Small invertebrates in bivalve-cultivated and unmodified habitats of nearshore ecosystems
Many nearshore ecosystems are modified by aquaculture, including bivalve culture to produce food and restore extirpated populations. Small invertebrates in nearshore ecosystems support fundamental ecological processes, but the effects of bivalve culture on invertebrates are incompletely understood....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Hydrobiologia 2021-03, Vol.848 (6), p.1249-1265 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1265 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 1249 |
| container_title | Hydrobiologia |
| container_volume | 848 |
| creator | Munsch, Stuart H. Barber, Julie S. Cordell, Jeffery R. Kiffney, Peter M. Sanderson, Beth L. Toft, Jason D. |
| description | Many nearshore ecosystems are modified by aquaculture, including bivalve culture to produce food and restore extirpated populations. Small invertebrates in nearshore ecosystems support fundamental ecological processes, but the effects of bivalve culture on invertebrates are incompletely understood. Here, we compared invertebrate assemblages from multiple studies of bivalve-cultivated and unmodified nearshore habitats along the US west coast. In general, unmodified eelgrass and nearby off-bottom culture habitats with eelgrass present were inhabited by a greater abundance, richness, and diversity of epibenthic invertebrates than bottom culture and bare (mud, sand) habitats that both lacked eelgrass. Findings of individual studies suggested: minor differences in epibenthic invertebrate assemblages associated with various aquaculture practices; restoring native oysters to mudflats did not detectably alter epibenthic invertebrate abundances; epibenthic invertebrates were more abundant on shell hash introduced to mudflats than unmodified mudflats; and benthic invertebrates were less abundant, rich, and diverse in habitats cultured on bottom by Manila clams. Considering the range of these patterns, there appears to be potential for coastal communities to restore extirpated bivalve populations or develop bivalve culture practices that meet objectives to grow food while maintaining nearshore ecosystems’ fundamental processes supported by robust invertebrate assemblages. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10750-021-04520-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2495192753</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A653662101</galeid><sourcerecordid>A653662101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-ed101ac8017ab654f9b0eb50cd580359bece3cd771ad850e9c00ea37b9259d943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFLHjEQhoNU8Kv2D_S00JOH6GSz2WyOIq0KgqD20FPIJrOfkd2NTbIf-u-N3YJ4kRySCc8zM_AS8p3BCQOQp4mBFEChZhQaUQNle2TDhORUMCa_kA0A62jHRHdAvqb0CEVSNWzIn7vJjGPl5x3GjH00GVOpqt7vzLhDapcxl2dGV5nZVcs8BecHX8oH0_tscqrCUM1oYnoIESu0Ib2kjFM6IvuDGRN--38fkt-_ft6fX9Lrm4ur87NrahveZoqOATO2AyZN34pmUD1gL8A60QEXqkeL3DopmXGdAFQWAA2XvaqFcqrhh-TH2vcphr8LpqwfwxLnMlLXjRJM1VLwQp2s1NaMqP08hByNLcfh5G2YcfDl_6wVvG3rslERjj8Ihcn4nLdmSUlf3d1-ZOuVtTGkFHHQT9FPJr5oBvotH73mo0s--l8--k3iq5QKPG8xvu_9ifUKPj6S3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2495192753</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Small invertebrates in bivalve-cultivated and unmodified habitats of nearshore ecosystems</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Munsch, Stuart H. ; Barber, Julie S. ; Cordell, Jeffery R. ; Kiffney, Peter M. ; Sanderson, Beth L. ; Toft, Jason D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Munsch, Stuart H. ; Barber, Julie S. ; Cordell, Jeffery R. ; Kiffney, Peter M. ; Sanderson, Beth L. ; Toft, Jason D.</creatorcontrib><description>Many nearshore ecosystems are modified by aquaculture, including bivalve culture to produce food and restore extirpated populations. Small invertebrates in nearshore ecosystems support fundamental ecological processes, but the effects of bivalve culture on invertebrates are incompletely understood. Here, we compared invertebrate assemblages from multiple studies of bivalve-cultivated and unmodified nearshore habitats along the US west coast. In general, unmodified eelgrass and nearby off-bottom culture habitats with eelgrass present were inhabited by a greater abundance, richness, and diversity of epibenthic invertebrates than bottom culture and bare (mud, sand) habitats that both lacked eelgrass. Findings of individual studies suggested: minor differences in epibenthic invertebrate assemblages associated with various aquaculture practices; restoring native oysters to mudflats did not detectably alter epibenthic invertebrate abundances; epibenthic invertebrates were more abundant on shell hash introduced to mudflats than unmodified mudflats; and benthic invertebrates were less abundant, rich, and diverse in habitats cultured on bottom by Manila clams. Considering the range of these patterns, there appears to be potential for coastal communities to restore extirpated bivalve populations or develop bivalve culture practices that meet objectives to grow food while maintaining nearshore ecosystems’ fundamental processes supported by robust invertebrate assemblages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10750-021-04520-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Aquaculture ; Aquaculture industry ; Aquaculture practices ; Aquatic plants ; Benthic fauna ; Benthos ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Bivalve culture ; Bivalvia ; Bottom culture ; Clams ; Ecological effects ; Ecology ; Ecosystems ; Food ; Foods ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Habitats ; Invertebrates ; Life Sciences ; Marine molluscs ; Mollusks ; Mud flats ; Off-bottom culture ; Oysters ; Populations ; Primary Research Paper ; Sea grasses ; Zoobenthos ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2021-03, Vol.848 (6), p.1249-1265</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-ed101ac8017ab654f9b0eb50cd580359bece3cd771ad850e9c00ea37b9259d943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-ed101ac8017ab654f9b0eb50cd580359bece3cd771ad850e9c00ea37b9259d943</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2432-9535</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10750-021-04520-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10750-021-04520-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Munsch, Stuart H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barber, Julie S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cordell, Jeffery R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiffney, Peter M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanderson, Beth L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toft, Jason D.</creatorcontrib><title>Small invertebrates in bivalve-cultivated and unmodified habitats of nearshore ecosystems</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><addtitle>Hydrobiologia</addtitle><description>Many nearshore ecosystems are modified by aquaculture, including bivalve culture to produce food and restore extirpated populations. Small invertebrates in nearshore ecosystems support fundamental ecological processes, but the effects of bivalve culture on invertebrates are incompletely understood. Here, we compared invertebrate assemblages from multiple studies of bivalve-cultivated and unmodified nearshore habitats along the US west coast. In general, unmodified eelgrass and nearby off-bottom culture habitats with eelgrass present were inhabited by a greater abundance, richness, and diversity of epibenthic invertebrates than bottom culture and bare (mud, sand) habitats that both lacked eelgrass. Findings of individual studies suggested: minor differences in epibenthic invertebrate assemblages associated with various aquaculture practices; restoring native oysters to mudflats did not detectably alter epibenthic invertebrate abundances; epibenthic invertebrates were more abundant on shell hash introduced to mudflats than unmodified mudflats; and benthic invertebrates were less abundant, rich, and diverse in habitats cultured on bottom by Manila clams. Considering the range of these patterns, there appears to be potential for coastal communities to restore extirpated bivalve populations or develop bivalve culture practices that meet objectives to grow food while maintaining nearshore ecosystems’ fundamental processes supported by robust invertebrate assemblages.</description><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Aquaculture industry</subject><subject>Aquaculture practices</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Benthic fauna</subject><subject>Benthos</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Bivalve culture</subject><subject>Bivalvia</subject><subject>Bottom culture</subject><subject>Clams</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Foods</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine molluscs</subject><subject>Mollusks</subject><subject>Mud flats</subject><subject>Off-bottom culture</subject><subject>Oysters</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Primary Research Paper</subject><subject>Sea grasses</subject><subject>Zoobenthos</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFLHjEQhoNU8Kv2D_S00JOH6GSz2WyOIq0KgqD20FPIJrOfkd2NTbIf-u-N3YJ4kRySCc8zM_AS8p3BCQOQp4mBFEChZhQaUQNle2TDhORUMCa_kA0A62jHRHdAvqb0CEVSNWzIn7vJjGPl5x3GjH00GVOpqt7vzLhDapcxl2dGV5nZVcs8BecHX8oH0_tscqrCUM1oYnoIESu0Ib2kjFM6IvuDGRN--38fkt-_ft6fX9Lrm4ur87NrahveZoqOATO2AyZN34pmUD1gL8A60QEXqkeL3DopmXGdAFQWAA2XvaqFcqrhh-TH2vcphr8LpqwfwxLnMlLXjRJM1VLwQp2s1NaMqP08hByNLcfh5G2YcfDl_6wVvG3rslERjj8Ihcn4nLdmSUlf3d1-ZOuVtTGkFHHQT9FPJr5oBvotH73mo0s--l8--k3iq5QKPG8xvu_9ifUKPj6S3w</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Munsch, Stuart H.</creator><creator>Barber, Julie S.</creator><creator>Cordell, Jeffery R.</creator><creator>Kiffney, Peter M.</creator><creator>Sanderson, Beth L.</creator><creator>Toft, Jason D.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2432-9535</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Small invertebrates in bivalve-cultivated and unmodified habitats of nearshore ecosystems</title><author>Munsch, Stuart H. ; Barber, Julie S. ; Cordell, Jeffery R. ; Kiffney, Peter M. ; Sanderson, Beth L. ; Toft, Jason D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-ed101ac8017ab654f9b0eb50cd580359bece3cd771ad850e9c00ea37b9259d943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Aquaculture industry</topic><topic>Aquaculture practices</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Benthic fauna</topic><topic>Benthos</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Bivalve culture</topic><topic>Bivalvia</topic><topic>Bottom culture</topic><topic>Clams</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Foods</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine molluscs</topic><topic>Mollusks</topic><topic>Mud flats</topic><topic>Off-bottom culture</topic><topic>Oysters</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Primary Research Paper</topic><topic>Sea grasses</topic><topic>Zoobenthos</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Munsch, Stuart H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barber, Julie S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cordell, Jeffery R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiffney, Peter M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanderson, Beth L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toft, Jason D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Munsch, Stuart H.</au><au>Barber, Julie S.</au><au>Cordell, Jeffery R.</au><au>Kiffney, Peter M.</au><au>Sanderson, Beth L.</au><au>Toft, Jason D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Small invertebrates in bivalve-cultivated and unmodified habitats of nearshore ecosystems</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><stitle>Hydrobiologia</stitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>848</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1249</spage><epage>1265</epage><pages>1249-1265</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><abstract>Many nearshore ecosystems are modified by aquaculture, including bivalve culture to produce food and restore extirpated populations. Small invertebrates in nearshore ecosystems support fundamental ecological processes, but the effects of bivalve culture on invertebrates are incompletely understood. Here, we compared invertebrate assemblages from multiple studies of bivalve-cultivated and unmodified nearshore habitats along the US west coast. In general, unmodified eelgrass and nearby off-bottom culture habitats with eelgrass present were inhabited by a greater abundance, richness, and diversity of epibenthic invertebrates than bottom culture and bare (mud, sand) habitats that both lacked eelgrass. Findings of individual studies suggested: minor differences in epibenthic invertebrate assemblages associated with various aquaculture practices; restoring native oysters to mudflats did not detectably alter epibenthic invertebrate abundances; epibenthic invertebrates were more abundant on shell hash introduced to mudflats than unmodified mudflats; and benthic invertebrates were less abundant, rich, and diverse in habitats cultured on bottom by Manila clams. Considering the range of these patterns, there appears to be potential for coastal communities to restore extirpated bivalve populations or develop bivalve culture practices that meet objectives to grow food while maintaining nearshore ecosystems’ fundamental processes supported by robust invertebrate assemblages.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10750-021-04520-1</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2432-9535</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0018-8158 |
| ispartof | Hydrobiologia, 2021-03, Vol.848 (6), p.1249-1265 |
| issn | 0018-8158 1573-5117 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2495192753 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Aquaculture Aquaculture industry Aquaculture practices Aquatic plants Benthic fauna Benthos Biomedical and Life Sciences Bivalve culture Bivalvia Bottom culture Clams Ecological effects Ecology Ecosystems Food Foods Freshwater & Marine Ecology Habitats Invertebrates Life Sciences Marine molluscs Mollusks Mud flats Off-bottom culture Oysters Populations Primary Research Paper Sea grasses Zoobenthos Zoology |
| title | Small invertebrates in bivalve-cultivated and unmodified habitats of nearshore ecosystems |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T09%3A54%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Small%20invertebrates%20in%20bivalve-cultivated%20and%20unmodified%20habitats%20of%20nearshore%20ecosystems&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=Munsch,%20Stuart%20H.&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=848&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1249&rft.epage=1265&rft.pages=1249-1265&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10750-021-04520-1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA653662101%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2495192753&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A653662101&rfr_iscdi=true |