Affective polarization in multiparty systems
Affective polarization captures the extent to which citizens feel sympathy towards partisan in-groups and antagonism towards partisan out-groups. This is comparatively easy to assess in two-party systems, but capturing the pattern of affect towards multiple parties is more complex in multiparty syst...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Electoral studies 2021-02, Vol.69, p.102199, Article 102199 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 102199 |
container_title | Electoral studies |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Wagner, Markus |
description | Affective polarization captures the extent to which citizens feel sympathy towards partisan in-groups and antagonism towards partisan out-groups. This is comparatively easy to assess in two-party systems, but capturing the pattern of affect towards multiple parties is more complex in multiparty systems. This article first discusses these challenges and then presents different ways of measuring individual-level affective polarization using like-dislike scores, a widespread measure of party sympathy. Using data for 51 countries and 166 elections from five modules of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, I then show that affective polarization adds to existing concepts as a way of understanding political participation and democratic orientations. Studying affective polarization outside the US could therefore have important consequences for our understanding of citizen perceptions of politics as well as citizen behaviour, but we need the appropriate measures to do so. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102199 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2500408919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0261379420300822</els_id><sourcerecordid>2500408919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-56e5758c601657da560dfcd7c9ba4d6ae5282878e878dfab40ce7065174ddb3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-Bgte7Zqkzb_jsugqLHjRc8gmU0jptjVJF9ZPb5aKVw_DwPDem5kfQvcErwgm_KldQQc2xTS5FcX0PKVEqQu0IFJUJZcKX6IFppyUlVD1NbqJscWYUKXIAj2umya7_RGKcehM8N8m-aEvfF8cpi750YR0KuIpJjjEW3TVmC7C3W9fos-X54_Na7l7375t1rvSVoqmknFggknL83lMOMM4do11wqq9qR03wKikUkjI5Rqzr7EFgTkjonZuX5lqiR7m3DEMXxPEpNthCn1eqSnDuMZSEZVVYlbZMMQYoNFj8AcTTppgfUajW_2HRp_R6BlNdq5nJ-Qnjh6CjtZDb8H5kPXaDf7fjB_RPHDy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2500408919</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Affective polarization in multiparty systems</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Wagner, Markus</creator><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Markus</creatorcontrib><description>Affective polarization captures the extent to which citizens feel sympathy towards partisan in-groups and antagonism towards partisan out-groups. This is comparatively easy to assess in two-party systems, but capturing the pattern of affect towards multiple parties is more complex in multiparty systems. This article first discusses these challenges and then presents different ways of measuring individual-level affective polarization using like-dislike scores, a widespread measure of party sympathy. Using data for 51 countries and 166 elections from five modules of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, I then show that affective polarization adds to existing concepts as a way of understanding political participation and democratic orientations. Studying affective polarization outside the US could therefore have important consequences for our understanding of citizen perceptions of politics as well as citizen behaviour, but we need the appropriate measures to do so.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-3794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6890</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102199</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Affective polarization ; Citizens ; Comparative studies ; Elections ; Electoral systems ; Group identity ; Hostility ; Ideological polarization ; Individual differences ; Multiparty system ; Negative partisanship ; Partisanship ; Polarization ; Political participation ; Political parties ; Politics ; Sympathy ; Two-party systems</subject><ispartof>Electoral studies, 2021-02, Vol.69, p.102199, Article 102199</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Feb 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-56e5758c601657da560dfcd7c9ba4d6ae5282878e878dfab40ce7065174ddb3a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-56e5758c601657da560dfcd7c9ba4d6ae5282878e878dfab40ce7065174ddb3a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102199$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Markus</creatorcontrib><title>Affective polarization in multiparty systems</title><title>Electoral studies</title><description>Affective polarization captures the extent to which citizens feel sympathy towards partisan in-groups and antagonism towards partisan out-groups. This is comparatively easy to assess in two-party systems, but capturing the pattern of affect towards multiple parties is more complex in multiparty systems. This article first discusses these challenges and then presents different ways of measuring individual-level affective polarization using like-dislike scores, a widespread measure of party sympathy. Using data for 51 countries and 166 elections from five modules of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, I then show that affective polarization adds to existing concepts as a way of understanding political participation and democratic orientations. Studying affective polarization outside the US could therefore have important consequences for our understanding of citizen perceptions of politics as well as citizen behaviour, but we need the appropriate measures to do so.</description><subject>Affective polarization</subject><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Electoral systems</subject><subject>Group identity</subject><subject>Hostility</subject><subject>Ideological polarization</subject><subject>Individual differences</subject><subject>Multiparty system</subject><subject>Negative partisanship</subject><subject>Partisanship</subject><subject>Polarization</subject><subject>Political participation</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Sympathy</subject><subject>Two-party systems</subject><issn>0261-3794</issn><issn>1873-6890</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-Bgte7Zqkzb_jsugqLHjRc8gmU0jptjVJF9ZPb5aKVw_DwPDem5kfQvcErwgm_KldQQc2xTS5FcX0PKVEqQu0IFJUJZcKX6IFppyUlVD1NbqJscWYUKXIAj2umya7_RGKcehM8N8m-aEvfF8cpi750YR0KuIpJjjEW3TVmC7C3W9fos-X54_Na7l7375t1rvSVoqmknFggknL83lMOMM4do11wqq9qR03wKikUkjI5Rqzr7EFgTkjonZuX5lqiR7m3DEMXxPEpNthCn1eqSnDuMZSEZVVYlbZMMQYoNFj8AcTTppgfUajW_2HRp_R6BlNdq5nJ-Qnjh6CjtZDb8H5kPXaDf7fjB_RPHDy</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Wagner, Markus</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Affective polarization in multiparty systems</title><author>Wagner, Markus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-56e5758c601657da560dfcd7c9ba4d6ae5282878e878dfab40ce7065174ddb3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Affective polarization</topic><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Electoral systems</topic><topic>Group identity</topic><topic>Hostility</topic><topic>Ideological polarization</topic><topic>Individual differences</topic><topic>Multiparty system</topic><topic>Negative partisanship</topic><topic>Partisanship</topic><topic>Polarization</topic><topic>Political participation</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Sympathy</topic><topic>Two-party systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Markus</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Electoral studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wagner, Markus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Affective polarization in multiparty systems</atitle><jtitle>Electoral studies</jtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>69</volume><spage>102199</spage><pages>102199-</pages><artnum>102199</artnum><issn>0261-3794</issn><eissn>1873-6890</eissn><abstract>Affective polarization captures the extent to which citizens feel sympathy towards partisan in-groups and antagonism towards partisan out-groups. This is comparatively easy to assess in two-party systems, but capturing the pattern of affect towards multiple parties is more complex in multiparty systems. This article first discusses these challenges and then presents different ways of measuring individual-level affective polarization using like-dislike scores, a widespread measure of party sympathy. Using data for 51 countries and 166 elections from five modules of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, I then show that affective polarization adds to existing concepts as a way of understanding political participation and democratic orientations. Studying affective polarization outside the US could therefore have important consequences for our understanding of citizen perceptions of politics as well as citizen behaviour, but we need the appropriate measures to do so.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102199</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0261-3794 |
ispartof | Electoral studies, 2021-02, Vol.69, p.102199, Article 102199 |
issn | 0261-3794 1873-6890 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2500408919 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Affective polarization Citizens Comparative studies Elections Electoral systems Group identity Hostility Ideological polarization Individual differences Multiparty system Negative partisanship Partisanship Polarization Political participation Political parties Politics Sympathy Two-party systems |
title | Affective polarization in multiparty systems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T18%3A33%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Affective%20polarization%20in%20multiparty%20systems&rft.jtitle=Electoral%20studies&rft.au=Wagner,%20Markus&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=69&rft.spage=102199&rft.pages=102199-&rft.artnum=102199&rft.issn=0261-3794&rft.eissn=1873-6890&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102199&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2500408919%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2500408919&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0261379420300822&rfr_iscdi=true |