New flight trajectory optimisation method using genetic algorithms

This paper presents a new flight trajectory optimisation method, based on genetic algorithms, where the selected optimisation criterion is the minimisation of the total cost. The candidate flight trajectories evaluated in the optimisation process are defined as flight plans with two components: a la...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aeronautical journal 2021-04, Vol.125 (1286), p.618-671
Hauptverfasser: Dancila, R.I., Botez, R.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 671
container_issue 1286
container_start_page 618
container_title Aeronautical journal
container_volume 125
creator Dancila, R.I.
Botez, R.M.
description This paper presents a new flight trajectory optimisation method, based on genetic algorithms, where the selected optimisation criterion is the minimisation of the total cost. The candidate flight trajectories evaluated in the optimisation process are defined as flight plans with two components: a lateral flight plan (the set of geographic points that define the flight trajectory track segments) and a vertical flight plan (the set of data that define the altitude and speed profiles, as well as the points where the altitude and/or speed changes occur). The lateral components of the candidate flight plans are constructed by selecting a set of adjacent nodes from a routing grid. The routing grid nodes are generated based on the orthodromic route between the flight trajectory’s initial and final points, a selected maximum lateral deviation from the orthodromic route and a selected grid node step size along and across the orthodromic route. Two strategies are investigated to handle invalid flight plans (relative to the aircraft’s flight envelope) and to compute their flight performance parameters. A first strategy is to assign a large penalty total cost to invalid flight profiles. The second strategy is to adjust the invalid flight plan parameters (altitude and/or speed) to the nearest limit of the flight envelope, with priority being given to maintaining the planned altitude. The tests performed in this study show that the second strategy is computationally expensive (requiring more than twice the execution time relative to the first strategy) and yields less optimal solutions. The performance of the optimal profiles identified by the proposed optimisation method, using the two strategies regarding invalid flight profile performance evaluation, were compared with the performance data of a reference flight profile, using identical input data: initial aircraft weight, initial and final aircraft geographic positions, altitudes and speed, cost index, and atmospheric data. The initial and final aircraft geographic positions, and the reference flight profile data, were retrieved from the FlightAware web site. This data corresponds to a real flight performed with the aircraft model used in this study. Tests were performed for six Cost Index values. Given the randomness of the genetic algorithms, the convergence to a global optimal solution is not guaranteed (the solution may be non-optimal or a local optima). For a better evaluation of the performance of the proposed
doi_str_mv 10.1017/aer.2020.138
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2498890162</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_aer_2020_138</cupid><sourcerecordid>2498890162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-79913b5c039a158b7ac2508d53174335d7dfac97456182a799301480abbc97b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs3f8CCV7dOvjaboxarQtGLnkM2m92mdDc1SZH-e1Na8OJpmOGZ94UHoVsMMwxYPGgbZgRI3mh9hiYEuCwrVrFzNAEAXErC4BJdxbgGoEAYm6Cnd_tTdBvXr1KRgl5bk3zYF36b3OCiTs6PxWDTyrfFLrqxL3o72uRMoTe9Dy6thniNLjq9ifbmNKfoa_H8OX8tlx8vb_PHZWlyVyqFlJg23ACVGvO6EdoQDnXLKRaMUt6KttNGCsYrXBOdcQqY1aCbJl8bQafo7pi7Df57Z2NSa78LY65UhMm6loArkqn7I2WCjzHYTm2DG3TYKwzqYEllS-pgSWVLGZ-dcD00wbW9_Uv99-EXNCporQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2498890162</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New flight trajectory optimisation method using genetic algorithms</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><creator>Dancila, R.I. ; Botez, R.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dancila, R.I. ; Botez, R.M.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents a new flight trajectory optimisation method, based on genetic algorithms, where the selected optimisation criterion is the minimisation of the total cost. The candidate flight trajectories evaluated in the optimisation process are defined as flight plans with two components: a lateral flight plan (the set of geographic points that define the flight trajectory track segments) and a vertical flight plan (the set of data that define the altitude and speed profiles, as well as the points where the altitude and/or speed changes occur). The lateral components of the candidate flight plans are constructed by selecting a set of adjacent nodes from a routing grid. The routing grid nodes are generated based on the orthodromic route between the flight trajectory’s initial and final points, a selected maximum lateral deviation from the orthodromic route and a selected grid node step size along and across the orthodromic route. Two strategies are investigated to handle invalid flight plans (relative to the aircraft’s flight envelope) and to compute their flight performance parameters. A first strategy is to assign a large penalty total cost to invalid flight profiles. The second strategy is to adjust the invalid flight plan parameters (altitude and/or speed) to the nearest limit of the flight envelope, with priority being given to maintaining the planned altitude. The tests performed in this study show that the second strategy is computationally expensive (requiring more than twice the execution time relative to the first strategy) and yields less optimal solutions. The performance of the optimal profiles identified by the proposed optimisation method, using the two strategies regarding invalid flight profile performance evaluation, were compared with the performance data of a reference flight profile, using identical input data: initial aircraft weight, initial and final aircraft geographic positions, altitudes and speed, cost index, and atmospheric data. The initial and final aircraft geographic positions, and the reference flight profile data, were retrieved from the FlightAware web site. This data corresponds to a real flight performed with the aircraft model used in this study. Tests were performed for six Cost Index values. Given the randomness of the genetic algorithms, the convergence to a global optimal solution is not guaranteed (the solution may be non-optimal or a local optima). For a better evaluation of the performance of the proposed method, ten test runs were performed for each Cost Index value. The total cost reduction for the optimal flight plans obtained using the proposed method, relative to the reference flight plan, was between 0.822% and 3.042% for the cases when the invalid flight profiles were corrected, and between 1.598% and 3.97% for the cases where the invalid profiles were assigned a penalty total cost.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-9240</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2059-6464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/aer.2020.138</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Aircraft ; Aircraft models ; Aircraft performance ; Altitude ; Aviation ; Construction planning ; Consumption ; Flight characteristics ; Flight envelopes ; Flight plans ; Genetic algorithms ; Nodes ; Parameters ; Performance evaluation ; Planning ; Route selection ; Sea level ; Speed limits ; Trajectory analysis ; Trajectory optimization ; Unmanned aerial vehicles ; Vertical flight ; Websites ; Wind</subject><ispartof>Aeronautical journal, 2021-04, Vol.125 (1286), p.618-671</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-79913b5c039a158b7ac2508d53174335d7dfac97456182a799301480abbc97b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-79913b5c039a158b7ac2508d53174335d7dfac97456182a799301480abbc97b73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0911-6646</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0001924020001384/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27923,27924,55627</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dancila, R.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botez, R.M.</creatorcontrib><title>New flight trajectory optimisation method using genetic algorithms</title><title>Aeronautical journal</title><addtitle>Aeronaut. j</addtitle><description>This paper presents a new flight trajectory optimisation method, based on genetic algorithms, where the selected optimisation criterion is the minimisation of the total cost. The candidate flight trajectories evaluated in the optimisation process are defined as flight plans with two components: a lateral flight plan (the set of geographic points that define the flight trajectory track segments) and a vertical flight plan (the set of data that define the altitude and speed profiles, as well as the points where the altitude and/or speed changes occur). The lateral components of the candidate flight plans are constructed by selecting a set of adjacent nodes from a routing grid. The routing grid nodes are generated based on the orthodromic route between the flight trajectory’s initial and final points, a selected maximum lateral deviation from the orthodromic route and a selected grid node step size along and across the orthodromic route. Two strategies are investigated to handle invalid flight plans (relative to the aircraft’s flight envelope) and to compute their flight performance parameters. A first strategy is to assign a large penalty total cost to invalid flight profiles. The second strategy is to adjust the invalid flight plan parameters (altitude and/or speed) to the nearest limit of the flight envelope, with priority being given to maintaining the planned altitude. The tests performed in this study show that the second strategy is computationally expensive (requiring more than twice the execution time relative to the first strategy) and yields less optimal solutions. The performance of the optimal profiles identified by the proposed optimisation method, using the two strategies regarding invalid flight profile performance evaluation, were compared with the performance data of a reference flight profile, using identical input data: initial aircraft weight, initial and final aircraft geographic positions, altitudes and speed, cost index, and atmospheric data. The initial and final aircraft geographic positions, and the reference flight profile data, were retrieved from the FlightAware web site. This data corresponds to a real flight performed with the aircraft model used in this study. Tests were performed for six Cost Index values. Given the randomness of the genetic algorithms, the convergence to a global optimal solution is not guaranteed (the solution may be non-optimal or a local optima). For a better evaluation of the performance of the proposed method, ten test runs were performed for each Cost Index value. The total cost reduction for the optimal flight plans obtained using the proposed method, relative to the reference flight plan, was between 0.822% and 3.042% for the cases when the invalid flight profiles were corrected, and between 1.598% and 3.97% for the cases where the invalid profiles were assigned a penalty total cost.</description><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>Aircraft models</subject><subject>Aircraft performance</subject><subject>Altitude</subject><subject>Aviation</subject><subject>Construction planning</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Flight characteristics</subject><subject>Flight envelopes</subject><subject>Flight plans</subject><subject>Genetic algorithms</subject><subject>Nodes</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Route selection</subject><subject>Sea level</subject><subject>Speed limits</subject><subject>Trajectory analysis</subject><subject>Trajectory optimization</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><subject>Vertical flight</subject><subject>Websites</subject><subject>Wind</subject><issn>0001-9240</issn><issn>2059-6464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs3f8CCV7dOvjaboxarQtGLnkM2m92mdDc1SZH-e1Na8OJpmOGZ94UHoVsMMwxYPGgbZgRI3mh9hiYEuCwrVrFzNAEAXErC4BJdxbgGoEAYm6Cnd_tTdBvXr1KRgl5bk3zYF36b3OCiTs6PxWDTyrfFLrqxL3o72uRMoTe9Dy6thniNLjq9ifbmNKfoa_H8OX8tlx8vb_PHZWlyVyqFlJg23ACVGvO6EdoQDnXLKRaMUt6KttNGCsYrXBOdcQqY1aCbJl8bQafo7pi7Df57Z2NSa78LY65UhMm6loArkqn7I2WCjzHYTm2DG3TYKwzqYEllS-pgSWVLGZ-dcD00wbW9_Uv99-EXNCporQ</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Dancila, R.I.</creator><creator>Botez, R.M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0911-6646</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>New flight trajectory optimisation method using genetic algorithms</title><author>Dancila, R.I. ; Botez, R.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-79913b5c039a158b7ac2508d53174335d7dfac97456182a799301480abbc97b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>Aircraft models</topic><topic>Aircraft performance</topic><topic>Altitude</topic><topic>Aviation</topic><topic>Construction planning</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Flight characteristics</topic><topic>Flight envelopes</topic><topic>Flight plans</topic><topic>Genetic algorithms</topic><topic>Nodes</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Route selection</topic><topic>Sea level</topic><topic>Speed limits</topic><topic>Trajectory analysis</topic><topic>Trajectory optimization</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><topic>Vertical flight</topic><topic>Websites</topic><topic>Wind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dancila, R.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botez, R.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Aeronautical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dancila, R.I.</au><au>Botez, R.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New flight trajectory optimisation method using genetic algorithms</atitle><jtitle>Aeronautical journal</jtitle><addtitle>Aeronaut. j</addtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>1286</issue><spage>618</spage><epage>671</epage><pages>618-671</pages><issn>0001-9240</issn><eissn>2059-6464</eissn><abstract>This paper presents a new flight trajectory optimisation method, based on genetic algorithms, where the selected optimisation criterion is the minimisation of the total cost. The candidate flight trajectories evaluated in the optimisation process are defined as flight plans with two components: a lateral flight plan (the set of geographic points that define the flight trajectory track segments) and a vertical flight plan (the set of data that define the altitude and speed profiles, as well as the points where the altitude and/or speed changes occur). The lateral components of the candidate flight plans are constructed by selecting a set of adjacent nodes from a routing grid. The routing grid nodes are generated based on the orthodromic route between the flight trajectory’s initial and final points, a selected maximum lateral deviation from the orthodromic route and a selected grid node step size along and across the orthodromic route. Two strategies are investigated to handle invalid flight plans (relative to the aircraft’s flight envelope) and to compute their flight performance parameters. A first strategy is to assign a large penalty total cost to invalid flight profiles. The second strategy is to adjust the invalid flight plan parameters (altitude and/or speed) to the nearest limit of the flight envelope, with priority being given to maintaining the planned altitude. The tests performed in this study show that the second strategy is computationally expensive (requiring more than twice the execution time relative to the first strategy) and yields less optimal solutions. The performance of the optimal profiles identified by the proposed optimisation method, using the two strategies regarding invalid flight profile performance evaluation, were compared with the performance data of a reference flight profile, using identical input data: initial aircraft weight, initial and final aircraft geographic positions, altitudes and speed, cost index, and atmospheric data. The initial and final aircraft geographic positions, and the reference flight profile data, were retrieved from the FlightAware web site. This data corresponds to a real flight performed with the aircraft model used in this study. Tests were performed for six Cost Index values. Given the randomness of the genetic algorithms, the convergence to a global optimal solution is not guaranteed (the solution may be non-optimal or a local optima). For a better evaluation of the performance of the proposed method, ten test runs were performed for each Cost Index value. The total cost reduction for the optimal flight plans obtained using the proposed method, relative to the reference flight plan, was between 0.822% and 3.042% for the cases when the invalid flight profiles were corrected, and between 1.598% and 3.97% for the cases where the invalid profiles were assigned a penalty total cost.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/aer.2020.138</doi><tpages>54</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0911-6646</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-9240
ispartof Aeronautical journal, 2021-04, Vol.125 (1286), p.618-671
issn 0001-9240
2059-6464
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2498890162
source Cambridge Journals Online
subjects Aircraft
Aircraft models
Aircraft performance
Altitude
Aviation
Construction planning
Consumption
Flight characteristics
Flight envelopes
Flight plans
Genetic algorithms
Nodes
Parameters
Performance evaluation
Planning
Route selection
Sea level
Speed limits
Trajectory analysis
Trajectory optimization
Unmanned aerial vehicles
Vertical flight
Websites
Wind
title New flight trajectory optimisation method using genetic algorithms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T14%3A39%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20flight%20trajectory%20optimisation%20method%20using%20genetic%20algorithms&rft.jtitle=Aeronautical%20journal&rft.au=Dancila,%20R.I.&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=1286&rft.spage=618&rft.epage=671&rft.pages=618-671&rft.issn=0001-9240&rft.eissn=2059-6464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/aer.2020.138&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2498890162%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2498890162&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_aer_2020_138&rfr_iscdi=true