Combined effect of anthropogenic noise and artificial night lighting negatively affect Western Bluebird chick development

Sensory pollutants such as anthropogenic noise and night lighting now expose much of the world to evolutionarily novel sound and night lighting conditions. An emerging body of literature has reported a variety of deleterious effects caused by these stimuli, spanning behavioral, physiological, popula...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.) Calif.), 2020-11, Vol.122 (4), p.1-12
Hauptverfasser: Ferraro, Danielle M., Le, My-Lan T., Francis, Clinton D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 12
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1
container_title The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)
container_volume 122
creator Ferraro, Danielle M.
Le, My-Lan T.
Francis, Clinton D.
description Sensory pollutants such as anthropogenic noise and night lighting now expose much of the world to evolutionarily novel sound and night lighting conditions. An emerging body of literature has reported a variety of deleterious effects caused by these stimuli, spanning behavioral, physiological, population, and community-level responses. However, the combined influence of noise and light has received almost no attention despite the co-occurrence of these stimuli in many landscapes. Here we evaluated the singular and combined effects of these stimuli on Western Bluebird (Sialia mexicana) reproductive success using a field-based manipulation. Nests exposed to noise and light together experienced less predation than control and light-exposed nests, and noise-exposed nests experienced less predation than control nests, yet overall nest success was only higher in noise-exposed nests compared to light-exposed nests. Although exposure to light decreased nestling body condition and evidence was mixed for the singular effects of noise or light on nestling size, those nestlings exposed to noise and light together were smaller across several metrics than nestlings in control nests. Our results support previous research on the singular effects of either stimuli, including potential benefits, such as reduced nest predation with noise exposure. However, our results also suggest that noise and light together can negatively affect some aspects of reproduction more strongly than either sensory pollutant alone. This finding is especially important given that these stimuli tend to covary and are projected to increase dramatically in the next several decades. LAY SUMMARY Noise and light pollution often occur together, but their combined influence on wildlife is poorly understood. We manipulated traffic noise and artificial night lighting exposure at Western Bluebird nests. Relative to control nests, those exposed to noise experienced lower nest predation and produced more fledglings whereas chicks in nests exposed to light took longer to fledge and had lower body condition. Nests exposed to noise and light together produced smaller nestlings than control nests and, for some body measurements, those exposed to either noise or light alone.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/condor/duaa037
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2493523990</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2493523990</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b304t-333224c10e67dfc7d32d203fd5b97da34a937c1d9df0f50d36843e97ecaae4603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1PwzAMxSMEEmNw5RyJK92SuF2XI0x8SZO4gDhWaeJ0GV1S0gxp_z2dujsXW7Z-79l6hNxyNuNMwlwHb0Kcm71SDMozMuESllnBhTwnE8Y4y4pciEty1fdbNswiFxNyWIVd7TwaitaiTjRYqnzaxNCFBr3T1AfX47AzVMXkrNNOtdS7ZpNoe6zON9Rjo5L7xfZA1WjzhX3C6Olju8faRUP1xulvanCAQrdDn67JhVVtjzenPiWfz08fq9ds_f7ytnpYZzWwPGUAIESuOcNFaawuDQgjGFhT1LI0CnIlodTcSGOZLZiBxTIHlCVqpTBfMJiSu9G3i-FnP7xVbcM--uFkJXIJhQApj9RspHQMfR_RVl10OxUPFWfVMd5qjLc6xTsI7kdB7ULw-B_-B1C5gi8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2493523990</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combined effect of anthropogenic noise and artificial night lighting negatively affect Western Bluebird chick development</title><source>Freely Accessible Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Ferraro, Danielle M. ; Le, My-Lan T. ; Francis, Clinton D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ferraro, Danielle M. ; Le, My-Lan T. ; Francis, Clinton D.</creatorcontrib><description>Sensory pollutants such as anthropogenic noise and night lighting now expose much of the world to evolutionarily novel sound and night lighting conditions. An emerging body of literature has reported a variety of deleterious effects caused by these stimuli, spanning behavioral, physiological, population, and community-level responses. However, the combined influence of noise and light has received almost no attention despite the co-occurrence of these stimuli in many landscapes. Here we evaluated the singular and combined effects of these stimuli on Western Bluebird (Sialia mexicana) reproductive success using a field-based manipulation. Nests exposed to noise and light together experienced less predation than control and light-exposed nests, and noise-exposed nests experienced less predation than control nests, yet overall nest success was only higher in noise-exposed nests compared to light-exposed nests. Although exposure to light decreased nestling body condition and evidence was mixed for the singular effects of noise or light on nestling size, those nestlings exposed to noise and light together were smaller across several metrics than nestlings in control nests. Our results support previous research on the singular effects of either stimuli, including potential benefits, such as reduced nest predation with noise exposure. However, our results also suggest that noise and light together can negatively affect some aspects of reproduction more strongly than either sensory pollutant alone. This finding is especially important given that these stimuli tend to covary and are projected to increase dramatically in the next several decades. LAY SUMMARY Noise and light pollution often occur together, but their combined influence on wildlife is poorly understood. We manipulated traffic noise and artificial night lighting exposure at Western Bluebird nests. Relative to control nests, those exposed to noise experienced lower nest predation and produced more fledglings whereas chicks in nests exposed