Assessing the accuracy of density‐independent demographic models for predicting species ranges
Accurately predicting species ranges is a primary goal of ecology. Demographic distribution models (DDMs), which correlate underlying vital rates (e.g. survival and reproduction) with environmental conditions, can potentially predict species ranges through time and space. However, tests of DDM accur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecography (Copenhagen) 2021-03, Vol.44 (3), p.345-357 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 357 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 345 |
container_title | Ecography (Copenhagen) |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Holden, Matthew H. Yen, Jian D. L. Briscoe, Natalie J. Lahoz‐Monfort, José J. Salguero‐Gómez, Roberto Vesk, Peter A. Guillera‐Arroita, Gurutzeta |
description | Accurately predicting species ranges is a primary goal of ecology. Demographic distribution models (DDMs), which correlate underlying vital rates (e.g. survival and reproduction) with environmental conditions, can potentially predict species ranges through time and space. However, tests of DDM accuracy across wide ranges of species' life histories are surprisingly lacking. Using simulations of 1.5 million hypothetical species' range dynamics, we evaluated when DDMs accurately predicted future ranges, to provide clear guidelines for the use of this emerging approach. We limited our study to deterministic demographic models ignoring density dependence, since these models are the most commonly used in the literature. We found that density‐independent DDMs overpredicted extinction if populations were near carrying capacity in the locations where demographic data were available. However, DDMs accurately predicted species ranges if demographic data were limited to sites with mean initial abundance less than one half of carrying capacity. Additionally, the DDMs required demographic data from at least 25 sites, over a short time‐interval (< 10 time‐steps), as populations initially below carrying capacity can saturate in long‐term studies. For species with demographic data from many low density sites, DDMs predicted occurrence more accurately than correlative species distribution models (SDMs) in locations where the species eventually persisted, but not where the species went extinct. These results were insensitive to differences in simulated dispersal, levels of environmental stochasticity, the effects of the environmental variables and the functional forms of density dependence. Our findings suggest that deterministic, density‐independent DDMs are appropriate for applications where locating all possible sites the species might occur in is prioritized over reducing false presence predictions in absent sites. This makes DDMs a promising tool for mapping invasion risk. However, demographic data are often collected at sites where a species is abundant. Density‐independent DDMs are inappropriate in this case. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ecog.05250 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2494791751</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A710756552</galeid><sourcerecordid>A710756552</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3769-acaa5e3a123199f4e527b44fac403fba1ab805c6ee106f181b68e30f97a359d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9KAzEQxoMoWKsXn2DBm7B1srtJNsdS_AcFL3qOaXayprSbNdkivfkIPqNPYup6dgZmYPjNN8xHyCWFGU1xg8a3M2AFgyMyoRwgB1aLYzIBCTwXTMIpOYtxDUALyesJeZ3HiDG6rs2GN8y0MbugzT7zNmuwi27Yf39-ua7BHlPphjTd-jbo_s2ZbOsb3MTM-pD1ARtnhoNO7NE4jFnQXYvxnJxYvYl48den5OXu9nnxkC-f7h8X82VuSsFlro3WDEtNi5JKaStkhVhVldWmgtKuNNWrGpjhiBS4pTVd8RpLsFLoksmGl1NyNer2wb_vMA5q7XehSydVUclKSCoYTdRspFq9QeU664f0bsr0ljO-Q-vSfC4oCMYZK9LC9bhggo8xoFV9cFsd9oqCOliuDparX8sTTEf4I6ns_yHV7eLpnhZcyPIHTO2Fng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2494791751</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the accuracy of density‐independent demographic models for predicting species ranges</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Holden, Matthew H. ; Yen, Jian D. L. ; Briscoe, Natalie J. ; Lahoz‐Monfort, José J. ; Salguero‐Gómez, Roberto ; Vesk, Peter A. ; Guillera‐Arroita, Gurutzeta</creator><creatorcontrib>Holden, Matthew H. ; Yen, Jian D. L. ; Briscoe, Natalie J. ; Lahoz‐Monfort, José J. ; Salguero‐Gómez, Roberto ; Vesk, Peter A. ; Guillera‐Arroita, Gurutzeta</creatorcontrib><description>Accurately predicting species ranges is a primary goal of ecology. Demographic distribution models (DDMs), which correlate underlying vital rates (e.g. survival and reproduction) with environmental conditions, can potentially predict species ranges through time and space. However, tests of DDM accuracy across wide ranges of species' life histories are surprisingly lacking. Using simulations of 1.5 million hypothetical species' range dynamics, we evaluated when DDMs accurately predicted future ranges, to provide clear guidelines for the use of this emerging approach. We limited our study to deterministic demographic models ignoring density dependence, since these models are the most commonly used in the literature. We found that density‐independent DDMs overpredicted extinction if populations were near carrying capacity in the locations where demographic data were available. However, DDMs accurately predicted species ranges if demographic data were limited to sites with mean initial abundance less than one half of carrying capacity. Additionally, the DDMs required demographic data from at least 25 sites, over a short time‐interval (< 10 time‐steps), as populations initially below carrying capacity can saturate in long‐term studies. For species with demographic data from many low density sites, DDMs predicted occurrence more accurately than correlative species distribution models (SDMs) in locations where the species eventually persisted, but not where the species went extinct. These results were insensitive to differences in simulated dispersal, levels of environmental stochasticity, the effects of the environmental variables and the functional forms of density dependence. Our findings suggest that deterministic, density‐independent DDMs are appropriate for applications where locating all possible sites the species might occur in is prioritized over reducing false presence predictions in absent sites. This makes DDMs a promising tool for mapping invasion risk. However, demographic data are often collected at sites where a species is abundant. Density‐independent DDMs are inappropriate in this case.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0906-7590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0587</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ecog.05250</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Carrying capacity ; demographic distribution model ; Demographics ; Density ; Density dependence ; Dependence ; Dispersal ; Environmental conditions ; Environmental effects ; Extinct species ; Geographical distribution ; invasion risk map ; matrix population model ; Model accuracy ; Population growth ; Populations ; Random variables ; range dynamics ; range shifts ; Reproduction (biology) ; Species ; species distribution model ; Stochasticity</subject><ispartof>Ecography (Copenhagen), 2021-03, Vol.44 (3), p.345-357</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. Ecography published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Society Oikos</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3769-acaa5e3a123199f4e527b44fac403fba1ab805c6ee106f181b68e30f97a359d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3769-acaa5e3a123199f4e527b44fac403fba1ab805c6ee106f181b68e30f97a359d63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0049-8956 ; 0000-0003-2008-7062 ; 0000-0002-8387-5739 ; 0000-0001-5135-9433 ; 0000-0002-0845-7035 ; 0000-0002-6085-4433 ; 0000-0001-7964-923X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fecog.05250$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fecog.05250$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,1417,11561,27923,27924,45573,45574,46051,46475</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holden, Matthew H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yen, Jian D. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briscoe, Natalie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lahoz‐Monfort, José J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salguero‐Gómez, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vesk, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillera‐Arroita, Gurutzeta</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the accuracy of density‐independent demographic models for predicting species ranges</title><title>Ecography (Copenhagen)</title><description>Accurately predicting species ranges is a primary goal of ecology. Demographic distribution models (DDMs), which correlate underlying vital rates (e.g. survival and reproduction) with environmental conditions, can potentially predict species ranges through time and space. However, tests of DDM accuracy across wide ranges of species' life histories are surprisingly lacking. Using simulations of 1.5 million hypothetical species' range dynamics, we evaluated when DDMs accurately predicted future ranges, to provide clear guidelines for the use of this emerging approach. We limited our study to deterministic demographic models ignoring density dependence, since these models are the most commonly used in the literature. We found that density‐independent DDMs overpredicted extinction if populations were near carrying capacity in the locations where demographic data were available. However, DDMs accurately predicted species ranges if demographic data were limited to sites with mean initial abundance less than one half of carrying capacity. Additionally, the DDMs required demographic data from at least 25 sites, over a short time‐interval (< 10 time‐steps), as populations initially below carrying capacity can saturate in long‐term studies. For species with demographic data from many low density sites, DDMs predicted occurrence more accurately than correlative species distribution models (SDMs) in locations where the species eventually persisted, but not where the species went extinct. These results were insensitive to differences in simulated dispersal, levels of environmental stochasticity, the effects of the environmental variables and the functional forms of density dependence. Our findings suggest that deterministic, density‐independent DDMs are appropriate for applications where locating all possible sites the species might occur in is prioritized over reducing false presence predictions in absent sites. This makes DDMs a promising tool for mapping invasion risk. However, demographic data are often collected at sites where a species is abundant. Density‐independent DDMs are inappropriate in this case.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Carrying capacity</subject><subject>demographic distribution model</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Density dependence</subject><subject>Dependence</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Environmental effects</subject><subject>Extinct species</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>invasion risk map</subject><subject>matrix population model</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Random variables</subject><subject>range dynamics</subject><subject>range shifts</subject><subject>Reproduction (biology)</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>species distribution model</subject><subject>Stochasticity</subject><issn>0906-7590</issn><issn>1600-0587</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9KAzEQxoMoWKsXn2DBm7B1srtJNsdS_AcFL3qOaXayprSbNdkivfkIPqNPYup6dgZmYPjNN8xHyCWFGU1xg8a3M2AFgyMyoRwgB1aLYzIBCTwXTMIpOYtxDUALyesJeZ3HiDG6rs2GN8y0MbugzT7zNmuwi27Yf39-ua7BHlPphjTd-jbo_s2ZbOsb3MTM-pD1ARtnhoNO7NE4jFnQXYvxnJxYvYl48den5OXu9nnxkC-f7h8X82VuSsFlro3WDEtNi5JKaStkhVhVldWmgtKuNNWrGpjhiBS4pTVd8RpLsFLoksmGl1NyNer2wb_vMA5q7XehSydVUclKSCoYTdRspFq9QeU664f0bsr0ljO-Q-vSfC4oCMYZK9LC9bhggo8xoFV9cFsd9oqCOliuDparX8sTTEf4I6ns_yHV7eLpnhZcyPIHTO2Fng</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Holden, Matthew H.</creator><creator>Yen, Jian D. L.</creator><creator>Briscoe, Natalie J.</creator><creator>Lahoz‐Monfort, José J.</creator><creator>Salguero‐Gómez, Roberto</creator><creator>Vesk, Peter A.</creator><creator>Guillera‐Arroita, Gurutzeta</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0049-8956</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2008-7062</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8387-5739</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5135-9433</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0845-7035</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6085-4433</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7964-923X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Assessing the accuracy of density‐independent demographic models for predicting species ranges</title><author>Holden, Matthew H. ; Yen, Jian D. L. ; Briscoe, Natalie J. ; Lahoz‐Monfort, José J. ; Salguero‐Gómez, Roberto ; Vesk, Peter A. ; Guillera‐Arroita, Gurutzeta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3769-acaa5e3a123199f4e527b44fac403fba1ab805c6ee106f181b68e30f97a359d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Carrying capacity</topic><topic>demographic distribution model</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Density dependence</topic><topic>Dependence</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Environmental effects</topic><topic>Extinct species</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>invasion risk map</topic><topic>matrix population model</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Random variables</topic><topic>range dynamics</topic><topic>range shifts</topic><topic>Reproduction (biology)</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>species distribution model</topic><topic>Stochasticity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holden, Matthew H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yen, Jian D. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briscoe, Natalie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lahoz‐Monfort, José J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salguero‐Gómez, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vesk, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillera‐Arroita, Gurutzeta</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Ecography (Copenhagen)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holden, Matthew H.</au><au>Yen, Jian D. L.</au><au>Briscoe, Natalie J.</au><au>Lahoz‐Monfort, José J.</au><au>Salguero‐Gómez, Roberto</au><au>Vesk, Peter A.</au><au>Guillera‐Arroita, Gurutzeta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the accuracy of density‐independent demographic models for predicting species ranges</atitle><jtitle>Ecography (Copenhagen)</jtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>345</spage><epage>357</epage><pages>345-357</pages><issn>0906-7590</issn><eissn>1600-0587</eissn><abstract>Accurately predicting species ranges is a primary goal of ecology. Demographic distribution models (DDMs), which correlate underlying vital rates (e.g. survival and reproduction) with environmental conditions, can potentially predict species ranges through time and space. However, tests of DDM accuracy across wide ranges of species' life histories are surprisingly lacking. Using simulations of 1.5 million hypothetical species' range dynamics, we evaluated when DDMs accurately predicted future ranges, to provide clear guidelines for the use of this emerging approach. We limited our study to deterministic demographic models ignoring density dependence, since these models are the most commonly used in the literature. We found that density‐independent DDMs overpredicted extinction if populations were near carrying capacity in the locations where demographic data were available. However, DDMs accurately predicted species ranges if demographic data were limited to sites with mean initial abundance less than one half of carrying capacity. Additionally, the DDMs required demographic data from at least 25 sites, over a short time‐interval (< 10 time‐steps), as populations initially below carrying capacity can saturate in long‐term studies. For species with demographic data from many low density sites, DDMs predicted occurrence more accurately than correlative species distribution models (SDMs) in locations where the species eventually persisted, but not where the species went extinct. These results were insensitive to differences in simulated dispersal, levels of environmental stochasticity, the effects of the environmental variables and the functional forms of density dependence. Our findings suggest that deterministic, density‐independent DDMs are appropriate for applications where locating all possible sites the species might occur in is prioritized over reducing false presence predictions in absent sites. This makes DDMs a promising tool for mapping invasion risk. However, demographic data are often collected at sites where a species is abundant. Density‐independent DDMs are inappropriate in this case.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ecog.05250</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0049-8956</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2008-7062</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8387-5739</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5135-9433</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0845-7035</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6085-4433</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7964-923X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0906-7590 |
ispartof | Ecography (Copenhagen), 2021-03, Vol.44 (3), p.345-357 |
issn | 0906-7590 1600-0587 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2494791751 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Accuracy Carrying capacity demographic distribution model Demographics Density Density dependence Dependence Dispersal Environmental conditions Environmental effects Extinct species Geographical distribution invasion risk map matrix population model Model accuracy Population growth Populations Random variables range dynamics range shifts Reproduction (biology) Species species distribution model Stochasticity |
title | Assessing the accuracy of density‐independent demographic models for predicting species ranges |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A54%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20accuracy%20of%20density%E2%80%90independent%20demographic%20models%20for%20predicting%20species%20ranges&rft.jtitle=Ecography%20(Copenhagen)&rft.au=Holden,%20Matthew%20H.&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=345&rft.epage=357&rft.pages=345-357&rft.issn=0906-7590&rft.eissn=1600-0587&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ecog.05250&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA710756552%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2494791751&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A710756552&rfr_iscdi=true |