Effect of different fibers (steel fibers, glass fibers, and carbon fibers) on mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete
In the present study, reactive powder concrete (RPC) was investigated with three different types of single fibers that is, steel fiber (SF), glass fiber (GF), and carbon fiber (CF). Moreover, the effect of hybrid SF‐GF, GF‐CF, and CF‐SF on RPC was also investigated. In case of both single and hybrid...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Structural concrete : journal of the FIB 2021-02, Vol.22 (1), p.334-346 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 346 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 334 |
container_title | Structural concrete : journal of the FIB |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Raza, Syed Safdar Qureshi, Liaqat Ali Ali, Babar Raza, Ali Khan, Mudasser Muneer |
description | In the present study, reactive powder concrete (RPC) was investigated with three different types of single fibers that is, steel fiber (SF), glass fiber (GF), and carbon fiber (CF). Moreover, the effect of hybrid SF‐GF, GF‐CF, and CF‐SF on RPC was also investigated. In case of both single and hybrid fiber‐reinforced RPCs, a constant volume fraction of 2% fiber was used. A plain RPC was also produced that served as a reference/control mix. Studied parameters include compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, peak strains in compression, compression toughness, total energy absorbed in compression, splitting tensile strength, and flexural strength. Results showed that among single fiber‐reinforced RPCs, CF‐RPC performed better than both SF‐ and GF‐RPC in compression. Whereas, single SF‐RPC performed better than GF‐ and CF‐RPC in splitting tensile and flexural strength, single SF‐RPC showed significant softening response compared with single CF and GF‐RPC. CF‐RPC showed comparable performance to that of the SF‐RPC in both tensile and flexural strength. But CF‐RPC showed lower toughness than SF‐RPC. Hybridization of 1%SF and 1%CF yielded maximum overall mechanical performance among both single and hybrid fiber RPCs. Maximum attribution (17–38%) of fibers was toward flexural strength compared to other strength properties. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/suco.201900439 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2501869274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2501869274</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3179-7b727166eddac97dd08cf922b88e2f4fb27d3577da02dd5f665f9a06ca58019f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LAzEUDKJgrV49B7wouDXJ7iabo5T6AYUetOeQTV50y3ZTk62lJ_-6KS316OnNPGbmPQaha0pGlBD2ENfGjxihkpAilydoQEVJM8GL6jThghdZQYU4RxcxLpI-4XKAfibOgemxd9g2CQboeuyaGkLEt7EHaA_sHn-0OsYj053FRofad4fVHU5wCeZTd43RLV4Fv4LQNxB34QG06ZtvwCu_sRCw8Z0J0MMlOnO6jXB1mEM0f5q8j1-y6ez5dfw4zUxOhcxELZignIO12khhLamMk4zVVQXMFa5mwualEFYTZm3pOC-d1IQbXVapEZcP0c0-N731tYbYq4Vfhy6dVKwktOKSiSKpRnuVCT7GAE6tQrPUYasoUbuS1a5kdSw5GeTesGla2P6jVm_z8ezP-wu35YK3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501869274</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of different fibers (steel fibers, glass fibers, and carbon fibers) on mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Raza, Syed Safdar ; Qureshi, Liaqat Ali ; Ali, Babar ; Raza, Ali ; Khan, Mudasser Muneer</creator><creatorcontrib>Raza, Syed Safdar ; Qureshi, Liaqat Ali ; Ali, Babar ; Raza, Ali ; Khan, Mudasser Muneer</creatorcontrib><description>In the present study, reactive powder concrete (RPC) was investigated with three different types of single fibers that is, steel fiber (SF), glass fiber (GF), and carbon fiber (CF). Moreover, the effect of hybrid SF‐GF, GF‐CF, and CF‐SF on RPC was also investigated. In case of both single and hybrid fiber‐reinforced RPCs, a constant volume fraction of 2% fiber was used. A plain RPC was also produced that served as a reference/control mix. Studied parameters include compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, peak strains in compression, compression toughness, total energy absorbed in compression, splitting tensile strength, and flexural strength. Results showed that among single fiber‐reinforced RPCs, CF‐RPC performed better than both SF‐ and GF‐RPC in compression. Whereas, single SF‐RPC performed better than GF‐ and CF‐RPC in splitting tensile and flexural strength, single SF‐RPC showed significant softening response compared with single CF and GF‐RPC. CF‐RPC showed comparable performance to that of the SF‐RPC in both tensile and flexural strength. But CF‐RPC showed lower toughness than SF‐RPC. Hybridization of 1%SF and 1%CF yielded maximum overall mechanical performance among both single and hybrid fiber RPCs. Maximum attribution (17–38%) of fibers was toward flexural strength compared to other strength properties.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-4177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-7648</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/suco.201900439</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA</publisher><subject>Carbon fibers ; Compressive strength ; Flexural strength ; glass fiber ; Glass fibers ; hybrid fibers ; Mechanical properties ; Modulus of elasticity ; reactive powder concrete ; Splitting ; steel fiber ; Steel fibers ; Tensile strength ; Toughness ; Ultra high performance concrete</subject><ispartof>Structural concrete : journal of the FIB, 2021-02, Vol.22 (1), p.334-346</ispartof><rights>2020 . International Federation for Structural Concrete</rights><rights>2021 fib. International Federation for Structural Concrete</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3179-7b727166eddac97dd08cf922b88e2f4fb27d3577da02dd5f665f9a06ca58019f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3179-7b727166eddac97dd08cf922b88e2f4fb27d3577da02dd5f665f9a06ca58019f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2531-1505</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsuco.201900439$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsuco.201900439$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45552,45553</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raza, Syed Safdar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qureshi, Liaqat Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Babar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raza, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Mudasser Muneer</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of different fibers (steel fibers, glass fibers, and carbon fibers) on mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete</title><title>Structural concrete : journal of the FIB</title><description>In the present study, reactive powder concrete (RPC) was investigated with three different types of single fibers that is, steel fiber (SF), glass fiber (GF), and carbon fiber (CF). Moreover, the effect of hybrid SF‐GF, GF‐CF, and CF‐SF on RPC was also investigated. In case of both single and hybrid fiber‐reinforced RPCs, a constant volume fraction of 2% fiber was used. A plain RPC was also produced that served as a reference/control mix. Studied parameters include compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, peak strains in compression, compression toughness, total energy absorbed in compression, splitting tensile strength, and flexural strength. Results showed that among single fiber‐reinforced RPCs, CF‐RPC performed better than both SF‐ and GF‐RPC in compression. Whereas, single SF‐RPC performed better than GF‐ and CF‐RPC in splitting tensile and flexural strength, single SF‐RPC showed significant softening response compared with single CF and GF‐RPC. CF‐RPC showed comparable performance to that of the SF‐RPC in both tensile and flexural strength. But CF‐RPC showed lower toughness than SF‐RPC. Hybridization of 1%SF and 1%CF yielded maximum overall mechanical performance among both single and hybrid fiber RPCs. Maximum attribution (17–38%) of fibers was toward flexural strength compared to other strength properties.</description><subject>Carbon fibers</subject><subject>Compressive strength</subject><subject>Flexural strength</subject><subject>glass fiber</subject><subject>Glass fibers</subject><subject>hybrid fibers</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Modulus of elasticity</subject><subject>reactive powder concrete</subject><subject>Splitting</subject><subject>steel fiber</subject><subject>Steel fibers</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>Toughness</subject><subject>Ultra high performance concrete</subject><issn>1464-4177</issn><issn>1751-7648</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUE1LAzEUDKJgrV49B7wouDXJ7iabo5T6AYUetOeQTV50y3ZTk62lJ_-6KS316OnNPGbmPQaha0pGlBD2ENfGjxihkpAilydoQEVJM8GL6jThghdZQYU4RxcxLpI-4XKAfibOgemxd9g2CQboeuyaGkLEt7EHaA_sHn-0OsYj053FRofad4fVHU5wCeZTd43RLV4Fv4LQNxB34QG06ZtvwCu_sRCw8Z0J0MMlOnO6jXB1mEM0f5q8j1-y6ez5dfw4zUxOhcxELZignIO12khhLamMk4zVVQXMFa5mwualEFYTZm3pOC-d1IQbXVapEZcP0c0-N731tYbYq4Vfhy6dVKwktOKSiSKpRnuVCT7GAE6tQrPUYasoUbuS1a5kdSw5GeTesGla2P6jVm_z8ezP-wu35YK3</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Raza, Syed Safdar</creator><creator>Qureshi, Liaqat Ali</creator><creator>Ali, Babar</creator><creator>Raza, Ali</creator><creator>Khan, Mudasser Muneer</creator><general>WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2531-1505</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Effect of different fibers (steel fibers, glass fibers, and carbon fibers) on mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete</title><author>Raza, Syed Safdar ; Qureshi, Liaqat Ali ; Ali, Babar ; Raza, Ali ; Khan, Mudasser Muneer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3179-7b727166eddac97dd08cf922b88e2f4fb27d3577da02dd5f665f9a06ca58019f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Carbon fibers</topic><topic>Compressive strength</topic><topic>Flexural strength</topic><topic>glass fiber</topic><topic>Glass fibers</topic><topic>hybrid fibers</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Modulus of elasticity</topic><topic>reactive powder concrete</topic><topic>Splitting</topic><topic>steel fiber</topic><topic>Steel fibers</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>Toughness</topic><topic>Ultra high performance concrete</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raza, Syed Safdar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qureshi, Liaqat Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Babar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raza, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Mudasser Muneer</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Structural concrete : journal of the FIB</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raza, Syed Safdar</au><au>Qureshi, Liaqat Ali</au><au>Ali, Babar</au><au>Raza, Ali</au><au>Khan, Mudasser Muneer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of different fibers (steel fibers, glass fibers, and carbon fibers) on mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete</atitle><jtitle>Structural concrete : journal of the FIB</jtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>334</spage><epage>346</epage><pages>334-346</pages><issn>1464-4177</issn><eissn>1751-7648</eissn><abstract>In the present study, reactive powder concrete (RPC) was investigated with three different types of single fibers that is, steel fiber (SF), glass fiber (GF), and carbon fiber (CF). Moreover, the effect of hybrid SF‐GF, GF‐CF, and CF‐SF on RPC was also investigated. In case of both single and hybrid fiber‐reinforced RPCs, a constant volume fraction of 2% fiber was used. A plain RPC was also produced that served as a reference/control mix. Studied parameters include compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, peak strains in compression, compression toughness, total energy absorbed in compression, splitting tensile strength, and flexural strength. Results showed that among single fiber‐reinforced RPCs, CF‐RPC performed better than both SF‐ and GF‐RPC in compression. Whereas, single SF‐RPC performed better than GF‐ and CF‐RPC in splitting tensile and flexural strength, single SF‐RPC showed significant softening response compared with single CF and GF‐RPC. CF‐RPC showed comparable performance to that of the SF‐RPC in both tensile and flexural strength. But CF‐RPC showed lower toughness than SF‐RPC. Hybridization of 1%SF and 1%CF yielded maximum overall mechanical performance among both single and hybrid fiber RPCs. Maximum attribution (17–38%) of fibers was toward flexural strength compared to other strength properties.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA</pub><doi>10.1002/suco.201900439</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2531-1505</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1464-4177 |
ispartof | Structural concrete : journal of the FIB, 2021-02, Vol.22 (1), p.334-346 |
issn | 1464-4177 1751-7648 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2501869274 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Carbon fibers Compressive strength Flexural strength glass fiber Glass fibers hybrid fibers Mechanical properties Modulus of elasticity reactive powder concrete Splitting steel fiber Steel fibers Tensile strength Toughness Ultra high performance concrete |
title | Effect of different fibers (steel fibers, glass fibers, and carbon fibers) on mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T09%3A41%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20different%20fibers%20(steel%20fibers,%20glass%20fibers,%20and%20carbon%20fibers)%20on%20mechanical%20properties%20of%20reactive%20powder%20concrete&rft.jtitle=Structural%20concrete%20:%20journal%20of%20the%20FIB&rft.au=Raza,%20Syed%20Safdar&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=334&rft.epage=346&rft.pages=334-346&rft.issn=1464-4177&rft.eissn=1751-7648&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/suco.201900439&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2501869274%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501869274&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |