Effect of different fibers (steel fibers, glass fibers, and carbon fibers) on mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete

In the present study, reactive powder concrete (RPC) was investigated with three different types of single fibers that is, steel fiber (SF), glass fiber (GF), and carbon fiber (CF). Moreover, the effect of hybrid SF‐GF, GF‐CF, and CF‐SF on RPC was also investigated. In case of both single and hybrid...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Structural concrete : journal of the FIB 2021-02, Vol.22 (1), p.334-346
Hauptverfasser: Raza, Syed Safdar, Qureshi, Liaqat Ali, Ali, Babar, Raza, Ali, Khan, Mudasser Muneer
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 346
container_issue 1
container_start_page 334
container_title Structural concrete : journal of the FIB
container_volume 22
creator Raza, Syed Safdar
Qureshi, Liaqat Ali
Ali, Babar
Raza, Ali
Khan, Mudasser Muneer
description In the present study, reactive powder concrete (RPC) was investigated with three different types of single fibers that is, steel fiber (SF), glass fiber (GF), and carbon fiber (CF). Moreover, the effect of hybrid SF‐GF, GF‐CF, and CF‐SF on RPC was also investigated. In case of both single and hybrid fiber‐reinforced RPCs, a constant volume fraction of 2% fiber was used. A plain RPC was also produced that served as a reference/control mix. Studied parameters include compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, peak strains in compression, compression toughness, total energy absorbed in compression, splitting tensile strength, and flexural strength. Results showed that among single fiber‐reinforced RPCs, CF‐RPC performed better than both SF‐ and GF‐RPC in compression. Whereas, single SF‐RPC performed better than GF‐ and CF‐RPC in splitting tensile and flexural strength, single SF‐RPC showed significant softening response compared with single CF and GF‐RPC. CF‐RPC showed comparable performance to that of the SF‐RPC in both tensile and flexural strength. But CF‐RPC showed lower toughness than SF‐RPC. Hybridization of 1%SF and 1%CF yielded maximum overall mechanical performance among both single and hybrid fiber RPCs. Maximum attribution (17–38%) of fibers was toward flexural strength compared to other strength properties.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/suco.201900439
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2501869274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2501869274</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3179-7b727166eddac97dd08cf922b88e2f4fb27d3577da02dd5f665f9a06ca58019f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LAzEUDKJgrV49B7wouDXJ7iabo5T6AYUetOeQTV50y3ZTk62lJ_-6KS316OnNPGbmPQaha0pGlBD2ENfGjxihkpAilydoQEVJM8GL6jThghdZQYU4RxcxLpI-4XKAfibOgemxd9g2CQboeuyaGkLEt7EHaA_sHn-0OsYj053FRofad4fVHU5wCeZTd43RLV4Fv4LQNxB34QG06ZtvwCu_sRCw8Z0J0MMlOnO6jXB1mEM0f5q8j1-y6ez5dfw4zUxOhcxELZignIO12khhLamMk4zVVQXMFa5mwualEFYTZm3pOC-d1IQbXVapEZcP0c0-N731tYbYq4Vfhy6dVKwktOKSiSKpRnuVCT7GAE6tQrPUYasoUbuS1a5kdSw5GeTesGla2P6jVm_z8ezP-wu35YK3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501869274</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of different fibers (steel fibers, glass fibers, and carbon fibers) on mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Raza, Syed Safdar ; Qureshi, Liaqat Ali ; Ali, Babar ; Raza, Ali ; Khan, Mudasser Muneer</creator><creatorcontrib>Raza, Syed Safdar ; Qureshi, Liaqat Ali ; Ali, Babar ; Raza, Ali ; Khan, Mudasser Muneer</creatorcontrib><description>In the present study, reactive powder concrete (RPC) was investigated with three different types of single fibers that is, steel fiber (SF), glass fiber (GF), and carbon fiber (CF). Moreover, the effect of hybrid SF‐GF, GF‐CF, and CF‐SF on RPC was also investigated. In case of both single and hybrid fiber‐reinforced RPCs, a constant volume fraction of 2% fiber was used. A plain RPC was also produced that served as a reference/control mix. Studied parameters include compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, peak strains in compression, compression toughness, total energy absorbed in compression, splitting tensile strength, and flexural strength. Results showed that among single fiber‐reinforced RPCs, CF‐RPC performed better than both SF‐ and GF‐RPC in compression. Whereas, single SF‐RPC performed better than GF‐ and CF‐RPC in splitting tensile and flexural strength, single SF‐RPC showed significant softening response compared with single CF and GF‐RPC. CF‐RPC showed comparable performance to that of the SF‐RPC in both tensile and flexural strength. But CF‐RPC showed lower toughness than SF‐RPC. Hybridization of 1%SF and 1%CF yielded maximum overall mechanical performance among both single and hybrid fiber RPCs. Maximum attribution (17–38%) of fibers was toward flexural strength compared to other strength properties.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-4177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-7648</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/suco.201900439</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA</publisher><subject>Carbon fibers ; Compressive strength ; Flexural strength ; glass fiber ; Glass fibers ; hybrid fibers ; Mechanical properties ; Modulus of elasticity ; reactive powder concrete ; Splitting ; steel fiber ; Steel fibers ; Tensile strength ; Toughness ; Ultra high performance concrete</subject><ispartof>Structural concrete : journal of the FIB, 2021-02, Vol.22 (1), p.334-346</ispartof><rights>2020 . International Federation for Structural Concrete</rights><rights>2021 fib. International Federation for Structural Concrete</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3179-7b727166eddac97dd08cf922b88e2f4fb27d3577da02dd5f665f9a06ca58019f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3179-7b727166eddac97dd08cf922b88e2f4fb27d3577da02dd5f665f9a06ca58019f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2531-1505</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsuco.201900439$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsuco.201900439$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45552,45553</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raza, Syed Safdar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qureshi, Liaqat Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Babar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raza, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Mudasser Muneer</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of different fibers (steel fibers, glass fibers, and carbon fibers) on mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete</title><title>Structural concrete : journal of the FIB</title><description>In the present study, reactive powder concrete (RPC) was investigated with three different types of single fibers that is, steel fiber (SF), glass fiber (GF), and carbon fiber (CF). Moreover, the effect of hybrid SF‐GF, GF‐CF, and CF‐SF on RPC was also investigated. In case of both single and hybrid fiber‐reinforced RPCs, a constant volume fraction of 2% fiber was used. A plain RPC was also produced that served as a reference/control mix. Studied parameters include compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, peak strains in compression, compression toughness, total energy absorbed in compression, splitting tensile strength, and flexural strength. Results showed that among single fiber‐reinforced RPCs, CF‐RPC performed better than both SF‐ and GF‐RPC in compression. Whereas, single SF‐RPC performed better than GF‐ and CF‐RPC in splitting tensile and flexural strength, single SF‐RPC showed significant softening response compared with single CF and GF‐RPC. CF‐RPC showed comparable performance to that of the SF‐RPC in both tensile and flexural strength. But CF‐RPC showed lower toughness than SF‐RPC. Hybridization of 1%SF and 1%CF yielded maximum overall mechanical performance among both single and hybrid fiber RPCs. Maximum attribution (17–38%) of fibers was toward flexural strength compared to other strength properties.</description><subject>Carbon fibers</subject><subject>Compressive strength</subject><subject>Flexural strength</subject><subject>glass fiber</subject><subject>Glass fibers</subject><subject>hybrid fibers</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Modulus of elasticity</subject><subject>reactive powder concrete</subject><subject>Splitting</subject><subject>steel fiber</subject><subject>Steel fibers</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>Toughness</subject><subject>Ultra high performance concrete</subject><issn>1464-4177</issn><issn>1751-7648</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUE1LAzEUDKJgrV49B7wouDXJ7iabo5T6AYUetOeQTV50y3ZTk62lJ_-6KS316OnNPGbmPQaha0pGlBD2ENfGjxihkpAilydoQEVJM8GL6jThghdZQYU4RxcxLpI-4XKAfibOgemxd9g2CQboeuyaGkLEt7EHaA_sHn-0OsYj053FRofad4fVHU5wCeZTd43RLV4Fv4LQNxB34QG06ZtvwCu_sRCw8Z0J0MMlOnO6jXB1mEM0f5q8j1-y6ez5dfw4zUxOhcxELZignIO12khhLamMk4zVVQXMFa5mwualEFYTZm3pOC-d1IQbXVapEZcP0c0-N731tYbYq4Vfhy6dVKwktOKSiSKpRnuVCT7GAE6tQrPUYasoUbuS1a5kdSw5GeTesGla2P6jVm_z8ezP-wu35YK3</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Raza, Syed Safdar</creator><creator>Qureshi, Liaqat Ali</creator><creator>Ali, Babar</creator><creator>Raza, Ali</creator><creator>Khan, Mudasser Muneer</creator><general>WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2531-1505</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Effect of different fibers (steel fibers, glass fibers, and carbon fibers) on mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete</title><author>Raza, Syed Safdar ; Qureshi, Liaqat Ali ; Ali, Babar ; Raza, Ali ; Khan, Mudasser Muneer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3179-7b727166eddac97dd08cf922b88e2f4fb27d3577da02dd5f665f9a06ca58019f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Carbon fibers</topic><topic>Compressive strength</topic><topic>Flexural strength</topic><topic>glass fiber</topic><topic>Glass fibers</topic><topic>hybrid fibers</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Modulus of elasticity</topic><topic>reactive powder concrete</topic><topic>Splitting</topic><topic>steel fiber</topic><topic>Steel fibers</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>Toughness</topic><topic>Ultra high performance concrete</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raza, Syed Safdar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qureshi, Liaqat Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Babar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raza, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Mudasser Muneer</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Structural concrete : journal of the FIB</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raza, Syed Safdar</au><au>Qureshi, Liaqat Ali</au><au>Ali, Babar</au><au>Raza, Ali</au><au>Khan, Mudasser Muneer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of different fibers (steel fibers, glass fibers, and carbon fibers) on mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete</atitle><jtitle>Structural concrete : journal of the FIB</jtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>334</spage><epage>346</epage><pages>334-346</pages><issn>1464-4177</issn><eissn>1751-7648</eissn><abstract>In the present study, reactive powder concrete (RPC) was investigated with three different types of single fibers that is, steel fiber (SF), glass fiber (GF), and carbon fiber (CF). Moreover, the effect of hybrid SF‐GF, GF‐CF, and CF‐SF on RPC was also investigated. In case of both single and hybrid fiber‐reinforced RPCs, a constant volume fraction of 2% fiber was used. A plain RPC was also produced that served as a reference/control mix. Studied parameters include compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, peak strains in compression, compression toughness, total energy absorbed in compression, splitting tensile strength, and flexural strength. Results showed that among single fiber‐reinforced RPCs, CF‐RPC performed better than both SF‐ and GF‐RPC in compression. Whereas, single SF‐RPC performed better than GF‐ and CF‐RPC in splitting tensile and flexural strength, single SF‐RPC showed significant softening response compared with single CF and GF‐RPC. CF‐RPC showed comparable performance to that of the SF‐RPC in both tensile and flexural strength. But CF‐RPC showed lower toughness than SF‐RPC. Hybridization of 1%SF and 1%CF yielded maximum overall mechanical performance among both single and hybrid fiber RPCs. Maximum attribution (17–38%) of fibers was toward flexural strength compared to other strength properties.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA</pub><doi>10.1002/suco.201900439</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2531-1505</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1464-4177
ispartof Structural concrete : journal of the FIB, 2021-02, Vol.22 (1), p.334-346
issn 1464-4177
1751-7648
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2501869274
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Carbon fibers
Compressive strength
Flexural strength
glass fiber
Glass fibers
hybrid fibers
Mechanical properties
Modulus of elasticity
reactive powder concrete
Splitting
steel fiber
Steel fibers
Tensile strength
Toughness
Ultra high performance concrete
title Effect of different fibers (steel fibers, glass fibers, and carbon fibers) on mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T09%3A41%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20different%20fibers%20(steel%20fibers,%20glass%20fibers,%20and%20carbon%20fibers)%20on%20mechanical%20properties%20of%20reactive%20powder%20concrete&rft.jtitle=Structural%20concrete%20:%20journal%20of%20the%20FIB&rft.au=Raza,%20Syed%20Safdar&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=334&rft.epage=346&rft.pages=334-346&rft.issn=1464-4177&rft.eissn=1751-7648&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/suco.201900439&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2501869274%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501869274&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true