Radiolabelling of nanomaterials for medical imaging and therapy
Nanomaterials offer unique physical, chemical and biological properties of interest for medical imaging and therapy. Over the last two decades, there has been an increasing effort to translate nanomaterial-based medicinal products (so-called nanomedicines) into clinical practice and, although multip...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chemical Society reviews 2021-03, Vol.5 (5), p.3355-3423 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3423 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 3355 |
container_title | Chemical Society reviews |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Pellico, Juan Gawne, Peter J de Rosales, Rafael |
description | Nanomaterials offer unique physical, chemical and biological properties of interest for medical imaging and therapy. Over the last two decades, there has been an increasing effort to translate nanomaterial-based medicinal products (so-called nanomedicines) into clinical practice and, although multiple nanoparticle-based formulations are clinically available, there is still a disparity between the number of pre-clinical products and those that reach clinical approval. To facilitate the efficient clinical translation of nanomedicinal-drugs, it is important to study their whole-body biodistribution and pharmacokinetics from the early stages of their development. Integrating this knowledge with that of their therapeutic profile and/or toxicity should provide a powerful combination to efficiently inform nanomedicine trials and allow early selection of the most promising candidates. In this context, radiolabelling nanomaterials allows whole-body and non-invasive
in vivo
tracking by the sensitive clinical imaging techniques positron emission tomography (PET), and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Furthermore, certain radionuclides with specific nuclear emissions can elicit therapeutic effects by themselves, leading to radionuclide-based therapy. To ensure robust information during the development of nanomaterials for PET/SPECT imaging and/or radionuclide therapy, selection of the most appropriate radiolabelling method and knowledge of its limitations are critical. Different radiolabelling strategies are available depending on the type of material, the radionuclide and/or the final application. In this review we describe the different radiolabelling strategies currently available, with a critical vision over their advantages and disadvantages. The final aim is to review the most relevant and up-to-date knowledge available in this field, and support the efficient clinical translation of future nanomedicinal products for
in vivo
imaging and/or therapy.
This review describes and critically evaluates the various strategies available to radiolabel organic and inorganic nanomaterials for
in vivo
imaging and therapy |
doi_str_mv | 10.1039/d0cs00384k |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2501235645</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2501235645</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-36819fc9a63866cd38528a9f6af8934c8ea97e3e4ad9b3e0d235101be84cec373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtPwzAMhyMEYuNx4Q6qxA2p4NRpmpwQGk8xCYnHuUrTZHR0zUi6w_57MjbGyZb8yfbvI-SEwiUFlFc16ACAgn3tkCFlHFJWMLZLhoDAUwCaDchBCNPY0YJn-2SAyCQtKBuS61dVN65VlWnbppskziad6txM9cY3qg2JdT6ZmbrRqk2amZqsINXVSf9pvJovj8iejZg53tRD8nF_9z56TMcvD0-jm3GqmYA-RS6otFoqjoJzXaPIM6Gk5coKiUwLo2Rh0DBVywoN1BnmFGhlBNNGY4GH5Hy9d-7d98KEvpy6he_iyTLLY0LMOcsjdbGmtHcheGPLuY9P-2VJoVy5Km9h9Pbr6jnCZ5uViyom3KJ_ciJwugZ80Nvpv2z8AbwTbSY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501235645</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiolabelling of nanomaterials for medical imaging and therapy</title><source>Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Pellico, Juan ; Gawne, Peter J ; de Rosales, Rafael</creator><creatorcontrib>Pellico, Juan ; Gawne, Peter J ; de Rosales, Rafael</creatorcontrib><description>Nanomaterials offer unique physical, chemical and biological properties of interest for medical imaging and therapy. Over the last two decades, there has been an increasing effort to translate nanomaterial-based medicinal products (so-called nanomedicines) into clinical practice and, although multiple nanoparticle-based formulations are clinically available, there is still a disparity between the number of pre-clinical products and those that reach clinical approval. To facilitate the efficient clinical translation of nanomedicinal-drugs, it is important to study their whole-body biodistribution and pharmacokinetics from the early stages of their development. Integrating this knowledge with that of their therapeutic profile and/or toxicity should provide a powerful combination to efficiently inform nanomedicine trials and allow early selection of the most promising candidates. In this context, radiolabelling nanomaterials allows whole-body and non-invasive
in vivo
tracking by the sensitive clinical imaging techniques positron emission tomography (PET), and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Furthermore, certain radionuclides with specific nuclear emissions can elicit therapeutic effects by themselves, leading to radionuclide-based therapy. To ensure robust information during the development of nanomaterials for PET/SPECT imaging and/or radionuclide therapy, selection of the most appropriate radiolabelling method and knowledge of its limitations are critical. Different radiolabelling strategies are available depending on the type of material, the radionuclide and/or the final application. In this review we describe the different radiolabelling strategies currently available, with a critical vision over their advantages and disadvantages. The final aim is to review the most relevant and up-to-date knowledge available in this field, and support the efficient clinical translation of future nanomedicinal products for
in vivo
imaging and/or therapy.
This review describes and critically evaluates the various strategies available to radiolabel organic and inorganic nanomaterials for
in vivo
imaging and therapy</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-0012</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-4744</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/d0cs00384k</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33491714</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Royal Society of Chemistry</publisher><subject>Biocompatibility ; Biological properties ; Computed tomography ; Imaging techniques ; In vivo methods and tests ; Medical imaging ; Nanomaterials ; Nanoparticles ; Photon emission ; Positron emission ; Radiation therapy ; Radioisotopes ; Radiolabelling ; Tomography ; Toxicity</subject><ispartof>Chemical Society reviews, 2021-03, Vol.5 (5), p.3355-3423</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-36819fc9a63866cd38528a9f6af8934c8ea97e3e4ad9b3e0d235101be84cec373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-36819fc9a63866cd38528a9f6af8934c8ea97e3e4ad9b3e0d235101be84cec373</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2787-8641 ; 0000-0002-8763-1045 ; 0000-0003-0431-0535</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33491714$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pellico, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gawne, Peter J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Rosales, Rafael</creatorcontrib><title>Radiolabelling of nanomaterials for medical imaging and therapy</title><title>Chemical Society reviews</title><addtitle>Chem Soc Rev</addtitle><description>Nanomaterials offer unique physical, chemical and biological properties of interest for medical imaging and therapy. Over the last two decades, there has been an increasing effort to translate nanomaterial-based medicinal products (so-called nanomedicines) into clinical practice and, although multiple nanoparticle-based formulations are clinically available, there is still a disparity between the number of pre-clinical products and those that reach clinical approval. To facilitate the efficient clinical translation of nanomedicinal-drugs, it is important to study their whole-body biodistribution and pharmacokinetics from the early stages of their development. Integrating this knowledge with that of their therapeutic profile and/or toxicity should provide a powerful combination to efficiently inform nanomedicine trials and allow early selection of the most promising candidates. In this context, radiolabelling nanomaterials allows whole-body and non-invasive
in vivo
tracking by the sensitive clinical imaging techniques positron emission tomography (PET), and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Furthermore, certain radionuclides with specific nuclear emissions can elicit therapeutic effects by themselves, leading to radionuclide-based therapy. To ensure robust information during the development of nanomaterials for PET/SPECT imaging and/or radionuclide therapy, selection of the most appropriate radiolabelling method and knowledge of its limitations are critical. Different radiolabelling strategies are available depending on the type of material, the radionuclide and/or the final application. In this review we describe the different radiolabelling strategies currently available, with a critical vision over their advantages and disadvantages. The final aim is to review the most relevant and up-to-date knowledge available in this field, and support the efficient clinical translation of future nanomedicinal products for
in vivo
imaging and/or therapy.
This review describes and critically evaluates the various strategies available to radiolabel organic and inorganic nanomaterials for
in vivo
imaging and therapy</description><subject>Biocompatibility</subject><subject>Biological properties</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Imaging techniques</subject><subject>In vivo methods and tests</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Nanomaterials</subject><subject>Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Photon emission</subject><subject>Positron emission</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Radiolabelling</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><issn>0306-0012</issn><issn>1460-4744</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkMtPwzAMhyMEYuNx4Q6qxA2p4NRpmpwQGk8xCYnHuUrTZHR0zUi6w_57MjbGyZb8yfbvI-SEwiUFlFc16ACAgn3tkCFlHFJWMLZLhoDAUwCaDchBCNPY0YJn-2SAyCQtKBuS61dVN65VlWnbppskziad6txM9cY3qg2JdT6ZmbrRqk2amZqsINXVSf9pvJovj8iejZg53tRD8nF_9z56TMcvD0-jm3GqmYA-RS6otFoqjoJzXaPIM6Gk5coKiUwLo2Rh0DBVywoN1BnmFGhlBNNGY4GH5Hy9d-7d98KEvpy6he_iyTLLY0LMOcsjdbGmtHcheGPLuY9P-2VJoVy5Km9h9Pbr6jnCZ5uViyom3KJ_ciJwugZ80Nvpv2z8AbwTbSY</recordid><startdate>20210307</startdate><enddate>20210307</enddate><creator>Pellico, Juan</creator><creator>Gawne, Peter J</creator><creator>de Rosales, Rafael</creator><general>Royal Society of Chemistry</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2787-8641</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8763-1045</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0431-0535</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210307</creationdate><title>Radiolabelling of nanomaterials for medical imaging and therapy</title><author>Pellico, Juan ; Gawne, Peter J ; de Rosales, Rafael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-36819fc9a63866cd38528a9f6af8934c8ea97e3e4ad9b3e0d235101be84cec373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biocompatibility</topic><topic>Biological properties</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Imaging techniques</topic><topic>In vivo methods and tests</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Nanomaterials</topic><topic>Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Photon emission</topic><topic>Positron emission</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Radiolabelling</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pellico, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gawne, Peter J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Rosales, Rafael</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Chemical Society reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pellico, Juan</au><au>Gawne, Peter J</au><au>de Rosales, Rafael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiolabelling of nanomaterials for medical imaging and therapy</atitle><jtitle>Chemical Society reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Chem Soc Rev</addtitle><date>2021-03-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>3355</spage><epage>3423</epage><pages>3355-3423</pages><issn>0306-0012</issn><eissn>1460-4744</eissn><abstract>Nanomaterials offer unique physical, chemical and biological properties of interest for medical imaging and therapy. Over the last two decades, there has been an increasing effort to translate nanomaterial-based medicinal products (so-called nanomedicines) into clinical practice and, although multiple nanoparticle-based formulations are clinically available, there is still a disparity between the number of pre-clinical products and those that reach clinical approval. To facilitate the efficient clinical translation of nanomedicinal-drugs, it is important to study their whole-body biodistribution and pharmacokinetics from the early stages of their development. Integrating this knowledge with that of their therapeutic profile and/or toxicity should provide a powerful combination to efficiently inform nanomedicine trials and allow early selection of the most promising candidates. In this context, radiolabelling nanomaterials allows whole-body and non-invasive
in vivo
tracking by the sensitive clinical imaging techniques positron emission tomography (PET), and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Furthermore, certain radionuclides with specific nuclear emissions can elicit therapeutic effects by themselves, leading to radionuclide-based therapy. To ensure robust information during the development of nanomaterials for PET/SPECT imaging and/or radionuclide therapy, selection of the most appropriate radiolabelling method and knowledge of its limitations are critical. Different radiolabelling strategies are available depending on the type of material, the radionuclide and/or the final application. In this review we describe the different radiolabelling strategies currently available, with a critical vision over their advantages and disadvantages. The final aim is to review the most relevant and up-to-date knowledge available in this field, and support the efficient clinical translation of future nanomedicinal products for
in vivo
imaging and/or therapy.
This review describes and critically evaluates the various strategies available to radiolabel organic and inorganic nanomaterials for
in vivo
imaging and therapy</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Royal Society of Chemistry</pub><pmid>33491714</pmid><doi>10.1039/d0cs00384k</doi><tpages>69</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2787-8641</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8763-1045</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0431-0535</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0306-0012 |
ispartof | Chemical Society reviews, 2021-03, Vol.5 (5), p.3355-3423 |
issn | 0306-0012 1460-4744 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2501235645 |
source | Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Biocompatibility Biological properties Computed tomography Imaging techniques In vivo methods and tests Medical imaging Nanomaterials Nanoparticles Photon emission Positron emission Radiation therapy Radioisotopes Radiolabelling Tomography Toxicity |
title | Radiolabelling of nanomaterials for medical imaging and therapy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T19%3A26%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiolabelling%20of%20nanomaterials%20for%20medical%20imaging%20and%20therapy&rft.jtitle=Chemical%20Society%20reviews&rft.au=Pellico,%20Juan&rft.date=2021-03-07&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=3355&rft.epage=3423&rft.pages=3355-3423&rft.issn=0306-0012&rft.eissn=1460-4744&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/d0cs00384k&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2501235645%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501235645&rft_id=info:pmid/33491714&rfr_iscdi=true |