How stable is labour market dualism? Reforms of employment protection in nine European countries
Labour market segmentation is at the forefront of national and European policy debates. While the European Commission and the OECD claim to promote what they see as more inclusive policies, academic observers remain sceptical. The dualization literature in particular points to stable equilibria that...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of industrial relations 2021-03, Vol.27 (1), p.93-110 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 110 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 93 |
container_title | European journal of industrial relations |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Eichhorst, Werner Marx, Paul |
description | Labour market segmentation is at the forefront of national and European policy debates. While the European Commission and the OECD claim to promote what they see as more inclusive policies, academic observers remain sceptical. The dualization literature in particular points to stable equilibria that sustain divisions between labour market insiders and outsiders. In this article, we trace recent reform trajectories in a diverse group of nine European countries marked by a high share of temporary employment: France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden. Our case studies show that recent reforms of employment regulation involve much more dynamism than one would expect based on the experiences of the two preceding decades, or from dualization or insider–outsider theories. The reform trajectories display rather contradictory approaches, sometimes in close succession. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0959680119899199 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2501443398</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0959680119899199</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2501443398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-43674e4cbbf6b5f31c80a69361cb752c7adb46ff4567716dc358b53321b280103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LwzAYDqLgnN49BjxXk-arOYmM6YSBIHquSZZKZpvMJEX2782oIAie3sPz9T4PAJcYXWMsxA2STPIGYSwbKbGUR2CGKceVwLU8BrMDXB3wU3CW0hYh1DBez8DbKnzBlJXuLXQJ9kqHMcJBxQ-b4WZUvUvDLXy2XYhDgqGDdtj1YT9Yn-EuhmxNdsFD56F33sLlGMPOKg9NGH2OzqZzcNKpPtmLnzsHr_fLl8WqWj89PC7u1pWhFOeKEi6opUbrjmvWEWwapLgkHBstWG2E2mjKu44yLgTmG0NYoxkhNdZ1aYXIHFxNvuWrz9Gm3G5LE18i25ohTCkhsiksNLFMDClF27W76ErbfYtRe9ix_btjkcBJYk3wLv0KyluC1gSRQqkmSlLv9jf3X8tvsUp8tw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501443398</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How stable is labour market dualism? Reforms of employment protection in nine European countries</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Eichhorst, Werner ; Marx, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Eichhorst, Werner ; Marx, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>Labour market segmentation is at the forefront of national and European policy debates. While the European Commission and the OECD claim to promote what they see as more inclusive policies, academic observers remain sceptical. The dualization literature in particular points to stable equilibria that sustain divisions between labour market insiders and outsiders. In this article, we trace recent reform trajectories in a diverse group of nine European countries marked by a high share of temporary employment: France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden. Our case studies show that recent reforms of employment regulation involve much more dynamism than one would expect based on the experiences of the two preceding decades, or from dualization or insider–outsider theories. The reform trajectories display rather contradictory approaches, sometimes in close succession.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-6801</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7129</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0959680119899199</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Dualism ; Employment ; European cultural groups ; Labor market ; Market segmentation ; Reforms ; Succession ; Temporary employment</subject><ispartof>European journal of industrial relations, 2021-03, Vol.27 (1), p.93-110</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-43674e4cbbf6b5f31c80a69361cb752c7adb46ff4567716dc358b53321b280103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-43674e4cbbf6b5f31c80a69361cb752c7adb46ff4567716dc358b53321b280103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0959680119899199$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0959680119899199$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,33751,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eichhorst, Werner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marx, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>How stable is labour market dualism? Reforms of employment protection in nine European countries</title><title>European journal of industrial relations</title><description>Labour market segmentation is at the forefront of national and European policy debates. While the European Commission and the OECD claim to promote what they see as more inclusive policies, academic observers remain sceptical. The dualization literature in particular points to stable equilibria that sustain divisions between labour market insiders and outsiders. In this article, we trace recent reform trajectories in a diverse group of nine European countries marked by a high share of temporary employment: France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden. Our case studies show that recent reforms of employment regulation involve much more dynamism than one would expect based on the experiences of the two preceding decades, or from dualization or insider–outsider theories. The reform trajectories display rather contradictory approaches, sometimes in close succession.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Dualism</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>European cultural groups</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Market segmentation</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Succession</subject><subject>Temporary employment</subject><issn>0959-6801</issn><issn>1461-7129</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LwzAYDqLgnN49BjxXk-arOYmM6YSBIHquSZZKZpvMJEX2782oIAie3sPz9T4PAJcYXWMsxA2STPIGYSwbKbGUR2CGKceVwLU8BrMDXB3wU3CW0hYh1DBez8DbKnzBlJXuLXQJ9kqHMcJBxQ-b4WZUvUvDLXy2XYhDgqGDdtj1YT9Yn-EuhmxNdsFD56F33sLlGMPOKg9NGH2OzqZzcNKpPtmLnzsHr_fLl8WqWj89PC7u1pWhFOeKEi6opUbrjmvWEWwapLgkHBstWG2E2mjKu44yLgTmG0NYoxkhNdZ1aYXIHFxNvuWrz9Gm3G5LE18i25ohTCkhsiksNLFMDClF27W76ErbfYtRe9ix_btjkcBJYk3wLv0KyluC1gSRQqkmSlLv9jf3X8tvsUp8tw</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Eichhorst, Werner</creator><creator>Marx, Paul</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>How stable is labour market dualism? Reforms of employment protection in nine European countries</title><author>Eichhorst, Werner ; Marx, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-43674e4cbbf6b5f31c80a69361cb752c7adb46ff4567716dc358b53321b280103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Dualism</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>European cultural groups</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Market segmentation</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Succession</topic><topic>Temporary employment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eichhorst, Werner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marx, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>European journal of industrial relations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eichhorst, Werner</au><au>Marx, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How stable is labour market dualism? Reforms of employment protection in nine European countries</atitle><jtitle>European journal of industrial relations</jtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>93</spage><epage>110</epage><pages>93-110</pages><issn>0959-6801</issn><eissn>1461-7129</eissn><abstract>Labour market segmentation is at the forefront of national and European policy debates. While the European Commission and the OECD claim to promote what they see as more inclusive policies, academic observers remain sceptical. The dualization literature in particular points to stable equilibria that sustain divisions between labour market insiders and outsiders. In this article, we trace recent reform trajectories in a diverse group of nine European countries marked by a high share of temporary employment: France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden. Our case studies show that recent reforms of employment regulation involve much more dynamism than one would expect based on the experiences of the two preceding decades, or from dualization or insider–outsider theories. The reform trajectories display rather contradictory approaches, sometimes in close succession.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0959680119899199</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-6801 |
ispartof | European journal of industrial relations, 2021-03, Vol.27 (1), p.93-110 |
issn | 0959-6801 1461-7129 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2501443398 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Case studies Dualism Employment European cultural groups Labor market Market segmentation Reforms Succession Temporary employment |
title | How stable is labour market dualism? Reforms of employment protection in nine European countries |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T11%3A29%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20stable%20is%20labour%20market%20dualism?%20Reforms%20of%20employment%20protection%20in%20nine%20European%20countries&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20industrial%20relations&rft.au=Eichhorst,%20Werner&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=110&rft.pages=93-110&rft.issn=0959-6801&rft.eissn=1461-7129&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0959680119899199&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2501443398%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501443398&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0959680119899199&rfr_iscdi=true |