to light took longer to fledge and had lower body condition. Nests exposed to noise and light together produced smaller nestlings than control nests and, for some body measurements, those exposed to either noise or light alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-5422</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2732-4621</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/condor/duaa037</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Waco: University of California Press</publisher><subject>ALAN ; Anthropogenic factors ; anthropogenic noise ; artificial night lighting ; Breeding success ; contaminación lumínica ; contaminación sonora ; contaminantes sensoriales ; estresores múltiples ; field-based manipulation ; Human influences ; iluminación nocturna artificial ; Light ; Light effects ; light pollution ; Lighting ; manipulación realizada a campo ; multiple stressors ; nest success ; Nests ; Night ; Noise ; Noise levels ; noise pollution ; Ornithology ; Physiological effects ; Pollutants ; Predation ; Reproduction ; RESEARCH ARTICLE ; ruido antropogénico ; sensory pollutants ; Sialia mexicana ; Stimuli ; éxito del nido</subject><ispartof>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.), 2020-11, Vol.122 (4), p.1-12</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Ornithological Society 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><rights>Copyright American Ornithological Society Nov 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b304t-333224c10e67dfc7d32d203fd5b97da34a937c1d9df0f50d36843e97ecaae4603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b304t-333224c10e67dfc7d32d203fd5b97da34a937c1d9df0f50d36843e97ecaae4603</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2018-4954</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ferraro, Danielle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le, My-Lan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francis, Clinton D.</creatorcontrib><title>Combined effect of anthropogenic noise and artificial night lighting negatively affect Western Bluebird chick development</title><title>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</title><description>Sensory pollutants such as anthropogenic noise and night lighting now expose much of the world to evolutionarily novel sound and night lighting conditions. An emerging body of literature has reported a variety of deleterious effects caused by these stimuli, spanning behavioral, physiological, population, and community-level responses. However, the combined influence of noise and light has received almost no attention despite the co-occurrence of these stimuli in many landscapes. Here we evaluated the singular and combined effects of these stimuli on Western Bluebird (Sialia mexicana) reproductive success using a field-based manipulation. Nests exposed to noise and light together experienced less predation than control and light-exposed nests, and noise-exposed nests experienced less predation than control nests, yet overall nest success was only higher in noise-exposed nests compared to light-exposed nests. Although exposure to light decreased nestling body condition and evidence was mixed for the singular effects of noise or light on nestling size, those nestlings exposed to noise and light together were smaller across several metrics than nestlings in control nests. Our results support previous research on the singular effects of either stimuli, including potential benefits, such as reduced nest predation with noise exposure. However, our results also suggest that noise and light together can negatively affect some aspects of reproduction more strongly than either sensory pollutant alone. This finding is especially important given that these stimuli tend to covary and are projected to increase dramatically in the next several decades. LAY SUMMARY Noise and light pollution often occur together, but their combined influence on wildlife is poorly understood. We manipulated traffic noise and artificial night lighting exposure at Western Bluebird nests. Relative to control nests, those exposed to noise experienced lower nest predation and produced more fledglings whereas chicks in nests exposed to light took longer to fledge and had lower body condition. Nests exposed to noise and light together produced smaller nestlings than control nests and, for some body measurements, those exposed to either noise or light alone.</description><subject>ALAN</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>anthropogenic noise</subject><subject>artificial night lighting</subject><subject>Breeding success</subject><subject>contaminación lumínica</subject><subject>contaminación sonora</subject><subject>contaminantes sensoriales</subject><subject>estresores múltiples</subject><subject>field-based manipulation</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>iluminación nocturna artificial</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Light effects</subject><subject>light pollution</subject><subject>Lighting</subject><subject>manipulación realizada a campo</subject><subject>multiple stressors</subject><subject>nest success</subject><subject>Nests</subject><subject>Night</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Noise levels</subject><subject>noise pollution</subject><subject>Ornithology</subject><subject>Physiological effects</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>RESEARCH ARTICLE</subject><subject>ruido antropogénico</subject><subject>sensory pollutants</subject><subject>Sialia mexicana</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>éxito del nido</subject><issn>0010-5422</issn><issn>1938-5129</issn><issn>2732-4621</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1PwzAMxSMEEmNw5RyJK92SuF2XI0x8SZO4gDhWaeJ0GV1S0gxp_z2dujsXW7Z-79l6hNxyNuNMwlwHb0Kcm71SDMozMuESllnBhTwnE8Y4y4pciEty1fdbNswiFxNyWIVd7TwaitaiTjRYqnzaxNCFBr3T1AfX47AzVMXkrNNOtdS7ZpNoe6zON9Rjo5L7xfZA1WjzhX3C6Olju8faRUP1xulvanCAQrdDn67JhVVtjzenPiWfz08fq9ds_f7ytnpYZzWwPGUAIESuOcNFaawuDQgjGFhT1LI0CnIlodTcSGOZLZiBxTIHlCVqpTBfMJiSu9G3i-FnP7xVbcM--uFkJXIJhQApj9RspHQMfR_RVl10OxUPFWfVMd5qjLc6xTsI7kdB7ULw-B_-B1C5gi8</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Ferraro, Danielle M.</creator><creator>Le, My-Lan T.</creator><creator>Francis, Clinton D.