4CPS-249 Second generation β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations: ceftazidime–avibactam and ceftolozane–tazobactam experience of use
Background and importanceCeftazidime–avibactam and ceftolozane–tazobactam are two second generation cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. The antimicrobial spectrum of activity includes multidrug resistant gram negative bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ceftazidime–avibactam is...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice 2021-03, Vol.28 (Suppl 1), p.A39-A40 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | A40 |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | A39 |
container_title | European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Lavandeira Pérez, M Martínez Ruiz, E Casarrubios Lázaro, G Mendoza Acosta, I Tardaguila Molina, P Dean Barahona, C Gutiérrez, Á Yuste Blanco Crespo, M Lázaro López, A Horta Hernández, AM |
description | Background and importanceCeftazidime–avibactam and ceftolozane–tazobactam are two second generation cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. The antimicrobial spectrum of activity includes multidrug resistant gram negative bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ceftazidime–avibactam is also active against carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae that produce Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases. Both drugs are approved for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), community acquired pneumonia (CAP) and ventilator associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP).Aim and objectivesTo evaluate the use of ceftazidime–avibactam and ceftolozane–tazobactam in a Spanish general hospital (400 beds).Material and methodsA prospective descriptive study was carried out from October 2016 to September 2020 including all patients treated with ceftazidime–avibactam and ceftolozane–tazobactam at the hospital. Variables collected were demographic (age/sex) and clinical (type of infection, microorganism isolated, duration of treatment, dose administered, prescriber clinical service and antibiotic tested in the antibiogram).Results40 patients were included and the results are shown in table 1.Abstract 4CPS-249 Table 1 Ceftazidime–avibactam Ceftolozane–tazobactam Patients (n) 24 16 Demographic variables Age (median (IQR)) (years) 68.5 (63.5–75) 67 (57.5–73.7) Sex (men) (%) 58.3 56.2 Type of infection (%) cUTIs 12.5 0 cIAIs 41.7 31.25 CAP and VABP 20.8 37.5 Bacteraemia 12.5 25 Other 12.5 6.25 Microorganisms isolated (%) 100 93.75 P aeruginosa multiresistant 20.8 68.7 K pneumoniae 70.8 0 E coli BLEE 4.2 12.5 Other 4.2 12.5 Duration of treatment (median (IQR)) (days) 11.5 (6.5–16.5) 12.5 (8–17.75) The most common dosage of ceftazidime–avibactam was 2 g every 8 hours. The prescribing clinical services were 33.3% general surgery (GS), 20.8% intensive care unit (ICU), 12.5% haematology, 8.3% oncology and 25.1% other. For ceftolozane–tazobactam, the most common dosage was 1 g every 8 hours, and the prescribing clinical services were 68.75% ICU, 12.5% internal medicine, 12.5% haematology and 6.25% GS.Both antibiotics were susceptible in 75% of patients. Clinical and microbiological resolution of the infection was 75% for ceftazidime–avibactam and 70% for ceftolozane–tazobactam. 17.5% of patients died during hospitalisation because of their clinical situation.Conclusion and relevanceBoth patient populations were demograp |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-eahpconf.81 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_bmj_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2501192522</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2501192522</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1241-da942a09d47cbe39ef71bfff0cfb4ed572cedc60a59a1f8dbacd433298faff613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kUtOw0AQRC0EElHIHYxYO5mfHQ87FPGTIoEUWI96xj1kothjbAdBVtlwAbgJB-EQOQnOh6y6pHpVvaggOKekTylPBjibllOo8ogRRiOEaWl8YfspPQo6jIhhJGUijg86Tk6DXl07TWLOUym47ARfYvQ4iZiQ69XnBNt4Fr5ggRU0zhfh7080B9NAPjgoqDF0xdRp1_gqND7XrtjC9WVo0DawdJnLcb36hjent5EQ2taN5-d-CcXGazG_N_G9xMphYTD0NlzUeBacWJjX2NvfbvB8c_00uovGD7f3o6txpCkTNMpACgZEZmJoNHKJdki1tZYYqwVm8ZAZzExCIJZAbZq17zLBOZOpBWsTyrvBxa63rPzrAutGzfyiKtqXisWEUslixlpK7Cidz1RZuRyqD0WJ2gyg_gdQmwHU_wAqpfwPYvmHSA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501192522</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>4CPS-249 Second generation β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations: ceftazidime–avibactam and ceftolozane–tazobactam experience of use</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lavandeira Pérez, M ; Martínez Ruiz, E ; Casarrubios Lázaro, G ; Mendoza Acosta, I ; Tardaguila Molina, P ; Dean Barahona, C ; Gutiérrez, Á Yuste ; Blanco Crespo, M ; Lázaro López, A ; Horta Hernández, AM</creator><creatorcontrib>Lavandeira Pérez, M ; Martínez Ruiz, E ; Casarrubios Lázaro, G ; Mendoza Acosta, I ; Tardaguila Molina, P ; Dean Barahona, C ; Gutiérrez, Á Yuste ; Blanco Crespo, M ; Lázaro López, A ; Horta Hernández, AM</creatorcontrib><description>Background and importanceCeftazidime–avibactam and ceftolozane–tazobactam are two second generation cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. The antimicrobial spectrum of activity includes multidrug resistant gram negative bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ceftazidime–avibactam is also active against carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae that produce Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases. Both drugs are approved for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), community acquired pneumonia (CAP) and ventilator associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP).Aim and objectivesTo evaluate the use of ceftazidime–avibactam and ceftolozane–tazobactam in a Spanish general hospital (400 beds).Material and methodsA prospective descriptive study was carried out from October 2016 to September 2020 including all patients treated with ceftazidime–avibactam and ceftolozane–tazobactam at the hospital. Variables collected were demographic (age/sex) and clinical (type of infection, microorganism isolated, duration of treatment, dose administered, prescriber clinical service and antibiotic tested in the antibiogram).Results40 patients were included and the results are shown in table 1.Abstract 4CPS-249 Table 1 Ceftazidime–avibactam Ceftolozane–tazobactam Patients (n) 24 16 Demographic variables Age (median (IQR)) (years) 68.5 (63.5–75) 67 (57.5–73.7) Sex (men) (%) 58.3 56.2 Type of infection (%) cUTIs 12.5 0 cIAIs 41.7 31.25 CAP and VABP 20.8 37.5 Bacteraemia 12.5 25 Other 12.5 6.25 Microorganisms isolated (%) 100 93.75 P aeruginosa multiresistant 20.8 68.7 K pneumoniae 70.8 0 E coli BLEE 4.2 12.5 Other 4.2 12.5 Duration of treatment (median (IQR)) (days) 11.5 (6.5–16.5) 12.5 (8–17.75) The most common dosage of ceftazidime–avibactam was 2 g every 8 hours. The prescribing clinical services were 33.3% general surgery (GS), 20.8% intensive care unit (ICU), 12.5% haematology, 8.3% oncology and 25.1% other. For ceftolozane–tazobactam, the most common dosage was 1 g every 8 hours, and the prescribing clinical services were 68.75% ICU, 12.5% internal medicine, 12.5% haematology and 6.25% GS.Both antibiotics were susceptible in 75% of patients. Clinical and microbiological resolution of the infection was 75% for ceftazidime–avibactam and 70% for ceftolozane–tazobactam. 17.5% of patients died during hospitalisation because of their clinical situation.Conclusion and relevanceBoth patient populations were demographically similar but the use of ceftazidime–avibactam was more frequent.cIAIs and pneumonias were the most common infections treated. Mostly, ceftazidime–avibactam was used for carbapenemase producing K pneumoniae and ceftolozane–tazobactam for P aeruginosa multiresistant.ICU and general surgery were the most experienced clinical services.Both antibiotics were tested in the antibiogram in most cases.References and/or acknowledgementsConflict of interestNo conflict of interest</description><identifier>ISSN: 2047-9956</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2047-9964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-eahpconf.81</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Antibiotics ; Conflicts of interest ; Demography ; Hematology ; Infections ; Pneumonia</subject><ispartof>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice, 2021-03, Vol.28 (Suppl 1), p.A39-A40</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2021 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lavandeira Pérez, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez Ruiz, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casarrubios Lázaro, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendoza Acosta, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tardaguila Molina, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dean Barahona, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutiérrez, Á Yuste</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanco Crespo, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lázaro López, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horta Hernández, AM</creatorcontrib><title>4CPS-249 Second generation β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations: ceftazidime–avibactam and ceftolozane–tazobactam experience of use</title><title>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</title><description>Background and importanceCeftazidime–avibactam and ceftolozane–tazobactam are two second generation cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. The antimicrobial spectrum of activity includes multidrug resistant gram negative bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ceftazidime–avibactam is also active against carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae that produce Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases. Both drugs are approved for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), community acquired pneumonia (CAP) and ventilator associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP).Aim and objectivesTo evaluate the use of ceftazidime–avibactam and ceftolozane–tazobactam in a Spanish general hospital (400 beds).Material and methodsA prospective descriptive study was carried out from October 2016 to September 2020 including all patients treated with ceftazidime–avibactam and ceftolozane–tazobactam at the hospital. Variables collected were demographic (age/sex) and clinical (type of infection, microorganism isolated, duration of treatment, dose administered, prescriber clinical service and antibiotic tested in the antibiogram).Results40 patients were included and the results are shown in table 1.Abstract 4CPS-249 Table 1 Ceftazidime–avibactam Ceftolozane–tazobactam Patients (n) 24 16 Demographic variables Age (median (IQR)) (years) 68.5 (63.5–75) 67 (57.5–73.7) Sex (men) (%) 58.3 56.2 Type of infection (%) cUTIs 12.5 0 cIAIs 41.7 31.25 CAP and VABP 20.8 37.5 Bacteraemia 12.5 25 Other 12.5 6.25 Microorganisms isolated (%) 100 93.75 P aeruginosa multiresistant 20.8 68.7 K pneumoniae 70.8 0 E coli BLEE 4.2 12.5 Other 4.2 12.5 Duration of treatment (median (IQR)) (days) 11.5 (6.5–16.5) 12.5 (8–17.75) The most common dosage of ceftazidime–avibactam was 2 g every 8 hours. The prescribing clinical services were 33.3% general surgery (GS), 20.8% intensive care unit (ICU), 12.5% haematology, 8.3% oncology and 25.1% other. For ceftolozane–tazobactam, the most common dosage was 1 g every 8 hours, and the prescribing clinical services were 68.75% ICU, 12.5% internal medicine, 12.5% haematology and 6.25% GS.Both antibiotics were susceptible in 75% of patients. Clinical and microbiological resolution of the infection was 75% for ceftazidime–avibactam and 70% for ceftolozane–tazobactam. 17.5% of patients died during hospitalisation because of their clinical situation.Conclusion and relevanceBoth patient populations were demographically similar but the use of ceftazidime–avibactam was more frequent.cIAIs and pneumonias were the most common infections treated. Mostly, ceftazidime–avibactam was used for carbapenemase producing K pneumoniae and ceftolozane–tazobactam for P aeruginosa multiresistant.ICU and general surgery were the most experienced clinical services.Both antibiotics were tested in the antibiogram in most cases.References and/or acknowledgementsConflict of interestNo conflict of interest</description><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Pneumonia</subject><issn>2047-9956</issn><issn>2047-9964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kUtOw0AQRC0EElHIHYxYO5mfHQ87FPGTIoEUWI96xj1kothjbAdBVtlwAbgJB-EQOQnOh6y6pHpVvaggOKekTylPBjibllOo8ogRRiOEaWl8YfspPQo6jIhhJGUijg86Tk6DXl07TWLOUym47ARfYvQ4iZiQ69XnBNt4Fr5ggRU0zhfh7080B9NAPjgoqDF0xdRp1_gqND7XrtjC9WVo0DawdJnLcb36hjent5EQ2taN5-d-CcXGazG_N_G9xMphYTD0NlzUeBacWJjX2NvfbvB8c_00uovGD7f3o6txpCkTNMpACgZEZmJoNHKJdki1tZYYqwVm8ZAZzExCIJZAbZq17zLBOZOpBWsTyrvBxa63rPzrAutGzfyiKtqXisWEUslixlpK7Cidz1RZuRyqD0WJ2gyg_gdQmwHU_wAqpfwPYvmHSA</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Lavandeira Pérez, M</creator><creator>Martínez Ruiz, E</creator><creator>Casarrubios Lázaro, G</creator><creator>Mendoza Acosta, I</creator><creator>Tardaguila Molina, P</creator><creator>Dean Barahona, C</creator><creator>Gutiérrez, Á Yuste</creator><creator>Blanco Crespo, M</creator><creator>Lázaro López, A</creator><creator>Horta Hernández, AM</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>4CPS-249 Second generation β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations: ceftazidime–avibactam and ceftolozane–tazobactam experience of use</title><author>Lavandeira Pérez, M ; Martínez Ruiz, E ; Casarrubios Lázaro, G ; Mendoza Acosta, I ; Tardaguila Molina, P ; Dean Barahona, C ; Gutiérrez, Á Yuste ; Blanco Crespo, M ; Lázaro López, A ; Horta Hernández, AM</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1241-da942a09d47cbe39ef71bfff0cfb4ed572cedc60a59a1f8dbacd433298faff613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Pneumonia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lavandeira Pérez, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez Ruiz, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casarrubios Lázaro, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendoza Acosta, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tardaguila Molina, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dean Barahona, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutiérrez, Á Yuste</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanco Crespo, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lázaro López, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horta Hernández, AM</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lavandeira Pérez, M</au><au>Martínez Ruiz, E</au><au>Casarrubios Lázaro, G</au><au>Mendoza Acosta, I</au><au>Tardaguila Molina, P</au><au>Dean Barahona, C</au><au>Gutiérrez, Á Yuste</au><au>Blanco Crespo, M</au><au>Lázaro López, A</au><au>Horta Hernández, AM</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>4CPS-249 Second generation β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations: ceftazidime–avibactam and ceftolozane–tazobactam experience of use</atitle><jtitle>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</jtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A39</spage><epage>A40</epage><pages>A39-A40</pages><issn>2047-9956</issn><eissn>2047-9964</eissn><abstract>Background and importanceCeftazidime–avibactam and ceftolozane–tazobactam are two second generation cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. The antimicrobial spectrum of activity includes multidrug resistant gram negative bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ceftazidime–avibactam is also active against carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae that produce Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases. Both drugs are approved for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), community acquired pneumonia (CAP) and ventilator associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP).Aim and objectivesTo evaluate the use of ceftazidime–avibactam and ceftolozane–tazobactam in a Spanish general hospital (400 beds).Material and methodsA prospective descriptive study was carried out from October 2016 to September 2020 including all patients treated with ceftazidime–avibactam and ceftolozane–tazobactam at the hospital. Variables collected were demographic (age/sex) and clinical (type of infection, microorganism isolated, duration of treatment, dose administered, prescriber clinical service and antibiotic tested in the antibiogram).Results40 patients were included and the results are shown in table 1.Abstract 4CPS-249 Table 1 Ceftazidime–avibactam Ceftolozane–tazobactam Patients (n) 24 16 Demographic variables Age (median (IQR)) (years) 68.5 (63.5–75) 67 (57.5–73.7) Sex (men) (%) 58.3 56.2 Type of infection (%) cUTIs 12.5 0 cIAIs 41.7 31.25 CAP and VABP 20.8 37.5 Bacteraemia 12.5 25 Other 12.5 6.25 Microorganisms isolated (%) 100 93.75 P aeruginosa multiresistant 20.8 68.7 K pneumoniae 70.8 0 E coli BLEE 4.2 12.5 Other 4.2 12.5 Duration of treatment (median (IQR)) (days) 11.5 (6.5–16.5) 12.5 (8–17.75) The most common dosage of ceftazidime–avibactam was 2 g every 8 hours. The prescribing clinical services were 33.3% general surgery (GS), 20.8% intensive care unit (ICU), 12.5% haematology, 8.3% oncology and 25.1% other. For ceftolozane–tazobactam, the most common dosage was 1 g every 8 hours, and the prescribing clinical services were 68.75% ICU, 12.5% internal medicine, 12.5% haematology and 6.25% GS.Both antibiotics were susceptible in 75% of patients. Clinical and microbiological resolution of the infection was 75% for ceftazidime–avibactam and 70% for ceftolozane–tazobactam. 17.5% of patients died during hospitalisation because of their clinical situation.Conclusion and relevanceBoth patient populations were demographically similar but the use of ceftazidime–avibactam was more frequent.cIAIs and pneumonias were the most common infections treated. Mostly, ceftazidime–avibactam was used for carbapenemase producing K pneumoniae and ceftolozane–tazobactam for P aeruginosa multiresistant.ICU and general surgery were the most experienced clinical services.Both antibiotics were tested in the antibiogram in most cases.References and/or acknowledgementsConflict of interestNo conflict of interest</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-eahpconf.81</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2047-9956 |
ispartof | European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice, 2021-03, Vol.28 (Suppl 1), p.A39-A40 |
issn | 2047-9956 2047-9964 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2501192522 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Antibiotics Conflicts of interest Demography Hematology Infections Pneumonia |
title | 4CPS-249 Second generation β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations: ceftazidime–avibactam and ceftolozane–tazobactam experience of use |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T12%3A16%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_bmj_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=4CPS-249%E2%80%85Second%20generation%20%CE%B2-lactam/%CE%B2-lactamase%20inhibitor%20combinations:%20ceftazidime%E2%80%93avibactam%20and%20ceftolozane%E2%80%93tazobactam%20experience%20of%20use&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20hospital%20pharmacy.%20Science%20and%20practice&rft.au=Lavandeira%20P%C3%A9rez,%20M&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A39&rft.epage=A40&rft.pages=A39-A40&rft.issn=2047-9956&rft.eissn=2047-9964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-eahpconf.81&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_bmj_p%3E2501192522%3C/proquest_bmj_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501192522&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |