Impact of diet and quality grade on tenderness of beef steaks
Research was conducted to evaluate the effects of feeding different types of processed corn, with or without distiller grains with solubles, and differing quality grade on tenderness of beef steaks. Steers (n=240) were finished on Dry Rolled Corn (DRC), DRC + 30% Dried Distillers Grains with Soluble...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 2020-11, Vol.98, p.45-45 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 45 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 45 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | Bland, Nicolas Herrera, Nicolas Henriott, Morgan Ribeiro, Felipe Hart, Kellen Calkins, Chris |
description | Research was conducted to evaluate the effects of feeding different types of processed corn, with or without distiller grains with solubles, and differing quality grade on tenderness of beef steaks. Steers (n=240) were finished on Dry Rolled Corn (DRC), DRC + 30% Dried Distillers Grains with Solubles (DDGS), Steam Flaked Corn (SFC), or SFC + 30% DDGS. Cattle were fed 10 per pen. Only pens with upper 2/3 Choice and Selectgrade carcasses were sampled, with a goal of two (and a minimum of one) of each grade per pen. Three pens per treatment met the selection criterion and 36 carcasses were chosen (21 upper 2/3 Choice and 15 Select). Pen was considered the experimental unit. Both strip loins were collected from each carcass, halved, and aged for 2, 9, 16, or 23 d. After aging, steaks were placed under retail display for 7 d. Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF), slice shear force (SSF), sarcomere length, sarcoplasmic calcium, and troponin-T (TnT) degradation were determined. Minimal to no impacts on sarcomere length and calcium were found (P >0.05). For both WBSF and SSF, Choice steaks were more tender than Select. Significantly more Tn-T was degraded at 23 d of aging compared to 2 d of aging. Beef steaks from cattle fed DRC were more tender than SFC, regardless of the presence or absence of DDGS. For 2 d aged samples, Tn-T degradation was higher when cattle were fed DDGS compared to no DDGS. Overall, these data suggest that steaks from cattle fed DRC are more tender than steaks from cattle fed SFC and Choice-grade steaks are more tender than Selectgrade steaks. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2501937259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2501937259</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_25019372593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjbsKwjAUQIMoWB__cMG5kAfRdnASRXf3Es2NtNakzU0H_94KfoDTGc6BM2GZ0FLnSmzVlGWcS5EXhZBztiBqOBdSlzpj-8urM_cEwYGtMYHxFvrBtHV6wyMaixA8JPQWo0eib3dDdEAJzZNWbOZMS7j-cck2p-P1cM67GPoBKVVNGKIfVSU1F6XajVf1X_UBH8s4sA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501937259</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of diet and quality grade on tenderness of beef steaks</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bland, Nicolas ; Herrera, Nicolas ; Henriott, Morgan ; Ribeiro, Felipe ; Hart, Kellen ; Calkins, Chris</creator><creatorcontrib>Bland, Nicolas ; Herrera, Nicolas ; Henriott, Morgan ; Ribeiro, Felipe ; Hart, Kellen ; Calkins, Chris</creatorcontrib><description>Research was conducted to evaluate the effects of feeding different types of processed corn, with or without distiller grains with solubles, and differing quality grade on tenderness of beef steaks. Steers (n=240) were finished on Dry Rolled Corn (DRC), DRC + 30% Dried Distillers Grains with Solubles (DDGS), Steam Flaked Corn (SFC), or SFC + 30% DDGS. Cattle were fed 10 per pen. Only pens with upper 2/3 Choice and Selectgrade carcasses were sampled, with a goal of two (and a minimum of one) of each grade per pen. Three pens per treatment met the selection criterion and 36 carcasses were chosen (21 upper 2/3 Choice and 15 Select). Pen was considered the experimental unit. Both strip loins were collected from each carcass, halved, and aged for 2, 9, 16, or 23 d. After aging, steaks were placed under retail display for 7 d. Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF), slice shear force (SSF), sarcomere length, sarcoplasmic calcium, and troponin-T (TnT) degradation were determined. Minimal to no impacts on sarcomere length and calcium were found (P >0.05). For both WBSF and SSF, Choice steaks were more tender than Select. Significantly more Tn-T was degraded at 23 d of aging compared to 2 d of aging. Beef steaks from cattle fed DRC were more tender than SFC, regardless of the presence or absence of DDGS. For 2 d aged samples, Tn-T degradation was higher when cattle were fed DDGS compared to no DDGS. Overall, these data suggest that steaks from cattle fed DRC are more tender than steaks from cattle fed SFC and Choice-grade steaks are more tender than Selectgrade steaks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aging ; Beef ; Beef cattle ; Calcium ; Calcium-binding protein ; Carcasses ; Cattle ; Corn ; Degradation ; Diet ; Grain ; Meat quality ; Quality ; Shear forces ; Steam ; Troponin</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2020-11, Vol.98, p.45-45</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press Nov 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bland, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrera, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henriott, Morgan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Kellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calkins, Chris</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of diet and quality grade on tenderness of beef steaks</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Research was conducted to evaluate the effects of feeding different types of processed corn, with or without distiller grains with solubles, and differing quality grade on tenderness of beef steaks. Steers (n=240) were finished on Dry Rolled Corn (DRC), DRC + 30% Dried Distillers Grains with Solubles (DDGS), Steam Flaked Corn (SFC), or SFC + 30% DDGS. Cattle were fed 10 per pen. Only pens with upper 2/3 Choice and Selectgrade carcasses were sampled, with a goal of two (and a minimum of one) of each grade per pen. Three pens per treatment met the selection criterion and 36 carcasses were chosen (21 upper 2/3 Choice and 15 Select). Pen was considered the experimental unit. Both strip loins were collected from each carcass, halved, and aged for 2, 9, 16, or 23 d. After aging, steaks were placed under retail display for 7 d. Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF), slice shear force (SSF), sarcomere length, sarcoplasmic calcium, and troponin-T (TnT) degradation were determined. Minimal to no impacts on sarcomere length and calcium were found (P >0.05). For both WBSF and SSF, Choice steaks were more tender than Select. Significantly more Tn-T was degraded at 23 d of aging compared to 2 d of aging. Beef steaks from cattle fed DRC were more tender than SFC, regardless of the presence or absence of DDGS. For 2 d aged samples, Tn-T degradation was higher when cattle were fed DDGS compared to no DDGS. Overall, these data suggest that steaks from cattle fed DRC are more tender than steaks from cattle fed SFC and Choice-grade steaks are more tender than Selectgrade steaks.</description><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Beef cattle</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Calcium-binding protein</subject><subject>Carcasses</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Grain</subject><subject>Meat quality</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Shear forces</subject><subject>Steam</subject><subject>Troponin</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjbsKwjAUQIMoWB__cMG5kAfRdnASRXf3Es2NtNakzU0H_94KfoDTGc6BM2GZ0FLnSmzVlGWcS5EXhZBztiBqOBdSlzpj-8urM_cEwYGtMYHxFvrBtHV6wyMaixA8JPQWo0eib3dDdEAJzZNWbOZMS7j-cck2p-P1cM67GPoBKVVNGKIfVSU1F6XajVf1X_UBH8s4sA</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Bland, Nicolas</creator><creator>Herrera, Nicolas</creator><creator>Henriott, Morgan</creator><creator>Ribeiro, Felipe</creator><creator>Hart, Kellen</creator><creator>Calkins, Chris</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Impact of diet and quality grade on tenderness of beef steaks</title><author>Bland, Nicolas ; Herrera, Nicolas ; Henriott, Morgan ; Ribeiro, Felipe ; Hart, Kellen ; Calkins, Chris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_25019372593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Beef cattle</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Calcium-binding protein</topic><topic>Carcasses</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Grain</topic><topic>Meat quality</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Shear forces</topic><topic>Steam</topic><topic>Troponin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bland, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrera, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henriott, Morgan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Kellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calkins, Chris</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bland, Nicolas</au><au>Herrera, Nicolas</au><au>Henriott, Morgan</au><au>Ribeiro, Felipe</au><au>Hart, Kellen</au><au>Calkins, Chris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of diet and quality grade on tenderness of beef steaks</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>98</volume><spage>45</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>45-45</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Research was conducted to evaluate the effects of feeding different types of processed corn, with or without distiller grains with solubles, and differing quality grade on tenderness of beef steaks. Steers (n=240) were finished on Dry Rolled Corn (DRC), DRC + 30% Dried Distillers Grains with Solubles (DDGS), Steam Flaked Corn (SFC), or SFC + 30% DDGS. Cattle were fed 10 per pen. Only pens with upper 2/3 Choice and Selectgrade carcasses were sampled, with a goal of two (and a minimum of one) of each grade per pen. Three pens per treatment met the selection criterion and 36 carcasses were chosen (21 upper 2/3 Choice and 15 Select). Pen was considered the experimental unit. Both strip loins were collected from each carcass, halved, and aged for 2, 9, 16, or 23 d. After aging, steaks were placed under retail display for 7 d. Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF), slice shear force (SSF), sarcomere length, sarcoplasmic calcium, and troponin-T (TnT) degradation were determined. Minimal to no impacts on sarcomere length and calcium were found (P >0.05). For both WBSF and SSF, Choice steaks were more tender than Select. Significantly more Tn-T was degraded at 23 d of aging compared to 2 d of aging. Beef steaks from cattle fed DRC were more tender than SFC, regardless of the presence or absence of DDGS. For 2 d aged samples, Tn-T degradation was higher when cattle were fed DDGS compared to no DDGS. Overall, these data suggest that steaks from cattle fed DRC are more tender than steaks from cattle fed SFC and Choice-grade steaks are more tender than Selectgrade steaks.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2020-11, Vol.98, p.45-45 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2501937259 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); PubMed Central |
subjects | Aging Beef Beef cattle Calcium Calcium-binding protein Carcasses Cattle Corn Degradation Diet Grain Meat quality Quality Shear forces Steam Troponin |
title | Impact of diet and quality grade on tenderness of beef steaks |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T04%3A21%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20diet%20and%20quality%20grade%20on%20tenderness%20of%20beef%20steaks&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Bland,%20Nicolas&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=98&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=45-45&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2501937259%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501937259&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |