A Gain-based Remedy for Breach of Contract in English Law: Some Lessons for South African Law

A gain-based remedy for breach of contract is aimed at taking away the profits acquired through breach of contract. Traditionally, contractual damages can be claimed only if the breach caused the plaintiff patrimonial loss. There is an assumption that breach of contract causes a loss to the plaintif...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Comparative and international law journal of southern Africa 2020-01, Vol.53 (2), p.1-29
1. Verfasser: Seanego, KA
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 29
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1
container_title The Comparative and international law journal of southern Africa
container_volume 53
creator Seanego, KA
description A gain-based remedy for breach of contract is aimed at taking away the profits acquired through breach of contract. Traditionally, contractual damages can be claimed only if the breach caused the plaintiff patrimonial loss. There is an assumption that breach of contract causes a loss to the plaintiff, and as a result the defendant should compensate the plaintiff. However, in the past, courts have been confronted with cases where the opposite of this assumption is true. This is in instances where a defendant breaches a contract and gains profit as a result of that breach, whereas the plaintiff suffers little or no patrimonial loss. Unfortunately, in these circumstances the plaintiff may be left with no remedy or legal recourse for the breach, while the defendant may keep the profits generated as a result of the breach. However, in English law the courts have recognised a gain-based remedy in the circumstances outlined above, allowing the disgorgement of such ill-gotten profits. But a similar remedy has not yet gained recognition in the South African law of contract. The purpose of this article is to explore how South African law can draw some valuable lessons from English law in developing and recognising a gain-based remedy for breach of contract in order to deal with the profits generated through breach of contract.
doi_str_mv 10.25159/2522-3062/7742
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2501257964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A674624412</galeid><jstor_id>27328031</jstor_id><sabinet_id>https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-cilsa-v53-n2-a4</sabinet_id><sourcerecordid>A674624412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-c0d89f0326e3e337857a115507f855f7d836c9f0f90e67ef4ecebe73c3d857dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UEuLFDEQDqLgsO7ZkxDw3Dt5dDrdx3FcV2FAED0XmaSynaEnGZMeZf_9pm3ZqkNB1fcoPkLec3YnFFfDVighGsk6sdW6Fa_I5mXxmmwY46xpmeJvyW0pJ1ZLdbzn7YYMO_pgQmyOpqCjP_CM7on6lOmnjMaONHm6T3HOxs40RHofH6dQRnowf9-RN95MBW__zxvy68v9z_3X5vD94dt-d2isFHxuLHP94JkUHUqUUvdKG86VYtr3SnntetnZCvADw06jb9HiEbW00lWos_KGfFx1Lzn9vmKZ4ZSuOVZLEIpxofTQtRV1t6IezYQQok_Lz7UdnoNNEX2o-12n2060LReVsF0JNqdSMnq45HA2-Qk4g3-ZwhIhLBHCkmllfF4ZxRxDxBmKwcv1COM8XwqMboLRRFddlhtnSjDAkwUbpmLgj5IQBZjl0w-rzKnMKb-4Ci1FzySXzztrh-0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501257964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Gain-based Remedy for Breach of Contract in English Law: Some Lessons for South African Law</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Seanego, KA</creator><creatorcontrib>Seanego, KA</creatorcontrib><description>A gain-based remedy for breach of contract is aimed at taking away the profits acquired through breach of contract. Traditionally, contractual damages can be claimed only if the breach caused the plaintiff patrimonial loss. There is an assumption that breach of contract causes a loss to the plaintiff, and as a result the defendant should compensate the plaintiff. However, in the past, courts have been confronted with cases where the opposite of this assumption is true. This is in instances where a defendant breaches a contract and gains profit as a result of that breach, whereas the plaintiff suffers little or no patrimonial loss. Unfortunately, in these circumstances the plaintiff may be left with no remedy or legal recourse for the breach, while the defendant may keep the profits generated as a result of the breach. However, in English law the courts have recognised a gain-based remedy in the circumstances outlined above, allowing the disgorgement of such ill-gotten profits. But a similar remedy has not yet gained recognition in the South African law of contract. The purpose of this article is to explore how South African law can draw some valuable lessons from English law in developing and recognising a gain-based remedy for breach of contract in order to deal with the profits generated through breach of contract.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4051</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2522-3062</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.25159/2522-3062/7742</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Pretoria: Unisa Press (University of South Africa Press)</publisher><subject>Book publishing ; Breach of contract ; Breaches ; Contract law ; Contracts ; contractual damages ; Corporate profits ; Courts ; Damages ; disgorgement ; gain-based remedies ; ill-gotten profits ; Law of contract ; Profits ; Settlements &amp; damages ; Unjustified enrichment</subject><ispartof>The Comparative and international law journal of southern Africa, 2020-01, Vol.53 (2), p.1-29</ispartof><rights>Unisa Press 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Sabinet Online</rights><rights>Copyright University of South Africa 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-c0d89f0326e3e337857a115507f855f7d836c9f0f90e67ef4ecebe73c3d857dc3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27328031$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27328031$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seanego, KA</creatorcontrib><title>A Gain-based Remedy for Breach of Contract in English Law: Some Lessons for South African Law</title><title>The Comparative and international law journal of southern Africa</title><description>A gain-based remedy for breach of contract is aimed at taking away the profits acquired through breach of contract. Traditionally, contractual damages can be claimed only if the breach caused the plaintiff patrimonial loss. There is an assumption that breach of contract causes a loss to the plaintiff, and as a result the defendant should compensate the plaintiff. However, in the past, courts have been confronted with cases where the opposite of this assumption is true. This is in instances where a defendant breaches a contract and gains profit as a result of that breach, whereas the plaintiff suffers little or no patrimonial loss. Unfortunately, in these circumstances the plaintiff may be left with no remedy or legal recourse for the breach, while the defendant may keep the profits generated as a result of the breach. However, in English law the courts have recognised a gain-based remedy in the circumstances outlined above, allowing the disgorgement of such ill-gotten profits. But a similar remedy has not yet gained recognition in the South African law of contract. The purpose of this article is to explore how South African law can draw some valuable lessons from English law in developing and recognising a gain-based remedy for breach of contract in order to deal with the profits generated through breach of contract.</description><subject>Book publishing</subject><subject>Breach of contract</subject><subject>Breaches</subject><subject>Contract law</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>contractual damages</subject><subject>Corporate profits</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Damages</subject><subject>disgorgement</subject><subject>gain-based remedies</subject><subject>ill-gotten profits</subject><subject>Law of contract</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Settlements &amp; damages</subject><subject>Unjustified enrichment</subject><issn>0010-4051</issn><issn>2522-3062</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9UEuLFDEQDqLgsO7ZkxDw3Dt5dDrdx3FcV2FAED0XmaSynaEnGZMeZf_9pm3ZqkNB1fcoPkLec3YnFFfDVighGsk6sdW6Fa_I5mXxmmwY46xpmeJvyW0pJ1ZLdbzn7YYMO_pgQmyOpqCjP_CM7on6lOmnjMaONHm6T3HOxs40RHofH6dQRnowf9-RN95MBW__zxvy68v9z_3X5vD94dt-d2isFHxuLHP94JkUHUqUUvdKG86VYtr3SnntetnZCvADw06jb9HiEbW00lWos_KGfFx1Lzn9vmKZ4ZSuOVZLEIpxofTQtRV1t6IezYQQok_Lz7UdnoNNEX2o-12n2060LReVsF0JNqdSMnq45HA2-Qk4g3-ZwhIhLBHCkmllfF4ZxRxDxBmKwcv1COM8XwqMboLRRFddlhtnSjDAkwUbpmLgj5IQBZjl0w-rzKnMKb-4Ci1FzySXzztrh-0</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Seanego, KA</creator><general>Unisa Press (University of South Africa Press)</general><general>Institute of Foreign and Comparative Law</general><general>Sabinet Online</general><general>University of South Africa</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>A Gain-based Remedy for Breach of Contract in English Law</title><author>Seanego, KA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-c0d89f0326e3e337857a115507f855f7d836c9f0f90e67ef4ecebe73c3d857dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Book publishing</topic><topic>Breach of contract</topic><topic>Breaches</topic><topic>Contract law</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>contractual damages</topic><topic>Corporate profits</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Damages</topic><topic>disgorgement</topic><topic>gain-based remedies</topic><topic>ill-gotten profits</topic><topic>Law of contract</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Settlements &amp; damages</topic><topic>Unjustified enrichment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seanego, KA</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Comparative and international law journal of southern Africa</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seanego, KA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Gain-based Remedy for Breach of Contract in English Law: Some Lessons for South African Law</atitle><jtitle>The Comparative and international law journal of southern Africa</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>1-29</pages><issn>0010-4051</issn><eissn>2522-3062</eissn><abstract>A gain-based remedy for breach of contract is aimed at taking away the profits acquired through breach of contract. Traditionally, contractual damages can be claimed only if the breach caused the plaintiff patrimonial loss. There is an assumption that breach of contract causes a loss to the plaintiff, and as a result the defendant should compensate the plaintiff. However, in the past, courts have been confronted with cases where the opposite of this assumption is true. This is in instances where a defendant breaches a contract and gains profit as a result of that breach, whereas the plaintiff suffers little or no patrimonial loss. Unfortunately, in these circumstances the plaintiff may be left with no remedy or legal recourse for the breach, while the defendant may keep the profits generated as a result of the breach. However, in English law the courts have recognised a gain-based remedy in the circumstances outlined above, allowing the disgorgement of such ill-gotten profits. But a similar remedy has not yet gained recognition in the South African law of contract. The purpose of this article is to explore how South African law can draw some valuable lessons from English law in developing and recognising a gain-based remedy for breach of contract in order to deal with the profits generated through breach of contract.</abstract><cop>Pretoria</cop><pub>Unisa Press (University of South Africa Press)</pub><doi>10.25159/2522-3062/7742</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-4051
ispartof The Comparative and international law journal of southern Africa, 2020-01, Vol.53 (2), p.1-29
issn 0010-4051
2522-3062
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2501257964
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Book publishing
Breach of contract
Breaches
Contract law
Contracts
contractual damages
Corporate profits
Courts
Damages
disgorgement
gain-based remedies
ill-gotten profits
Law of contract
Profits
Settlements & damages
Unjustified enrichment
title A Gain-based Remedy for Breach of Contract in English Law: Some Lessons for South African Law
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T10%3A05%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Gain-based%20Remedy%20for%20Breach%20of%20Contract%20in%20English%20Law:%20Some%20Lessons%20for%20South%20African%20Law&rft.jtitle=The%20Comparative%20and%20international%20law%20journal%20of%20southern%20Africa&rft.au=Seanego,%20KA&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=1-29&rft.issn=0010-4051&rft.eissn=2522-3062&rft_id=info:doi/10.25159/2522-3062/7742&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA674624412%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501257964&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A674624412&rft_jstor_id=27328031&rft_sabinet_id=https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-cilsa-v53-n2-a4&rfr_iscdi=true