Effect of Decreasing Biological Lability on Dissolved Organic Matter Dynamics in Streams

Respiration of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in streams contributes to the global CO2 efflux, yet this efflux has not been linked to specific DOM sources and their respective uptake rates. Further, removal of DOM inferred from longitudinal concentration gradients in river networks has been insuffic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water resources research 2021-02, Vol.57 (2), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Li, Angang, Drummond, Jennifer D., Bowen, Jennifer C., Cory, Rose M., Kaplan, Louis A., Packman, Aaron I.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Water resources research
container_volume 57
creator Li, Angang
Drummond, Jennifer D.
Bowen, Jennifer C.
Cory, Rose M.
Kaplan, Louis A.
Packman, Aaron I.
description Respiration of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in streams contributes to the global CO2 efflux, yet this efflux has not been linked to specific DOM sources and their respective uptake rates. Further, removal of DOM inferred from longitudinal concentration gradients in river networks has been insufficient to account for observed CO2 outgassing. We hypothesize that understanding in‐stream dynamics of DOM, which is a heterogeneous mixture spanning a wide range of biological labilities, requires considering that DOM lability decreases during downstream transport. To test this hypothesis, we paired seasonal bioreactor measurements of DOM biological lability with whole‐stream tracer data from White Clay Creek, Pennsylvania, USA, and used a particle‐tracking model to predict in‐stream DOM dynamics. The model simulates continuous inputs of DOM and uses storage time in the stream bioactive regions plus kinetic parameters from bioreactors to assess differential uptake of DOM fractions (i.e., fractionation) in the stream. We compared predictions for in‐stream dynamics of bulk DOM concentration (quantified as dissolved organic carbon) and fluorescent DOM components. Our model‐data synthesis approach demonstrates that more labile fractions of DOM in stream water preferentially originate and are consumed within short travel distances, causing spiraling metrics to change with downstream distance. Our model can account for local sources of rapidly cycled labile DOM, providing a basis for improved interpretation of DOM dynamics in streams that can reconcile apparent discrepancies between respiratory outgassing of CO2 and longitudinal DOM concentration gradients within river networks. Plain Language Summary In streams, microorganisms metabolize naturally occurring organic molecules dissolved in streamwater and release carbon dioxide, which contributes to global carbon emissions. These organic molecules are part of a complex and diverse mixture including thousands of different chemical compounds that differ widely in susceptibility to biodegradation. We developed a mathematical model to describe changes in the pool of organic molecules flowing downstream, incorporating field and laboratory measurements of biological degradation of organic molecules and information about water flow into and out of zones that promote biological activity. We demonstrated that the molecules more susceptible to biodegradation are preferentially metabolized and become depleted over short travel dis
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2020WR027918
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2493168014</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2493168014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3682-9b29f3a2157f9987c6424239d9435a1b5868bd0bf3a9f9da2c88d5167d4abbe73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90EtLAzEUBeAgCtbqzh8QcOtoXjNJltrWB1QKVam7kGSSkjKdaDJV5t87UheuXN3NxzncA8A5RlcYEXlNEEGrJSJcYnEARlgyVnDJ6SEYIcRogankx-Ak5w1CmJUVH4G3mffOdjB6OHU2OZ1Du4a3ITZxHaxu4Fyb0ISuh7GF05BzbD5dDRdprdtg4ZPuOpfgtG_1NtgMQwufuyFlm0_BkddNdme_dwxe72Yvk4divrh_nNzMC00rQQppiPRUE1xyL6XgtmKEESpryWipsSlFJUyNzGCkl7UmVoi6xBWvmTbGcToGF_vc9xQ_di53ahN3qR0qFWGS4koMrw7qcq9sijkn59V7CludeoWR-tlO_d1u4HTPv0Lj-n-tWi0nS1IiQeg3wYpvZg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2493168014</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Decreasing Biological Lability on Dissolved Organic Matter Dynamics in Streams</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Li, Angang ; Drummond, Jennifer D. ; Bowen, Jennifer C. ; Cory, Rose M. ; Kaplan, Louis A. ; Packman, Aaron I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Angang ; Drummond, Jennifer D. ; Bowen, Jennifer C. ; Cory, Rose M. ; Kaplan, Louis A. ; Packman, Aaron I.</creatorcontrib><description>Respiration of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in streams contributes to the global CO2 efflux, yet this efflux has not been linked to specific DOM sources and their respective uptake rates. Further, removal of DOM inferred from longitudinal concentration gradients in river networks has been insufficient to account for observed CO2 outgassing. We hypothesize that understanding in‐stream dynamics of DOM, which is a heterogeneous mixture spanning a wide range of biological labilities, requires considering that DOM lability decreases during downstream transport. To test this hypothesis, we paired seasonal bioreactor measurements of DOM biological lability with whole‐stream tracer data from White Clay Creek, Pennsylvania, USA, and used a particle‐tracking model to predict in‐stream DOM dynamics. The model simulates continuous inputs of DOM and uses storage time in the stream bioactive regions plus kinetic parameters from bioreactors to assess differential uptake of DOM fractions (i.e., fractionation) in the stream. We compared predictions for in‐stream dynamics of bulk DOM concentration (quantified as dissolved organic carbon) and fluorescent DOM components. Our model‐data synthesis approach demonstrates that more labile fractions of DOM in stream water preferentially originate and are consumed within short travel distances, causing spiraling metrics to change with downstream distance. Our model can account for local sources of rapidly cycled labile DOM, providing a basis for improved interpretation of DOM dynamics in streams that can reconcile apparent discrepancies between respiratory outgassing of CO2 and longitudinal DOM concentration gradients within river networks. Plain Language Summary In streams, microorganisms metabolize naturally occurring organic molecules dissolved in streamwater and release carbon dioxide, which contributes to global carbon emissions. These organic molecules are part of a complex and diverse mixture including thousands of different chemical compounds that differ widely in susceptibility to biodegradation. We developed a mathematical model to describe changes in the pool of organic molecules flowing downstream, incorporating field and laboratory measurements of biological degradation of organic molecules and information about water flow into and out of zones that promote biological activity. We demonstrated that the molecules more susceptible to biodegradation are preferentially metabolized and become depleted over short travel distances downstream, while organic species less susceptible to biodegradation are transported farther downstream. Our model improves understanding of the transport and metabolism of organic molecules in streams, and explains factors that control the overall concentration of organic molecules in streams and rivers. The results help to reconcile discrepancies between estimates of carbon dioxide outgassing from streams and observations of organic carbon concentrations within streams. Key Points Dissolved organic matter (DOM) biological lability decreases with residence time in bioactive regions of the stream (defined as bioactive residence time) Decreasing biological lability, exchange into and residence times in bioactive regions influence in‐stream DOM dynamics Model predictions show how the distribution of DOM fractions (i.e., fractionation) and spiraling metrics depend on in‐stream location</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2020WR027918</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Biodegradation ; Biological activity ; Biological effects ; biological lability ; Bioreactors ; Carbon content ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon emissions ; Chemical compounds ; Coastal inlets ; Concentration gradient ; Creeks &amp; streams ; Dissolved organic carbon ; Dissolved organic matter ; DOM ; Downstream ; Dynamics ; Efflux ; Emissions ; FDOM ; Fluorescence ; Fractionation ; Gradients ; Lability ; Mathematical models ; Metabolism ; Microorganisms ; Organic carbon ; Organic chemistry ; Outgassing ; particle‐tracking model ; River networks ; Rivers ; Storage ; Streams ; Tracers ; Transport ; Travel ; Uptake ; Water flow</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2021-02, Vol.57 (2), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3682-9b29f3a2157f9987c6424239d9435a1b5868bd0bf3a9f9da2c88d5167d4abbe73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3682-9b29f3a2157f9987c6424239d9435a1b5868bd0bf3a9f9da2c88d5167d4abbe73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2551-8725 ; 0000-0002-8262-1788 ; 0000-0001-9867-7084 ; 0000-0002-3085-3229 ; 0000-0003-3172-4549 ; 0000-0002-6501-7618</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2020WR027918$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2020WR027918$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,11512,27922,27923,45572,45573,46466,46890</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Angang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drummond, Jennifer D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowen, Jennifer C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cory, Rose M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Louis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Packman, Aaron I.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Decreasing Biological Lability on Dissolved Organic Matter Dynamics in Streams</title><title>Water resources research</title><description>Respiration of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in streams contributes to the global CO2 efflux, yet this efflux has not been linked to specific DOM sources and their respective uptake rates. Further, removal of DOM inferred from longitudinal concentration gradients in river networks has been insufficient to account for observed CO2 outgassing. We hypothesize that understanding in‐stream dynamics of DOM, which is a heterogeneous mixture spanning a wide range of biological labilities, requires considering that DOM lability decreases during downstream transport. To test this hypothesis, we paired seasonal bioreactor measurements of DOM biological lability with whole‐stream tracer data from White Clay Creek, Pennsylvania, USA, and used a particle‐tracking model to predict in‐stream DOM dynamics. The model simulates continuous inputs of DOM and uses storage time in the stream bioactive regions plus kinetic parameters from bioreactors to assess differential uptake of DOM fractions (i.e., fractionation) in the stream. We compared predictions for in‐stream dynamics of bulk DOM concentration (quantified as dissolved organic carbon) and fluorescent DOM components. Our model‐data synthesis approach demonstrates that more labile fractions of DOM in stream water preferentially originate and are consumed within short travel distances, causing spiraling metrics to change with downstream distance. Our model can account for local sources of rapidly cycled labile DOM, providing a basis for improved interpretation of DOM dynamics in streams that can reconcile apparent discrepancies between respiratory outgassing of CO2 and longitudinal DOM concentration gradients within river networks. Plain Language Summary In streams, microorganisms metabolize naturally occurring organic molecules dissolved in streamwater and release carbon dioxide, which contributes to global carbon emissions. These organic molecules are part of a complex and diverse mixture including thousands of different chemical compounds that differ widely in susceptibility to biodegradation. We developed a mathematical model to describe changes in the pool of organic molecules flowing downstream, incorporating field and laboratory measurements of biological degradation of organic molecules and information about water flow into and out of zones that promote biological activity. We demonstrated that the molecules more susceptible to biodegradation are preferentially metabolized and become depleted over short travel distances downstream, while organic species less susceptible to biodegradation are transported farther downstream. Our model improves understanding of the transport and metabolism of organic molecules in streams, and explains factors that control the overall concentration of organic molecules in streams and rivers. The results help to reconcile discrepancies between estimates of carbon dioxide outgassing from streams and observations of organic carbon concentrations within streams. Key Points Dissolved organic matter (DOM) biological lability decreases with residence time in bioactive regions of the stream (defined as bioactive residence time) Decreasing biological lability, exchange into and residence times in bioactive regions influence in‐stream DOM dynamics Model predictions show how the distribution of DOM fractions (i.e., fractionation) and spiraling metrics depend on in‐stream location</description><subject>Biodegradation</subject><subject>Biological activity</subject><subject>Biological effects</subject><subject>biological lability</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Carbon content</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon emissions</subject><subject>Chemical compounds</subject><subject>Coastal inlets</subject><subject>Concentration gradient</subject><subject>Creeks &amp; streams</subject><subject>Dissolved organic carbon</subject><subject>Dissolved organic matter</subject><subject>DOM</subject><subject>Downstream</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Efflux</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>FDOM</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Fractionation</subject><subject>Gradients</subject><subject>Lability</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Outgassing</subject><subject>particle‐tracking model</subject><subject>River networks</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Storage</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Tracers</subject><subject>Transport</subject><subject>Travel</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><subject>Water flow</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90EtLAzEUBeAgCtbqzh8QcOtoXjNJltrWB1QKVam7kGSSkjKdaDJV5t87UheuXN3NxzncA8A5RlcYEXlNEEGrJSJcYnEARlgyVnDJ6SEYIcRogankx-Ak5w1CmJUVH4G3mffOdjB6OHU2OZ1Du4a3ITZxHaxu4Fyb0ISuh7GF05BzbD5dDRdprdtg4ZPuOpfgtG_1NtgMQwufuyFlm0_BkddNdme_dwxe72Yvk4divrh_nNzMC00rQQppiPRUE1xyL6XgtmKEESpryWipsSlFJUyNzGCkl7UmVoi6xBWvmTbGcToGF_vc9xQ_di53ahN3qR0qFWGS4koMrw7qcq9sijkn59V7CludeoWR-tlO_d1u4HTPv0Lj-n-tWi0nS1IiQeg3wYpvZg</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Li, Angang</creator><creator>Drummond, Jennifer D.</creator><creator>Bowen, Jennifer C.</creator><creator>Cory, Rose M.</creator><creator>Kaplan, Louis A.</creator><creator>Packman, Aaron I.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2551-8725</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8262-1788</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9867-7084</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3085-3229</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3172-4549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6501-7618</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Effect of Decreasing Biological Lability on Dissolved Organic Matter Dynamics in Streams</title><author>Li, Angang ; Drummond, Jennifer D. ; Bowen, Jennifer C. ; Cory, Rose M. ; Kaplan, Louis A. ; Packman, Aaron I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3682-9b29f3a2157f9987c6424239d9435a1b5868bd0bf3a9f9da2c88d5167d4abbe73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biodegradation</topic><topic>Biological activity</topic><topic>Biological effects</topic><topic>biological lability</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Carbon content</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon emissions</topic><topic>Chemical compounds</topic><topic>Coastal inlets</topic><topic>Concentration gradient</topic><topic>Creeks &amp; streams</topic><topic>Dissolved organic carbon</topic><topic>Dissolved organic matter</topic><topic>DOM</topic><topic>Downstream</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Efflux</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>FDOM</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Fractionation</topic><topic>Gradients</topic><topic>Lability</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Outgassing</topic><topic>particle‐tracking model</topic><topic>River networks</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Storage</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Tracers</topic><topic>Transport</topic><topic>Travel</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><topic>Water flow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Angang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drummond, Jennifer D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowen, Jennifer C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cory, Rose M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Louis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Packman, Aaron I.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Angang</au><au>Drummond, Jennifer D.</au><au>Bowen, Jennifer C.</au><au>Cory, Rose M.</au><au>Kaplan, Louis A.</au><au>Packman, Aaron I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Decreasing Biological Lability on Dissolved Organic Matter Dynamics in Streams</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>2</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>Respiration of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in streams contributes to the global CO2 efflux, yet this efflux has not been linked to specific DOM sources and their respective uptake rates. Further, removal of DOM inferred from longitudinal concentration gradients in river networks has been insufficient to account for observed CO2 outgassing. We hypothesize that understanding in‐stream dynamics of DOM, which is a heterogeneous mixture spanning a wide range of biological labilities, requires considering that DOM lability decreases during downstream transport. To test this hypothesis, we paired seasonal bioreactor measurements of DOM biological lability with whole‐stream tracer data from White Clay Creek, Pennsylvania, USA, and used a particle‐tracking model to predict in‐stream DOM dynamics. The model simulates continuous inputs of DOM and uses storage time in the stream bioactive regions plus kinetic parameters from bioreactors to assess differential uptake of DOM fractions (i.e., fractionation) in the stream. We compared predictions for in‐stream dynamics of bulk DOM concentration (quantified as dissolved organic carbon) and fluorescent DOM components. Our model‐data synthesis approach demonstrates that more labile fractions of DOM in stream water preferentially originate and are consumed within short travel distances, causing spiraling metrics to change with downstream distance. Our model can account for local sources of rapidly cycled labile DOM, providing a basis for improved interpretation of DOM dynamics in streams that can reconcile apparent discrepancies between respiratory outgassing of CO2 and longitudinal DOM concentration gradients within river networks. Plain Language Summary In streams, microorganisms metabolize naturally occurring organic molecules dissolved in streamwater and release carbon dioxide, which contributes to global carbon emissions. These organic molecules are part of a complex and diverse mixture including thousands of different chemical compounds that differ widely in susceptibility to biodegradation. We developed a mathematical model to describe changes in the pool of organic molecules flowing downstream, incorporating field and laboratory measurements of biological degradation of organic molecules and information about water flow into and out of zones that promote biological activity. We demonstrated that the molecules more susceptible to biodegradation are preferentially metabolized and become depleted over short travel distances downstream, while organic species less susceptible to biodegradation are transported farther downstream. Our model improves understanding of the transport and metabolism of organic molecules in streams, and explains factors that control the overall concentration of organic molecules in streams and rivers. The results help to reconcile discrepancies between estimates of carbon dioxide outgassing from streams and observations of organic carbon concentrations within streams. Key Points Dissolved organic matter (DOM) biological lability decreases with residence time in bioactive regions of the stream (defined as bioactive residence time) Decreasing biological lability, exchange into and residence times in bioactive regions influence in‐stream DOM dynamics Model predictions show how the distribution of DOM fractions (i.e., fractionation) and spiraling metrics depend on in‐stream location</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2020WR027918</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2551-8725</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8262-1788</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9867-7084</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3085-3229</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3172-4549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6501-7618</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1397
ispartof Water resources research, 2021-02, Vol.57 (2), p.n/a
issn 0043-1397
1944-7973
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2493168014
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Biodegradation
Biological activity
Biological effects
biological lability
Bioreactors
Carbon content
Carbon dioxide
Carbon emissions
Chemical compounds
Coastal inlets
Concentration gradient
Creeks & streams
Dissolved organic carbon
Dissolved organic matter
DOM
Downstream
Dynamics
Efflux
Emissions
FDOM
Fluorescence
Fractionation
Gradients
Lability
Mathematical models
Metabolism
Microorganisms
Organic carbon
Organic chemistry
Outgassing
particle‐tracking model
River networks
Rivers
Storage
Streams
Tracers
Transport
Travel
Uptake
Water flow
title Effect of Decreasing Biological Lability on Dissolved Organic Matter Dynamics in Streams
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T21%3A00%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Decreasing%20Biological%20Lability%20on%20Dissolved%20Organic%20Matter%20Dynamics%20in%20Streams&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Li,%20Angang&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=2&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2020WR027918&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2493168014%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2493168014&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true