Impossible measurements require impossible apparatus
A well-recognized open conceptual problem in relativistic quantum field theory concerns the relation between measurement and causality. Naive generalizations of quantum measurement rules can allow for superluminal signaling ("impossible measurements"). This raises the problem of delineatin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physical review. D 2021-01, Vol.103 (2), p.1, Article 025017 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Physical review. D |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | Bostelmann, Henning Fewster, Christopher J. Ruep, Maximilian H. |
description | A well-recognized open conceptual problem in relativistic quantum field theory concerns the relation between measurement and causality. Naive generalizations of quantum measurement rules can allow for superluminal signaling ("impossible measurements"). This raises the problem of delineating physically allowed quantum measurements and operations. We analyze this issue in a recently proposed framework in which local measurements (in possibly curved spacetime) are described physically by coupling the system to a probe. We show that the state-update rule in this setting is consistent with causality provided that the coupling between the system and probe is local. Thus, by establishing a well-defined framework for successive measurements, we also provide a class of physically allowed operations. Conversely, impossible measurements can only be performed using impossible (nonlocal) apparatus. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.025017 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2496359111</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2496359111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-4fa82fdd1d04eb81032abad1caf155aa56453c5f38e98f73234e9ff61f2d8c713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkFtLw0AQhRdRsNT-Al8CPifu7CWbPEq9FQqK6PMySWYxpWnS3UTovzchXp7mHOYwc_gYuwaeAHB5-_p5Cm_0dZ-MJuFCczBnbCGU4THnIj__08Av2SqEHR9lynMDsGBq03RtCHWxp6ghDIOnhg59iDwdh9pTVP_vsevQYz-EK3bhcB9o9TOX7OPx4X39HG9fnjbru21cSmH6WDnMhKsqqLiiIhvrCSywghIdaI2oU6VlqZ3MKM-ckUIqyp1LwYkqKw3IJbuZ73a-PQ4UertrB38YX1qh8lTqHGBKyTlV-rGpJ2c7XzfoTxa4nQjZX0J2MjMh-Q28QltR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2496359111</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impossible measurements require impossible apparatus</title><source>American Physical Society Journals</source><creator>Bostelmann, Henning ; Fewster, Christopher J. ; Ruep, Maximilian H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bostelmann, Henning ; Fewster, Christopher J. ; Ruep, Maximilian H.</creatorcontrib><description>A well-recognized open conceptual problem in relativistic quantum field theory concerns the relation between measurement and causality. Naive generalizations of quantum measurement rules can allow for superluminal signaling ("impossible measurements"). This raises the problem of delineating physically allowed quantum measurements and operations. We analyze this issue in a recently proposed framework in which local measurements (in possibly curved spacetime) are described physically by coupling the system to a probe. We show that the state-update rule in this setting is consistent with causality provided that the coupling between the system and probe is local. Thus, by establishing a well-defined framework for successive measurements, we also provide a class of physically allowed operations. Conversely, impossible measurements can only be performed using impossible (nonlocal) apparatus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2470-0010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2470-0029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.025017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>College Park: American Physical Society</publisher><subject>Coupling ; Field theory ; Quantum field theory ; Quantum theory ; Relativistic theory</subject><ispartof>Physical review. D, 2021-01, Vol.103 (2), p.1, Article 025017</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Physical Society Jan 15, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-4fa82fdd1d04eb81032abad1caf155aa56453c5f38e98f73234e9ff61f2d8c713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-4fa82fdd1d04eb81032abad1caf155aa56453c5f38e98f73234e9ff61f2d8c713</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0233-2928 ; 0000-0001-6866-4506 ; 0000-0001-8915-5321</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2863,2864,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bostelmann, Henning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fewster, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruep, Maximilian H.</creatorcontrib><title>Impossible measurements require impossible apparatus</title><title>Physical review. D</title><description>A well-recognized open conceptual problem in relativistic quantum field theory concerns the relation between measurement and causality. Naive generalizations of quantum measurement rules can allow for superluminal signaling ("impossible measurements"). This raises the problem of delineating physically allowed quantum measurements and operations. We analyze this issue in a recently proposed framework in which local measurements (in possibly curved spacetime) are described physically by coupling the system to a probe. We show that the state-update rule in this setting is consistent with causality provided that the coupling between the system and probe is local. Thus, by establishing a well-defined framework for successive measurements, we also provide a class of physically allowed operations. Conversely, impossible measurements can only be performed using impossible (nonlocal) apparatus.</description><subject>Coupling</subject><subject>Field theory</subject><subject>Quantum field theory</subject><subject>Quantum theory</subject><subject>Relativistic theory</subject><issn>2470-0010</issn><issn>2470-0029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkFtLw0AQhRdRsNT-Al8CPifu7CWbPEq9FQqK6PMySWYxpWnS3UTovzchXp7mHOYwc_gYuwaeAHB5-_p5Cm_0dZ-MJuFCczBnbCGU4THnIj__08Av2SqEHR9lynMDsGBq03RtCHWxp6ghDIOnhg59iDwdh9pTVP_vsevQYz-EK3bhcB9o9TOX7OPx4X39HG9fnjbru21cSmH6WDnMhKsqqLiiIhvrCSywghIdaI2oU6VlqZ3MKM-ckUIqyp1LwYkqKw3IJbuZ73a-PQ4UertrB38YX1qh8lTqHGBKyTlV-rGpJ2c7XzfoTxa4nQjZX0J2MjMh-Q28QltR</recordid><startdate>20210120</startdate><enddate>20210120</enddate><creator>Bostelmann, Henning</creator><creator>Fewster, Christopher J.</creator><creator>Ruep, Maximilian H.</creator><general>American Physical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0233-2928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6866-4506</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8915-5321</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210120</creationdate><title>Impossible measurements require impossible apparatus</title><author>Bostelmann, Henning ; Fewster, Christopher J. ; Ruep, Maximilian H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-4fa82fdd1d04eb81032abad1caf155aa56453c5f38e98f73234e9ff61f2d8c713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Coupling</topic><topic>Field theory</topic><topic>Quantum field theory</topic><topic>Quantum theory</topic><topic>Relativistic theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bostelmann, Henning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fewster, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruep, Maximilian H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Physical review. D</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bostelmann, Henning</au><au>Fewster, Christopher J.</au><au>Ruep, Maximilian H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impossible measurements require impossible apparatus</atitle><jtitle>Physical review. D</jtitle><date>2021-01-20</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><artnum>025017</artnum><issn>2470-0010</issn><eissn>2470-0029</eissn><abstract>A well-recognized open conceptual problem in relativistic quantum field theory concerns the relation between measurement and causality. Naive generalizations of quantum measurement rules can allow for superluminal signaling ("impossible measurements"). This raises the problem of delineating physically allowed quantum measurements and operations. We analyze this issue in a recently proposed framework in which local measurements (in possibly curved spacetime) are described physically by coupling the system to a probe. We show that the state-update rule in this setting is consistent with causality provided that the coupling between the system and probe is local. Thus, by establishing a well-defined framework for successive measurements, we also provide a class of physically allowed operations. Conversely, impossible measurements can only be performed using impossible (nonlocal) apparatus.</abstract><cop>College Park</cop><pub>American Physical Society</pub><doi>10.1103/PhysRevD.103.025017</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0233-2928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6866-4506</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8915-5321</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2470-0010 |
ispartof | Physical review. D, 2021-01, Vol.103 (2), p.1, Article 025017 |
issn | 2470-0010 2470-0029 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2496359111 |
source | American Physical Society Journals |
subjects | Coupling Field theory Quantum field theory Quantum theory Relativistic theory |
title | Impossible measurements require impossible apparatus |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T17%3A34%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impossible%20measurements%20require%20impossible%20apparatus&rft.jtitle=Physical%20review.%20D&rft.au=Bostelmann,%20Henning&rft.date=2021-01-20&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.artnum=025017&rft.issn=2470-0010&rft.eissn=2470-0029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.025017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2496359111%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2496359111&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |