Affective polarization in multiparty systems

Affective polarization captures the extent to which citizens feel sympathy towards partisan in-groups and antagonism towards partisan out-groups. This is comparatively easy to assess in two-party systems, but capturing the pattern of affect towards multiple parties is more complex in multiparty syst...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Electoral studies 2021-02, Vol.69, p.102199, Article 102199
1. Verfasser: Wagner, Markus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 102199
container_title Electoral studies
container_volume 69
creator Wagner, Markus
description Affective polarization captures the extent to which citizens feel sympathy towards partisan in-groups and antagonism towards partisan out-groups. This is comparatively easy to assess in two-party systems, but capturing the pattern of affect towards multiple parties is more complex in multiparty systems. This article first discusses these challenges and then presents different ways of measuring individual-level affective polarization using like-dislike scores, a widespread measure of party sympathy. Using data for 51 countries and 166 elections from five modules of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, I then show that affective polarization adds to existing concepts as a way of understanding political participation and democratic orientations. Studying affective polarization outside the US could therefore have important consequences for our understanding of citizen perceptions of politics as well as citizen behaviour, but we need the appropriate measures to do so.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102199
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2500408919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0261379420300822</els_id><sourcerecordid>2500408919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-56e5758c601657da560dfcd7c9ba4d6ae5282878e878dfab40ce7065174ddb3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-Bgte7Zqkzb_jsugqLHjRc8gmU0jptjVJF9ZPb5aKVw_DwPDem5kfQvcErwgm_KldQQc2xTS5FcX0PKVEqQu0IFJUJZcKX6IFppyUlVD1NbqJscWYUKXIAj2umya7_RGKcehM8N8m-aEvfF8cpi750YR0KuIpJjjEW3TVmC7C3W9fos-X54_Na7l7375t1rvSVoqmknFggknL83lMOMM4do11wqq9qR03wKikUkjI5Rqzr7EFgTkjonZuX5lqiR7m3DEMXxPEpNthCn1eqSnDuMZSEZVVYlbZMMQYoNFj8AcTTppgfUajW_2HRp_R6BlNdq5nJ-Qnjh6CjtZDb8H5kPXaDf7fjB_RPHDy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2500408919</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Affective polarization in multiparty systems</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Wagner, Markus</creator><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Markus</creatorcontrib><description>Affective polarization captures the extent to which citizens feel sympathy towards partisan in-groups and antagonism towards partisan out-groups. This is comparatively easy to assess in two-party systems, but capturing the pattern of affect towards multiple parties is more complex in multiparty systems. This article first discusses these challenges and then presents different ways of measuring individual-level affective polarization using like-dislike scores, a widespread measure of party sympathy. Using data for 51 countries and 166 elections from five modules of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, I then show that affective polarization adds to existing concepts as a way of understanding political participation and democratic orientations. Studying affective polarization outside the US could therefore have important consequences for our understanding of citizen perceptions of politics as well as citizen behaviour, but we need the appropriate measures to do so.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-3794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6890</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102199</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Affective polarization ; Citizens ; Comparative studies ; Elections ; Electoral systems ; Group identity ; Hostility ; Ideological polarization ; Individual differences ; Multiparty system ; Negative partisanship ; Partisanship ; Polarization ; Political participation ; Political parties ; Politics ; Sympathy ; Two-party systems</subject><ispartof>Electoral studies, 2021-02, Vol.69, p.102199, Article 102199</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Feb 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-56e5758c601657da560dfcd7c9ba4d6ae5282878e878dfab40ce7065174ddb3a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-56e5758c601657da560dfcd7c9ba4d6ae5282878e878dfab40ce7065174ddb3a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102199$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Markus</creatorcontrib><title>Affective polarization in multiparty systems</title><title>Electoral studies</title><description>Affective polarization captures the extent to which citizens feel sympathy towards partisan in-groups and antagonism towards partisan out-groups. This is comparatively easy to assess in two-party systems, but capturing the pattern of affect towards multiple parties is more complex in multiparty systems. This article first discusses these challenges and then presents different ways of measuring individual-level affective polarization using like-dislike scores, a widespread measure of party sympathy. Using data for 51 countries and 166 elections from five modules of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, I then show that affective polarization adds to existing concepts as a way of understanding political participation and democratic orientations. Studying affective polarization outside the US could therefore have important consequences for our understanding of citizen perceptions of politics as well as citizen behaviour, but we need the appropriate measures to do so.</description><subject>Affective polarization</subject><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Electoral systems</subject><subject>Group identity</subject><subject>Hostility</subject><subject>Ideological polarization</subject><subject>Individual differences</subject><subject>Multiparty system</subject><subject>Negative partisanship</subject><subject>Partisanship</subject><subject>Polarization</subject><subject>Political participation</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Sympathy</subject><subject>Two-party systems</subject><issn>0261-3794</issn><issn>1873-6890</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-Bgte7Zqkzb_jsugqLHjRc8gmU0jptjVJF9ZPb5aKVw_DwPDem5kfQvcErwgm_KldQQc2xTS5FcX0PKVEqQu0IFJUJZcKX6IFppyUlVD1NbqJscWYUKXIAj2umya7_RGKcehM8N8m-aEvfF8cpi750YR0KuIpJjjEW3TVmC7C3W9fos-X54_Na7l7375t1rvSVoqmknFggknL83lMOMM4do11wqq9qR03wKikUkjI5Rqzr7EFgTkjonZuX5lqiR7m3DEMXxPEpNthCn1eqSnDuMZSEZVVYlbZMMQYoNFj8AcTTppgfUajW_2HRp_R6BlNdq5nJ-Qnjh6CjtZDb8H5kPXaDf7fjB_RPHDy</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Wagner, Markus</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Affective polarization in multiparty systems</title><author>Wagner, Markus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-56e5758c601657da560dfcd7c9ba4d6ae5282878e878dfab40ce7065174ddb3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Affective polarization</topic><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Electoral systems</topic><topic>Group identity</topic><topic>Hostility</topic><topic>Ideological polarization</topic><topic>Individual differences</topic><topic>Multiparty system</topic><topic>Negative partisanship</topic><topic>Partisanship</topic><topic>Polarization</topic><topic>Political participation</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Sympathy</topic><topic>Two-party systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Markus</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Electoral studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wagner, Markus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Affective polarization in multiparty systems</atitle><jtitle>Electoral studies</jtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>69</volume><spage>102199</spage><pages>102199-</pages><artnum>102199</artnum><issn>0261-3794</issn><eissn>1873-6890</eissn><abstract>Affective polarization captures the extent to which citizens feel sympathy towards partisan in-groups and antagonism towards partisan out-groups. This is comparatively easy to assess in two-party systems, but capturing the pattern of affect towards multiple parties is more complex in multiparty systems. This article first discusses these challenges and then presents different ways of measuring individual-level affective polarization using like-dislike scores, a widespread measure of party sympathy. Using data for 51 countries and 166 elections from five modules of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, I then show that affective polarization adds to existing concepts as a way of understanding political participation and democratic orientations. Studying affective polarization outside the US could therefore have important consequences for our understanding of citizen perceptions of politics as well as citizen behaviour, but we need the appropriate measures to do so.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102199</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0261-3794
ispartof Electoral studies, 2021-02, Vol.69, p.102199, Article 102199
issn 0261-3794
1873-6890
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2500408919
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Affective polarization
Citizens
Comparative studies
Elections
Electoral systems
Group identity
Hostility
Ideological polarization
Individual differences
Multiparty system
Negative partisanship
Partisanship
Polarization
Political participation
Political parties
Politics
Sympathy
Two-party systems
title Affective polarization in multiparty systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T18%3A33%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Affective%20polarization%20in%20multiparty%20systems&rft.jtitle=Electoral%20studies&rft.au=Wagner,%20Markus&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=69&rft.spage=102199&rft.pages=102199-&rft.artnum=102199&rft.issn=0261-3794&rft.eissn=1873-6890&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102199&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2500408919%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2500408919&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0261379420300822&rfr_iscdi=true