Evaluation of extended release eprinomectin efficacy on multiparous beef cow performance[1]

Internal parasitism inevitability prompts economic loss in beef cattle production by decreasing growth performance and reproductive traits. Previous studies have conflicting results on the macrocyclic lactones (ML) efficacy against internal parasitism. The objective of this study was to evaluate the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2020-11, Vol.98, p.60-61
Hauptverfasser: Zammit, Laine, Powell, Jermey G, Cauble, Reagan N, Lester, Toby D, Lichtenwalter, Callan, Herring, Ellen, McGuire, Clay, Pickett, Autumn T, Wray, Eva, Tucker, Christopher
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 61
container_issue
container_start_page 60
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 98
creator Zammit, Laine
Powell, Jermey G
Cauble, Reagan N
Lester, Toby D
Lichtenwalter, Callan
Herring, Ellen
McGuire, Clay
Pickett, Autumn T
Wray, Eva
Tucker, Christopher
description Internal parasitism inevitability prompts economic loss in beef cattle production by decreasing growth performance and reproductive traits. Previous studies have conflicting results on the macrocyclic lactones (ML) efficacy against internal parasitism. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of milbeymycin and avermectin sub groups of ML on cow performance. Multiparous fall calving, crossbred beef cows (n = 106) were allocated randomly to 1 of 3 anthelmintic treatments: 1) Negative control (CON), in which cows did not receive an anthelmintic, 2) Injectable moxidectin (MOX) and 3) Injectable extended release eprinomectin (ERE). Body weights (BW), body condition scores (BCS), and fecal egg counts (FEC) were taken throughout the duration of the calving season to weaning on d0, d80, d162, and d217, with weaning occurring on d217. Performance data were analyzed using the MIXED procedures of SAS, and pregnancy data were analyzed using the GENMOD procedures of SAS. Significance was fixed at P < 0.05 and tendencies were established from 0.05 < P < 0.10. There was no effect of anthelmintic treatment on cow BW (P > 0.57) or cow BCS (P > 0.22) during the 217 d study; however, CON cows tended to have lower BCS (P = 0.08) throughout the duration of the study. Cows treated with ERE had fewer FEC compared to MOX and CON groups (P < 0.001), and tended to improve pregnancy rates (c2 = 0.0546). Calf weaning weight was similar among treatments averaging 216, 225, and 223 kg regarding CON, MOX, and ERE cow treatments, respectively.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2501933170</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2501933170</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_25019331703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNykkKwjAUgOEgCtbhDg9cFzIQbddS8QDuRCSmL5DSJjWDw-114QFc_Yv_m5CCSS5LwbZiSgpKOSurivE5WcTYUcq4rGVBzs1D9Vkl6x14A_hK6FpsIWCPKiLgGKzzA-pkHaAxViv9hi8ecp_sqILPEW6IBrR_wojB-DAop_HMLisyM6qPuP51STaH5rQ_lmPw94wxXTufg_uuK5eU1UKwHRX_qQ_y10Ty</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501933170</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of extended release eprinomectin efficacy on multiparous beef cow performance[1]</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Zammit, Laine ; Powell, Jermey G ; Cauble, Reagan N ; Lester, Toby D ; Lichtenwalter, Callan ; Herring, Ellen ; McGuire, Clay ; Pickett, Autumn T ; Wray, Eva ; Tucker, Christopher</creator><creatorcontrib>Zammit, Laine ; Powell, Jermey G ; Cauble, Reagan N ; Lester, Toby D ; Lichtenwalter, Callan ; Herring, Ellen ; McGuire, Clay ; Pickett, Autumn T ; Wray, Eva ; Tucker, Christopher</creatorcontrib><description>Internal parasitism inevitability prompts economic loss in beef cattle production by decreasing growth performance and reproductive traits. Previous studies have conflicting results on the macrocyclic lactones (ML) efficacy against internal parasitism. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of milbeymycin and avermectin sub groups of ML on cow performance. Multiparous fall calving, crossbred beef cows (n = 106) were allocated randomly to 1 of 3 anthelmintic treatments: 1) Negative control (CON), in which cows did not receive an anthelmintic, 2) Injectable moxidectin (MOX) and 3) Injectable extended release eprinomectin (ERE). Body weights (BW), body condition scores (BCS), and fecal egg counts (FEC) were taken throughout the duration of the calving season to weaning on d0, d80, d162, and d217, with weaning occurring on d217. Performance data were analyzed using the MIXED procedures of SAS, and pregnancy data were analyzed using the GENMOD procedures of SAS. Significance was fixed at P &lt; 0.05 and tendencies were established from 0.05 &lt; P &lt; 0.10. There was no effect of anthelmintic treatment on cow BW (P &gt; 0.57) or cow BCS (P &gt; 0.22) during the 217 d study; however, CON cows tended to have lower BCS (P = 0.08) throughout the duration of the study. Cows treated with ERE had fewer FEC compared to MOX and CON groups (P &lt; 0.001), and tended to improve pregnancy rates (c2 = 0.0546). Calf weaning weight was similar among treatments averaging 216, 225, and 223 kg regarding CON, MOX, and ERE cow treatments, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animal reproduction ; Anthelmintic agents ; Antiparasitic agents ; Avermectin ; Beef ; Beef cattle ; Cattle production ; Data analysis ; Economic impact ; Lactones ; Parasitism ; Pregnancy ; Weaning</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2020-11, Vol.98, p.60-61</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press Nov 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zammit, Laine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Jermey G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cauble, Reagan N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lester, Toby D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichtenwalter, Callan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herring, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuire, Clay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickett, Autumn T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wray, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Christopher</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of extended release eprinomectin efficacy on multiparous beef cow performance[1]</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Internal parasitism inevitability prompts economic loss in beef cattle production by decreasing growth performance and reproductive traits. Previous studies have conflicting results on the macrocyclic lactones (ML) efficacy against internal parasitism. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of milbeymycin and avermectin sub groups of ML on cow performance. Multiparous fall calving, crossbred beef cows (n = 106) were allocated randomly to 1 of 3 anthelmintic treatments: 1) Negative control (CON), in which cows did not receive an anthelmintic, 2) Injectable moxidectin (MOX) and 3) Injectable extended release eprinomectin (ERE). Body weights (BW), body condition scores (BCS), and fecal egg counts (FEC) were taken throughout the duration of the calving season to weaning on d0, d80, d162, and d217, with weaning occurring on d217. Performance data were analyzed using the MIXED procedures of SAS, and pregnancy data were analyzed using the GENMOD procedures of SAS. Significance was fixed at P &lt; 0.05 and tendencies were established from 0.05 &lt; P &lt; 0.10. There was no effect of anthelmintic treatment on cow BW (P &gt; 0.57) or cow BCS (P &gt; 0.22) during the 217 d study; however, CON cows tended to have lower BCS (P = 0.08) throughout the duration of the study. Cows treated with ERE had fewer FEC compared to MOX and CON groups (P &lt; 0.001), and tended to improve pregnancy rates (c2 = 0.0546). Calf weaning weight was similar among treatments averaging 216, 225, and 223 kg regarding CON, MOX, and ERE cow treatments, respectively.</description><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Anthelmintic agents</subject><subject>Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>Avermectin</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Beef cattle</subject><subject>Cattle production</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Lactones</subject><subject>Parasitism</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Weaning</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNykkKwjAUgOEgCtbhDg9cFzIQbddS8QDuRCSmL5DSJjWDw-114QFc_Yv_m5CCSS5LwbZiSgpKOSurivE5WcTYUcq4rGVBzs1D9Vkl6x14A_hK6FpsIWCPKiLgGKzzA-pkHaAxViv9hi8ecp_sqILPEW6IBrR_wojB-DAop_HMLisyM6qPuP51STaH5rQ_lmPw94wxXTufg_uuK5eU1UKwHRX_qQ_y10Ty</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Zammit, Laine</creator><creator>Powell, Jermey G</creator><creator>Cauble, Reagan N</creator><creator>Lester, Toby D</creator><creator>Lichtenwalter, Callan</creator><creator>Herring, Ellen</creator><creator>McGuire, Clay</creator><creator>Pickett, Autumn T</creator><creator>Wray, Eva</creator><creator>Tucker, Christopher</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of extended release eprinomectin efficacy on multiparous beef cow performance[1]</title><author>Zammit, Laine ; Powell, Jermey G ; Cauble, Reagan N ; Lester, Toby D ; Lichtenwalter, Callan ; Herring, Ellen ; McGuire, Clay ; Pickett, Autumn T ; Wray, Eva ; Tucker, Christopher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_25019331703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Anthelmintic agents</topic><topic>Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>Avermectin</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Beef cattle</topic><topic>Cattle production</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Lactones</topic><topic>Parasitism</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Weaning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zammit, Laine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, Jermey G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cauble, Reagan N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lester, Toby D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichtenwalter, Callan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herring, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuire, Clay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickett, Autumn T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wray, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Christopher</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep (ProQuest)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zammit, Laine</au><au>Powell, Jermey G</au><au>Cauble, Reagan N</au><au>Lester, Toby D</au><au>Lichtenwalter, Callan</au><au>Herring, Ellen</au><au>McGuire, Clay</au><au>Pickett, Autumn T</au><au>Wray, Eva</au><au>Tucker, Christopher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of extended release eprinomectin efficacy on multiparous beef cow performance[1]</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>98</volume><spage>60</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>60-61</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Internal parasitism inevitability prompts economic loss in beef cattle production by decreasing growth performance and reproductive traits. Previous studies have conflicting results on the macrocyclic lactones (ML) efficacy against internal parasitism. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of milbeymycin and avermectin sub groups of ML on cow performance. Multiparous fall calving, crossbred beef cows (n = 106) were allocated randomly to 1 of 3 anthelmintic treatments: 1) Negative control (CON), in which cows did not receive an anthelmintic, 2) Injectable moxidectin (MOX) and 3) Injectable extended release eprinomectin (ERE). Body weights (BW), body condition scores (BCS), and fecal egg counts (FEC) were taken throughout the duration of the calving season to weaning on d0, d80, d162, and d217, with weaning occurring on d217. Performance data were analyzed using the MIXED procedures of SAS, and pregnancy data were analyzed using the GENMOD procedures of SAS. Significance was fixed at P &lt; 0.05 and tendencies were established from 0.05 &lt; P &lt; 0.10. There was no effect of anthelmintic treatment on cow BW (P &gt; 0.57) or cow BCS (P &gt; 0.22) during the 217 d study; however, CON cows tended to have lower BCS (P = 0.08) throughout the duration of the study. Cows treated with ERE had fewer FEC compared to MOX and CON groups (P &lt; 0.001), and tended to improve pregnancy rates (c2 = 0.0546). Calf weaning weight was similar among treatments averaging 216, 225, and 223 kg regarding CON, MOX, and ERE cow treatments, respectively.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2020-11, Vol.98, p.60-61
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2501933170
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Oxford Journals Online; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Animal reproduction
Anthelmintic agents
Antiparasitic agents
Avermectin
Beef
Beef cattle
Cattle production
Data analysis
Economic impact
Lactones
Parasitism
Pregnancy
Weaning
title Evaluation of extended release eprinomectin efficacy on multiparous beef cow performance[1]
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T07%3A02%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20extended%20release%20eprinomectin%20efficacy%20on%20multiparous%20beef%20cow%20performance%5B1%5D&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Zammit,%20Laine&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=98&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=60-61&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2501933170%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501933170&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true