Association between preconception maternal stress and offspring birth weight: findings from an Australian longitudinal data linkage study
ObjectiveExamine the relationship between preconception stress and offspring birth weight.SettingPopulation-based cohort study linked with state-based administrative perinatal data.Participants6100 births from 3622 women from the 1973–1978 cohort of the Australian Longitudinal Study of Women’s Healt...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ open 2021-03, Vol.11 (3), p.e041502, Article 041502 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ObjectiveExamine the relationship between preconception stress and offspring birth weight.SettingPopulation-based cohort study linked with state-based administrative perinatal data.Participants6100 births from 3622 women from the 1973–1978 cohort of the Australian Longitudinal Study of Women’s Health who (1) recorded a singleton birth between January 1997 and December 2011; (2) returned at least one follow-up survey within 3 years of conception; and (3) had complete data on perceived stress prior to conception.Primary outcome measuresLinear generalised estimating equations were used to examine the relationship between preconception stress and a continuous measure of birth weight, exploring differences based on birth order and stress chronicity. The minimal sufficient adjustment set of covariates was determined by a directed acyclic graph.ResultsFor all births, there was no relationship between moderate/high acute or chronic stress and offspring birth weight in grams. Among first births only, there was a trend towards a relationship between moderate/high chronic stress and offspring birth weight. Offspring sex was associated with birth weight in all models, with female babies born lighter than male babies on average, after adjusting for covariates (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2044-6055 2044-6055 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041502 |