Student Teachers’ and Teacher Educators’ Professional Vision: Findings from an Eye Tracking Study

Teaching is a complex and demanding endeavour. Teachers must deal with numerous forces, often face dilemma-ridden and ambiguous situations and have to act under time pressure. In order to accomplish these tasks, teachers must apply professional knowledge differentially (Fairbanks et al. 2009 ). In r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educational psychology review 2021-03, Vol.33 (1), p.91-107
Hauptverfasser: Wyss, Corinne, Rosenberger, Katharina, Bührer, Wolfgang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 107
container_issue 1
container_start_page 91
container_title Educational psychology review
container_volume 33
creator Wyss, Corinne
Rosenberger, Katharina
Bührer, Wolfgang
description Teaching is a complex and demanding endeavour. Teachers must deal with numerous forces, often face dilemma-ridden and ambiguous situations and have to act under time pressure. In order to accomplish these tasks, teachers must apply professional knowledge differentially (Fairbanks et al. 2009 ). In recent decades, various studies have focused on defining and investigating the domains of teachers’ professional knowledge. In this respect, much attention has been paid of late to the concept of professional vision. In the present study, we look for indications of professional vision using eye tracking data and post hoc think-aloud verbalisations. We worked with student teachers and teacher educators, who watched a short video clip of a school lesson and described afterwards what they had seen. The video shows an authentic teaching situation and discloses a ‘critical incident’. The results show that there are differences between the two groups of participants, both in terms of eye tracking and post hoc think-aloud verbalisation. However, the differences originate primarily from six teacher educators explicitly mentioning the ‘critical incident’ in the post hoc think-aloud verbalisation. As with other studies, these results indicate differences in professional vision between novice and experienced teaching professionals. Additionally, our analysis reveals that eye tracking data can assist in identifying professional vision.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10648-020-09535-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2501356868</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713723042</galeid><ericid>EJ1291134</ericid><sourcerecordid>A713723042</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-990210c02ebf80fda2d44b2a1ac51a39249ce827ff7a4b2f452df22b535b28703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UEtKBDEUbETB7wUEIeC69eUl3el2JzLjB0HBUdyFTDoZozMdTXoW48preD1PYsb2s5Ms8lL1qqhUlu1SOKAA4jBSKHmVA0IOdcGK_HUl26CFYDlj5f1qmoFDLrC8X882Y3wEgFpwtpGZm27emLYjI6P0gwnx4-2dqLb5eZNBM9eq8z1xHbw1MTrfqim5c8vhiAxd27h2EokNfpa0ZLAwZBSUfkooWfovtrM1q6bR7HzfW9ntcDA6Ocsvr07PT44vc80q6PK6BqSgAc3YVmAbhQ3nY1RU6YIqViOvtalQWCtUwi0vsLGI4_ThMVYC2Fa23_s-B_8yN7GTj34eUtgosQDKirIqq7R10G9N1NRI11rfpbTpNGbmtG-NdQk_FpQJZMAxCbAX6OBjDMbK5-BmKiwkBbnsX_b9y9S__OpfvibRXi8ywelfweCCYk0p44lnPR8T105M-Mv6j-snXseUCA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501356868</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Student Teachers’ and Teacher Educators’ Professional Vision: Findings from an Eye Tracking Study</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Wyss, Corinne ; Rosenberger, Katharina ; Bührer, Wolfgang</creator><creatorcontrib>Wyss, Corinne ; Rosenberger, Katharina ; Bührer, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><description>Teaching is a complex and demanding endeavour. Teachers must deal with numerous forces, often face dilemma-ridden and ambiguous situations and have to act under time pressure. In order to accomplish these tasks, teachers must apply professional knowledge differentially (Fairbanks et al. 2009 ). In recent decades, various studies have focused on defining and investigating the domains of teachers’ professional knowledge. In this respect, much attention has been paid of late to the concept of professional vision. In the present study, we look for indications of professional vision using eye tracking data and post hoc think-aloud verbalisations. We worked with student teachers and teacher educators, who watched a short video clip of a school lesson and described afterwards what they had seen. The video shows an authentic teaching situation and discloses a ‘critical incident’. The results show that there are differences between the two groups of participants, both in terms of eye tracking and post hoc think-aloud verbalisation. However, the differences originate primarily from six teacher educators explicitly mentioning the ‘critical incident’ in the post hoc think-aloud verbalisation. As with other studies, these results indicate differences in professional vision between novice and experienced teaching professionals. Additionally, our analysis reveals that eye tracking data can assist in identifying professional vision.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-726X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-336X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10648-020-09535-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Attention ; Child and School Psychology ; Critical Incidents Method ; Education ; Educational Psychology ; Eye Movements ; Learning and Instruction ; Mixed methods research ; Observation ; Protocol Analysis ; Review Article ; Student Teachers ; Teacher education ; Teacher Educators ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Video Technology ; Vision</subject><ispartof>Educational psychology review, 2021-03, Vol.33 (1), p.91-107</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-990210c02ebf80fda2d44b2a1ac51a39249ce827ff7a4b2f452df22b535b28703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-990210c02ebf80fda2d44b2a1ac51a39249ce827ff7a4b2f452df22b535b28703</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1025-6053</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10648-020-09535-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10648-020-09535-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1291134$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wyss, Corinne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenberger, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bührer, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><title>Student Teachers’ and Teacher Educators’ Professional Vision: Findings from an Eye Tracking Study</title><title>Educational psychology review</title><addtitle>Educ Psychol Rev</addtitle><description>Teaching is a complex and demanding endeavour. Teachers must deal with numerous forces, often face dilemma-ridden and ambiguous situations and have to act under time pressure. In order to accomplish these tasks, teachers must apply professional knowledge differentially (Fairbanks et al. 2009 ). In recent decades, various studies have focused on defining and investigating the domains of teachers’ professional knowledge. In this respect, much attention has been paid of late to the concept of professional vision. In the present study, we look for indications of professional vision using eye tracking data and post hoc think-aloud verbalisations. We worked with student teachers and teacher educators, who watched a short video clip of a school lesson and described afterwards what they had seen. The video shows an authentic teaching situation and discloses a ‘critical incident’. The results show that there are differences between the two groups of participants, both in terms of eye tracking and post hoc think-aloud verbalisation. However, the differences originate primarily from six teacher educators explicitly mentioning the ‘critical incident’ in the post hoc think-aloud verbalisation. As with other studies, these results indicate differences in professional vision between novice and experienced teaching professionals. Additionally, our analysis reveals that eye tracking data can assist in identifying professional vision.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Critical Incidents Method</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Psychology</subject><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Mixed methods research</subject><subject>Observation</subject><subject>Protocol Analysis</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Student Teachers</subject><subject>Teacher education</subject><subject>Teacher Educators</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Video Technology</subject><subject>Vision</subject><issn>1040-726X</issn><issn>1573-336X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UEtKBDEUbETB7wUEIeC69eUl3el2JzLjB0HBUdyFTDoZozMdTXoW48preD1PYsb2s5Ms8lL1qqhUlu1SOKAA4jBSKHmVA0IOdcGK_HUl26CFYDlj5f1qmoFDLrC8X882Y3wEgFpwtpGZm27emLYjI6P0gwnx4-2dqLb5eZNBM9eq8z1xHbw1MTrfqim5c8vhiAxd27h2EokNfpa0ZLAwZBSUfkooWfovtrM1q6bR7HzfW9ntcDA6Ocsvr07PT44vc80q6PK6BqSgAc3YVmAbhQ3nY1RU6YIqViOvtalQWCtUwi0vsLGI4_ThMVYC2Fa23_s-B_8yN7GTj34eUtgosQDKirIqq7R10G9N1NRI11rfpbTpNGbmtG-NdQk_FpQJZMAxCbAX6OBjDMbK5-BmKiwkBbnsX_b9y9S__OpfvibRXi8ywelfweCCYk0p44lnPR8T105M-Mv6j-snXseUCA</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Wyss, Corinne</creator><creator>Rosenberger, Katharina</creator><creator>Bührer, Wolfgang</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1025-6053</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Student Teachers’ and Teacher Educators’ Professional Vision: Findings from an Eye Tracking Study</title><author>Wyss, Corinne ; Rosenberger, Katharina ; Bührer, Wolfgang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-990210c02ebf80fda2d44b2a1ac51a39249ce827ff7a4b2f452df22b535b28703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Critical Incidents Method</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Psychology</topic><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Mixed methods research</topic><topic>Observation</topic><topic>Protocol Analysis</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Student Teachers</topic><topic>Teacher education</topic><topic>Teacher Educators</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Video Technology</topic><topic>Vision</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wyss, Corinne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenberger, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bührer, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Educational psychology review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wyss, Corinne</au><au>Rosenberger, Katharina</au><au>Bührer, Wolfgang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1291134</ericid><atitle>Student Teachers’ and Teacher Educators’ Professional Vision: Findings from an Eye Tracking Study</atitle><jtitle>Educational psychology review</jtitle><stitle>Educ Psychol Rev</stitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>107</epage><pages>91-107</pages><issn>1040-726X</issn><eissn>1573-336X</eissn><abstract>Teaching is a complex and demanding endeavour. Teachers must deal with numerous forces, often face dilemma-ridden and ambiguous situations and have to act under time pressure. In order to accomplish these tasks, teachers must apply professional knowledge differentially (Fairbanks et al. 2009 ). In recent decades, various studies have focused on defining and investigating the domains of teachers’ professional knowledge. In this respect, much attention has been paid of late to the concept of professional vision. In the present study, we look for indications of professional vision using eye tracking data and post hoc think-aloud verbalisations. We worked with student teachers and teacher educators, who watched a short video clip of a school lesson and described afterwards what they had seen. The video shows an authentic teaching situation and discloses a ‘critical incident’. The results show that there are differences between the two groups of participants, both in terms of eye tracking and post hoc think-aloud verbalisation. However, the differences originate primarily from six teacher educators explicitly mentioning the ‘critical incident’ in the post hoc think-aloud verbalisation. As with other studies, these results indicate differences in professional vision between novice and experienced teaching professionals. Additionally, our analysis reveals that eye tracking data can assist in identifying professional vision.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10648-020-09535-z</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1025-6053</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1040-726X
ispartof Educational psychology review, 2021-03, Vol.33 (1), p.91-107
issn 1040-726X
1573-336X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2501356868
source SpringerNature Journals; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Analysis
Attention
Child and School Psychology
Critical Incidents Method
Education
Educational Psychology
Eye Movements
Learning and Instruction
Mixed methods research
Observation
Protocol Analysis
Review Article
Student Teachers
Teacher education
Teacher Educators
Teachers
Teaching
Teaching Methods
Video Technology
Vision
title Student Teachers’ and Teacher Educators’ Professional Vision: Findings from an Eye Tracking Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A59%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Student%20Teachers%E2%80%99%20and%20Teacher%20Educators%E2%80%99%20Professional%20Vision:%20Findings%20from%20an%20Eye%20Tracking%20Study&rft.jtitle=Educational%20psychology%20review&rft.au=Wyss,%20Corinne&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=107&rft.pages=91-107&rft.issn=1040-726X&rft.eissn=1573-336X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10648-020-09535-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA713723042%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501356868&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A713723042&rft_ericid=EJ1291134&rfr_iscdi=true