</creator><general>University of California Press</general><general>American Ornithological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2018-4954</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Combined effect of anthropogenic noise and artificial night lighting negatively affect Western Bluebird chick development</title><author>Ferraro, Danielle M. ; Le, My-Lan T. ; Francis, Clinton D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b304t-333224c10e67dfc7d32d203fd5b97da34a937c1d9df0f50d36843e97ecaae4603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>ALAN</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>anthropogenic noise</topic><topic>artificial night lighting</topic><topic>Breeding success</topic><topic>contaminación lumínica</topic><topic>contaminación sonora</topic><topic>contaminantes sensoriales</topic><topic>estresores múltiples</topic><topic>field-based manipulation</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>iluminación nocturna artificial</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Light effects</topic><topic>light pollution</topic><topic>Lighting</topic><topic>manipulación realizada a campo</topic><topic>multiple stressors</topic><topic>nest success</topic><topic>Nests</topic><topic>Night</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Noise levels</topic><topic>noise pollution</topic><topic>Ornithology</topic><topic>Physiological effects</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>RESEARCH ARTICLE</topic><topic>ruido antropogénico</topic><topic>sensory pollutants</topic><topic>Sialia mexicana</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>éxito del nido</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferraro, Danielle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le, My-Lan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francis, Clinton D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferraro, Danielle M.</au><au>Le, My-Lan T.</au><au>Francis, Clinton D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combined effect of anthropogenic noise and artificial night lighting negatively affect Western Bluebird chick development</atitle><jtitle>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</jtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>1-12</pages><issn>0010-5422</issn><eissn>1938-5129</eissn><eissn>2732-4621</eissn><abstract>Sensory pollutants such as anthropogenic noise and night lighting now expose much of the world to evolutionarily novel sound and night lighting conditions. An emerging body of literature has reported a variety of deleterious effects caused by these stimuli, spanning behavioral, physiological, population, and community-level responses. However, the combined influence of noise and light has received almost no attention despite the co-occurrence of these stimuli in many landscapes. Here we evaluated the singular and combined effects of these stimuli on Western Bluebird (Sialia mexicana) reproductive success using a field-based manipulation. Nests exposed to noise and light together experienced less predation than control and light-exposed nests, and noise-exposed nests experienced less predation than control nests, yet overall nest success was only higher in noise-exposed nests compared to light-exposed nests. Although exposure to light decreased nestling body condition and evidence was mixed for the singular effects of noise or light on nestling size, those nestlings exposed to noise and light together were smaller across several metrics than nestlings in control nests. Our results support previous research on the singular effects of either stimuli, including potential benefits, such as reduced nest predation with noise exposure. However, our results also suggest that noise and light together can negatively affect some aspects of reproduction more strongly than either sensory pollutant alone. This finding is especially important given that these stimuli tend to covary and are projected to increase dramatically in the next several decades. LAY SUMMARY Noise and light pollution often occur together, but their combined influence on wildlife is poorly understood. We manipulated traffic noise and artificial night lighting exposure at Western Bluebird nests. Relative to control nests, those exposed to noise experienced lower nest predation and produced more fledglings whereas chicks in nests exposed to light took longer to fledge and had lower body condition. Nests exposed to noise and light together produced smaller nestlings than control nests and, for some body measurements, those exposed to either noise or light alone.</abstract><cop>Waco</cop><pub>University of California Press</pub><doi>10.1093/condor/duaa037</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2018-4954</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-5422
ispartof The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.), 2020-11, Vol.122 (4), p.1-12
issn 0010-5422
1938-5129
2732-4621
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2493523990
source Freely Accessible Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects ALAN
Anthropogenic factors
anthropogenic noise
artificial night lighting
Breeding success
contaminación lumínica
contaminación sonora
contaminantes sensoriales
estresores múltiples
field-based manipulation
Human influences
iluminación nocturna artificial
Light
Light effects
light pollution
Lighting
manipulación realizada a campo
multiple stressors
nest success
Nests
Night
Noise
Noise levels
noise pollution
Ornithology
Physiological effects
Pollutants
Predation
Reproduction
RESEARCH ARTICLE
ruido antropogénico
sensory pollutants
Sialia mexicana
Stimuli
éxito del nido
title Combined effect of anthropogenic noise and artificial night lighting negatively affect Western Bluebird chick development
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T06%3A52%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combined%20effect%20of%20anthropogenic%20noise%20and%20artificial%20night%20lighting%20negatively%20affect%20Western%20Bluebird%20chick%20development&rft.jtitle=The%20Condor%20(Los%20Angeles,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Ferraro,%20Danielle%20M.&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=1-12&rft.issn=0010-5422&rft.eissn=1938-5129&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/condor/duaa037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2493523990%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2493523990&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true