Towards a best practice methodology for the detection of Phytophthora species in soils

The genus Phytophthora contains species that are major pathogens worldwide, affecting a multitude of plant species across agriculture, horticulture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Here, we concentrate on those species that are dispersed through soil and water, attacking the roots of the plants, c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant pathology 2021-04, Vol.70 (3), p.604-614
Hauptverfasser: Burgess, Treena, López-Villamor, Adrián, Paap, Trudy, Williams, Briony, Belhaj, Rajah, Crone, Michael, Dunstan, William, Howard, Kay, Hardy, Giles
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 614
container_issue 3
container_start_page 604
container_title Plant pathology
container_volume 70
creator Burgess, Treena
López-Villamor, Adrián
Paap, Trudy
Williams, Briony
Belhaj, Rajah
Crone, Michael
Dunstan, William
Howard, Kay
Hardy, Giles
description The genus Phytophthora contains species that are major pathogens worldwide, affecting a multitude of plant species across agriculture, horticulture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Here, we concentrate on those species that are dispersed through soil and water, attacking the roots of the plants, causing them to rot and die. The intention of this study was to compare the soil baiting protocol developed by the Centre for Phytophthora Science and Management (CPSM) with two other baiting methods used in Australia. The aim was to demonstrate the effectiveness of each protocol for soil baiting Phytophthora species in different substrates. Three experiments were conducted: the first to test the sensitivity of each method to detect Phytophthora cinnamomi, the second to test the effect of substrate type (sand or loam), and the third to test the detection of species (P. cinnamomi, P. multivora, or P. pseudocryptogea). The specificity of different plant species baits was compared within and between the methods. Substrate type influenced isolation in all methods; however, the CPSM method was superior regardless of substrate, albeit slower than one of the other methods for one substrate. Comparing bait species between the three methods, Quercus ilex was the most attractive bait for P. cinnamomi, particularly in the CPSM method. The choice of protocol affected the isolation associated with each bait type. Overall, the multiple bait system used by CPSM was shown to provide the most sensitive and reliable detection of Phytophthora species from soil samples.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ppa.13312
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2495990126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2495990126</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3612-a2deb484bd7227be3f96836b3f672f46351826567f013176c0fc9c8f888215dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8swcKQ1h-J44xVxZdUiQ6F1XIcm6RKa2O7VPn3GAIjt9xwz3OnewG4xmiGU82dkzNMKSYnYIIpKzKKiuoUTBCiJEOckXNwEcIWIVxUFZ-At409St8EKGGtQ4TOSxU7peFOx9Y2trfvAzTWw9hq2Oio09TuoTVw3Q7RujZRXsLgtOp0gN0eBtv14RKcGdkHffXbp-D14X6zfMpWL4_Py8UqU5RhkknS6Drned2UhJS1pqZinLKaGlYSkzNaYE5YwUqDMMUlU8ioSnHDOSe4aBSdgptxr_P245AeEFt78Pt0UpC8Si8iTFii7kZKeRuC10Y43-2kHwRG4js2kWITP7Eldj6yx67Xw_-gWK8Xf8btaHglpRNef3YhypCUHCUrFxRziugX2lV5Xw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2495990126</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Towards a best practice methodology for the detection of Phytophthora species in soils</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Burgess, Treena ; López-Villamor, Adrián ; Paap, Trudy ; Williams, Briony ; Belhaj, Rajah ; Crone, Michael ; Dunstan, William ; Howard, Kay ; Hardy, Giles</creator><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Treena ; López-Villamor, Adrián ; Paap, Trudy ; Williams, Briony ; Belhaj, Rajah ; Crone, Michael ; Dunstan, William ; Howard, Kay ; Hardy, Giles</creatorcontrib><description>The genus Phytophthora contains species that are major pathogens worldwide, affecting a multitude of plant species across agriculture, horticulture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Here, we concentrate on those species that are dispersed through soil and water, attacking the roots of the plants, causing them to rot and die. The intention of this study was to compare the soil baiting protocol developed by the Centre for Phytophthora Science and Management (CPSM) with two other baiting methods used in Australia. The aim was to demonstrate the effectiveness of each protocol for soil baiting Phytophthora species in different substrates. Three experiments were conducted: the first to test the sensitivity of each method to detect Phytophthora cinnamomi, the second to test the effect of substrate type (sand or loam), and the third to test the detection of species (P. cinnamomi, P. multivora, or P. pseudocryptogea). The specificity of different plant species baits was compared within and between the methods. Substrate type influenced isolation in all methods; however, the CPSM method was superior regardless of substrate, albeit slower than one of the other methods for one substrate. Comparing bait species between the three methods, Quercus ilex was the most attractive bait for P. cinnamomi, particularly in the CPSM method. The choice of protocol affected the isolation associated with each bait type. Overall, the multiple bait system used by CPSM was shown to provide the most sensitive and reliable detection of Phytophthora species from soil samples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-0862</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3059</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ppa.13312</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: British Society for Plant Pathology</publisher><subject>Agricultural ecosystems ; Artificial inoculum ; Baiting ; Baits ; Best practice ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Forestry ; Horticulture ; Natural ; Phytophthora ; Plant species ; pre‐wetting ; Protocol ; Rot ; Sensitivity analysis ; Soil baiting ; Soil dispersion ; Soil type ; Soil water ; Soils ; Species ; Substrates</subject><ispartof>Plant pathology, 2021-04, Vol.70 (3), p.604-614</ispartof><rights>2020 British Society for Plant Pathology</rights><rights>Plant Pathology © 2021 British Society for Plant Pathology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3612-a2deb484bd7227be3f96836b3f672f46351826567f013176c0fc9c8f888215dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3612-a2deb484bd7227be3f96836b3f672f46351826567f013176c0fc9c8f888215dc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1364-4350 ; 0000-0001-7419-5064 ; 0000-0002-7962-219X ; 0000-0003-3977-1243</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fppa.13312$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fppa.13312$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27903,27904,45553,45554,46387,46811</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Treena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Villamor, Adrián</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paap, Trudy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Briony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belhaj, Rajah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crone, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunstan, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Kay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Giles</creatorcontrib><title>Towards a best practice methodology for the detection of Phytophthora species in soils</title><title>Plant pathology</title><description>The genus Phytophthora contains species that are major pathogens worldwide, affecting a multitude of plant species across agriculture, horticulture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Here, we concentrate on those species that are dispersed through soil and water, attacking the roots of the plants, causing them to rot and die. The intention of this study was to compare the soil baiting protocol developed by the Centre for Phytophthora Science and Management (CPSM) with two other baiting methods used in Australia. The aim was to demonstrate the effectiveness of each protocol for soil baiting Phytophthora species in different substrates. Three experiments were conducted: the first to test the sensitivity of each method to detect Phytophthora cinnamomi, the second to test the effect of substrate type (sand or loam), and the third to test the detection of species (P. cinnamomi, P. multivora, or P. pseudocryptogea). The specificity of different plant species baits was compared within and between the methods. Substrate type influenced isolation in all methods; however, the CPSM method was superior regardless of substrate, albeit slower than one of the other methods for one substrate. Comparing bait species between the three methods, Quercus ilex was the most attractive bait for P. cinnamomi, particularly in the CPSM method. The choice of protocol affected the isolation associated with each bait type. Overall, the multiple bait system used by CPSM was shown to provide the most sensitive and reliable detection of Phytophthora species from soil samples.</description><subject>Agricultural ecosystems</subject><subject>Artificial inoculum</subject><subject>Baiting</subject><subject>Baits</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Horticulture</subject><subject>Natural</subject><subject>Phytophthora</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>pre‐wetting</subject><subject>Protocol</subject><subject>Rot</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Soil baiting</subject><subject>Soil dispersion</subject><subject>Soil type</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><issn>0032-0862</issn><issn>1365-3059</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8swcKQ1h-J44xVxZdUiQ6F1XIcm6RKa2O7VPn3GAIjt9xwz3OnewG4xmiGU82dkzNMKSYnYIIpKzKKiuoUTBCiJEOckXNwEcIWIVxUFZ-At409St8EKGGtQ4TOSxU7peFOx9Y2trfvAzTWw9hq2Oio09TuoTVw3Q7RujZRXsLgtOp0gN0eBtv14RKcGdkHffXbp-D14X6zfMpWL4_Py8UqU5RhkknS6Drned2UhJS1pqZinLKaGlYSkzNaYE5YwUqDMMUlU8ioSnHDOSe4aBSdgptxr_P245AeEFt78Pt0UpC8Si8iTFii7kZKeRuC10Y43-2kHwRG4js2kWITP7Eldj6yx67Xw_-gWK8Xf8btaHglpRNef3YhypCUHCUrFxRziugX2lV5Xw</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Burgess, Treena</creator><creator>López-Villamor, Adrián</creator><creator>Paap, Trudy</creator><creator>Williams, Briony</creator><creator>Belhaj, Rajah</creator><creator>Crone, Michael</creator><creator>Dunstan, William</creator><creator>Howard, Kay</creator><creator>Hardy, Giles</creator><general>British Society for Plant Pathology</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>RCLKO</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1364-4350</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7419-5064</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7962-219X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3977-1243</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Towards a best practice methodology for the detection of Phytophthora species in soils</title><author>Burgess, Treena ; López-Villamor, Adrián ; Paap, Trudy ; Williams, Briony ; Belhaj, Rajah ; Crone, Michael ; Dunstan, William ; Howard, Kay ; Hardy, Giles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3612-a2deb484bd7227be3f96836b3f672f46351826567f013176c0fc9c8f888215dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agricultural ecosystems</topic><topic>Artificial inoculum</topic><topic>Baiting</topic><topic>Baits</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Horticulture</topic><topic>Natural</topic><topic>Phytophthora</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>pre‐wetting</topic><topic>Protocol</topic><topic>Rot</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Soil baiting</topic><topic>Soil dispersion</topic><topic>Soil type</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Treena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Villamor, Adrián</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paap, Trudy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Briony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belhaj, Rajah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crone, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunstan, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Kay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Giles</creatorcontrib><collection>RCAAP open access repository</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burgess, Treena</au><au>López-Villamor, Adrián</au><au>Paap, Trudy</au><au>Williams, Briony</au><au>Belhaj, Rajah</au><au>Crone, Michael</au><au>Dunstan, William</au><au>Howard, Kay</au><au>Hardy, Giles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Towards a best practice methodology for the detection of Phytophthora species in soils</atitle><jtitle>Plant pathology</jtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>604</spage><epage>614</epage><pages>604-614</pages><issn>0032-0862</issn><eissn>1365-3059</eissn><abstract>The genus Phytophthora contains species that are major pathogens worldwide, affecting a multitude of plant species across agriculture, horticulture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Here, we concentrate on those species that are dispersed through soil and water, attacking the roots of the plants, causing them to rot and die. The intention of this study was to compare the soil baiting protocol developed by the Centre for Phytophthora Science and Management (CPSM) with two other baiting methods used in Australia. The aim was to demonstrate the effectiveness of each protocol for soil baiting Phytophthora species in different substrates. Three experiments were conducted: the first to test the sensitivity of each method to detect Phytophthora cinnamomi, the second to test the effect of substrate type (sand or loam), and the third to test the detection of species (P. cinnamomi, P. multivora, or P. pseudocryptogea). The specificity of different plant species baits was compared within and between the methods. Substrate type influenced isolation in all methods; however, the CPSM method was superior regardless of substrate, albeit slower than one of the other methods for one substrate. Comparing bait species between the three methods, Quercus ilex was the most attractive bait for P. cinnamomi, particularly in the CPSM method. The choice of protocol affected the isolation associated with each bait type. Overall, the multiple bait system used by CPSM was shown to provide the most sensitive and reliable detection of Phytophthora species from soil samples.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>British Society for Plant Pathology</pub><doi>10.1111/ppa.13312</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1364-4350</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7419-5064</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7962-219X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3977-1243</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-0862
ispartof Plant pathology, 2021-04, Vol.70 (3), p.604-614
issn 0032-0862
1365-3059
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2495990126
source Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Agricultural ecosystems
Artificial inoculum
Baiting
Baits
Best practice
Flowers & plants
Forestry
Horticulture
Natural
Phytophthora
Plant species
pre‐wetting
Protocol
Rot
Sensitivity analysis
Soil baiting
Soil dispersion
Soil type
Soil water
Soils
Species
Substrates
title Towards a best practice methodology for the detection of Phytophthora species in soils
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T06%3A46%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Towards%20a%20best%20practice%20methodology%20for%20the%20detection%20of%20Phytophthora%20species%20in%20soils&rft.jtitle=Plant%20pathology&rft.au=Burgess,%20Treena&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=604&rft.epage=614&rft.pages=604-614&rft.issn=0032-0862&rft.eissn=1365-3059&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ppa.13312&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2495990126%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2495990126&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true