minerals ; Dietary supplements ; Evaluation ; Feeders ; Feeds ; Femur ; Fetuses ; Gestation ; Grazing ; Liver ; Metabolites ; Pasture ; Progesterone ; Stability ; Supplements</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2020-11, Vol.98, p.130-130</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press Nov 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCcarthy, Kacie L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Underdahl, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Undi, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sedivec, Kevin K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>cherio, J Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caton, Joel S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlen, Carl R</creatorcontrib><title>Young Scholar Presentation: Energy and Mineral Supplementation Strategies for Beef Cattle Grazing the Northern Great Plains</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Three experiments were conducted to evaluate supplementation strategies for beef cattle grazing in the Northern Great Plains. In experiment 1, 28 cow-calf pairs had access to electronic feeders (SmartFeed system; C-Lock Inc., Rapid City, SD) that monitored individual vitamin and mineral supplement (VTM) intake. Cows had greater VTM intakes (81.1 ± 8.2 g/d; P < 0.01) than calves (44.2 ± 8.6 g/d) but both attended feeders a similar (P = 0.71) proportion of days. Furthermore, we noted greater (P < 0.01) concentrations of Se, Cu, and Co in livers of HIGH intake cows compared to LOW intake cows. Experiment 2, we used the SmartFeed system to regulate intake of individual heifers (n = 60) in a group pasture scenario assigned to control (CON), VTM, or energy supplement (NRG) treatments, and evaluated supplement intake, and concentrations of liver mineral and metabolites. Though no differences were observed in BW and ADG, treatments that provided VTM enhanced liver concentrations of Se, Fe, Cu, and Co (P < 0.05). No differences (P = 0.85) were observed in concentrations of NEFA; however, NRG heifers had greater (P = 0.01) glucose concentrations than CON and VTM heifers. Experiment 3 objectives were to determine the influence of feeding VTM and NRG supplements to beef heifers (n = 35) during the first 84 days of pregnancy on concentrations of progesterone (P4), corpus luteum (CL) size and fetal body measurements. Providing NRG during early gestation resulted in heavier CLs (P = 0.003) that produced more P4 (P = 0.002) and greater fetal femur growth (P = 0.009) whereas providing VTM enhanced fetal liver growth (P = 0.05). Overall, we were able to successfully monitor and control individual mineral intake, corroborated those differences in liver mineral concentrations, and observed alterations in fetal growth after mineral and energy supplementation.</description><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Beef cattle</subject><subject>Body measurements</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Calves</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Corpus luteum</subject><subject>Dietary minerals</subject><subject>Dietary supplements</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Feeders</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Femur</subject><subject>Fetuses</subject><subject>Gestation</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Progesterone</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Supplements</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjE1PwzAQRC0EEuHjP6zEOZLt1FXCkarABVQpvXCqVu0mdWXssN4cgD-PD3Dn9EYzT3OmKuOsqxuzbM5VpbU1ddsae6mucj5pbazrXKW-39IcR-j3xxSQYcOUKQqKT_Ee1pF4_ASMB3jxJWOAfp6mQO9_DvTCKDR6yjAkhgeiAVYoEgieGL98-ZYjwWviAo6lJBTYBPQx36iLAUOm219eq7vH9Xb1XE-cPmbKsjulmWOZdtZp0y0Wy7Zr_mf9ALIeUCU</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>McCcarthy, Kacie L</creator><creator>Underdahl, Sarah</creator><creator>Undi, Michael</creator><creator>Becker, Stephanie</creator><creator>Sedivec, Kevin K</creator><creator>cherio, J Christopher</creator><creator>Scott, Ronald</creator><creator>Caton, Joel S</creator><creator>Dahlen, Carl R</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Young Scholar Presentation: Energy and Mineral Supplementation Strategies for Beef Cattle Grazing the Northern Great Plains</title><author>McCcarthy, Kacie L ; Underdahl, Sarah ; Undi, Michael ; Becker, Stephanie ; Sedivec, Kevin K ; cherio, J Christopher ; Scott, Ronald ; Caton, Joel S ; Dahlen, Carl R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_25019446893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Beef cattle</topic><topic>Body measurements</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Calves</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Corpus luteum</topic><topic>Dietary minerals</topic><topic>Dietary supplements</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Feeders</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Femur</topic><topic>Fetuses</topic><topic>Gestation</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Progesterone</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Supplements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCcarthy, Kacie L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Underdahl, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Undi, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sedivec, Kevin K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>cherio, J Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caton, Joel S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlen, Carl R</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCcarthy, Kacie L</au><au>Underdahl, Sarah</au><au>Undi, Michael</au><au>Becker, Stephanie</au><au>Sedivec, Kevin K</au><au>cherio, J Christopher</au><au>Scott, Ronald</au><au>Caton, Joel S</au><au>Dahlen, Carl R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Young Scholar Presentation: Energy and Mineral Supplementation Strategies for Beef Cattle Grazing the Northern Great Plains</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>98</volume><spage>130</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>130-130</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Three experiments were conducted to evaluate supplementation strategies for beef cattle grazing in the Northern Great Plains. In experiment 1, 28 cow-calf pairs had access to electronic feeders (SmartFeed system; C-Lock Inc., Rapid City, SD) that monitored individual vitamin and mineral supplement (VTM) intake. Cows had greater VTM intakes (81.1 ± 8.2 g/d; P < 0.01) than calves (44.2 ± 8.6 g/d) but both attended feeders a similar (P = 0.71) proportion of days. Furthermore, we noted greater (P < 0.01) concentrations of Se, Cu, and Co in livers of HIGH intake cows compared to LOW intake cows. Experiment 2, we used the SmartFeed system to regulate intake of individual heifers (n = 60) in a group pasture scenario assigned to control (CON), VTM, or energy supplement (NRG) treatments, and evaluated supplement intake, and concentrations of liver mineral and metabolites. Though no differences were observed in BW and ADG, treatments that provided VTM enhanced liver concentrations of Se, Fe, Cu, and Co (P < 0.05). No differences (P = 0.85) were observed in concentrations of NEFA; however, NRG heifers had greater (P = 0.01) glucose concentrations than CON and VTM heifers. Experiment 3 objectives were to determine the influence of feeding VTM and NRG supplements to beef heifers (n = 35) during the first 84 days of pregnancy on concentrations of progesterone (P4), corpus luteum (CL) size and fetal body measurements. Providing NRG during early gestation resulted in heavier CLs (P = 0.003) that produced more P4 (P = 0.002) and greater fetal femur growth (P = 0.009) whereas providing VTM enhanced fetal liver growth (P = 0.05). Overall, we were able to successfully monitor and control individual mineral intake, corroborated those differences in liver mineral concentrations, and observed alterations in fetal growth after mineral and energy supplementation.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2020-11, Vol.98, p.130-130 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2501944689 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Beef Beef cattle Body measurements Body size Calves Cattle Copper Corpus luteum Dietary minerals Dietary supplements Evaluation Feeders Feeds Femur Fetuses Gestation Grazing Liver Metabolites Pasture Progesterone Stability Supplements |
title | Young Scholar Presentation: Energy and Mineral Supplementation Strategies for Beef Cattle Grazing the Northern Great Plains |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T23%3A02%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Young%20Scholar%20Presentation:%20Energy%20and%20Mineral%20Supplementation%20Strategies%20for%20Beef%20Cattle%20Grazing%20the%20Northern%20Great%20Plains&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=McCcarthy,%20Kacie%20L&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=98&rft.spage=130&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=130-130&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2501944689%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501944689&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |