A Gain-based Remedy for Breach of Contract in English Law: Some Lessons for South African Law
A gain-based remedy for breach of contract is aimed at taking away the profits acquired through breach of contract. Traditionally, contractual damages can be claimed only if the breach caused the plaintiff patrimonial loss. There is an assumption that breach of contract causes a loss to the plaintif...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Comparative and international law journal of southern Africa 2020-01, Vol.53 (2), p.1-29 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 29 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | The Comparative and international law journal of southern Africa |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Seanego, KA |
description | A gain-based remedy for breach of contract is aimed at taking away the profits acquired through breach of contract. Traditionally, contractual damages can be claimed only if the breach caused the plaintiff patrimonial loss. There is an assumption that breach of contract causes a loss to the plaintiff, and as a result the defendant should compensate the plaintiff. However, in the past, courts have been confronted with cases where the opposite of this assumption is true. This is in instances where a defendant breaches a contract and gains profit as a result of that breach, whereas the plaintiff suffers little or no patrimonial loss. Unfortunately, in these circumstances the plaintiff may be left with no remedy or legal recourse for the breach, while the defendant may keep the profits generated as a result of the breach. However, in English law the courts have recognised a gain-based remedy in the circumstances outlined above, allowing the disgorgement of such ill-gotten profits. But a similar remedy has not yet gained recognition in the South African law of contract. The purpose of this article is to explore how South African law can draw some valuable lessons from English law in developing and recognising a gain-based remedy for breach of contract in order to deal with the profits generated through breach of contract. |
doi_str_mv | 10.25159/2522-3062/7742 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2501257964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A674624412</galeid><jstor_id>27328031</jstor_id><sabinet_id>https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-cilsa-v53-n2-a4</sabinet_id><sourcerecordid>A674624412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-c0d89f0326e3e337857a115507f855f7d836c9f0f90e67ef4ecebe73c3d857dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UEuLFDEQDqLgsO7ZkxDw3Dt5dDrdx3FcV2FAED0XmaSynaEnGZMeZf_9pm3ZqkNB1fcoPkLec3YnFFfDVighGsk6sdW6Fa_I5mXxmmwY46xpmeJvyW0pJ1ZLdbzn7YYMO_pgQmyOpqCjP_CM7on6lOmnjMaONHm6T3HOxs40RHofH6dQRnowf9-RN95MBW__zxvy68v9z_3X5vD94dt-d2isFHxuLHP94JkUHUqUUvdKG86VYtr3SnntetnZCvADw06jb9HiEbW00lWos_KGfFx1Lzn9vmKZ4ZSuOVZLEIpxofTQtRV1t6IezYQQok_Lz7UdnoNNEX2o-12n2060LReVsF0JNqdSMnq45HA2-Qk4g3-ZwhIhLBHCkmllfF4ZxRxDxBmKwcv1COM8XwqMboLRRFddlhtnSjDAkwUbpmLgj5IQBZjl0w-rzKnMKb-4Ci1FzySXzztrh-0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501257964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Gain-based Remedy for Breach of Contract in English Law: Some Lessons for South African Law</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Seanego, KA</creator><creatorcontrib>Seanego, KA</creatorcontrib><description>A gain-based remedy for breach of contract is aimed at taking away the profits acquired through breach of contract. Traditionally, contractual damages can be claimed only if the breach caused the plaintiff patrimonial loss. There is an assumption that breach of contract causes a loss to the plaintiff, and as a result the defendant should compensate the plaintiff. However, in the past, courts have been confronted with cases where the opposite of this assumption is true. This is in instances where a defendant breaches a contract and gains profit as a result of that breach, whereas the plaintiff suffers little or no patrimonial loss. Unfortunately, in these circumstances the plaintiff may be left with no remedy or legal recourse for the breach, while the defendant may keep the profits generated as a result of the breach. However, in English law the courts have recognised a gain-based remedy in the circumstances outlined above, allowing the disgorgement of such ill-gotten profits. But a similar remedy has not yet gained recognition in the South African law of contract. The purpose of this article is to explore how South African law can draw some valuable lessons from English law in developing and recognising a gain-based remedy for breach of contract in order to deal with the profits generated through breach of contract.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4051</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2522-3062</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.25159/2522-3062/7742</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Pretoria: Unisa Press (University of South Africa Press)</publisher><subject>Book publishing ; Breach of contract ; Breaches ; Contract law ; Contracts ; contractual damages ; Corporate profits ; Courts ; Damages ; disgorgement ; gain-based remedies ; ill-gotten profits ; Law of contract ; Profits ; Settlements & damages ; Unjustified enrichment</subject><ispartof>The Comparative and international law journal of southern Africa, 2020-01, Vol.53 (2), p.1-29</ispartof><rights>Unisa Press 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Sabinet Online</rights><rights>Copyright University of South Africa 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-c0d89f0326e3e337857a115507f855f7d836c9f0f90e67ef4ecebe73c3d857dc3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27328031$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27328031$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seanego, KA</creatorcontrib><title>A Gain-based Remedy for Breach of Contract in English Law: Some Lessons for South African Law</title><title>The Comparative and international law journal of southern Africa</title><description>A gain-based remedy for breach of contract is aimed at taking away the profits acquired through breach of contract. Traditionally, contractual damages can be claimed only if the breach caused the plaintiff patrimonial loss. There is an assumption that breach of contract causes a loss to the plaintiff, and as a result the defendant should compensate the plaintiff. However, in the past, courts have been confronted with cases where the opposite of this assumption is true. This is in instances where a defendant breaches a contract and gains profit as a result of that breach, whereas the plaintiff suffers little or no patrimonial loss. Unfortunately, in these circumstances the plaintiff may be left with no remedy or legal recourse for the breach, while the defendant may keep the profits generated as a result of the breach. However, in English law the courts have recognised a gain-based remedy in the circumstances outlined above, allowing the disgorgement of such ill-gotten profits. But a similar remedy has not yet gained recognition in the South African law of contract. The purpose of this article is to explore how South African law can draw some valuable lessons from English law in developing and recognising a gain-based remedy for breach of contract in order to deal with the profits generated through breach of contract.</description><subject>Book publishing</subject><subject>Breach of contract</subject><subject>Breaches</subject><subject>Contract law</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>contractual damages</subject><subject>Corporate profits</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Damages</subject><subject>disgorgement</subject><subject>gain-based remedies</subject><subject>ill-gotten profits</subject><subject>Law of contract</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Settlements & damages</subject><subject>Unjustified enrichment</subject><issn>0010-4051</issn><issn>2522-3062</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9UEuLFDEQDqLgsO7ZkxDw3Dt5dDrdx3FcV2FAED0XmaSynaEnGZMeZf_9pm3ZqkNB1fcoPkLec3YnFFfDVighGsk6sdW6Fa_I5mXxmmwY46xpmeJvyW0pJ1ZLdbzn7YYMO_pgQmyOpqCjP_CM7on6lOmnjMaONHm6T3HOxs40RHofH6dQRnowf9-RN95MBW__zxvy68v9z_3X5vD94dt-d2isFHxuLHP94JkUHUqUUvdKG86VYtr3SnntetnZCvADw06jb9HiEbW00lWos_KGfFx1Lzn9vmKZ4ZSuOVZLEIpxofTQtRV1t6IezYQQok_Lz7UdnoNNEX2o-12n2060LReVsF0JNqdSMnq45HA2-Qk4g3-ZwhIhLBHCkmllfF4ZxRxDxBmKwcv1COM8XwqMboLRRFddlhtnSjDAkwUbpmLgj5IQBZjl0w-rzKnMKb-4Ci1FzySXzztrh-0</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Seanego, KA</creator><general>Unisa Press (University of South Africa Press)</general><general>Institute of Foreign and Comparative Law</general><general>Sabinet Online</general><general>University of South Africa</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>A Gain-based Remedy for Breach of Contract in English Law</title><author>Seanego, KA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-c0d89f0326e3e337857a115507f855f7d836c9f0f90e67ef4ecebe73c3d857dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Book publishing</topic><topic>Breach of contract</topic><topic>Breaches</topic><topic>Contract law</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>contractual damages</topic><topic>Corporate profits</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Damages</topic><topic>disgorgement</topic><topic>gain-based remedies</topic><topic>ill-gotten profits</topic><topic>Law of contract</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Settlements & damages</topic><topic>Unjustified enrichment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seanego, KA</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Comparative and international law journal of southern Africa</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seanego, KA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Gain-based Remedy for Breach of Contract in English Law: Some Lessons for South African Law</atitle><jtitle>The Comparative and international law journal of southern Africa</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>1-29</pages><issn>0010-4051</issn><eissn>2522-3062</eissn><abstract>A gain-based remedy for breach of contract is aimed at taking away the profits acquired through breach of contract. Traditionally, contractual damages can be claimed only if the breach caused the plaintiff patrimonial loss. There is an assumption that breach of contract causes a loss to the plaintiff, and as a result the defendant should compensate the plaintiff. However, in the past, courts have been confronted with cases where the opposite of this assumption is true. This is in instances where a defendant breaches a contract and gains profit as a result of that breach, whereas the plaintiff suffers little or no patrimonial loss. Unfortunately, in these circumstances the plaintiff may be left with no remedy or legal recourse for the breach, while the defendant may keep the profits generated as a result of the breach. However, in English law the courts have recognised a gain-based remedy in the circumstances outlined above, allowing the disgorgement of such ill-gotten profits. But a similar remedy has not yet gained recognition in the South African law of contract. The purpose of this article is to explore how South African law can draw some valuable lessons from English law in developing and recognising a gain-based remedy for breach of contract in order to deal with the profits generated through breach of contract.</abstract><cop>Pretoria</cop><pub>Unisa Press (University of South Africa Press)</pub><doi>10.25159/2522-3062/7742</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-4051 |
ispartof | The Comparative and international law journal of southern Africa, 2020-01, Vol.53 (2), p.1-29 |
issn | 0010-4051 2522-3062 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2501257964 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Book publishing Breach of contract Breaches Contract law Contracts contractual damages Corporate profits Courts Damages disgorgement gain-based remedies ill-gotten profits Law of contract Profits Settlements & damages Unjustified enrichment |
title | A Gain-based Remedy for Breach of Contract in English Law: Some Lessons for South African Law |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T10%3A05%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Gain-based%20Remedy%20for%20Breach%20of%20Contract%20in%20English%20Law:%20Some%20Lessons%20for%20South%20African%20Law&rft.jtitle=The%20Comparative%20and%20international%20law%20journal%20of%20southern%20Africa&rft.au=Seanego,%20KA&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=1-29&rft.issn=0010-4051&rft.eissn=2522-3062&rft_id=info:doi/10.25159/2522-3062/7742&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA674624412%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501257964&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A674624412&rft_jstor_id=27328031&rft_sabinet_id=https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-cilsa-v53-n2-a4&rfr_iscdi=true |