Overview of recent cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union (September 2020-December 2020)

The reporting period (September 2020-December 2020) was a particularly intense time in terms of important judgments on social security with no fewer than four judgments from the Grand Chamber of the Court. This overview reports five cases in total. First, there are three cases on the Posted Workers...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of social security 2021-03, Vol.23 (1), p.81-90
1. Verfasser: Melin, Pauline
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 90
container_issue 1
container_start_page 81
container_title European journal of social security
container_volume 23
creator Melin, Pauline
description The reporting period (September 2020-December 2020) was a particularly intense time in terms of important judgments on social security with no fewer than four judgments from the Grand Chamber of the Court. This overview reports five cases in total. First, there are three cases on the Posted Workers Directive. The first two are on the dismissal of the annulment procedures regarding the adoption of the new Posted Workers Directive (Directive 2018/957) started by Hungary (C-620/18) and Poland (C-626/18). Then, the FNV case (C-815/18), which is on the application of the Posted Workers Directive (Directive 96/71) to the transnational provision of services in the road transport sector, is discussed. The overview continues onto other subjects, with a follow-up of the Dano and Alimanovic saga in the Job Center Krefeld case (C-181/19), which relates to the access to social assistance for a job-seeker who is the primary carer of a child receiving education in the host Member State. From there, commentary is given on the A v. Veselï bas ministrija case, which deals with the difficult balance between the freedom of religion and the system of prior authorization for planned healthcare. Finally, the Syndicat CFTC case (C-463/19) is reviewed, and it concerns the conditions under which an additional maternity leave can be reserved to female workers without being considered as discriminatory.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1388262720987251
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2493401469</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1388262720987251</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2493401469</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-99d7dfc8680d16fb0c27764a4683d21eacb8855c9ae944cd9b4be1ea7fe8b1df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtLxDAQDqLgunr3GPCih2iSpk1ylHV9sbAH3XNJ0ol2cduapCv-e1tWFARPM_O9ZhiEThm9ZEzKK5YpxQsuOdVK8pztoQnPtCZcC7WPJiNNRv4QHcW4ppRqmRcTVC-3ELY1fODW4wAOmoSdiRCxBd8GwOkV8KztQxoFj31MtYOxHfF5H9oOTINXTd02-PwJugQbCwFzyim5GeJ-potjdODNW4ST7zpFq9v58-yeLJZ3D7PrBXFZzhLRupKVd6pQtGKFt9RxKQthRKGyijMwziqV504b0EK4SlthYYClB2VZ5bMpOtvldqF97yGmcj2c3wwrSy50JigThR5UdKdyoY0xgC-7UG9M-CwZLceHln8fOljIzhLNC_yG_qv_ApYIc-4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2493401469</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Overview of recent cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union (September 2020-December 2020)</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Melin, Pauline</creator><creatorcontrib>Melin, Pauline</creatorcontrib><description>The reporting period (September 2020-December 2020) was a particularly intense time in terms of important judgments on social security with no fewer than four judgments from the Grand Chamber of the Court. This overview reports five cases in total. First, there are three cases on the Posted Workers Directive. The first two are on the dismissal of the annulment procedures regarding the adoption of the new Posted Workers Directive (Directive 2018/957) started by Hungary (C-620/18) and Poland (C-626/18). Then, the FNV case (C-815/18), which is on the application of the Posted Workers Directive (Directive 96/71) to the transnational provision of services in the road transport sector, is discussed. The overview continues onto other subjects, with a follow-up of the Dano and Alimanovic saga in the Job Center Krefeld case (C-181/19), which relates to the access to social assistance for a job-seeker who is the primary carer of a child receiving education in the host Member State. From there, commentary is given on the A v. Veselï bas ministrija case, which deals with the difficult balance between the freedom of religion and the system of prior authorization for planned healthcare. Finally, the Syndicat CFTC case (C-463/19) is reviewed, and it concerns the conditions under which an additional maternity leave can be reserved to female workers without being considered as discriminatory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1388-2627</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2399-2948</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1388262720987251</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Annulment ; Authorization ; Caregivers ; Courts ; Dismissal ; Freedom of religion ; Health care ; Job hunting ; Maternity &amp; paternity leaves ; Religion ; Road transport ; Social security ; Welfare benefits ; Workers</subject><ispartof>European journal of social security, 2021-03, Vol.23 (1), p.81-90</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-99d7dfc8680d16fb0c27764a4683d21eacb8855c9ae944cd9b4be1ea7fe8b1df3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-1173-7126</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1388262720987251$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1388262720987251$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Melin, Pauline</creatorcontrib><title>Overview of recent cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union (September 2020-December 2020)</title><title>European journal of social security</title><description>The reporting period (September 2020-December 2020) was a particularly intense time in terms of important judgments on social security with no fewer than four judgments from the Grand Chamber of the Court. This overview reports five cases in total. First, there are three cases on the Posted Workers Directive. The first two are on the dismissal of the annulment procedures regarding the adoption of the new Posted Workers Directive (Directive 2018/957) started by Hungary (C-620/18) and Poland (C-626/18). Then, the FNV case (C-815/18), which is on the application of the Posted Workers Directive (Directive 96/71) to the transnational provision of services in the road transport sector, is discussed. The overview continues onto other subjects, with a follow-up of the Dano and Alimanovic saga in the Job Center Krefeld case (C-181/19), which relates to the access to social assistance for a job-seeker who is the primary carer of a child receiving education in the host Member State. From there, commentary is given on the A v. Veselï bas ministrija case, which deals with the difficult balance between the freedom of religion and the system of prior authorization for planned healthcare. Finally, the Syndicat CFTC case (C-463/19) is reviewed, and it concerns the conditions under which an additional maternity leave can be reserved to female workers without being considered as discriminatory.</description><subject>Annulment</subject><subject>Authorization</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Dismissal</subject><subject>Freedom of religion</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Job hunting</subject><subject>Maternity &amp; paternity leaves</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Road transport</subject><subject>Social security</subject><subject>Welfare benefits</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>1388-2627</issn><issn>2399-2948</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UEtLxDAQDqLgunr3GPCih2iSpk1ylHV9sbAH3XNJ0ol2cduapCv-e1tWFARPM_O9ZhiEThm9ZEzKK5YpxQsuOdVK8pztoQnPtCZcC7WPJiNNRv4QHcW4ppRqmRcTVC-3ELY1fODW4wAOmoSdiRCxBd8GwOkV8KztQxoFj31MtYOxHfF5H9oOTINXTd02-PwJugQbCwFzyim5GeJ-potjdODNW4ST7zpFq9v58-yeLJZ3D7PrBXFZzhLRupKVd6pQtGKFt9RxKQthRKGyijMwziqV504b0EK4SlthYYClB2VZ5bMpOtvldqF97yGmcj2c3wwrSy50JigThR5UdKdyoY0xgC-7UG9M-CwZLceHln8fOljIzhLNC_yG_qv_ApYIc-4</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Melin, Pauline</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1173-7126</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Overview of recent cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union (September 2020-December 2020)</title><author>Melin, Pauline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-99d7dfc8680d16fb0c27764a4683d21eacb8855c9ae944cd9b4be1ea7fe8b1df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Annulment</topic><topic>Authorization</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Dismissal</topic><topic>Freedom of religion</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Job hunting</topic><topic>Maternity &amp; paternity leaves</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Road transport</topic><topic>Social security</topic><topic>Welfare benefits</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Melin, Pauline</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>European journal of social security</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Melin, Pauline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Overview of recent cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union (September 2020-December 2020)</atitle><jtitle>European journal of social security</jtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>90</epage><pages>81-90</pages><issn>1388-2627</issn><eissn>2399-2948</eissn><abstract>The reporting period (September 2020-December 2020) was a particularly intense time in terms of important judgments on social security with no fewer than four judgments from the Grand Chamber of the Court. This overview reports five cases in total. First, there are three cases on the Posted Workers Directive. The first two are on the dismissal of the annulment procedures regarding the adoption of the new Posted Workers Directive (Directive 2018/957) started by Hungary (C-620/18) and Poland (C-626/18). Then, the FNV case (C-815/18), which is on the application of the Posted Workers Directive (Directive 96/71) to the transnational provision of services in the road transport sector, is discussed. The overview continues onto other subjects, with a follow-up of the Dano and Alimanovic saga in the Job Center Krefeld case (C-181/19), which relates to the access to social assistance for a job-seeker who is the primary carer of a child receiving education in the host Member State. From there, commentary is given on the A v. Veselï bas ministrija case, which deals with the difficult balance between the freedom of religion and the system of prior authorization for planned healthcare. Finally, the Syndicat CFTC case (C-463/19) is reviewed, and it concerns the conditions under which an additional maternity leave can be reserved to female workers without being considered as discriminatory.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1388262720987251</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1173-7126</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1388-2627
ispartof European journal of social security, 2021-03, Vol.23 (1), p.81-90
issn 1388-2627
2399-2948
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2493401469
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; SAGE Complete
subjects Annulment
Authorization
Caregivers
Courts
Dismissal
Freedom of religion
Health care
Job hunting
Maternity & paternity leaves
Religion
Road transport
Social security
Welfare benefits
Workers
title Overview of recent cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union (September 2020-December 2020)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T11%3A43%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Overview%20of%20recent%20cases%20before%20the%20Court%20of%20Justice%20of%20the%20European%20Union%20(September%202020-December%202020)&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20social%20security&rft.au=Melin,%20Pauline&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=90&rft.pages=81-90&rft.issn=1388-2627&rft.eissn=2399-2948&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1388262720987251&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2493401469%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2493401469&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1388262720987251&rfr_iscdi=true