Effects of acclimation on cattle response to humans while being handled

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of previous human interaction on the behavior of beef cows while they are being handled. To achieve this, 84 F-1 Angus x Brahman cows were randomly assigned to one of two human interaction treatments. The positive human-animal interaction group...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2020-11, Vol.98, p.9-9
Hauptverfasser: Hemphill, Corban H, Reuter, Ryan R, Neel, James P, Goodman, Laura
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 9
container_issue
container_start_page 9
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 98
creator Hemphill, Corban H
Reuter, Ryan R
Neel, James P
Goodman, Laura
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of previous human interaction on the behavior of beef cows while they are being handled. To achieve this, 84 F-1 Angus x Brahman cows were randomly assigned to one of two human interaction treatments. The positive human-animal interaction group (P) was subjected to daily contact with a herdsman (on foot) for 15 minutes and was fed supplement by the herdsman. The control group (N) was checked daily and fed from a vehicle, with no direct human interaction. Each acclimation procedure was replicated in 2 pastures/herds (n = 16 to 26 cows in each herd). During routine processing times for these herds (d 0, 256, and 317), herds were gathered from their pastures and temperament was assessed. Chute and alley scores were assigned to individual animals by the same trained observer and ranged from 1 (calm) to 5 (aggressive). Chute exit velocity was also measured. Temperament variables were evaluated with ANOVA as a split plot with acclimation procedure in the whole plots and pasture as the whole-plot experimental unit, and processing time in the split plot. Neither human interaction (P = 0.99) nor time (P = 0.13) affected chute exit velocity. Chute score increased through time (P = 0.01) but was not affected by human interaction (P = 0.70). Alley score was not affected by human interaction (P = 0.32) or time (P = 0.81). Neither time nor the specific type of human acclimation we implemented affected cattle temperament, indicating other traits may be more important. Alternatively, different acclimation procedures may be more effective to improve cattle temperament.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2501930188</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2501930188</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_25019301883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNiksKwjAUAIMoWD93CLgu5EMkXUvVA7gvMX2xKWlS-1K8vl14AGFgFjMrUnAlVCn5Wa5JwZjgpdZcbMkOsWeMC1Wpgtxq58BmpMlRY23wg8k-RbpgTc4B6AQ4pohAc6LdPJiI9NP5JTzBxxftTGwDtAeycSYgHH_ek9O1flzu5Til9wyYmz7NU1xSIxTjlWRca_nf9QXqljzL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501930188</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of acclimation on cattle response to humans while being handled</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hemphill, Corban H ; Reuter, Ryan R ; Neel, James P ; Goodman, Laura</creator><creatorcontrib>Hemphill, Corban H ; Reuter, Ryan R ; Neel, James P ; Goodman, Laura</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of previous human interaction on the behavior of beef cows while they are being handled. To achieve this, 84 F-1 Angus x Brahman cows were randomly assigned to one of two human interaction treatments. The positive human-animal interaction group (P) was subjected to daily contact with a herdsman (on foot) for 15 minutes and was fed supplement by the herdsman. The control group (N) was checked daily and fed from a vehicle, with no direct human interaction. Each acclimation procedure was replicated in 2 pastures/herds (n = 16 to 26 cows in each herd). During routine processing times for these herds (d 0, 256, and 317), herds were gathered from their pastures and temperament was assessed. Chute and alley scores were assigned to individual animals by the same trained observer and ranged from 1 (calm) to 5 (aggressive). Chute exit velocity was also measured. Temperament variables were evaluated with ANOVA as a split plot with acclimation procedure in the whole plots and pasture as the whole-plot experimental unit, and processing time in the split plot. Neither human interaction (P = 0.99) nor time (P = 0.13) affected chute exit velocity. Chute score increased through time (P = 0.01) but was not affected by human interaction (P = 0.70). Alley score was not affected by human interaction (P = 0.32) or time (P = 0.81). Neither time nor the specific type of human acclimation we implemented affected cattle temperament, indicating other traits may be more important. Alternatively, different acclimation procedures may be more effective to improve cattle temperament.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Acclimation ; Acclimatization ; Animal care ; Beef ; Beef cattle ; Cattle ; Evaluation ; Gene expression ; Pasture ; Streets ; Variance analysis ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2020-11, Vol.98, p.9-9</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press Nov 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hemphill, Corban H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reuter, Ryan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neel, James P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Laura</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of acclimation on cattle response to humans while being handled</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of previous human interaction on the behavior of beef cows while they are being handled. To achieve this, 84 F-1 Angus x Brahman cows were randomly assigned to one of two human interaction