Understanding the Whistle-Blowing Intention to Report Breach of Confidentiality

We examine the factors that encourage employees to whistle-blow wrongdoings in relation to confidentiality breaches. We investigate how their anticipated regret about remaining silent changes over time, how such changes influence their whistle-blowing intentions, and what employee characteristics an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Communications of the Association for Information Systems 2020-01, Vol.47 (1), p.72-94
Hauptverfasser: Li, Wanyun, Choi, Ka Wai (Stanley), Ho, Shuk Ying
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 94
container_issue 1
container_start_page 72
container_title Communications of the Association for Information Systems
container_volume 47
creator Li, Wanyun
Choi, Ka Wai (Stanley)
Ho, Shuk Ying
description We examine the factors that encourage employees to whistle-blow wrongdoings in relation to confidentiality breaches. We investigate how their anticipated regret about remaining silent changes over time, how such changes influence their whistle-blowing intentions, and what employee characteristics and organizational policies moderate this relationship. Drawing on attribution theory, we develop three hypotheses. Our experiment findings show that: 1) employees’ perceptions of the controllability and intentionality (but not stability) of the wrongdoing act affect how their anticipated regret evolves, 2) anticipated regret increases employees’ whistle-blowing intentions, 3) anticipated regret has a stronger effect on whistle-blowing intentions when organizations implement policies that promote efforts to protect information confidentiality, and 4) employees with information technology knowledge have a stronger intention to whistle-blow. Theoretically, our study extends the organization security literature’s focus to individuals’ whistle-blowing and highlights an IS research agenda around whistle-blowing in relation to confidentiality breaches. Practically, it informs organizations about how to encourage employees to whistle-blow when they observe confidentiality breaches.
doi_str_mv 10.17705/1CAIS.04704
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2500501138</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2500501138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-c6bb07dacc576b6d21c6c715a24e2c32af4a0c335341cc5c95b9ce6d04a3139a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs7f0DArVPvzWOms2wHH4VCQS0uQyaTsVPGpCYp0n9vHy5c3cPl4xz4CLlFGGFRgHzAajJ7G4EoQJyRAUpWZhzHeP4vX5KrGNcAKGTJBmSxdI0NMWnXdO6TppWlH6supt5m097_HH4zl6xLnXc0efpqNz4kOg1WmxX1La28a7vmAOi-S7trctHqPtqbvzsky6fH9-olmy-eZ9VknhkmxykzeV1D0WhjZJHXecPQ5KZAqZmwzHCmW6HBcC65wD1jSlmXxuYNCM2Rl5oPyd2pdxP899bGpNZ-G9x-UjEJIAGRj_fU_YkywccYbKs2ofvSYacQ1FGZOipTR2X8FxQGXqk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2500501138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding the Whistle-Blowing Intention to Report Breach of Confidentiality</title><source>Digital Commons Online Journals</source><creator>Li, Wanyun ; Choi, Ka Wai (Stanley) ; Ho, Shuk Ying</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Wanyun ; Choi, Ka Wai (Stanley) ; Ho, Shuk Ying ; The Australian National University</creatorcontrib><description>We examine the factors that encourage employees to whistle-blow wrongdoings in relation to confidentiality breaches. We investigate how their anticipated regret about remaining silent changes over time, how such changes influence their whistle-blowing intentions, and what employee characteristics and organizational policies moderate this relationship. Drawing on attribution theory, we develop three hypotheses. Our experiment findings show that: 1) employees’ perceptions of the controllability and intentionality (but not stability) of the wrongdoing act affect how their anticipated regret evolves, 2) anticipated regret increases employees’ whistle-blowing intentions, 3) anticipated regret has a stronger effect on whistle-blowing intentions when organizations implement policies that promote efforts to protect information confidentiality, and 4) employees with information technology knowledge have a stronger intention to whistle-blow. Theoretically, our study extends the organization security literature’s focus to individuals’ whistle-blowing and highlights an IS research agenda around whistle-blowing in relation to confidentiality breaches. Practically, it informs organizations about how to encourage employees to whistle-blow when they observe confidentiality breaches.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1529-3181</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-3181</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17705/1CAIS.04704</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Atlanta: Association for Information Systems</publisher><subject>Blowing time ; Confidentiality ; Control stability ; Controllability ; Employees ; Organizational policy ; Organizations ; Whistleblowing</subject><ispartof>Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2020-01, Vol.47 (1), p.72-94</ispartof><rights>Copyright Association for Information Systems 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Wanyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Ka Wai (Stanley)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Shuk Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Australian National University</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding the Whistle-Blowing Intention to Report Breach of Confidentiality</title><title>Communications of the Association for Information Systems</title><description>We examine the factors that encourage employees to whistle-blow wrongdoings in relation to confidentiality breaches. We investigate how their anticipated regret about remaining silent changes over time, how such changes influence their whistle-blowing intentions, and what employee characteristics and organizational policies moderate this relationship. Drawing on attribution theory, we develop three hypotheses. Our experiment findings show that: 1) employees’ perceptions of the controllability and intentionality (but not stability) of the wrongdoing act affect how their anticipated regret evolves, 2) anticipated regret increases employees’ whistle-blowing intentions, 3) anticipated regret has a stronger effect on whistle-blowing intentions when organizations implement policies that promote efforts to protect information confidentiality, and 4) employees with information technology knowledge have a stronger intention to whistle-blow. Theoretically, our study extends the organization security literature’s focus to individuals’ whistle-blowing and highlights an IS research agenda around whistle-blowing in relation to confidentiality breaches. Practically, it informs organizations about how to encourage employees to whistle-blow when they observe confidentiality breaches.</description><subject>Blowing time</subject><subject>Confidentiality</subject><subject>Control stability</subject><subject>Controllability</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Organizational policy</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Whistleblowing</subject><issn>1529-3181</issn><issn>1529-3181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs7f0DArVPvzWOms2wHH4VCQS0uQyaTsVPGpCYp0n9vHy5c3cPl4xz4CLlFGGFRgHzAajJ7G4EoQJyRAUpWZhzHeP4vX5KrGNcAKGTJBmSxdI0NMWnXdO6TppWlH6supt5m097_HH4zl6xLnXc0efpqNz4kOg1WmxX1La28a7vmAOi-S7trctHqPtqbvzsky6fH9-olmy-eZ9VknhkmxykzeV1D0WhjZJHXecPQ5KZAqZmwzHCmW6HBcC65wD1jSlmXxuYNCM2Rl5oPyd2pdxP899bGpNZ-G9x-UjEJIAGRj_fU_YkywccYbKs2ofvSYacQ1FGZOipTR2X8FxQGXqk</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Li, Wanyun</creator><creator>Choi, Ka Wai (Stanley)</creator><creator>Ho, Shuk Ying</creator><general>Association for Information Systems</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Understanding the Whistle-Blowing Intention to Report Breach of Confidentiality</title><author>Li, Wanyun ; Choi, Ka Wai (Stanley) ; Ho, Shuk Ying</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-c6bb07dacc576b6d21c6c715a24e2c32af4a0c335341cc5c95b9ce6d04a3139a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Blowing time</topic><topic>Confidentiality</topic><topic>Control stability</topic><topic>Controllability</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Organizational policy</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Whistleblowing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Wanyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Ka Wai (Stanley)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Shuk Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Australian National University</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Communications of the Association for Information Systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Wanyun</au><au>Choi, Ka Wai (Stanley)</au><au>Ho, Shuk Ying</au><aucorp>The Australian National University</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding the Whistle-Blowing Intention to Report Breach of Confidentiality</atitle><jtitle>Communications of the Association for Information Systems</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>72</spage><epage>94</epage><pages>72-94</pages><issn>1529-3181</issn><eissn>1529-3181</eissn><abstract>We examine the factors that encourage employees to whistle-blow wrongdoings in relation to confidentiality breaches. We investigate how their anticipated regret about remaining silent changes over time, how such changes influence their whistle-blowing intentions, and what employee characteristics and organizational policies moderate this relationship. Drawing on attribution theory, we develop three hypotheses. Our experiment findings show that: 1) employees’ perceptions of the controllability and intentionality (but not stability) of the wrongdoing act affect how their anticipated regret evolves, 2) anticipated regret increases employees’ whistle-blowing intentions, 3) anticipated regret has a stronger effect on whistle-blowing intentions when organizations implement policies that promote efforts to protect information confidentiality, and 4) employees with information technology knowledge have a stronger intention to whistle-blow. Theoretically, our study extends the organization security literature’s focus to individuals’ whistle-blowing and highlights an IS research agenda around whistle-blowing in relation to confidentiality breaches. Practically, it informs organizations about how to encourage employees to whistle-blow when they observe confidentiality breaches.</abstract><cop>Atlanta</cop><pub>Association for Information Systems</pub><doi>10.17705/1CAIS.04704</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1529-3181
ispartof Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2020-01, Vol.47 (1), p.72-94
issn 1529-3181
1529-3181
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2500501138
source Digital Commons Online Journals
subjects Blowing time
Confidentiality
Control stability
Controllability
Employees
Organizational policy
Organizations
Whistleblowing
title Understanding the Whistle-Blowing Intention to Report Breach of Confidentiality
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T12%3A55%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20the%20Whistle-Blowing%20Intention%20to%20Report%20Breach%20of%20Confidentiality&rft.jtitle=Communications%20of%20the%20Association%20for%20Information%20Systems&rft.au=Li,%20Wanyun&rft.aucorp=The%20Australian%20National%20University&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=72&rft.epage=94&rft.pages=72-94&rft.issn=1529-3181&rft.eissn=1529-3181&rft_id=info:doi/10.17705/1CAIS.04704&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2500501138%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2500501138&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true