Impossible measurements require impossible apparatus

A well-recognized open conceptual problem in relativistic quantum field theory concerns the relation between measurement and causality. Naive generalizations of quantum measurement rules can allow for superluminal signaling ("impossible measurements"). This raises the problem of delineatin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physical review. D 2021-01, Vol.103 (2), p.1, Article 025017
Hauptverfasser: Bostelmann, Henning, Fewster, Christopher J., Ruep, Maximilian H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1
container_title Physical review. D
container_volume 103
creator Bostelmann, Henning
Fewster, Christopher J.
Ruep, Maximilian H.
description A well-recognized open conceptual problem in relativistic quantum field theory concerns the relation between measurement and causality. Naive generalizations of quantum measurement rules can allow for superluminal signaling ("impossible measurements"). This raises the problem of delineating physically allowed quantum measurements and operations. We analyze this issue in a recently proposed framework in which local measurements (in possibly curved spacetime) are described physically by coupling the system to a probe. We show that the state-update rule in this setting is consistent with causality provided that the coupling between the system and probe is local. Thus, by establishing a well-defined framework for successive measurements, we also provide a class of physically allowed operations. Conversely, impossible measurements can only be performed using impossible (nonlocal) apparatus.
doi_str_mv 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.025017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2496359111</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2496359111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-4fa82fdd1d04eb81032abad1caf155aa56453c5f38e98f73234e9ff61f2d8c713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkFtLw0AQhRdRsNT-Al8CPifu7CWbPEq9FQqK6PMySWYxpWnS3UTovzchXp7mHOYwc_gYuwaeAHB5-_p5Cm_0dZ-MJuFCczBnbCGU4THnIj__08Av2SqEHR9lynMDsGBq03RtCHWxp6ghDIOnhg59iDwdh9pTVP_vsevQYz-EK3bhcB9o9TOX7OPx4X39HG9fnjbru21cSmH6WDnMhKsqqLiiIhvrCSywghIdaI2oU6VlqZ3MKM-ckUIqyp1LwYkqKw3IJbuZ73a-PQ4UertrB38YX1qh8lTqHGBKyTlV-rGpJ2c7XzfoTxa4nQjZX0J2MjMh-Q28QltR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2496359111</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impossible measurements require impossible apparatus</title><source>American Physical Society Journals</source><creator>Bostelmann, Henning ; Fewster, Christopher J. ; Ruep, Maximilian H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bostelmann, Henning ; Fewster, Christopher J. ; Ruep, Maximilian H.</creatorcontrib><description>A well-recognized open conceptual problem in relativistic quantum field theory concerns the relation between measurement and causality. Naive generalizations of quantum measurement rules can allow for superluminal signaling ("impossible measurements"). This raises the problem of delineating physically allowed quantum measurements and operations. We analyze this issue in a recently proposed framework in which local measurements (in possibly curved spacetime) are described physically by coupling the system to a probe. We show that the state-update rule in this setting is consistent with causality provided that the coupling between the system and probe is local. Thus, by establishing a well-defined framework for successive measurements, we also provide a class of physically allowed operations. Conversely, impossible measurements can only be performed using impossible (nonlocal) apparatus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2470-0010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2470-0029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.025017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>College Park: American Physical Society</publisher><subject>Coupling ; Field theory ; Quantum field theory ; Quantum theory ; Relativistic theory</subject><ispartof>Physical review. D, 2021-01, Vol.103 (2), p.1, Article 025017</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Physical Society Jan 15, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-4fa82fdd1d04eb81032abad1caf155aa56453c5f38e98f73234e9ff61f2d8c713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-4fa82fdd1d04eb81032abad1caf155aa56453c5f38e98f73234e9ff61f2d8c713</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0233-2928 ; 0000-0001-6866-4506 ; 0000-0001-8915-5321</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2863,2864,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bostelmann, Henning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fewster, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruep, Maximilian H.</creatorcontrib><title>Impossible measurements require impossible apparatus</title><title>Physical review. D</title><description>A well-recognized open conceptual problem in relativistic quantum field theory concerns the relation between measurement and causality. Naive generalizations of quantum measurement rules can allow for superluminal signaling ("impossible measurements"). This raises the problem of delineating physically allowed quantum measurements and operations. We analyze this issue in a recently proposed framework in which local measurements (in possibly curved spacetime) are described physically by coupling the system to a probe. We show that the state-update rule in this setting is consistent with causality provided that the coupling between the system and probe is local. Thus, by establishing a well-defined framework for successive measurements, we also provide a class of physically allowed operations. Conversely, impossible measurements can only be performed using impossible (nonlocal) apparatus.</description><subject>Coupling</subject><subject>Field theory</subject><subject>Quantum field theory</subject><subject>Quantum theory</subject><subject>Relativistic theory</subject><issn>2470-0010</issn><issn>2470-0029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkFtLw0AQhRdRsNT-Al8CPifu7CWbPEq9FQqK6PMySWYxpWnS3UTovzchXp7mHOYwc_gYuwaeAHB5-_p5Cm_0dZ-MJuFCczBnbCGU4THnIj__08Av2SqEHR9lynMDsGBq03RtCHWxp6ghDIOnhg59iDwdh9pTVP_vsevQYz-EK3bhcB9o9TOX7OPx4X39HG9fnjbru21cSmH6WDnMhKsqqLiiIhvrCSywghIdaI2oU6VlqZ3MKM-ckUIqyp1LwYkqKw3IJbuZ73a-PQ4UertrB38YX1qh8lTqHGBKyTlV-rGpJ2c7XzfoTxa4nQjZX0J2MjMh-Q28QltR</recordid><startdate>20210120</startdate><enddate>20210120</enddate><creator>Bostelmann, Henning</creator><creator>Fewster, Christopher J.</creator><creator>Ruep, Maximilian H.</creator><general>American Physical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0233-2928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6866-4506</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8915-5321</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210120</creationdate><title>Impossible measurements require impossible apparatus</title><author>Bostelmann, Henning ; Fewster, Christopher J. ; Ruep, Maximilian H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-4fa82fdd1d04eb81032abad1caf155aa56453c5f38e98f73234e9ff61f2d8c713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Coupling</topic><topic>Field theory</topic><topic>Quantum field theory</topic><topic>Quantum theory</topic><topic>Relativistic theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bostelmann, Henning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fewster, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruep, Maximilian H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Physical review. D</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bostelmann, Henning</au><au>Fewster, Christopher J.</au><au>Ruep, Maximilian H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impossible measurements require impossible apparatus</atitle><jtitle>Physical review. D</jtitle><date>2021-01-20</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><artnum>025017</artnum><issn>2470-0010</issn><eissn>2470-0029</eissn><abstract>A well-recognized open conceptual problem in relativistic quantum field theory concerns the relation between measurement and causality. Naive generalizations of quantum measurement rules can allow for superluminal signaling ("impossible measurements"). This raises the problem of delineating physically allowed quantum measurements and operations. We analyze this issue in a recently proposed framework in which local measurements (in possibly curved spacetime) are described physically by coupling the system to a probe. We show that the state-update rule in this setting is consistent with causality provided that the coupling between the system and probe is local. Thus, by establishing a well-defined framework for successive measurements, we also provide a class of physically allowed operations. Conversely, impossible measurements can only be performed using impossible (nonlocal) apparatus.</abstract><cop>College Park</cop><pub>American Physical Society</pub><doi>10.1103/PhysRevD.103.025017</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0233-2928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6866-4506</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8915-5321</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2470-0010
ispartof Physical review. D, 2021-01, Vol.103 (2), p.1, Article 025017
issn 2470-0010
2470-0029
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2496359111
source American Physical Society Journals
subjects Coupling
Field theory
Quantum field theory
Quantum theory
Relativistic theory
title Impossible measurements require impossible apparatus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T17%3A34%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impossible%20measurements%20require%20impossible%20apparatus&rft.jtitle=Physical%20review.%20D&rft.au=Bostelmann,%20Henning&rft.date=2021-01-20&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.artnum=025017&rft.issn=2470-0010&rft.eissn=2470-0029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.025017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2496359111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2496359111&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true