treatments. The positive human-animal interaction group (P) was subjected to daily contact with a herdsman (on foot) for 15 minutes and was fed supplement by the herdsman. The control group (N) was checked daily and fed from a vehicle, with no direct human interaction. Each acclimation procedure was replicated in 2 pastures/herds (n = 16 to 26 cows in each herd). During routine processing times for these herds (d 0, 256, and 317), herds were gathered from their pastures and temperament was assessed. Chute and alley scores were assigned to individual animals by the same trained observer and ranged from 1 (calm) to 5 (aggressive). Chute exit velocity was also measured. Temperament variables were evaluated with ANOVA as a split plot with acclimation procedure in the whole plots and pasture as the whole-plot experimental unit, and processing time in the split plot. Neither human interaction (P = 0.99) nor time (P = 0.13) affected chute exit velocity. Chute score increased through time (P = 0.01) but was not affected by human interaction (P = 0.70). Alley score was not affected by human interaction (P = 0.32) or time (P = 0.81). Neither time nor the specific type of human acclimation we implemented affected cattle temperament, indicating other traits may be more important. Alternatively, different acclimation procedures may be more effective to improve cattle temperament.</description><subject>Acclimation</subject><subject>Acclimatization</subject><subject>Animal care</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Beef cattle</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Streets</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNiksKwjAUAIMoWD93CLgu5EMkXUvVA7gvMX2xKWlS-1K8vl14AGFgFjMrUnAlVCn5Wa5JwZjgpdZcbMkOsWeMC1Wpgtxq58BmpMlRY23wg8k-RbpgTc4B6AQ4pohAc6LdPJiI9NP5JTzBxxftTGwDtAeycSYgHH_ek9O1flzu5Til9wyYmz7NU1xSIxTjlWRca_nf9QXqljzL</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Hemphill, Corban H</creator><creator>Reuter, Ryan R</creator><creator>Neel, James P</creator><creator>Goodman, Laura</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Effects of acclimation on cattle response to humans while being handled</title><author>Hemphill, Corban H ; Reuter, Ryan R ; Neel, James P ; Goodman, Laura</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_25019301883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acclimation</topic><topic>Acclimatization</topic><topic>Animal care</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Beef cattle</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Streets</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hemphill, Corban H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reuter, Ryan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neel, James P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Laura</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hemphill, Corban H</au><au>Reuter, Ryan R</au><au>Neel, James P</au><au>Goodman, Laura</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of acclimation on cattle response to humans while being handled</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>98</volume><spage>9</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>9-9</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of previous human interaction on the behavior of beef cows while they are being handled. To achieve this, 84 F-1 Angus x Brahman cows were randomly assigned to one of two human interaction treatments. The positive human-animal interaction group (P) was subjected to daily contact with a herdsman (on foot) for 15 minutes and was fed supplement by the herdsman. The control group (N) was checked daily and fed from a vehicle, with no direct human interaction. Each acclimation procedure was replicated in 2 pastures/herds (n = 16 to 26 cows in each herd). During routine processing times for these herds (d 0, 256, and 317), herds were gathered from their pastures and temperament was assessed. Chute and alley scores were assigned to individual animals by the same trained observer and ranged from 1 (calm) to 5 (aggressive). Chute exit velocity was also measured. Temperament variables were evaluated with ANOVA as a split plot with acclimation procedure in the whole plots and pasture as the whole-plot experimental unit, and processing time in the split plot. Neither human interaction (P = 0.99) nor time (P = 0.13) affected chute exit velocity. Chute score increased through time (P = 0.01) but was not affected by human interaction (P = 0.70). Alley score was not affected by human interaction (P = 0.32) or time (P = 0.81). Neither time nor the specific type of human acclimation we implemented affected cattle temperament, indicating other traits may be more important. Alternatively, different acclimation procedures may be more effective to improve cattle temperament.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2020-11, Vol.98, p.9-9
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2501930188
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Acclimation
Acclimatization
Animal care
Beef
Beef cattle
Cattle
Evaluation
Gene expression
Pasture
Streets
Variance analysis
Velocity
title Effects of acclimation on cattle response to humans while being handled
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T13%3A37%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20acclimation%20on%20cattle%20response%20to%20humans%20while%20being%20handled&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Hemphill,%20Corban%20H&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=98&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=9-9&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2501930188%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501930188&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true