Still in Search of Learning Organization?: Towards a Radical Account of "The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization"
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the inherent problem of Senge's learning organization, embedded in his seminal work, "The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization." The authors contend that such a problem has an enduring quality that leads t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The learning organization 2020-01, Vol.27 (1), p.31-41 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 41 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 31 |
container_title | The learning organization |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Hsu, Shih-Wei Lamb, Peter |
description | Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the inherent problem of Senge's learning organization, embedded in his seminal work, "The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization." The authors contend that such a problem has an enduring quality that leads to a highly problematic state of learning organization, and a radical shift in the understanding is necessary. Design/methodology/approach: This paper is based on a critical review of relevant literature in the areas of learning organization. Some of Senge's own works will also be reviewed. Findings: This paper contends that Senge's project of learning organization is a managerial attempt to remove bureaucracy and, as such, the concept of learning has been displaced from the outset. Hence, the theory of learning organization offers a weak response to the pressing issues such as climate and global warming. While some of Senge's other works seem to show an awareness of the necessity of new managerial visions, the authors argue that what is required is a scrutiny of the belief that corporations are able to achieve a wider social and ecological goal. Originality/value: This paper offers a radical account of Senge's concept of learning organization, including Senge's dialogue with Nan Huai-Jin, published in Chinese. The authors question the mysterious state of learning in Senge's learning organization and offer a possible new account of learning organization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/TLO-09-2019-0142 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2499042604</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1247627</ericid><sourcerecordid>2499042604</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-cb6531bb1237b720b559d6888f1f750bb14c2fc56fc7f1a5b3dbc54ade70878a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEFrGzEQhUVpoa6bey4BkZ43GWml1SqXYFw7STE4xM5ZaLWSrbDRulqZ0v6L_uNocekppxnevDcPPoTOCVwRAvX1drUuQBYUiCyAMPoBTYjgdSEk8I9oArKSRcUE-4y-DMMLABDKyQT93STfddgHvLE6mj3uHV7lLfiww-u408H_0cn34fYGb_tfOrYD1vhJt97oDs-M6Y8hjaHL7d7ipXdpj7_7wfhD54PNmazOYsI6tPgxapO8saM9Zf3dnsuv6JPT3WDP_s0pel4utvP7YrW-e5jPVoWhrEqFaSpekqYhtBSNoNBwLtuqrmtHnOCQD8xQZ3jljHBE86ZsG8OZbq2AWtS6nKJvp7-H2P882iGpl_4YQ65UlEkJjFbAsgtOLhP7YYjWqUP0rzr-VgTUCF5l8AqkGsGrEXyOXJwiNnrz3774QSgTFRXlG4BBf7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2499042604</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Still in Search of Learning Organization?: Towards a Radical Account of "The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization"</title><source>Emerald Complete Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Hsu, Shih-Wei ; Lamb, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Shih-Wei ; Lamb, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the inherent problem of Senge's learning organization, embedded in his seminal work, "The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization." The authors contend that such a problem has an enduring quality that leads to a highly problematic state of learning organization, and a radical shift in the understanding is necessary. Design/methodology/approach: This paper is based on a critical review of relevant literature in the areas of learning organization. Some of Senge's own works will also be reviewed. Findings: This paper contends that Senge's project of learning organization is a managerial attempt to remove bureaucracy and, as such, the concept of learning has been displaced from the outset. Hence, the theory of learning organization offers a weak response to the pressing issues such as climate and global warming. While some of Senge's other works seem to show an awareness of the necessity of new managerial visions, the authors argue that what is required is a scrutiny of the belief that corporations are able to achieve a wider social and ecological goal. Originality/value: This paper offers a radical account of Senge's concept of learning organization, including Senge's dialogue with Nan Huai-Jin, published in Chinese. The authors question the mysterious state of learning in Senge's learning organization and offer a possible new account of learning organization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-6474</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/TLO-09-2019-0142</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Administrative Organization ; Bureaucracy ; Climate ; Criticism ; Ecology ; Knowledge ; Learning ; Learning Theories ; Objectives ; Ontology ; Organizational Culture ; Organizational learning ; Organizational structure ; Organizational Theories</subject><ispartof>The learning organization, 2020-01, Vol.27 (1), p.31-41</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-cb6531bb1237b720b559d6888f1f750bb14c2fc56fc7f1a5b3dbc54ade70878a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,21695,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1247627$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Shih-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamb, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Still in Search of Learning Organization?: Towards a Radical Account of "The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization"</title><title>The learning organization</title><description>Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the inherent problem of Senge's learning organization, embedded in his seminal work, "The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization." The authors contend that such a problem has an enduring quality that leads to a highly problematic state of learning organization, and a radical shift in the understanding is necessary. Design/methodology/approach: This paper is based on a critical review of relevant literature in the areas of learning organization. Some of Senge's own works will also be reviewed. Findings: This paper contends that Senge's project of learning organization is a managerial attempt to remove bureaucracy and, as such, the concept of learning has been displaced from the outset. Hence, the theory of learning organization offers a weak response to the pressing issues such as climate and global warming. While some of Senge's other works seem to show an awareness of the necessity of new managerial visions, the authors argue that what is required is a scrutiny of the belief that corporations are able to achieve a wider social and ecological goal. Originality/value: This paper offers a radical account of Senge's concept of learning organization, including Senge's dialogue with Nan Huai-Jin, published in Chinese. The authors question the mysterious state of learning in Senge's learning organization and offer a possible new account of learning organization.</description><subject>Administrative Organization</subject><subject>Bureaucracy</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Theories</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Organizational Culture</subject><subject>Organizational learning</subject><subject>Organizational structure</subject><subject>Organizational Theories</subject><issn>0969-6474</issn><issn>1758-7905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkEFrGzEQhUVpoa6bey4BkZ43GWml1SqXYFw7STE4xM5ZaLWSrbDRulqZ0v6L_uNocekppxnevDcPPoTOCVwRAvX1drUuQBYUiCyAMPoBTYjgdSEk8I9oArKSRcUE-4y-DMMLABDKyQT93STfddgHvLE6mj3uHV7lLfiww-u408H_0cn34fYGb_tfOrYD1vhJt97oDs-M6Y8hjaHL7d7ipXdpj7_7wfhD54PNmazOYsI6tPgxapO8saM9Zf3dnsuv6JPT3WDP_s0pel4utvP7YrW-e5jPVoWhrEqFaSpekqYhtBSNoNBwLtuqrmtHnOCQD8xQZ3jljHBE86ZsG8OZbq2AWtS6nKJvp7-H2P882iGpl_4YQ65UlEkJjFbAsgtOLhP7YYjWqUP0rzr-VgTUCF5l8AqkGsGrEXyOXJwiNnrz3774QSgTFRXlG4BBf7A</recordid><startdate>20200102</startdate><enddate>20200102</enddate><creator>Hsu, Shih-Wei</creator><creator>Lamb, Peter</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200102</creationdate><title>Still in Search of Learning Organization?: Towards a Radical Account of "The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization"</title><author>Hsu, Shih-Wei ; Lamb, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-cb6531bb1237b720b559d6888f1f750bb14c2fc56fc7f1a5b3dbc54ade70878a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Administrative Organization</topic><topic>Bureaucracy</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Theories</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Organizational Culture</topic><topic>Organizational learning</topic><topic>Organizational structure</topic><topic>Organizational Theories</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Shih-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamb, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The learning organization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hsu, Shih-Wei</au><au>Lamb, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1247627</ericid><atitle>Still in Search of Learning Organization?: Towards a Radical Account of "The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization"</atitle><jtitle>The learning organization</jtitle><date>2020-01-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>31-41</pages><issn>0969-6474</issn><eissn>1758-7905</eissn><abstract>Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the inherent problem of Senge's learning organization, embedded in his seminal work, "The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization." The authors contend that such a problem has an enduring quality that leads to a highly problematic state of learning organization, and a radical shift in the understanding is necessary. Design/methodology/approach: This paper is based on a critical review of relevant literature in the areas of learning organization. Some of Senge's own works will also be reviewed. Findings: This paper contends that Senge's project of learning organization is a managerial attempt to remove bureaucracy and, as such, the concept of learning has been displaced from the outset. Hence, the theory of learning organization offers a weak response to the pressing issues such as climate and global warming. While some of Senge's other works seem to show an awareness of the necessity of new managerial visions, the authors argue that what is required is a scrutiny of the belief that corporations are able to achieve a wider social and ecological goal. Originality/value: This paper offers a radical account of Senge's concept of learning organization, including Senge's dialogue with Nan Huai-Jin, published in Chinese. The authors question the mysterious state of learning in Senge's learning organization and offer a possible new account of learning organization.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/TLO-09-2019-0142</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0969-6474 |
ispartof | The learning organization, 2020-01, Vol.27 (1), p.31-41 |
issn | 0969-6474 1758-7905 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2499042604 |
source | Emerald Complete Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection |
subjects | Administrative Organization Bureaucracy Climate Criticism Ecology Knowledge Learning Learning Theories Objectives Ontology Organizational Culture Organizational learning Organizational structure Organizational Theories |
title | Still in Search of Learning Organization?: Towards a Radical Account of "The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization" |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T09%3A27%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Still%20in%20Search%20of%20Learning%20Organization?:%20Towards%20a%20Radical%20Account%20of%20%22The%20Fifth%20Discipline:%20The%20Art%20and%20Practice%20of%20the%20Learning%20Organization%22&rft.jtitle=The%20learning%20organization&rft.au=Hsu,%20Shih-Wei&rft.date=2020-01-02&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=31-41&rft.issn=0969-6474&rft.eissn=1758-7905&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/TLO-09-2019-0142&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2499042604%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2499042604&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1247627&rfr_iscdi=true |