The ontological and epistemological superiority of hylomorphism
Materialism—the view that all of reality is wholly determined by the very, very small—and extreme nominalism—the view that properties, kinds, and qualities do not really exist—have been the dominant view in analytic philosophy for the last 100 years or so. Both views, however, have failed to provide...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Synthese (Dordrecht) 2021-02, Vol.198 (Suppl 3), p.885-903 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 903 |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 3 |
container_start_page | 885 |
container_title | Synthese (Dordrecht) |
container_volume | 198 |
creator | Koons, Robert C. |
description | Materialism—the view that all of reality is wholly determined by the very, very small—and extreme nominalism—the view that properties, kinds, and qualities do not really exist—have been the dominant view in analytic philosophy for the last 100 years or so. Both views, however, have failed to provide adequate accounts for the possibility of intentionality and of knowledge. We must therefore look to alternatives. One well-tested alternative, the hylomorphism of Aristotle and the medieval scholastics, was rejected without being refuted and so deserves further examination. I will argue that Aristotelian hylomorphic provides a markedly superior account of knowledge, cognitive normativity, and intentionality. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11229-016-1295-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2496283030</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2496283030</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-a5fa470a36304d9558bef42e6cc6cdd16bbe2f55ee51b47bf7da28fe41439ecb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gLeA59Wd_UxOIsUvKHip52WTzLYpSTbupof-e1MiepI5DAzv8w48hNwCuwfGzEMC4LygDDQFXiiqz8gClBGUFVqekwVjoqAmV-aSXKW0ZwxAS7Ygj5sdZqEfQxu2TeXazPV1hkOTRux-b-kwYGxCbMZjFny2O7ahC3HYNam7JhfetQlvfvaSfL48b1ZvdP3x-r56WtNKgB6pU95Jw5zQgsm6UCov0UuOuqp0VdegyxK5VwpRQSlN6U3teO5RghQFVqVYkru5d4jh64BptPtwiP300nJZaJ4LNs2SwJyqYkgpordDbDoXjxaYPXmysyc7ebInT1ZPDJ-ZNGX7Lca_5v-hbwDNbCU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2496283030</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The ontological and epistemological superiority of hylomorphism</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Koons, Robert C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Koons, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><description>Materialism—the view that all of reality is wholly determined by the very, very small—and extreme nominalism—the view that properties, kinds, and qualities do not really exist—have been the dominant view in analytic philosophy for the last 100 years or so. Both views, however, have failed to provide adequate accounts for the possibility of intentionality and of knowledge. We must therefore look to alternatives. One well-tested alternative, the hylomorphism of Aristotle and the medieval scholastics, was rejected without being refuted and so deserves further examination. I will argue that Aristotelian hylomorphic provides a markedly superior account of knowledge, cognitive normativity, and intentionality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-7857</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11229-016-1295-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Causality ; Composite materials ; Education ; Epistemology ; Intentionality ; Knowledge ; Logic ; Materialism ; Metaphysics ; Nominalism ; Ontology ; Organisms ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Language ; Philosophy of Science ; S.I.: Materialism & Metaphysics</subject><ispartof>Synthese (Dordrecht), 2021-02, Vol.198 (Suppl 3), p.885-903</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2017</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-a5fa470a36304d9558bef42e6cc6cdd16bbe2f55ee51b47bf7da28fe41439ecb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-a5fa470a36304d9558bef42e6cc6cdd16bbe2f55ee51b47bf7da28fe41439ecb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8555-1482</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11229-016-1295-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11229-016-1295-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koons, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><title>The ontological and epistemological superiority of hylomorphism</title><title>Synthese (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Synthese</addtitle><description>Materialism—the view that all of reality is wholly determined by the very, very small—and extreme nominalism—the view that properties, kinds, and qualities do not really exist—have been the dominant view in analytic philosophy for the last 100 years or so. Both views, however, have failed to provide adequate accounts for the possibility of intentionality and of knowledge. We must therefore look to alternatives. One well-tested alternative, the hylomorphism of Aristotle and the medieval scholastics, was rejected without being refuted and so deserves further examination. I will argue that Aristotelian hylomorphic provides a markedly superior account of knowledge, cognitive normativity, and intentionality.</description><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Intentionality</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Materialism</subject><subject>Metaphysics</subject><subject>Nominalism</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Organisms</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Language</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><subject>S.I.: Materialism & Metaphysics</subject><issn>0039-7857</issn><issn>1573-0964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gLeA59Wd_UxOIsUvKHip52WTzLYpSTbupof-e1MiepI5DAzv8w48hNwCuwfGzEMC4LygDDQFXiiqz8gClBGUFVqekwVjoqAmV-aSXKW0ZwxAS7Ygj5sdZqEfQxu2TeXazPV1hkOTRux-b-kwYGxCbMZjFny2O7ahC3HYNam7JhfetQlvfvaSfL48b1ZvdP3x-r56WtNKgB6pU95Jw5zQgsm6UCov0UuOuqp0VdegyxK5VwpRQSlN6U3teO5RghQFVqVYkru5d4jh64BptPtwiP300nJZaJ4LNs2SwJyqYkgpordDbDoXjxaYPXmysyc7ebInT1ZPDJ-ZNGX7Lca_5v-hbwDNbCU</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Koons, Robert C.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8555-1482</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>The ontological and epistemological superiority of hylomorphism</title><author>Koons, Robert C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-a5fa470a36304d9558bef42e6cc6cdd16bbe2f55ee51b47bf7da28fe41439ecb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Intentionality</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Materialism</topic><topic>Metaphysics</topic><topic>Nominalism</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Organisms</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Language</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><topic>S.I.: Materialism & Metaphysics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koons, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koons, Robert C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The ontological and epistemological superiority of hylomorphism</atitle><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Synthese</stitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>198</volume><issue>Suppl 3</issue><spage>885</spage><epage>903</epage><pages>885-903</pages><issn>0039-7857</issn><eissn>1573-0964</eissn><abstract>Materialism—the view that all of reality is wholly determined by the very, very small—and extreme nominalism—the view that properties, kinds, and qualities do not really exist—have been the dominant view in analytic philosophy for the last 100 years or so. Both views, however, have failed to provide adequate accounts for the possibility of intentionality and of knowledge. We must therefore look to alternatives. One well-tested alternative, the hylomorphism of Aristotle and the medieval scholastics, was rejected without being refuted and so deserves further examination. I will argue that Aristotelian hylomorphic provides a markedly superior account of knowledge, cognitive normativity, and intentionality.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11229-016-1295-6</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8555-1482</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0039-7857 |
ispartof | Synthese (Dordrecht), 2021-02, Vol.198 (Suppl 3), p.885-903 |
issn | 0039-7857 1573-0964 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2496283030 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Causality Composite materials Education Epistemology Intentionality Knowledge Logic Materialism Metaphysics Nominalism Ontology Organisms Philosophy Philosophy of Language Philosophy of Science S.I.: Materialism & Metaphysics |
title | The ontological and epistemological superiority of hylomorphism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T12%3A51%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20ontological%20and%20epistemological%20superiority%20of%20hylomorphism&rft.jtitle=Synthese%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Koons,%20Robert%20C.&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=198&rft.issue=Suppl%203&rft.spage=885&rft.epage=903&rft.pages=885-903&rft.issn=0039-7857&rft.eissn=1573-0964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11229-016-1295-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2496283030%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2496283030&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |